The Enemy Within

The phrase “enemy within” brings to mind the image of a shadowy spy stealing military secrets. That was the case for Israeli master spy, Jonathan Pollard, jailed for 1980s espionage that compromised U.S. Cold War strategy.

That phrase also describes those involved in a form of psy-ops that is not easily detected because it operates so brazenly. For instance, the well-timed release of diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks displaced reports of Israeli obstinacy in peace talks with reports of a need for war with Iran.

That operation relied on editors at four major newspapers chosen by WikiLeaks to manage the releases. Despite the delight at their impact voiced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, mainstream media failed to mention the possibility of undisclosed bias by those who chose what to release and when.

The bias of The New York Times is well known. Less clear is the role of Ian Katz, Deputy Editor at The Guardian (London) and Executive Editor Sylvie Kauffman at Le Monde in Paris. The geopolitical success of the WikiLeaks operation suggests an enemy within.

Israeli duplicity often operates through what U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates describes as “the people in between.” When waging unconventional warfare, those people are the most dangerous combatants, particularly those operatives in mainstream media.

The People in Between

For systems of governance reliant on informed consent, nothing could be more perilous. The “people in between” routinely target media — freedom’s greatest vulnerability — as a means for displacing facts with what a targeted populace can be deceived to believe.

How old is this duplicity? How long have false beliefs been used to manipulate behavior? Modern technology — particularly media — enables deception on a global scale. Between the American populace and the facts they require to protect their freedom — that’s where this enemy within imbeds its operatives.

The false intelligence claiming Iraqi WMD was a people-in-between operation. Judith Miller at The New York Times fed us a steady diet of front-page news that we now know was fixed around Israeli goals promoted by Ahmad Chalabi, a London-based Iraqi expatriate who, like Israel, sought regime change in Iraq.

Pentagon insider, Richard Perle, developed Chalabi over two decades. A Jewish Zionist, Perle has long been a strategically well-placed “person in between.” Miller left The Times and joined Fox News and then Newsmax.

Yet the impact of complicit media pales in comparison to the enemy within that brought the U.S. economy to its knees and undermined national security at its financial core.

Imbedded Inside

The most devastating in this chronicle of enemies is the most difficult to see. As with other “in between” operations, this too succeeds by displacing facts with false beliefs. Only in this case, those beliefs were imbedded in education and over decades worked their way into law.

Known as the “Washington Consensus,” this widely shared perspective shapes economic policy worldwide. At the heart of this generally accepted truth is found the belief that money should be accountable only to itself.

In this mindset, financial freedom is an article of faith. Instead of the civil rights refrain, “Let my people go,” its proponents insist: “Let my money go.” Allow money the freedom to work its will worldwide and everything will work out fine.

That shared belief works “in between” in the same way that Jonathan Pollard undermined national security, WikiLeaks shifted attention to Iran and Judith Miller induced us to war in Iraq. Only in this case a false belief has been so thoroughly internalized that it’s difficult to see because this shared mindset has become that with which we have been educated do our seeing.

A Global Sanhedrin

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund are the primary apostles of this consensus faith. The World Trade Organization (WTO) now seeks to take this belief to global scale by enforcing unrestricted free trade not only in goods and services but also financial capital.

The WTO operates like a global Sanhedrin akin to a Jewish high council accountable only to itself. What’s now emerging as a global enemy within is a finance-guided form of transnational governance marketed as free trade but accountable only to itself.

That ‘self’ traces its origins to an internalized mindset in which financial freedom serves, by consensus, as a proxy for personal freedom. That mindset was decades in the making.

This modern-day Mindset Warfare is being waged by an enemy that is truly within. Fast globalizing financial forces now induce us to freely embrace the very forces that undermine our freedom.

By waging war on us from the inside out, the originators of this money-myopic mindset dismantled the U.S. economy, enabled vast financial pillaging and induced us to fiscal ruin.

Those wielding this weaponry operate from our internal shadows as the Zionist entity within.

Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association, Democracy at Risk, and The Ownership Solution. Read other articles by Jeff, or visit Jeff's website.

33 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. bozh said on December 31st, 2010 at 8:51am #

    there is no proof that u.s invaded iraq because a few people propagated the idea in media.
    and it makes no sense to say that if one wld think of media as part of u.s governance; just like fbi, cia, judges, et al.
    so, in the end, it is u.s governance which demanded the invasion of iraq. but instead of administration calling for the invasion, u.s chose a few individuals to make the call.

    and the few individuals cld have not been heard w.o approval of editors, columnists, and owners of media.
    and pentagon had to be silent. giving impression that invading iraq is the last or no option.
    while in fact doing-thinking what? and if pentagon told u, wld u believe it?
    in view that media, cia, army, administration is all one skein of wool.
    so, does it matter which of its multiple faces speaks?

    does it matter if perle, miller, or bush speaks? i think not! tnx

  2. Don Hawkins said on December 31st, 2010 at 11:44am #

    In a few day’s here in the States Congress will be back. Then the state of the union address. “My fellow Americans people of Earth we are all in big trouble”. We don’t hear that then the rest is academic, nothing but a show. Anybody looked up the weather this last day of 2010 on planet Earth decided to give us life forms a little show of it’s own, academic. Mulga I hope will say a few words on the myth as where he lives not good.

  3. Mulga Mumblebrain said on December 31st, 2010 at 1:57pm #

    Don, where I live very bad. Not just because the floods are Noachite, with an area in Queensland the size of France and Germany combined inundated, caused by unprecedented deluges, but that also, even in the face of such disasters, absolute denialism reigns. So far, despite floods of great or unprecedented severity afflicting Colombia, Venezuela, California, New Zealand, Pakistan, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, even Egypt and Saudi Arabia in recent months, despite both the Chinese meteorological authorities and Munich RE reinsurance stating that 2010 saw the greatest climate disturbance and consequent weather disasters on record and despite weather derangements like the Russian heatwave and the wave of highest maximum temperatures in recorded history, despite it all, no-one dares point to anthropogenic climate change as the cause. I even forgot the current WINTER heatwave in Greenland, with temperatures 15 to 20 degrees Celsius above normal!!!
    I heard a truly bathetic example yesterday, on the radio, while watering our trees after a day when it reached 42 degrees here. On the ABC’s ‘News’ Radio, they had a ‘scientist’ on who was pontificating on the floods and La Nina. According to this ‘scientist’ who I have never heard of before, the floods were entirely down to the current La Nina, and Australia’s weather is controlled by the oscillation between La Nina and El Nino conditions. If that was not moronically over-simplified enough for the drones, that which followed had me utterly dumbfounded. I must paraphrase from my recollection because the transcript is not up yet on the station’s web-site.
    ‘What about this idea, that’s got around lately, that CO2 levels might have something to do with this?’ quoth the radio presenter. I kid you not- at the ABC the level of knowledge (if this was not some sort of sick spoof) is such that decades of research has been reduced to ‘..this idea, that’s got around lately..’. The ‘scientist’, surprise, surprise, rejected the role of CO2 in recent extreme weather events, almost entirely. Need I say that such an opinion is not shared by any other reputable climate scientist or academic body in the country. But it is now festering in the minds of any denialist dullards who caught the broadcast.
    So, who’s behind it? Who finds pseudo-scientists to push the denialist line? Where do you find individuals so thick that they treat the emission of greenhouse gases as some sort of novel rumour or scare campaign, in this day and age, and who decides that they should be national broadcasters?
    The answer, of course, is simplicity itself. ABC News Radio, like every other mainstream media organ in this country, is entirely of the Right. The Rightist ideology, religion really, is inculcated in the audience at every opportunity. Greed is good, economic growth is good, population growth is good, environmentalists are bad, Moslems are terrorists, the USA and Israel are our friends and allies ad nauseam. And the people who staff these organs are recruited and vetted carefully, and any sign of thought crime is career-ending. Hence you get presenters as thick as a plank, but who know that the Right rejects climate science, and that’s good enough for them.

  4. Don Hawkins said on December 31st, 2010 at 5:04pm #

    {http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/images3/glbSSTProbSea.gif}

    The same here in the States any word or truth on climate change just stopped about two years ago. It does show us just how far the control has gone as even in the face of seeing with our own eye’s just how bad it’s getting not a word. It must eat on the mind of the people in the media to have to think in that way.

  5. Don Hawkins said on December 31st, 2010 at 5:57pm #

    With the new EPA rules here in the States and a new Congress sort of in a few day’s all the great Senators from the great State of the few will be talking anything but the truth. Lawyer talk nonsense and I can still dream the State of the Union speech; “My fellow Americans and all the life on Earth we are in deep trouble”. Then a few words to the Congress on just what they have become. Kind of put them on notice then a few people who were in a secret location the people of the National Academy of Sciences, Union of Concerned scientists and heck last maybe Stephen Hawking for a few words. Then the President again and say once a week updates to the American people and all people on Earth on what is being done.

    It’s not that serious oh yes it is nuclear weapons climate change tied for first one fast one a little slower same result.

    This is not the 17th century, when “beliefs” trumped science, forcing Galileo to recant his understanding of the solar system. The President should unequivocally support the climate science community, which is under politically orchestrated assault on the legitimacy of its scientific assessments. If he needs reassurance or cover, the President can ask for a prompt report from the National Academy of Sciences, established by Abraham Lincoln for advice on technical issues. James Hansen

  6. Don Hawkins said on December 31st, 2010 at 6:29pm #

    Advice on technical issues survival of life on Earth not all waited to long. It’s the not all that is concerning as will take a new way of thinking and so far nothing new about it. The old way of thinking has worked just fine all these year’s, really for whom the bell tolls.

    Later in the book, Robert Jordan explains the threat of Fascism in his own country. “Robert Jordan, wiping out the stew bowl with bread, explained how the income tax and inheritance tax worked. ‘But the big estates remain. Also, there are taxes on the land,’ he said. ‘But surely the big proprietors and the rich will make a revolution against such taxes. Such taxes appear to me to be revolutionary. They will revolt against the government when they see that they are threatened, exactly as the fascists have done here,’ Primitivo said. ‘It is possible.’ ‘Then you will have to fight in your country as we fight here.’ ‘Yes, we will have to fight.’ ‘But are there not many fascists in your country?’ ‘There are many who do not know they are fascists but will find it out when the time comes.’ Wiki

  7. Mulga Mumblebrain said on December 31st, 2010 at 10:18pm #

    Don, the only quibble I have is when you speak of the ‘mind’ of the people in the media. Believe me, in this country the media are mediocrity itself. They are prime specimens of Dunning-Krugerism, their unmerited self-regard even more ludicrous because being in the ‘meeja’ makes them think themselves real big-shots.

  8. Don Hawkins said on January 1st, 2011 at 5:51am #

    2011 has a real ring to it and 2012 a nano second in human history probably a little louder. Did anybody see the firework’s in Australia as the Arctic is one canary in the coal mine and Australia is another.

    PERTH faces a week of blistering heat with four consecutive days of searing 40C maximum temperatures as 2010 is declared the hottest year on record.
    Maximum temperatures in Perth averaged at 25.3C, making 2010 the hottest year since records began in 1897.
    Meanwhile, Perth recorded just 503mm of rain this year, well below the average 868.3mm, making it the second driest year on record.
    Next week’s heatwave follows baking temperatures across Southern Australia with blistering New Year’s Eve temperatures forecast for Melbourne and Adelaide as Queensland battles record floods. Perth

    So the show must gone on I wonder where that rule came from of course in human history been tried many times always’ with the same result. This time of course second chances takes on a whole new meaning. So after two hundred thousand’s year’s at least here in the States we will listen to pure 100% nonsense and have fun doing it.

    Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. Wiki

    Oh dear just on the off chance we see a little of that now with known knowledge probably wouldn’t work to well then of course Capitalism and more and then more being somewhat a part of the system well remember 2010 being the first climate crisis and it sure look’s like the Earth not know about year’s and date’s has just gone right past old 2010 and of course for us human’s;

    The best-laid schemes o’ mice an’ men
    Gang aft agley,
    An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
    For promis’d joy!

    For promis’d joy and the pictures I saw yesterday from Australia were people on the beach waiting for the firework’s as in there North somewhat underwater. I think it’s becoming more clear to me now. The show must go on in 2011 according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy. All seems so simple real simple dare we say grand stupidity, stuck on stupid better not any good ball games on here in the greatest nation on Earth. Maybe Glenn Beck after talking to his boss and a few other people could put that on his blackboard but of course he will leave out stuff but maybe the puppets know where the wild wind blows. Yes there are a couple of outside forces and I still like gravity.

  9. 3bancan said on January 1st, 2011 at 10:53am #

    The enemy within, the enemy without, the enemy in-between…
    “Jawaher Abu Rahmah, 36, was evacuated to the Ramallah hospital yesterday after inhaling massive amounts of tear-gas during the weekly protest in Bil’in, and died of poisoning this morning. Abu Rahmah was the sister of Bassem Abu Rahmah who was also killed during a peaceful protest in Bil’in on April 17th, 2010…. ”
    [http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m73471&hd=&size=1&l=e]
    And there are still people out there who call that military Jewish colony of those racist supremacist bloodthirsty genociders a democracy!…

  10. mary said on January 1st, 2011 at 11:53am #

    I am as shocked at that news as you are Hayate. I put up a link on Ramzy Baroud’s article here about Jawaher’s injuries. (dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/hope-in-2011-peoples-civil-society-stand-tall/)

    Outrageous that this is still happening after all the many serious injuries that have been caused by the IOF at Bi’lin and Ni’lin. Also outrageous that Mohammad might be in prison soon joining his friend and colleague Abdallah.

    My brother has written an article for submission to medical journals about the systematic and methodical shooting of teenagers by IOF snipers on the Gaza border as recorded by DCI International. There are 23 cases listed. I will post it up when I get a link.

  11. Hue Longer said on January 1st, 2011 at 12:19pm #

    Hayate, 3bancan? no difference, Mary? I like your posts when they are related to the articles but these “guys” that you or someone is creating to yell “zionist” at anyone they can’t understand, isn’t helping the work you are doing. I can tell from your posts that you seem genuine but these characters look like “their” main goal is to dress the truth in a clown suit so people will turn away from it.

    It makes this site difficult to recommend

  12. mary said on January 1st, 2011 at 12:25pm #

    Sorry 3bancan that I used the wrong name to address you. There were and are tears in my eyes about Jawaher’s death. To think that they also killed her brother last year with the same evil. What a terrible start to the New Year for her family.

    When will their bloody killing cease?

  13. Mulga Mumblebrain said on January 1st, 2011 at 1:42pm #

    mary, the ‘bloody killing’ you speak of will not cease. We must never forget the Judaic fascists’ own words, as delivered by, amongst many others, the ‘Yesha Council of Rabbis and Torah Sages’ in 2006, during the bloody, murderous and vicious destruction of Lebanon. They stated plainly that, under their interpretation, that of the immensely powerful settler, extreme Orthodox, of Judaism, killing civilians was not just permissible, it was a ‘mitzvah’ or good deed. Need I say anything about the press reaction if such a statement had been made by an Islamic leader? There have been numerous similar obscenities, approving the killing of babies and children, outlining the rules for killing goyim with impunity and declaring, as Ovadia Yosef, the ‘spiritual’ leader of Shas did, that Gentiles only exist to serve the Jews, all ignored by the media, who prefer a relentless demonisation of Iran, preparatory to the slaughter of its children.
    I saw another startling example of the Judeofascists’ impudence and facility for bare-faced mendacity on The Guardian’s CiF blog. Some ‘Iranian’ emigre slandering the Iranian’s for, of course, ‘antisemitism’, in talking of an ‘Iranian Holocaust’ in reference to the events that Jews ‘celebrate’ at Purim. The gist of his argument was that the evil mullahs had invented a death-toll of 75,000 Persians, killed by the valiant Jews, who as we know, were just ‘averting’ a massacre of the Jews. The evil mullahs were thus attempting to create some ‘equivalence’ between this ancient massacre and the Nazi Judeocide, which as we know, as we have had bludgeoned into our head, is unique, the most significant event in human history and in no way to be compared to genocides of lesser beings like Roma, North American natives, Armenians, Congolese, Caribbean indigenous, black slaves, the Herrero or any others. Unfortunately, as a couple of contributors pointed out, the 75,000 dead comes straight, not from evil, ‘Holocaust denying’ mullahs, but from the Judaic Book of Esther, so Purim remains a yearly party where the Jews celebrate a massacre, of Biblical proportions. Just like Passover, and just like all the other genocides celebrated in the Book of Joshua etc, all, so archeology and other scholarship tells us, thankfully almost certainly mythical, but unfortunately, evidence of a not inconsiderable hatred of others.

  14. klaatu said on January 1st, 2011 at 2:04pm #

    Jeff’s point can be taken further, because “the enemy within” is also the mental constructs which have been given to us by the dominant culture. ALL assumptions need at least to be doubted, if not discarded, for almost all of the constructs (WWII, Holocaust, Civil War, etc.) need to be challenged and in most cases rejected. Howard Zinn’s lectures on the Three Holy Wars is a good starting point, and Deconstructing the Holocaust a good place for displacing the Zionist privilege construct.

  15. mary said on January 1st, 2011 at 2:22pm #

    Was it this character Mulga?
    {http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/meir-javedanfar}

    { http://www.meepas.com/Aboutmeepas.htm} If so they omit to mention the Jewish Chronicle as a recipient of his Zionist outporings in this profile. Enough said.

  16. hayate said on January 1st, 2011 at 7:03pm #

    Mulga Mumblebrain

    “I saw another startling example of the Judeofascists’ impudence and facility for bare-faced mendacity on The Guardian’s CiF blog.”

    I’m not surprised. That bigoted Judeo-supremacist rag gets more disgusting by the day.

  17. Mulga Mumblebrain said on January 1st, 2011 at 10:56pm #

    Yes, hayate, The Guardian is returning to the Rightwing mainstream norm, like a dog lapping up its own vomit. I suspect that the Supreme Beings are using their money power, behind the scenes. But although the comments blogs are notable for some typical climate change denialist imbecility, there is much criticism of the Herrenvolk, and you can bet a lot is censored. If there was even a 10% decent Western media, telling a fraction of the truth about the Zionist Reich, they would be in deep trouble.

  18. Liberte said on January 2nd, 2011 at 10:23am #

    @Klaatu, you are absolutely right. I have recently applied that lesson – questioning the mental constructs – to public opinion of political figures and icons who have been slandered in the news.

    1. Cynthia Mckinney
    2. Louis Farrakhan
    3. David Duke
    4. Mel Gibson
    5. Michael Jackson
    6. Aahmadinejad
    Any others I can add to the list of anti-zionists destroyed or injured by MSM?

    @Mulga, if we apply that same lesson to other constructs, such as global warming, we can see that it is actually the Zionists pushing that agenda. Just look at the prince of Zionism himself, the young David de Mayor Rothschild, author of the “Global Warming Survival Handbook”

    If global warming does occur, it isnt from the trivial consumerism (although that should be addressed) of the world, its from the scientific elite and their weather modifcation programs which you can learn about in the link I will provide. These projects are massive and so expensive that I cannot imagine anyone other than Zionists having the capital to fund them, from behind the scenes of course as per s.o.p.

    weathermodification.com/

  19. hayate said on January 2nd, 2011 at 3:27pm #

    A couple of items on Wikileaks I thought were of interest. First, Assange claims the bias of the media is preventing them from publishing the material on israel Wikileaks provided them. And he says Wikileaks will be publishing the material over the next 6 months themselves.

    The Peninsula- More About WikiLeaks and Israel DateThursday, December 23, 2010 at 7:53PM

    “The Guardian, El-Pais and Le Monde have published only two percent of the files related to Israel due to the sensitive relations between Germany, France and Israel. Even New York Times could not publish more due to the sensitivities related to the Jewish community in the US,” he added.”

    [http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/the-peninsula-more-about-wikileaks-and-israel.html]

    And:

    Daniel Domscheit-Berg Denies Rumor of Assange-Israeli Deals

    21 December 2010

    (excerpts)

    “I have been notified about the general rumour a few weeks ago, and shortly after about the appearance of me as involved in those allegations. I have never spoken to anyone at syriatruth or that reporter that is making these claims, nor do I know anything about any deals JA has allegedly made with Israelis.

    Given what is appearing in the Scandinavian area with the involvement of Shamir and Wahlstrom I wouldn’t actually expect that to happen either. In any case, this latter statement is just my personal judgement.”

    “As I read somewhere that this alleged reporter I allegedly talked to works for Hareetz, I have asked the folks from Israeli TV if they could help find out who that is, and how to contact her. They replied that there doesn’t seem to be anyone by that name. So obviously, which was my gut feeling also, that person does not exist. Why that rumour is circulated, I dont know. I have my feelings about that and think we should give it some more time to uncover itself.”

    [http://cryptome.org/0003/ddb-denial.htm]

    I’ve read that one of the things about israel in the Wikileaks stash is the israeli assassination of that Hamas leader in Dubai and I also read that the israelis are going to admit publicly they did it. Obviously, if Wikileaks is going to publish evidence they did, the goatsods might as well admit it.

    But if that’s an example of the most damaging material on israel that Wikileaks has….

  20. shabnam said on January 2nd, 2011 at 4:08pm #

    {one of the things about israel in the Wikileaks stash is the israeli assassination of that Hamas leader in Dubai …}

    I would not wait for Assange to ‘leak’ information regarding assassination of Hamas leader because we have know 10X times more than what he is going to ‘leak’. Dubai’s security services have VIDEO of Mossad agents who went into Hamas leader’s room using a pillow to suffocate him. They were dressed in shorts carrying Tennis rackets pretending they are going to play with ‘BALLS’. I am sure Dubai security agents have not revealed ALL of its evidence to the public but more than Assange ever could ‘leak’.
    Dubai can prove that it was Mossad agents on behalf of Israel who killed Hamas leader, their names was published. That’s why ‘Angry Arab’ writes, DUMB MOSSAD agent. Everything is on video. What else could Assange ‘leak’?

  21. hayate said on January 2nd, 2011 at 4:51pm #

    shabnam said on January 2nd, 2011 at 4:08pm

    My point was that if that (the mossad assassination in Dubai) was an example of the most damaging of what Wikileaks would be releasing about israeli related things, then they don’t really have much which is not already known.

  22. shabnam said on January 2nd, 2011 at 5:05pm #

    I agree with you.

  23. RichardKanePA said on January 3rd, 2011 at 4:44am #

    Lobbyists run things, Remember when the Russian lobbyists were designated
    to be spy’s and booted out of the country, so when Northern Ireland was in flames the American People were subjected to both British and Irish propaganda and lobbying. All this foreign lobbying is good for the American Treasury. The problem is that Iran and Hamas are prevented from lobbying. Maybe this has something to due with the power of the Israel Lobby but the solution is to demand that Iran be allowed to lobby, not give Omnipotent attributed to the Israeli Lobby.

  24. catguy00 said on January 3rd, 2011 at 5:15pm #

    “1. Cynthia Mckinney
    2. Louis Farrakhan
    3. David Duke
    4. Mel Gibson
    5. Michael Jackson
    6. Aahmadinejad
    Any others I can add to the list of anti-zionists destroyed or injured by MSM?”

    Only Cynthia Mckinney and Aahmadinejad have gotten an unfair rap in the mainstream media.

    Michael Jackson because of his “anti-zionism”? What a joke that is. He was already labeled a child molesting freak way before he blamed Jews for his last album tanking.

    Mel Gibson still made movies after his anti-JEWISH tirade. He got fired from his last movie after allegedly assaulting his mistress and saying that she desevered to be raped by a pack of N*****S. Nice man.

    David Duke tends to get some sympathy from the fringe here. I wonder why?

  25. Mulga Mumblebrain said on January 3rd, 2011 at 7:39pm #

    Liberte, I really admire your talent for dissimulation. Global climate disruption by the anthropogenic emission of greenhouse gases is a field of scientific endeavour, where the consensus is very high. If you wish to find a Zionazi element, I suggest looking to the denialists is a far better idea. The denialist industry represents the fossil fuel industry, the greatest source of wealth, the Judeofascists’ God, on the planet. The lies and disinformation of the denialist industry, which, as we know, are peddled by the totally Zionazi controlled Western mainstream media, which, in addition, has dropped any meaningful reporting of the science and the increasing litany of weather disasters and their relation to climate disruption, are brainwashing the dullards into moronic acquiescence in their own destruction. And, lastly, it has been the global elite’s dream, for decades, if not much longer, to engineer a vast Malthusian culling of billions of ‘useless eaters’ in the poor world. This is the same elite not a little dominated by Zionazis. In fact, if you think of it rationally, the observations of the like of Ovadia Yosef that the goyim exist only to serve the Jews, and of Kook the Elder that non-Jewish souls are closer to those of animals than to those of Jews and the endless discussion in orthodox circles as to whether the Amalek, who must be exterminated down to the last suckling child, are the Palestinians, Iranians, Arabs, Moslems, the USA or non-Jewish humanity in toto, all contribute to the very real suspicion that the Zionazis and their Sabbat Goy stooges may be deliberately engineering a gigantic genocide through climate disruption. Already we are on the very cusp of real problems with food production and affordability, likely to worsen greatly in the months, let alone years, ahead.

  26. 3bancan said on January 3rd, 2011 at 7:43pm #

    catguy00 said on January 3rd, 2011 at 5:15pm #
    “Michael Jackson because of his “anti-zionism”? What a joke that is. He was already labeled a child molesting freak way before he blamed Jews for his last album tanking”
    Ie, every criticism of Jews is antisemitism and everyone “labeled a child molesting freak” is naturally also an antisemite.
    “Mel Gibson still made movies after his anti-JEWISH tirade. He got fired from his last movie after allegedly assaulting his mistress and saying that she desevered to be raped by a pack of N*****S. Nice man”
    I don’t know what exactly Mel said, but when ziogatto says it was an “anti-JEWISH tirade” I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that Mel’s words were not totally devoid of truth. Very telling is Ziogatto’s statement that Mel assaulted (sic!) his mistress and said “that she desevered to be raped by a pack of N*****S”. But the antiantisemitic Wikipedia says: “In July 2010, it was alleged that Gibson had been recorded during a phone call with Oksana Grigorieva suggesting that if she got “raped by a pack of niggers,” she would be to blame”. This makes me guess about what ziogatto would have said if Mel had been a real rapist, ie like the “nice men” Roman Polanski, Moshe Katsav…

  27. Mulga Mumblebrain said on January 3rd, 2011 at 7:55pm #

    I believe that Jackson came to have a negative view of Jews, or some Jews, because he believed he’d been ripped off by Jewish business types. Of course, such behaviour being impossible as Jews are, universally, the most upright, honest and scrupulous people extant, as well as the smartest and most brilliant business people, Jackson was either deluded or just another vicious anti-semite (Boooo, Hisss). In case it was the second, the Zionazis in a purely defensive manner, as with Cast Lead, smeared his reputation, big-time. They are one group you had better look out for, if you annoy them. Just get the ouija board out and ask JFK.

  28. Deadbeat said on January 3rd, 2011 at 8:14pm #

    catguyoo writes …

    David Duke tends to get some sympathy from the fringe here. I wonder why?

    I wonder why the pseudo-Left comes to the defense of Noam Chomsky. Like Duke, Chomsky embraces a racist ideology

  29. hayate said on January 3rd, 2011 at 9:22pm #

    Mulga Mumblebrain said on January 3rd, 2011 at 7:39pm

    The ziofascists are controlling both sides of the climate debate, or trying to. They embrace both the free for exploitation of the corporate deniers and work diligently on the other side to make sure any measures worked out to alleviate climate change damage will be corporate friendly.

    Basically, the zios are doing what they always do, try to dominate everyone and profit at everyone else’s expense.

  30. catguy00 said on January 3rd, 2011 at 9:50pm #

    “I wonder why the pseudo-Left comes to the defense of Noam Chomsky. Like Duke, Chomsky embraces a racist ideology ”

    Equating Chomsky to Duke. It is really hard to take you seriously.

  31. catguy00 said on January 3rd, 2011 at 9:53pm #

    No I don’t think Jacko was actually anti-semitic. He just needed someone to blame for his faultering career. and he was deluded.

    Of course if you could provide evidence that there was some Jewish conspiracy against the king of pop I would love to read it.

  32. 3bancan said on January 3rd, 2011 at 10:26pm #

    catguy00 said on January 3rd, 2011 at 9:50pm #
    “Equating Chomsky to Duke. It is really hard to take you seriously”
    Ziogatto is the living proof of the undisputed truth of the statement “The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews” by Rabbi Ovadia Josef…

  33. jayn0t said on January 5th, 2011 at 6:55pm #

    The Duke question is a complicated one. Same with Kevin MacDonald and suchlike.

    David Duke and other far-right white identity types sometimes post, and link to, valid criticisms of Israeli behaviour. Another ‘fascist’ website produced a powerful critique of the hypocrisy of ‘Hillel’, an organization on American campuses which tries to persuade Jewish students that their homeland is Israel, in other words, it actually supports ethnic cleansing and murder NOW. Leftists in general are more critical of ‘white supremacists’ because they seem vaguely similar to people who did this kind of thing IN THE PAST.

    Naturally, for carefully arguing these observations, I’ve been accused of ‘left anti-semitism’ and ‘building bridges to the right’. This has only reinforced my belief that traditional left-wing anti-racism is simply inadequate for combating Zionism.

    If you try to find the research and Berkeley about Israeli organ theft, you don’t get to the university, you get a far right site. The reason appears to be because UC Berkeley, that bastion of Jewish pc leftism, has taken down the organ theft details, whereas Duke and his chums have no such qualms. So what are leftists who think Zionism is the most powerful form of racial oppression in the West today – by orders of magnitude – to do? It’s simple. Just be honest. Say Duke and others like him sometimes write useful stuff.