If There’s Been a Bigger Waste of Money, I’d Like to Know What It Was

Smedley Butler is one of America’s most distinguished yet least remembered war heroes.  At the time of his death, in 1940, Butler was the most decorated U.S. Marine in history, having won 16 medals in a career spanning 34 years, with five of those medals being awarded for conspicuous heroism.  Butler is one of only 19 men to have won the Congressional Medal of Honor….twice.

Yet what Butler should be most remembered for isn’t his combat record, but his willingness to put himself in the political crosshairs by exposing an egregious fraud being perpetrated on the American public.  In 1935, having retired as a Major General, Butler wrote a controversial book called War is a Racket in which he accuses the military-industrial complex of being a manipulative and greedy death machine.

General Butler pulled no punches.  Here is one of the more famous passages from his book:

I spent 33 years and four months in active military service, and during that period I spent most of my time as a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers.  In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.  I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1814.  I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.  I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street.  I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912.  I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916.  I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903.  In China, in 1927, I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints.  The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts.  I operated on three continents.

And people think Joe Biden speaks bluntly.

Mind you, this book was no personal vendetta.  It was not some disgruntled ex-enlisted man looking to get even with the military brass. Butler was not only a career officer, he was a Major General, not only a brave soldier, but a gloriously decorated one.  To win the Medal of Honor, you must demonstrate extraordinary valor.  To win it twice, you’re off the chart; they have to invent a whole new definition of courage.

One wonders what Butler would think of today’s military.  A defense behemoth that supports 865 military bases throughout the world (if we count the new bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s over 1,000), and a corporate conglomerate that spends — in war or peace, it makes no difference — more money on so-called “national defense” than the next 20 countries combined.

I approach this military bloat not from a moral or ethical point of view, but from a practical one.  Specifically, as a former union goon, I approach it from the view of organized labor.  If, as everyone says, those well-paying jobs in the manufacturing sector that once sustained the blue collar middle-class are gone forever, what’s to become of the workers?  The jobs may have vanished but the workers haven’t.

It’s important not to deceive ourselves.  In spite of all the optimistic rhetoric about the New Economy awaiting us — with its exciting, albeit yet-to-be-invented industries and technologies — those decent blue collar jobs may never come back.  And if that’s the case, then we need to seek an alternative remedy.  Looking to recapture a job-enriched past would not only be futile, it would be counterproductive.

Consider:  What if superior jobs weren’t the answer?  What if the criterion was income versus expenditures instead of superior jobs versus inferior jobs?  Even if the economy (not to be confused with the stock market) never recovers, the average worker would remain relatively secure so long as such things as health care, paid maternity leave, free public education (including college) and child care were guaranteed.

If the main expenses for these workers were food, clothing, shelter and transportation, the economy would continue to chug along, and we wouldn’t have to sweat creating those $60,000 a year jobs.  People could make it on $35,360 a year, which is what a full-time, 40-hour a week, 52-week a year worker earns at $17/hour.  Or what two unskilled workers earning $8.50/hour make.  (The federal minimum wage is $7.25/hour)

Question:  Could we afford these social programs?  Answer:  Yes.  Question:  Who would pay?  Answer:  The same taxpayers who currently underwrite America’s gargantuan defense budget.  The same taxpayers who’ve already been ripped off for, literally, trillions of dollars, and who are being asked to support 1,000 military bases around the world for God knows what reason.

Common sense tells us that to learn about surgery, we ask a surgeon, not an insurance agent or hospital administrator.  Accordingly, to learn about war, we ask a warrior, not a defense contractor or Pentagon lobbyist.  Despite his career as a loyal, dedicated soldier, Butler saw war for what it was — a racket.  And if that racket were eliminated, we’d have more live citizens, fewer dead soldiers, and more cash than we thought possible.

David Macaray is a playwright and author, whose latest book is How to Win Friends and Avoid Sacred Cows: Weird Adventures in India: Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims When the Peace Corps was New. Everything you ever wanted to know about India but were afraid to ask. He can be reached at: dmacaray@gmail.com. Read other articles by David.

25 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Deadbeat said on January 5th, 2011 at 9:21am #

    Another Liberal bromide. To ask the question “can we afford” plays right into Capitalist thinking and limits any possibility to think outside of the square. We can AFFORD EVERYTHING if money is eliminated from your thinking.

  2. bozh said on January 5th, 2011 at 9:54am #

    “can we afford it?” cld be replaced with an assertion: we can share of what there is. and share, of what we have at the moment, about equally!
    sufficient onto the day, is the rigor thereof, said and ancient shemite!

    as for not waging warfare, let’s not lean on individualistic saviorism; such as of jesus, ghandi, marx, lincoln, hitler, mohammed, ‘god’, john waine, assange, manning, et al.
    enlightenment is the only cure for christmasitis, personal cultishness, supremacism and many other diseases. tnx

    caveat. nevertheless approve of what manning and aasange had done. question arises, how many divisions they command?

  3. Deadbeat said on January 5th, 2011 at 10:12am #

    You contradict yourself bozh. You tell us let’s not lean on individualistic saviorism then you conclude with nevertheless approve of what manning and aasange had done

    The book is still out on Assange and Manning may have been set up. There’s more information and analysis required here before drawing firm conclusions.

    Promoting anti-Capitalism ideas is not “saviorism” it is commonsense analysis of a system that is in deep crisis.

  4. bozh said on January 5th, 2011 at 11:48am #

    db,
    i approve of what assange and manning have done. however, i’v said numerous times, leaks will go but structure of u.s society and governance wld not change, expect for worse

    the criminal minds, i fear, wld definitely behave more criminally than ever; leaks or no leaks.
    hopefully, i am wrong! so, some good may come from the weak or strong leaks.
    thus far we’v heard of just some insignificant leaks.

    there is no leaks about why u.s. slaughtered indigenes, atom bombed japan, invaded iraq, afpak, somalia and why it is destroying palestina.
    nobody as yet knows why u.s. warships cruise oceans or why u.s has 1k bases, wmd, etc.
    we can only guess! tnx

  5. Liberte said on January 5th, 2011 at 11:51am #

    Not suprisingly Gen. Butler “the author” is never mentioned at Paris Island where is name “the hero” is invoked on a daily basis.

    As to the money issue. God has spoken twice at least regarding the most nefarious quality of capitalism. Do not take or charge interest. This is the birthplace of exponential growth.

    Once the child “capitalism” is born and usury is unleashed, the centralization of wealth in the hands of; first a class, then the few, then one single entity begins. The adult capitalism is called communism, for what is left to purchase in the end but the 10 planks of communism and government “legitamacy” – total, global, dictatorial communism. Zionist created, zionist run, hell on earth.

    Break the hegelian dialectic. Heed the monetary system detailed in the Qur’an and hinted at in the Bible. Real money, no usury.

  6. bozh said on January 5th, 2011 at 12:04pm #

    db
    sorry, but imo u’r hunting for a snark when promoting [solely or largely] anti-capiatalism.
    serfdom, slavery, warfare, deceiving, lying, waging nescience-poverty-wars existed for millennia.
    ultimately, it is people who have perpetrated and who now perpetrate all these acts.
    by any name, it smells the same. u want to say that the cause for that is capitalism, that’s up to u. tnx

  7. Deadbeat said on January 5th, 2011 at 1:57pm #

    bozh writes …

    sorry, but imo u’r hunting for a snark when promoting [solely or largely] anti-capiatalism.

    Sorry bozh you’re the one “hunting for a snark” through your labelling. For someone who don’t like labels you do a pretty good job of making up your own.

    Do you know what M-C-M’ is. If you don’t I’d suggest you do some research because that is exactly why money is problematic and why money and Capitalism goes hand-in-hand.

    serfdom, slavery, warfare, deceiving, lying, waging nescience-poverty-wars existed for millennia. ultimately, it is people who have perpetrated and who now perpetrate all these acts. by any name, it smells the same. u want to say that the cause for that is capitalism, that’s up to u. tnx

    Yeah bozh, we’ve all seen your anti-intellectual shtick. This is your way of dismissing arguments by throwing out tangential points. The topic of discussion here has to do with Jeff Gates premise of reforming the monetary system. My argument is to get rid of it entirely. Your ego is blocking you from understanding that money is NOT a tool for humanity. That it is a “tool” of OPPRESSION — that money acts AGAINST humanity.

  8. Deadbeat said on January 5th, 2011 at 2:11pm #

    Ok bozh I’ll entertain this from you. Why don’t you explain to us how money is a useful tool so that I can make sufficient counter-arguments. Let’s have a debate.

  9. bozh said on January 5th, 2011 at 4:34pm #

    db,
    the label “snark” or label “two” appear as indubitable symbols; they r universally used.
    i am not suggesting we stop all labeling. we cldn’t get far if we cld not use many labels!
    all labels stand for actualities. their value to us is solely in symbolism.
    a symbol like “zionist’ cld be replaced with symbol robber and then u may add whatever to it.
    i say dayan, rabin were robbers! u’d say they were zionists! capone was a robber but he wld have said he had been a peace maker or law-and-order man of a peculiar type.
    so u want to call one robber “thief”, another a self chosen one like “zionist” ad still another that capone wld choose.

    what kind of label for self is obama, palin, gingrich using? and do i have too also?

    i know from personal experience that lots of people never ever heard of zionism but everybody heard about robberies, thieving, deceiving, lying, cheating, etc.
    hey, language is also a tool; and i add often used as weapon.
    so shall we get rid of the language?
    so i write for them not for u!

    how’s money being useful, u ask? i think i said, it cannot ever be useful in any supremacistic society. what isn’t abused in u.s? that appears pertinent!. some claim that supremacists violate even constitution.
    why wldn’t abuse money? tnx

  10. Loucleve said on January 5th, 2011 at 7:36pm #

    …..One wonders what Butler would think of today’s military…………..

    Well I can tell you that if he knew DADT has just been repealed, he would no doubt roll over in his grave.

  11. hayate said on January 5th, 2011 at 8:35pm #

    oucleve said on January 5th, 2011 at 7:36pm #

    “…..One wonders what Butler would think of today’s military…………..

    Well I can tell you that if he knew DADT has just been repealed, he would no doubt roll over in his grave.”

    How would you know that? I think you’re probably just acting out how upset you are at no longer being able to blackmail naive recruits into your bed.

  12. John Andrews said on January 6th, 2011 at 2:52am #

    It’s good to see any tribute to Butler. He was clearly a fairly exceptional guy; but I would like to have seen included a bit more about the attempt made in 1934 to involve him in the plot to overthrow FDR’s government.

  13. Luis Cayetano said on January 7th, 2011 at 9:12am #

    bozh said: ”there is no leaks about why u.s. slaughtered indigenes, atom bombed japan, invaded iraq, afpak, somalia and why it is destroying palestina.nobody as yet knows why u.s. warships cruise oceans or why u.s has 1k bases, wmd, etc.
    we can only guess!”

    Hang on, so you’re telling us that you need leaks to have any idea why these things happen? Really? Wow, talk about poverty of not only the imagination, but any semblance of effort. Since your thinking is devoid of a serious class or structural analysis, you’re obligated to wait for handouts that fuel your ”secret cables control the world” mindset rather than formulating something that’s of actual value. Without leaks, you flop around in the dark and plead ignorance about even the most basic features of the system. It’s kind of pathetic. Try this on for size, though: capitalist-imperialism. I can recommend some books and websites if you’d like.

    Seriously though, this stuff isn’t that hard to work out.

    Liberte: ”The adult capitalism is called communism, for what is left to purchase in the end but the 10 planks of communism and government “legitamacy” – total, global, dictatorial communism.”

    ROFLMAO. You clearly have no idea what communism even is. Apparently you’ve been reading too much Lyndon LaRouche.

  14. bozh said on January 7th, 2011 at 10:25am #

    luis,

    “Hang on, so you’re telling us that you need leaks to have any idea why these things happen. ”

    it seems u do not evaluate a “guess” as a thought and/or an idea. i do. and have many times stated why u.s. or any people wages wars.

    supremacism, [personal, ethnic, religious, military, etc.] constitutes the root cause for all ills that befalls us on intrapersonal, interpersonal, intra-ethnic, interethnic, int’l relationships.

    all wars, save one for saving helen, is waged solely for land.
    however, this info will never be leaked because this knowledge is not recorded in u.s.
    or if it is recorded, leaks do not and will not leak this info to public.

    so people wld have to guess why u.s. wages violence against ‘aliens’. or evaluate silence about why all that is done as: it’s done for other peoples’ land.
    but they won’t! not in u.s.
    wikileaks, tho, shld, but may not! we’l see!
    btw, what for u get personal? tnx

  15. Deadbeat said on January 7th, 2011 at 1:06pm #

    bozh, since you ducked the question, I’ll rephrase it. Tell me how money is USEFUL assuming a “non-supremacist” society.

  16. bozh said on January 7th, 2011 at 2:14pm #

    money may be of use as much or as little-to-none as a handshake or bread.
    in the verbal structure, they fall in class of undefinable terms. they defy any explanation.

    it is the trust that counts. and i leave that word undefinable because it, too, is undefinable.
    the meanings of such symbols is in our bones, so to speak.
    so, only u know if u can be trusted to deliver as handshake or $ten bill promises.
    however trust must exist before any deal cld be made.
    as in the promise: i give u a loaf of bread if u take my horse for a walk. or i cld say, i’l give u $ten if u’d wlk my horse a mile or do smthing for u and just shakehands on the deal.

    it is the trust of the promise that counts. but we all know that the ruling class had it utterly destroyed.

    so, a promise, handshake, money, gold, or a spade is now has near worthless symbolic values.
    u’r not gonna get a sizable loan unless u put up ur house as guarantee u’d pay loan back or lose ur home.

    even in a ideally trustful society [i think we had that at one time; otherwise we wldn’t have survived with one we have today] money just maybe more useful than a handshake or promise.
    for one thing, handshake is only good in one to one swap, money is u useful in swapping anything with mns of people.
    and it is easier to carry than a spade, bat, or a smile! hopefully u understood?? tnx

  17. Don Hawkins said on January 7th, 2011 at 2:44pm #

    I understood;

    it is the trust of the promise that counts. but we all know that the ruling class had it utterly destroyed.
    so, a promise, handshake, money, gold, or a spade is now has near worthless symbolic values, Bozh

    a promise, handshake, spade is about to make a comeback like never before no way around it now; best case scenario as those darn wizard’s of Oz and there dam illusions playing trick’s with the eye’s and ear’s.

  18. kalidas said on January 7th, 2011 at 7:32pm #

    That Assange hasn’t fallen out a window yet says a lot more than if he had.

  19. Deadbeat said on January 7th, 2011 at 8:26pm #

    I appreciate your awkward attempt at trying to explain how money is useful but none of your arguments are convincing. Money is clearly unnecessary to represent trust and there is no need for monetary exchange in any of the example you site.

    The problem with money is that for one it is a commodity and as a commodity it is detachable from human intercourse. Even in your idyllic scenario there is an inherent contradiction:

    Should a person lose their money their ability to engage in human intercourse is crippled. If the person is made whole then money essentially superfluous and loses its intrinsic value. If the person is not made whole the person lose his/her ability to engage in human intercourse while money’s value increases.

    Even in your scenario, the value of money distorts society and its value and circulation become more important than human intercourse. It places the object (money) ABOVE humanity. This is why I contend that money is not a tool. Money only leads to hoarding and activities that ultimately corrupts all sectors of society. Money essentially creates rulers and if it is our desire to rid ourselves of rulers we must rid ourselves of money.

  20. Luis Cayetano said on January 8th, 2011 at 6:45am #

    ”however, this info will never be leaked because this knowledge is not recorded in u.s.”

    Actually, it is recorded. In state planning documents, for example, which have been made public, like the planning documents in the 1940s that called for the United States to establish a ”Grand Area” over which it could maintain strategic and economic control. Or in the Energy Task Force documents that lay out the real motivations behind the Iraq war. This stuff isn’t nearly as mysterious as you imply.

  21. kalidas said on January 8th, 2011 at 11:31am #

    Something like this?
    What poor people who are a little self aware have been practicing for a long long time.

    http://lifedollars.org/

  22. bozh said on January 8th, 2011 at 12:06pm #

    don,
    in ten words or less– or maybe not this time. let’s see what comes out of my mouth?
    ignorant people of their ignorance impart ignorance to quite sane people!

    people also the say: blind leading blind. i emend it to: blind leading wide-open eyed people. maybe just a tad too wide.
    so the next time ur smallhead looks at u with that wide-eyed look, u better tell her to narrowed it dwn a bit! tnx

  23. hayate said on January 8th, 2011 at 6:46pm #

    Friday, Jan 7, 2011 23:08 ET

    DOJ subpoenas Twitter records of several WikiLeaks volunteers By Glenn Greenwald

    (excerpts)

    “UPDATE II: It’s worth recalling — and I hope journalists writing about this story remind themselves — that all of this extraordinary probing and “criminal” investigating is stemming from WikiLeaks’ doing nothing more than publishing classified information showing what the U.S. Government is doing: something investigative journalists, by definition, do all the time.

    And the key question now is this: did other Internet and social network companies (Google, Facebook, etc.) receive similar Orders and then quietly comply? It’s difficult to imagine why the DOJ would want information only from Twitter; if anything, given the limited information it has about users, Twitter would seem one of the least fruitful avenues to pursue. But if other companies did receive and quietly comply with these orders, it will be a long time before we know, if we ever do, given the prohibition in these orders on disclosing even its existence to anyone.

    UPDATE III: Iceland’s Interior Minister, Ögmundur Jónasson, described the DOJ’s efforts to obtain the Twitter information of a member of that country’s Parliament as “grave and odd.” While suggesting some criticisms of WikiLeaks, he added: “if we manage to make government transparent and give all of us some insight into what is happening in countries involved in warfare it can only be for the good.” The DOJ’s investigation of a member of Iceland’s Parliament — as part of an effort to intimidate anyone supporting WikiLeaks and to criminalize journalism that exposes what the U.S. Government does — is one of the most extreme acts yet in the Obama administration’s always-escalating war on whistleblowers, and shows how just excessive and paranoid the administration is when it comes to transparency: all this from a President who ran on a vow to have the “most transparent administration in history” and to “Protect Whistleblowers.”

    [http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/01/07/twitter]

  24. hayate said on January 8th, 2011 at 6:51pm #

    WikiLeaks demands Google and Facebook unseal US subpoenas

    Call comes after revelation that US has tried to force Twitter to release WikiLeaks members’ private details

    Peter Beaumont guardian.co.uk, Saturday 8 January 2011 15.36 GMT

    “Today, the existence of a secret US government grand jury espionage investigation into WikiLeaks was confirmed for the first time as a subpoena was brought into the public domain,” WikiLeaks said in a statement.”

    [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jan/08/wikileaks-calls-google-facebook-us-subpoenas?]

  25. hayate said on January 8th, 2011 at 8:25pm #

    Talk about a frivolous lawsuit, though apparently real:

    Assange Sued for $150M and Nuclear War Fear

    http://cryptome.org/0003/pitchford-v-ja.pdf

    Check out pitchford’s reasons listed in the complaint… 😀