The Anti-Empire Report

The worst thing that ever happened to the Jewish people is the Holocaust. The second worst thing that ever happened to the Jewish people is the state of Israel.

Things internationally are so dispiriting there’s nothing left to do but fantasize. I picture Turkey, as a member of NATO, demanding that the alliance come to its defense after being attacked by Israel. Under Article 5 of the NATO charter an armed attack on one member is deemed to constitute an armed attack on all members. That is the ostensible reason NATO is fighting in Afghanistan — the attack against the United States on September 11, 2001 is regarded as an attack on all NATO members (disregarding the awkward fact that Afghanistan as a country had nothing to do with the attack). The Israeli attack on a Turkish-flagged ship, operated by a Turkish humanitarian organization, killing nine Turkish nationals and wounding many more can certainly constitute an attack upon a NATO member.

So, after the United States, the UK, Germany, France and other leading NATO members offer their ridiculous non-sequitur excuses why they can’t … umm … er … invoke Article 5, and the international media swallows it all without any indigestion, Turkey demands that Israel should at least lose its formal association with NATO as a member of the Mediterranean Dialogue. This too is dismissed with scorn by the eminent NATO world powers on the grounds that it would constitute a victory for terrorism. And anti-Semitism of course.

Turkey then withdraws from NATO. Azerbaijan and five other Central Asian members of NATO’s Partnership for Peace with Turkic constituencies do the same. NATO falls into a crisis. Remaining member countries begin to question the organization’s policies as never before … like please tell us again why our young men are killing and dying in Afghanistan, and why we send them to Kosovo and Iraq and other places the Americans deem essential to their endlessly-threatened national security.

When Vice President Biden tells the eminent conservative-in-liberal-clothing pseudo-intellectual Charlie Rose on TV that “We have put as much pressure and as much cajoling on Israel as we can to allow them [Gaza] to get building materials in,” ((Charlie Rose Live, June 2, 2010 program)) Rose for once rises to the occasion and acts like a real journalist, asking Biden: “Have you threatened Israel with ending all military and economic aid? … Have you put the names of Israeli officials on your list of foreigners who can not enter the United States and whose bank accounts in the US are frozen, as you’ve done with numerous foreign officials who were not supporters of the empire? … Since Israel has committed both crimes against the peace and crimes against humanity, and since these are crimes that have international jurisdiction, certain Israeli political and military personnel can be named in trials held in any country of the world. Will you be instructing the Attorney General to proceed with such an indictment? Or if some other country which is a member of the International Criminal Court calls upon the ICC to prosecute these individuals, will the United States try to block the move? … Why hasn’t the United States itself delivered building materials to Gaza?”

When Israel justifies its murders on the grounds of “self-defense”, late-night TV comedians Jay Leno and David Letterman find great humor in this, pointing out that a new memoir by China’s premier at the time of the 1989 Tiananmen Square violent suppression defends the military action by saying that soldiers acted in “self-defense” when they fired on the democracy activists. ((Associated Press, June 4, 2010))

When Israel labels as “terrorists” the ship passengers who offered some resistance to the Israeli invaders, the New York Times points out that the passengers who resisted the 9-11 highjackers on the plane which crashed in Pennsylvania are called “heroes”. (As an aside, it’s worth noting that the United States uses 9-11 as Israel uses the Holocaust — as excuse and justification for all manner of illegal and violent international behavior.)

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reminds its readers that in 2009 Israel attacked a boat on international waters carrying medical aid to Gaza with former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney aboard; and that in 1967 Israel attacked an American ship, the USS Liberty, killing 34 and wounding about 173, and that President Johnson did then just what President Obama is doing now and would have done then — nothing.

And finally, Secretary of State Clinton declares that she’s had a revelation. She realizes that what she recently said about North Korea when it was accused of having torpedoed a South Korean warship applies as well to Israel. Mrs. Clinton had demanded that Pyongyang “stop its provocative behavior, halt its policy of threats of belligerence towards its neighbors, and take irreversible steps to fulfill its denuclearization commitments and comply with international law.” ((State Department press conference, May 24, 2010)) She adds that the North Korean guilt is by no means conclusive, while Israel doesn’t deny its attack on the ship at all; moreover, it’s not known for sure if North Korea actually possesses nuclear weapons, whereas there’s no uncertainty about Israel’s large stockpile.

So there you have it. Hypocrisy reigns. Despite my best fantasizing. Is hypocrisy a moral failing or a failure of the intellect? When President Obama says, as he has often, “No one is above the law” and in his next breath makes it clear that his administration will not seek to indict Bush or Cheney for any crimes, does he think that no one will notice the contradiction, the hypocrisy? That’s a callous disregard for public opinion and/or a dumbness worthy of his predecessor.

And when he declares: “The future does not belong to those who gather armies on a field of battle or bury missiles in the ground,” ((Talk given in Moscow, July 7, 2009, text released by the White House)) does it not occur to him at all that he’s predicting a bleak outlook for the United States? Or that his conscious, deliberate policy is to increase the size of America’s army and its stockpile of missiles?

Comrades, can the hypocrisy and the lies reach such a magnitude that enough American true believers begin to question their cherished faith, so that their number reaches a critical mass and explodes? Well, it’s already happened with countless Americans, but it’s an awfully formidable task keeping pace with what is turned out by the mass media and education factories. They’re awfully good at what they do. Too bad. But don’t forsake the struggle. What better way is there to live this life? And remember, just because the world has been taken over by lying, hypocritical, mass-murdering madmen doesn’t mean we can’t have a good time.

Bad guys and good guys

In Lahore, Pakistan, reported the Washington Post on May 29, “Militants staged coordinated attacks … on two mosques of a minority Muslim sect, taking hostages and killing at least 80 people. … At least seven men armed with grenades, high-powered rifles and suicide vests stormed the mosques as Friday prayers ended.”

Nice, really nice, very civilized. It’s no wonder that decent Americans think that this is what the United States is fighting against — Islamic fanatics, homicidal maniacs, who kill their own kind over some esoteric piece of religious dogma, who want to kill Americans over some other imagined holy sin, because we’re “infidels”. How can we reason with such people? Where is the common humanity the naive pacifists and anti-war activists would like us to honor?

And then we come to the very last paragraph of the story: “Elsewhere in Pakistan on Friday, a suspected U.S. drone-fired missile struck a Taliban compound in the South Waziristan tribal area, killing eight, according to two officials in the region.” This, we are asked to believe by our leaders, is a higher level of humanity. The United States does this every other day, sending robotic death machines called Predators flying over Afghanistan and Pakistan, to send Hellfire missiles screaming into wedding parties, funerals, homes, not knowing who the victims are, not caring who the victims are, many hundreds of them by now, as long as Washington can claim each time — whether correctly or not — that amongst their number was a prominent infidel, call him Taliban, or al Qaeda, or insurgent, or militant. How can one reason with such people, the ones in the CIA who operate the drone flights? What is the difference between them and a suicide bomber? The suicide bomber becomes one of the victims himself and sees his victims up close before killing them. The CIA murderer bomber sits safely in a room in Nevada or California and pretends he’s playing a video game, then goes out to dinner while his victims lay dying. The suicide bomber believes passionately in something called paradise. The murderer bomber believes passionately in something called flag and country.

The State Department’s Legal Advisor justifies the Predator bombings as … yes, “self-defense.” ((National Public Radio, March 26, 2010)) Try reasoning with that.

These American drone bombings are of course the height of aggression, the ultimate international crime. They were used over Iraq as well beginning in the 1990s. In December 2002, shortly before the US invasion in March, the Iraqis finally managed to shoot one down. This prompted a spokesman for the US Central Command, which oversees US military operations in the Middle East, to call it another sign of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein’s “campaign of military aggression.” ((Washington Post, December 24, 2002))

This particular piece of hypocrisy may have actually been outdone by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s comment about the US flights and bombings over Iraq during that period: “It bothers the dickens out of me that US and British pilots are getting fired at day after day after day, with impunity.” ((Associated Press, September 30, 2002))

Send me a stamped self-addressed envelope for a copy of the revised edition of “An arsonist’s guide to the homes of Pentagon officials”.

When politicians misbehave. By speaking the truth.

The German president, Horst Koehler, resigned last week because he said something government officials are not supposed to say. He said that Germany was fighting in Afghanistan for economic reasons. No reference to democracy. Nothing about freedom. Not a word about Good Guys fighting Bad Guys. The word “terrorism” was not mentioned at all. Neither was “God.” On a trip to German troops in Afghanistan he had declared that a country such as Germany, dependent on exports and free trade, must be prepared to use military force. The country, he said, had to act “to protect our interests, for example, free trade routes, or to prevent regional instability which might certainly have a negative effect on our trade, jobs and earnings.”

“Koehler has said something openly that has been obvious from the beginning,” said the head of Germany’s Left Party. “German soldiers are risking life and limb in Afghanistan to defend the export interests of big economic interests.” ((London Times Online, May 31, 2010))

Other opposition politicians had called for Koehler to take back the remarks and accused him of damaging public acceptance of German military missions abroad. ((Associated Press, May 31, 2010))

As T.S. Eliot famously observed: “Humankind can not bear very much reality.”

What is the opposite of being a conspiracy theorist?

David Remnick, editor of the New Yorker magazine and former Washington Post reporter, has a new book out, The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama. In the three pages Remnick devotes to Obama’s 1983-4 employment at Business International Corporation in New York he makes no mention of the well-known ties between BIC and the CIA. In 1977, for example, the New York Times revealed that BIC had provided cover for four CIA employees in various countries during earlier years of the Cold War; ((New York Times, December 27, 1977, p.40)) BIC also attempted to penetrate the radical left, including Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). ((Carl Oglesby, Ravens in the Storm: A Personal History of the 1960s Antiwar Movement (2008), passim))

Did Remnick not think it at all interesting and worthy of mention that the future president worked for more than a year with a company that was a CIA asset? Even if the company and the CIA made no attempt to recruit Obama, which in fact they may have done? It’s this kind of obvious omission that helps feed the left’s conspiracy thinking.

Because Remnick has impeccable establishment credentials the book has been widely reviewed. But none of the many reviewers has seen fit to mention this omission. And the way it works of course is that if it’s not mentioned, it didn’t happen. And if you mention such a thing, you’re a pathetic conspiracy theorist. Like me, who discussed it in the January edition of this report. ((William Blum, “The Anti-Empire Report,” January 3rd, 2009))

Spam, myself and my readers

As some of you now know, someone hacked into my website and used my address book to send out emails to many of the readers of this report. The emails indicated that they had been sent by me and directed people to a website which sells handbags, shoes and watches. What bothers me the most about this incident is that several of my readers believed that it was actually me who had sent out the emails, that I was peddling handbags, shoes and watches. The only thing I sell are books. But I think these readers have now learned something about spam. And hopefully about me.

Oh, by the way, can I interest any of you in some nice T-shirts, hats, or sunglasses?

William Blum is the author of: Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War 2, Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower, West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir, Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire. He can be reached at: Read other articles by William, or visit William's website.

15 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. bozh said on June 11th, 2010 at 9:33am #

    The greatest criminal minds changing their minds? Only with electric shocks, water boarding and other ‘non-longtime’ damaging techniques used on abducted muslims in order that they change their ‘terroristic’ minds .

    The problem with those ‘techniques’, devised by best US psychitrists and other mindchangers, was the fact that once abducted people started changing their minds, they cldn’t stop their changing them.
    That drove the shrinks to madness as they realized it was the case of tortured muslims torturing them and not the other way around.

    Natch, govt begged the shrinks to stay on; offered them much more money; allowing them to apply new ‘improved techniques’, but they refused!
    Are they now all in a loony place? tnx

  2. Gary S. Corseri said on June 11th, 2010 at 11:54am #

    One bit of good news amidst the morass–William Blum just seems to get feistier and feistier with time. In a world that made some humane sense–I’ll join him in fantasizing–he’d be declared a National Treasure, his books would be required reading in high schools and universities.

    I did get thrown for a moment by the lack of transition when WB was “fantasizing” about journalist-manque Charlie Rose’s response to human being manque Biden’s fatuous declarations about our “cajoling” Israel. I should have known in a second that such an articulate, well-reasoned argument from an Establishment pundit like Rose could only take place in a universe obverse to this one.

    It’s rich to fantasize about Turkey leaving NATO–or at least demanding that that “Organization” uphold its mandate to consider an attack on one member as an attack on all. We might fantasize as well that Turkey, a pivotal nation geopolitically, give the finger to the EU (as the EU has to Turkey for decades now), and sidle closer to the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization–China and Russia the principal members; Iran an observer), rally the Turkic populations in Central Asia, and stand firm with Brazil in a new movement of rising regional powers. But … from the time of Kemal Attaturk–and before him, the “Young Turks” Movement–Jews have played an important part in Turkey’s military and “secular” affairs. Erdogan and everyone else there must walk a very fine line.

    It should be clear what happens when a politician or a media personality blurs that line. Just ask German president Koehler, or ask former “dean” of our press corps, Helen Thomas. But, perhaps Blum is right and we’ll soon reach a “critical mass” in this country when the populace “explodes”–from anger, grief, outrage. If we don’t choke on the oil of hypocrisy first!

  3. mary said on June 11th, 2010 at 2:23pm #

    Reading Bill Blum and Gary Corseri is like drinking the finest champagne and just as invigorating.

    Gary mentions Helen Thomas. What an outrage in the Land of the Free.

    Alison Weir from If Americans Knew, has sent on this petition, saying –


    We don’t normally spend time with online petitions.

    However, we feel that there is massive support for Helen Thomas throughout the country and that it would be valuable to demonstrate this.

    Many people have asked us what they can do about the unwarranted and vicious attack on Helen.

    We feel that signing this petition supporting Thomas, and then distributing it as widely as possible is the thing to do.

    While the text of the petition is milder than the view many of us hold, and considerably milder than the facts Alison’s article and others revealed, we feel that at this point it is important to include as many people as possible on this issue – even those who currently know little about Israel-Palestine.

    It is our view that the more that people become engaged in opposing this unfair, orchestrated bullying, the more they will explore other cases of journalistic malpractice.

    Click here to sign the petition!

    Please distribute the link widely!


    The Petition

    We feel the massive attack on Helen Thomas has been excessive, extreme, and inconsistent with values that we believe are fundamental to our society: freedom of thought, an independent press, simple fairness and respect.

    We don’t think it’s right to throw someone out after a lifetime of hard work.

    We value the fact that Helen Thomas posed hard questions to politicians of both parties and feel that such journalism is essential to our country.

    We hold diverse opinions on the content of Helen’s 26-second-long response to a stranger holding a camera in her face. All of us call for Helen Thomas to remain in journalism and retire when SHE chooses, not when her enemies decree it.

    (The comments are good there too!)

  4. Hue Longer said on June 11th, 2010 at 4:10pm #

    Mr. Blum is good as always but I have a comment concerning, “The suicide bomber believes passionately in something called paradise. The murderer bomber believes passionately in something called flag and country”.

    Strapping a bomb or grabbing a gun and running into certain death is a difficult task helped by believing strongly in the afterlife but that’s not the reason WHY one would do it; Were a Us American to be put in the same situation and conclude that getting revenge or seeking to hurt a force which destroyed their living hope is the way to go, I’m sure they’d be screaming “God Help Me” after a healthy dose of praying. I don’t thing this behavior would be seen by many as “passionately believing in heaven”.

  5. Deadbeat said on June 11th, 2010 at 4:45pm #

    Hue’s raises very important concerns regarding Blum’s stereotyping and LACK OF EMPATHY of the suicide bomber especially as he creates a false comparison to the violence meted out by the CIA. This remark is telling and often typical of a desire by various members on the Left to stigmatize Palestinian resistance.

  6. Rehmat said on June 11th, 2010 at 6:12pm #

    Both myths have no historical background.

    Jewish scriptures state that many centuries ago – Roman murdered TWO billion Jews. The current holocaust figures began with “Eleven Million Died”, which was watered down to “Eight Million Died” followed by the so-called “Ne Jewish religion” – Six Million Died. Interestingly, the five Rabbi who attended Tehran Holocaust Conference in December 2006 – agreed that Nazis could not have killed more than one million Jews.

    The State of Israel was created by the European powers to get rid of their Jewish communities – which they did in almost every European country with England having the longest Jewish expulsion – 350 years. However, the did not want to burden any Christian country with these Jews. Therefore, Palestine became more attractive to the Vatican than Uganda.

    Israel is was never meant to be a Jewish state – as not only its fathers, Herzl, Weizman, Atzmon, Ben Gurion, etc. were all committed atheists. John Kaminski has summed up the history beautifully in one passage: “When you read the history of Israel from objective sources, you discover that it is an outlaw state, created by the powers that be by stealing the land from its original inhabitants, and systematically exterminating them ever since.”

    Study: Israelis prefer to live in ‘self-denial’

  7. kanomi said on June 11th, 2010 at 7:52pm #

    I think the worst thing that happened to Jewish people is Judaism. Shut up, you’re not special, you’re not different, everyone else is not “goyim” to exploit and abuse. If Goldman-Sachs and the Mossad and shooting people on the high seas is your idea of a culture, you have a heart made of straw and a brain made of stone. Go find Buddha or something. Your Stone Age psychopathic tribalism leaves me cold.

  8. SilverMoon said on June 11th, 2010 at 8:28pm #

    Speaking as an AMerican citizen, I can almost visualize this happening one day in America. A group of protesters are labeled “terrorist” & then the govt. can do as it pleases.

    You might read that new book out about the federal govt. declaring martial law on a small town in America after they are labeled ‘domestic terrorist’. It could be ur town or mine one day. It’s a great read cause one day we may all become a Palestine.

  9. Don Hawkins said on June 12th, 2010 at 3:47am #

    Kanomi a heart made of straw and a brain made of stone well put.

  10. Don Hawkins said on June 12th, 2010 at 4:11am #

    Developing countries were today shocked by new UN data showing that rich nations will be able to increase their carbon emissions by up to 8% if they take advantage of a series of major loopholes in their pledges.
    Instead of reducing emissions by a minimum of 30-40% by 2020 and holding temperatures to a rise of 2C – as many campaigners hoped the Copenhagen climate summit in December would achieve – many rich countries would not need to make any domestic cuts to stay within the legal limits of a new global climate deal being negotiated at resumed UN talks in Bonn this week.
    The figures, which are far higher than expected, could be achieved by a series of carbon accountancy tricks and devices including:
    • Selling “hot air” or surplus carbon allowances that were created when Soviet economies collapsed in the late 1980s;
    • Using carbon markets to “offset” as much as 30% of rich countries’ emission cuts;
    • Setting new rules to calculate emission gains and losses from logging and planting trees. Guardian

    Major loopholes accountancy tricks oops human’s 0 Earth 10 and what does this have to do with William’s article two words internationally and fantasize. Make that human’s 0 and the Earth still here.

  11. Don Hawkins said on June 12th, 2010 at 4:31am #

    Oh major loopholes accountancy tricks that is like so Wall Street you know Goldman Sachs and a few more here in the greatest nation on Earth. All so complex higher learning and all that the truth of course is third grade level crazy and a heart made of straw and a brain made of stone. Maybe Glenn Beck can put that on his blackboard and oh Glenn what are your thought’s on taxing carbon and returning the tax back to the people? Baby steps Glenn baby steps.

  12. Don Hawkins said on June 12th, 2010 at 6:54am #

    So far the health care bill a complex piece of crap financial regulation a complex piece of crap and next cap and trade a joke on the human race. The darkside is not winning the little God’s third grade level crazy but stopping any reason. It will take a lot of us how can we get this started how? No more war no more warming kind of a nobrainer.

  13. Maien said on June 12th, 2010 at 7:54am #

    Come on, jon s, can’t you do better? you feel sorry…. for people who are finally seeing what is going on. And they are not liking it. I guess people do notice (when they are allowed HONEST news) when others are committing barbaric acts.

    If it happens to be the same group over and over again…. well that’s called a PATTERN of behaviour. that’s why the regulars on this site know your name so well. Your words seem to simply validate the many thesis presented and reported on the site.

  14. bozh said on June 12th, 2010 at 9:58am #

    Healthcare bill is a bit more worth than the paper it’s written on, but when applied it is gonna be much worthier than anything obama said;will say [usualy nothing].
    So, that’s a big improvement. Let’s look at small mercies as well; for our sanity’s sake! Crying all the time is not good for my health. danke.

  15. mary said on June 16th, 2010 at 12:01am #

    The Israel lobby in the US will almost go to the ends of the earth to achieve the retribution against Helen Thomas. How petty. Now nasty.
    by Paul Craig Roberts.