400,000 Hiroshima Atomic Bombs Per Day

The energy of four hundred thousand (400,000) Hiroshima atomic bombs is how much energy imbalance Earth is absorbing because of global warming… per day!

This imbalance was explained by Dr. James Hansen, one of the world’s foremost, and most celebrated, climate scientists, wearing blue jeans, a white Polo button-down shirt, and an Indiana Jones-type fedora, speaking a year ago at the TED Conference in Long Beach, California. He gave an 18-minute lecture.

He explained how scientists know the Earth is out of balance because they have methods to measure the heat content in Earth’s heat reservoirs. For example, the biggest reservoir is the oceans. Scientists placed 3,000 Argo floats around the world’s oceans. The results show that the upper half of the oceans are gaining heat at a substantial rate. The deep oceans are also gaining heat but at a lesser rate.

Additionally, land at depths of tens of meters, is warming at a rapid rate.

The total energy imbalance is about 0.60 of a watt per square meter, and when added up across the entire world, it is enormous.

Dr. Hansen explains that the energy imbalance trapped in Earth is twenty times the rate of energy used by all humanity, or put another way, “… equivalent to exploding 400,000 Hiroshima atomic bombs per day 365 days per year. That’s how much extra energy Earth is gaining each day,” said Dr. James Hansen. (( “James Hansen: Why I Must Speak Out About Climate Change,” TED Conference, Long Beach, California, February, 2012.))

Dr. Hansen’s Hiroshima analogy is impossible to grasp, and yet, this alone tells the story. According to Hansen: “This imbalance means we must reduce CO2 from 391 ppm back to 350 ppm. That is the change necessary to restore energy balance.”

Forty years ago, Hansen published an article in Science magazine that changed the world’s perception of climate, and the article was repeated on the front page of the New York Times. The article concluded that observed warming of 0.4 degrees C the prior century was consistent with the greenhouse effect on increasing CO2. And, that Earth would likely warm in the 1980s. And, that the 21st century would see shifting climate zones, creation of drought-prone regions in North America and Asia, erosion of ice sheets, rising sea levels and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage — all of these impacts have happened or are well under way.

Hansen’s paper resulted in his testifying to Congress in the 1980s. His testimony emphasized that global warming increases both extremes of the Earth’s water cycle, meaning, heat waves and droughts on the one hand directly from the warming but also, because a warmer atmosphere holds more water, rainfall will become more extreme with stronger storms and greater flooding.

Forty years later, the climate is proving him correct… on all counts.

Today, he is more concerned that ever before.

From 1981-2013 Dr. Hansen was Head of NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

In April 2004, high-ranking U.S. government officials told Dr. Hansen to stop talking about how anthropogenic influences could have a dangerous impact on the climate because it was not understood what “dangerous” means or “how humans affect the climate.”

In June 2006, Hansen appeared on 60 Minutes, stating the George W. Bush White House had edited climate-related press releases of federal agencies to make global warming appear less threatening.

In April 2013, Dr. Hansen left NASA to begin a personal mission to educate the world about the dangers of climate change. He explains, in the simplest of terms, that adding CO2 to the atmosphere is “like throwing another blanket onto the bed. It reduces Earth’s heat radiation to space. So that there is a temporary energy imbalance.”

According to Hansen, the longer we wait to correct the problem, the more difficult and more expensive it becomes. For example, if we had started in 2005, it would have required reductions of 3% per year of emissions to restore planetary energy balance and stabilize climate this century.

However, if we start in 2013, it will require 6% reductions of emissions per year.

And, if we start in 10 years, it will require 15% reductions of emissions per year; however, by then it will most likely be too late.

“But we are not even starting!” exclaims Dr. Hansen.

The rate of increase of CO2 today is twice the rate in the 1960s, and the rate is increasing by the year.

According to CO2Now.org, the March 2013 CO2 level in the atmosphere is 397.34 ppm. Obviously, the rate of increase is growing ever faster, and the world is already within the danger zone. Dr. Hansen’s pleas for reductions of CO2 spewed into the atmosphere have fallen on deaf ears.

Climate Change Denial

Dr. Hansen’s speech touches upon climate deniers, and he explains away the climate denier claim that the Sun is the culprit behind global warming by countering that the current energy imbalance has occurred during the “deepest solar minimum on record when the Sun’s energy reaching Earth is least.”

The other prominent argument by deniers is that 800,000-year studies demonstrate that rising temperatures lead CO2 changes, by a few centuries, proving CO2 does not cause global warming. But, au contraire, the lag is exactly what science expects as CO2 is a feedback to rising temperatures in centuries past. Studies of the distant past show that ice sheets, CO2, and methane were feedbacks that amplified global temperature change, causing ancient climate oscillations to be huge even though the climate change was initiated by a very weak force.

The important point, as far as Dr. Hansen is concerned, is that the same amplifying feedbacks are occurring today — physics does not change. As Earth warms because of CO2 that we put into the atmosphere, ice will melt and warming oceans and melting permafrost will release CO2 and methane, amplifying hotter temperatures, the same as past millennia when slight tilts in Earth’s rotation caused identical conditions.

Current Conditions: Ripe for Big Trouble

According to Dr. Hansen, the current climate conditions are ripe for serious climatic trouble:

  1. GRACE (“Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment” — twin satellites launched in 2002) shows that both Greenland and Anttarctica are losing mass, and the rate is accelerating over the past decade.
  2. Methane is starting to escape from the permafrost.
  3. The last time CO2 was at 390 PPM, sea levels were higher by at least fifty feet, (50’.) Today’s (April 2013) CO2 reading is 397. Time is now the only determining factor to rising sea levels, unless corrective actions are immediately implemented.
  4. If we continue burning fossil fuels at the current rate, sea levels could rise by eighteen feet (18’) this century.
  5. If we continue burning fossil fuels at the current rate “this century… we will have started a process that is out of humanity’s control.”

The results will be: Ice sheets will continue to disintegrate, and there will be no stable shorelines in the world. The economic consequences will be unthinkable. Many species will be exterminated. Coastal cities will be entirely flooded

One recent example of impeding doom is: The world has experienced extraordinary heat waves these past few years; examples of extreme heat include the 2012 drought in the U.S., and Russia hit twice with extreme drought conditions within the past four years and in India, and in Syria, and the list goes on. The recent heat waves have been more than three times standard deviations, or put another way: Fifty years ago such heat wave anomalies covered only 2/10ths of 1% of the Earth’s surface. Today, the anomalies cover 10%. As a result, the world’s breadbaskets are increasingly at risk as drought conditions repeatedly bake the Earth with more frequency and cover a wider range of surface land.

The Climate Problem is Destined to Persist

Governmental subsidies for the discovery and production of fossil fuels amount to $500 billion per year. This is comparable to the world’s governments joining forces in a space program to send a rocket ship into outer space in order to nudge the direction of a ‘close-by-asteroid’ directly at Earth.

If the world stays on the current path of subsidizing world fossil fuel production, “this path guarantees we will pass tipping points.” This, according to Dr. Hansen, is the equivalent of knowing for certain that the giant asteroid is headed for a direct collision course with Earth. And, he laments: “Yet, we dither. Taking no action to divert even though the longer we wait, the more difficult and expensive it becomes,” similar to waiting to reduce emissions, year-after-year until the solution becomes untenable.

The “tipping point” is the point of no return when the Earth has finally had enough with cascading ice sheets determining humankind’s fate. Then, it is too late. Unfortunately, the “tipping point” does not sound any alarms beforehand. It just happens!

Interestingly, Dr. Hansen started his career studying the planet Venus, and he was the principal investigator of early scientific studies of Earth’s “sister planet.” Recent studies suggest that billions of years ago Venus’s atmosphere was much more like the Earth with substantial quantities of water on the surface. Over time, runaway greenhouse gases caused evaporation of the water. Today, Venus is the hottest planet at 900 degrees F shrouded by an opaque layer of clouds. It has the densest atmosphere of the terrestrial planets, and it is kept hot by a thick carbon dioxide, CO2, atmosphere.

In this fashion, the fatal attraction of fossil fuels is bound to vaporize planet Earth’s precious water.

Robert Hunziker (MA, economic history, DePaul University) is a freelance writer and environmental journalist whose articles have been translated into foreign languages and appeared in over 50 journals, magazines, and sites worldwide. He can be contacted at: rlhunziker@gmail.com. Read other articles by Robert.