Why Bush Should Have Signed the Children’s Health Act

President George W. (“I-Demand-an-Up-or-Down-Vote”) Bush today [Oct. 3] vetoed the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), which expired this past week. The highly successful program to aid children was begun in 1997 under the Clinton presidency.

The bipartisan legislation bill to increase funding and continue SCHIP was passed overwhelmingly by the House (265–159) and Senate (67–29). It would have increased health insurance for about two to four million children. Bush vetoed the bill behind closed doors and with no media present. About 6.5 million children are currently covered by state and federal programs. More than 43 million people are not covered by health insurance, with about six million under the age of 18.

The Senate had enough votes to override the President’s veto. However, House minority whip Ray Blunt (R-Mo.), who met with President Bush the day before the veto, said he was “absolutely confident” the House would fail to get the two-thirds vote to override the veto.

This was Bush’s fourth veto, his first one was to deny federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. His other vetoes, both in the Summer, were against House and Senate majority votes to reduce barriers on stem cell research and to systematically withdraw troops from Iraq. Why Bush only vetoed four bills in seven years is easily explained by a Republican Congress that refused to challenge him on critical social issues, and a Democrat minority that during his first term and much of his second term failed to bring numerous issues into full public discussion.

The additional funds for the children’s health care program would come from a 61-cent per pack increase in federal cigarette taxes. Dana Perino, Bush’s press secretary, spinning the veto as a plea for social justice, claimed the tax increase was “completely irresponsible.” Congress was irresponsible, she said, because the tax increase would affect the poor people of America because, as she claimed, the lower classes have the largest numbers of smokers. Her reasons may have been the first time that the Bush–Cheney Administration acknowledged there were poor people in America and that the oil-rich Administration “cared” about them.

President Bush himself threw the fear of socialized medicine into the discussion, claiming that the legislation would entice people to switch to government health insurance and, thus lead to socialized medicine. He didn’t mention that he, the Vice-President, all members of the Cabinet, the Executive office, Congress, most federal agencies, and the military all are covered by a socialized medicine program.

The cost of SCHIP would increase spending only $7 billion a year for five years, $35 billion total, up from the current $5 billion a year. The entire five-year cost of the health care program, including the increase, would be about four months of the cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In contrast to the $25 billion increase, Bush demands that Congress authorize an additional $189 billion to continue his invasion and occupation of Iraq. The total cost is expected to be at least $1 trillion, not including costs of extended health care for wounded and disabled veterans. President Bush, apparently, also had little concern about turning a surplus when he took office into a $3.5 trillion federal debt in less than seven years.

It makes no difference if Bush vetoed the health care bill because he wrongly believed he was “helping” tobacco-puffing lower income families or because he was frightened because terrorists, who imposed socialized medicine upon most civilized Western countries, would cross from Canada into the United States and scare Americans into becoming healthy.

George W. Bush, the strutting and smirking commander-in-chief, should have signed the bill because he needs every child in America to be healthy. It will be the children, protected by SCHIP, who will be called to Iraq and Afghanistan in the next decade.

Walter Brasch, during a 40-year work career in mass communications, has been a member of several unions, in both the private and public sectors. He is a syndicated newspaper columnist and the author of 16 books, including With Just Cause: Unionization of the American Journalist, Before the First Snow: Stories from the Revolution, and his latest Fracking Pennsylvania. He can be contacted at: walterbrasch@gmail.com. Read other articles by Walter, or visit Walter's website.

8 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Brian said on October 5th, 2007 at 5:19pm #

    What needs to be asked, is why George Bush resfused to the sign the SCHIP act? I am quite sure it has nothing to do with kids who he could care less about and more to do with getting new guns to Iraq on time which both cost about the same thing.

  2. DEB-Z said on October 5th, 2007 at 8:53pm #

    I am so discusted with this administration…
    It is all too obvious…
    This president is all about BIG BUSINESS, BIG PROFITS FOR FAMILY AND FRIENDS, BIG WARS AND WEAPONS, AND HIS BIG PRESIDENTAL LIBRARY (FROM THE OIL MONIES OF FRIEND
    HUNT 50m; HUNT OIL, GIVEN DRILLING RIGHTS IN IRAQ!!! etc.), AND RESTRICTED ACADEMIC FREEDOM SO NOBODY CAN TRY TO DISCUSS WHAT IS TAKING PLACE WITH FOREIGN POLICY OR THEY GET FIRED FROM ISRAEL WATCH DOGS LIKE DERSHOWITZ!!!
    Who cares about the USA’s children….not this administration….or others who support this war and give away programs to other countries…let the rich countries of the world contribute…We can’t even afford health care for our own citizens….

  3. Deadbeat said on October 6th, 2007 at 12:24pm #

    Why just Bush? Clinton’s repeal of Welfare threw many children off of Medicaid.

  4. iyamwutiam said on October 6th, 2007 at 10:31pm #

    Agreed on the Clinton comment. This country since the elction of Reagan has basically become a plutocracy and not a democracy. At some point we will make the same discovery as Astronmoers -except we will say that plutocrats are NOT part of our Solar system 🙂

  5. Kathy said on October 7th, 2007 at 7:02pm #

    The Schip Act as written should have been vetoed as it insured ILLEGAL aliens up to age 21.

  6. walter brasch said on October 8th, 2007 at 2:09am #

    Kathy–What seems to be your problem? Federal law ALREADY requires that ALL persons needing medical attentioon MUST be seen at a hospital. This is called DECENCY and COMPASSION. Federal law also requires children be allowed to be educated. One of the reasons for this is that employers have exploited Hispanic workers, in order to pay less than minimum wage, give no benefits, and not have to contribute to workmen’s compensation/health insurance. Exploting foreign labor is “the American way.”

  7. Kathy said on October 8th, 2007 at 11:28am #

    In San Diego County only, (California) it cost $255 billion for the illegal community (this was more than healthcare though). Now you multiply that by more counties and more states that have illegals and the taxpayer is being burdened by illegal immigration. Greedy corporate businesses are the ones exploiting these people —- NOT the American citizen.

    Also $82,000 a year is not poverty. Get real.

  8. DEB-Z said on October 8th, 2007 at 9:18pm #

    $82,000 IS ALMOST POVERTY AS A MIDDLE CLASS PERSON;
    EVERY MONTH $1,700 health care BlueCross me and my children;
    I DO NOT HAVE A FEDERAL, STATE, CITY OR BIG CORPORATION JOB THAT HAS TONS OF TAX PAYER BENEFITS; I OWN A SMALL BUSINESS! two are over 20 and do not make enough to purchase healthcare=
    $18,000+ for healthcare, $10,000+ for car insurance two cars, $22,000+ property insurance for my home and office (a day spa), another $10,000+ property insurance, slip and fall, and malpractice insurance, $ college costs for my children (over $40,000+ (due to not poor, however, I am far from rich), $ food costs, $ heating and home maintainance, $ state and federal taxes, $ clothing, FORGET RETIREMENT PLANNING OR SAVINGS….
    $82,000 IN THIS AGE IS NOT BIG MONEY…
    Costs a fortune in the USA for taxes, insurances, and colleges!!!