The State of the Union: Not a Time for Saccharin and Gimmicks

Members of the corporate political duopoly switched seats and sat next to each other making it even harder to tell the corporate welfare party from the crony capitalist party.  Sadly, the spokespersons for both failed to learn the lessons of history and as a result the American economy will continue to falter with U.S. militarism continuing to expand.

Listening to the saccharin rhetoric of President Obama one would think the nation’s economy was flourishing and the military was winning wars.  The truth, that the economy is still in collapse and the military is stuck in war quagmires all piling up record debt, was hard to see through his veil of words.

Debt, the bi-partisan duopoly mistaken priority, was the problem the president acknowledged offering two McCain campaign promises – no more earmarks which make up less than 1% of the federal budget; and a partial budget freeze, excluding national security.  When McCain proposed a freeze during the campaign Obama mocked it saying a “spending freeze is a hatchet, and we do need a scalpel.”  Gimmicks, not solutions

In fact, the economy continues to be in crisis with high levels of unemployment, record foreclosures and record poverty. The best lesson for how to get out of the economic mess of today comes from the depression.  It is important to look at the facts rather than the myths. The pre-WWII New Deal era from 1933-1940, even if you include the recession of 1937-38, saw the single biggest drop in the unemployment rate in U.S. history. According to the census, the unemployment rate in 1933 was 24.7% by 1940 unemployment had dropped to 14.5%. This was accomplished by massive federal spending focused on job creation.

Obama came into an economic crisis and wasted the opportunity by re-enforcing concentrated corporatism rather than challenging it, investing in Wall Street rather than creating jobs, re-enforcing insurance-dominated health care and failing to face up to uncontrolled spending for the military industrial complex. From last night’s speech, we can expect more of the same and a floundering economy as a result.

But the Republicans were even more out of touch with the lessons of history and the needs of the day. A second economic downturn officially began in May 1937 when FDR responded to deficit hawks and slashed spending programs to balance the budget. These premature spending cuts caused another severe recession. Cutting government spending brought unemployment back up to 19% in 1938 from 14% in 1937.  The recession ended after 13 months in June 1938 when FDR reversed course restarting economic growth. By the time of the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941, the unemployment rate was down to 9.7%

Even more absurd are calls to cutback Social Security and Medicare. These areas of spending have their own lines of funding from payroll taxes and therefore do not affect the deficit.  They need small changes to continue to make them self-supporting, but they have been self-supporting for decades prior to this recession. Breaking this contract with Americans, making the elderly poorer and unable to spend, is no way to stimulate the economy.

Neither the crony capitalist nor corporate welfare party are facing up to the cuts needed in the largest area of discretionary spending, the military.  Obama has created record DoD budgets, record intelligence budgets and record arms sales.  Those who profit from weapons and war have done well in the Obama economy. The cuts being talked about by outgoing Secretary Gates are a miniscule fraction of what is needed.

Unlike the era of FDR, war will not get the economy moving. The U.S. has been engaged in the longest war in our history in Afghanistan, still has tens of thousands of troops and mercenaries in Iraq and is expanding the war in Pakistan. Wars are not creating the kind of WW II war economy as the methods of war have changed.  At a cost of $1 million borrowed dollars per troop per year in Afghanistan the war is a drain on the economy not a stimulus.

Spending on military certainly creates jobs, just not many compared to other spending or tax cuts.  Spending $1 billion on the military creates 8,555 jobs while spending the same amount on mass transit would create 19,795 and on education 17,687.  Even spending on tax cuts, not a great form of stimulus, is more efficient than the military, creating 10,779 jobs. Health care and infrastructure spending create about 12,800 jobs.  The U.S. needs WWII in reverse, a rapid switch from a military-dominated economy to a civilian-dominated economy.

There are some signs of recovery finally, but there are also signs of frailty.  At best the economy will recover hesitantly, but another collapse is also possible. The failure to heed the lessons of history increases the chances of the economy faltering rather than growing, and with that the debt will grow as well. This is  not a time for sacchrin and gimmicks. It is time to face reality and institute paradigm shifting change. It is time for a democratized economy that benefits all of us and to end an economy designed for concentrated corporate interests that benefit few.

Kevin Zeese co-directs Popular Resistance and is on the coordinating council for the Maryland Green Party. Read other articles by Kevin, or visit Kevin's website.

3 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. bozh said on January 27th, 2011 at 10:08am #

    kevin:
    “Listening to the saccharin rhetoric of President Obama one would think the nation’s economy was flourishing and the military was winning wars. The truth, that the economy is still in collapse and the military is stuck in war quagmires all piling up record debt, was hard to see through his veil of words.”

    ok, obama’s or clinton’s speeches may get, on meritocratic level, an A+.

    i do not think that oneprecenters did not want to be stuck in all the wars they waged thus far.
    however, we still need to qualify the word “stuck”, as stuck in a war, mud, economic misfortunes, etc.
    to me the label, appears meaningful-meaningless.
    ok, let’s use more senseful-sensible words: u..s. and nato armies r in afgh’n and winning-losing; here-there, everywhere, nowhere, for no reason, etc.

    darn it! this also may confuse!? but then how can anyone explain a war? in which drones directed from a living room kill wedding party people, children, along–say they– great chiefs!

    u kids want chrismas aaand gifts or war and understandings?? u’r kidding me??!!
    stop it! tnx

  2. bozh said on January 27th, 2011 at 10:20am #

    kevin:
    “Obama came into an economic crisis and wasted the opportunity by re-enforcing concentrated corporatism rather than challenging it, investing in Wall Street rather than creating jobs, re-enforcing insurance-dominated health care and failing to face up to uncontrolled spending for the military industrial complex. From last night’s speech, we can expect more of the same and a floundering economy as a result”.

    the earth shook with joyful laughter when she heard this. she cldn’t believe her ears seeing this!
    best thing that cld happen to me, says she! but she wants even fewer americans to work.

    or does, but what kind of work? and to work for whom and for what? and hadn’t i, mother of all mothers, already created more work than the hands to do it? tnx

  3. hayate said on January 27th, 2011 at 11:27am #

    An interesting comparison:

    Five reasons why China is bound to win the race with the US

    (2 of the reasons in the piece)

    1. Economy

    The US economy grew by roughly 3% last year. China’s grew by 10%.

    In the US, the budget deficit for the fiscal year 2009 was a whopping $1.42 trillion. China had hundreds of billions of dollars worth of budget surplus in 2010.

    The US national debt just reached 14 trillion dollars and the country is paying interest on it at some $250 billion a year. Much of that money is being paid to China, its biggest creditor.

    Some, especially in the US say China is at fault for keeping its currency artificially low to make its cheap but quality goods even more competitive on world markets – others vehemently disagree.

    Both US and Chinese companies complain that they face obstacles when trying to enter each other’s markets directly, without a local partner.

    4. Geopolitics

    The US is currently fighting two wars. Although one is winding down, the other shows no sign of abating.In the last 30 years, the US was engaged in dozens of military conflicts, from very small to large. The US keeps hundreds of military bases abroad – with a varied decree of welcome from the local population, from “very positive” in Kosovo to “highly negative” in Okinawa.

    On the world stage, the US is involved in applying various forms of political and economic pressure on several countries at any given time, with North Korea and Iran being perennial enemies.

    China has not fought any wars since its short and indecisive engagement with Vietnam in 1979. Since then, the masters of Beijing prefer to fight wars for hearts and minds with fairly lavish economic aid to different countries of the world, especially in Africa. The hallmark of its foreign policy is “never criticize foreign countries, their people, governments and ways of living”.

    Take Pakistan. The US there is building a bunker of a new embassy and air strips to utilize its killer drones. China is building a super-highway through the mountains and deserts to the port of Gwadar that is promising quite simply to become the world biggest trade hub in the future.

    [http://rt.com/usa/columns/namenotfound/reasons-china-bound-win-race-us]

    There’s a 6th reason, unmentioned in this article. The american power structure is dominated by zionist interests, a party that views themselves as separate from the usa, or any other country or people. And views themselves as superior to all other peoples and destined to rule.

    China just has to deal with pudgy bureaucrats…