Top Media Lies about Iran

The Peace Prize President in the White House continues to increase his empty but angry rhetoric in an attempt to garner enough support for a strike on Iran. The propaganda juggernaut is in full action, and thousands of articles, TV shows, and politicians are beating the drums for a war against Iran. If this sounds eerily familiar, it’s because it is.

In 2001, the London Observer ran a series of reports linking Iraq to the September 11 attacks and going as far as to claim there were secret bases in Iraq that produced anthrax as a weapon of mass destruction.

In late 2009, The Times of London published a now admittedly forged document it asserted revealed “a four-year plan [by Iran] to test a neutron initiator.” On the same day, Catherine Phillips, another writer for The Times, quoted Mark Fitzpatrick barefacedly saying, “Is this the smoking gun? That’s the question people should be asking. It looks like the smoking gun. This is smoking uranium.”

To the naïve, this would be a shocking use of the media to garner support for a war that is pre-emptive and unjustified. To everyone else, it’s a repeat of 2001 and the pre-Iraq war legacy of the two biggest war criminals of our generation: George Bush and Tony Blair.

Not surprisingly, very few members of the corporate-owned media have bothered to ask: does Iran have nuclear weapons? Does Iran even want nuclear weapons? It doesn’t matter. When the media is as prostituted as it is now, the sole aim is to convince the masses that Iran threatens our very existence and must be dealt with in a manner that disregards every single international law and charter.

The Times of London is part of the seasoned propagandist Rupert Murdoch’s publishing empire that owns Fox News, the Sunday Times, and the New York Post. As expected, each and every Murdoch-owned media outlet views Iran from a decidedly pro-Israeli lens and disregards the need for evidence in making claims against a country that has fulfilled every clause of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT or NNPT). You know, the same one Israel refuses to sign.

Below are the top myths the media tells us daily about Iran.

Iran Has/Wants Nuclear Weapons

To date, no concrete evidence has been presented about the existence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran. Each and every inspect report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the National Intelligence Estimate has confirmed that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. Additionally, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, who has the final word in Iran on such issues, has denounced nuclear weapons as un-Islamic and stated unequivocally that Islam forbids the “production and stock piling of nuclear weapons.”

The Iranian fatwa against nuclear weapons is a registered document with the United Nations. Iran has been the only country to lobby for a nuclear-free Middle East. In contrast, Israel has yet to agree to a single IAEA inspection, and its nuclear weapons plant in Dimona is an open secret used to intimidate the Palestinians and neighboring countries.

Iran Threatened to Wipe Israel off the Map

The world hears incessantly how Iranian president Ahmedinjad threatened to “wipe Israel off the map.” Ironically, not a single translation of this speech has been made to clearly prove he made this statement. In 2005, the newly-elected Ahmedinjad was giving a speech at a conference in Tehran about Zionism. He quoted the founder of the Islamic Revolution, Imam Khomeini, and said, “Imam ghoft een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad.” A direct translation of this is: “The Imam [Khomeini] said [the] regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.” The words “wiped off the map” are not to be found in that sentence, and any amateur translator will tell you nagsheh, the Persian term for map, is not found in that sentence.

In the speech, Ahmedinjad further stated that just as the Soviet regime had fallen, the Zionist one would too. He did not say Israel was going to be wiped off any map. Obviously when the Soviet regime collapsed, was Russia wiped off the map? In the same infamous speech, Ahmedinjad called for a Middle East where Muslims, Jews, and Christians would live in a real democracy and in liberty.

For the record, Iran has not launched an attack on any nation in the past 300 years, but it has defended itself against assaults by other countries. Compare this track record to that of the biggest war monger in the Middle East, the same one that uses cluster bombs to take out innocent children.

The Iranians are Eagerly Awaiting the Arrival of “US Democracy”

American-style democracy has taken over the Middle East; just ask the Iraqis and Afghans how happy they are post-American liberation of their countries. Operation Iraqi Freedom has only cost 1.3 million Iraqi lives to date. In the last Iranian elections, an overwhelming 85 percent of voters turned out to pick the next president, and practically every pre-election poll showed President Ahmedinjad with a significant lead over his opponents. However, the West continues to claim Iran is not a democratic country despite it being the only Middle Eastern country with transparent elections and a fully functional parliament. Western hypocrisy of this magnitude must be respected, and the West has yet to call its allies (Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia) for throwing political opponents in jail and never holding elections.

By all instances, Iran is a democratic society, but to the United States and its allies, the very existence of a democracy in Iran is a threat. They removed this threat in 1953 when they overthrew the democratically-elected government and put in the totalitarian Shah.

Speaking of democracy and sovereignty, the US would know a thing or two about those terms, considering for the past 30 years we have tried to overthrow the Iranian government and laid siege upon siege on the Iranian people.

More recently, Congress voted to allocate 120 million dollars for anti-regime media broadcasts into Iran. It doesn’t end there. The US also generously donated 60-75 million dollars to fund and support violent underground extremist groups like Mujahiden-Khalq (MKO), one of the largest terrorist organizations in Iran. Democracy in the Middle East is synonymous with murderous and catastrophic regime change.

Iran Is Five Years Away from a Nuclear Bomb

Every few months, the United States and Britain try to scare us out of sleeping at night by saying Iran is five years away from a nuclear bomb. Here’s the problem: Iran has been “five years away from a nuclear bomb” for the past four decades, since the Shah began the peaceful nuclear program with US help. Those Iranians don’t seem to be getting any closer to a nuclear weapon, which they don’t seem to want by the way, but that won’t detract the propagandist and war criminals. When the Qom facility was “exposed” by the United States last year, the neocons were quick to hawk it as proof of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. However, they neglected to mention that Iran had openly revealed by it in a voluntary letter to the IAEA days before the US announced it. In addition, the Qom facility is incomplete and non-operational, and if the United States knew about the facility and did not reveal this information, then it too is in direct violation of the NPT. Unless, of course, the facility was not illegal, and thus there was no need to report it.

On April 13, President Obama was asked by a Washington Post reporter if he would “call on Israel to declare its nuclear program and sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty.” The usually eloquent Obama stuttered his way through a response once he finally regained his composure and stated, “And, as far as Israel goes, I’m not going to comment on their program.”

Maybe he should leave Iran’s peaceful program alone and worry about the nuclear warheads Israel and India have.

Huda Jawad is a writer for Islamic Insights, a weekly publication in North America. Read other articles by Huda.

9 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. MichaelKenny said on May 8th, 2010 at 11:07am #

    A useful reminder of just how dishonest the media (including the internet) are. A lesson, hopefully, for authors who view the New York Times as a trustworthy source on the Catholic Church or the Daily Telegraph as a source of reliable economic information.

  2. hayate said on May 8th, 2010 at 11:14am #

    Lying is the job the Jewish run western corporate media. You name it, they’ll lie to you about it. Those presstitutes who are spreading this disinformation are just as guilty of the war crimes as the capitalist oligarchs who order the crimes, the bureaucrats and military brass who plan and carry out the crimes and the politicians who vote for them.

  3. JE said on May 8th, 2010 at 11:44pm #

    Good Article and good comment haygate.

  4. Rehmat said on May 9th, 2010 at 3:58am #

    Professor Jeffrey Rudolph, who in 2008 asked: “Can You Pass the Israel-Palestine Quiz?“ has come up with a new quiz: “Can You Pass The Iran Quiz?“. The historical background provided by Jeffrey is killing the Zionist camel.

    Q: Is Iran an Arab country? A: Nope.

    Q: Has Iran launched an aggressive war of conquest against any country since 1900? A: Nope.

    Q: How many known cases of an Iranian suicide-bomber there have been from 1989 t0 2007? A: None.

    Q: What was Iran’s defense spending in 2008? A: US$9.6 billion (in fact it was less than US$6 billion as compared to America’s US$692 billion and Israel’s US$13.6 billion).

    Q: What is the Jewish population of Iran? A: 25,000 (some estimate it to be around 30,000)

    Q: Which Iranian leader said: “This (Israel’s) Occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time?” A: Imam Khomeini.

    Q: Which countries trained Shah’s brutal internal security service, SAVAK? A: CIA and Mossad.

    Q: Does Iran has nuclear weapons? A: Nope.

    Q: Is Iran a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)? A: Yes.

    Q: Is Israel a signatory of NPT? A: Nope.

    Q: Does the NPT permit a signatory to pursue a nuclear program? A: Yes.

    Q: What percentage of Iranian in 2008 said they have an unfavorable view of American people? A: 20%

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/the-iranian-quiz/

  5. EstherHaman said on May 9th, 2010 at 10:31am #

    Zionists say “There is nothing new here, and no reason for a change of direction on our part,”. Well, It seems to work for them to have an umbrella to committee all sorts of atrocities such as the one reported by the UN in the “Goldstone” report.

    Then they have the audacity to say “”We don’t really like this matter {nuclear free zone in the Middle East}, but is there anything to fear, really? I don’t think so,” Israel Michaeli of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission said”. So, If there is nothing to fear then why the Zionists don’t sign the NPT or even better, why even have 200+ A-bombs in the first place?! It is very clear that they want the neighboring countries to fear them and not to fight the Zionists aggressions.

    The Pakistanies have had 120 nuclear tipped missiles for the last 15 years and they have large population of Taliban and Al-Quida in their country, which enjoys a good relationship with them. So, why that radical Sunni country with all that nuclear weapon is NOT considered a threat to the rogue Zionist stae? Iran does not even have a operational nuclear reactor yet!

    These propaganda and scare tactics will not hide the truth and Iran phobia will not help the Zionists to get out of the peace treaty with the Palestinians. It has back fired on them so far.

    The night is still young

  6. EstherHaman said on May 9th, 2010 at 10:50am #

    Below is some free education. I am copying this for those who want to know more what is behind the sceens.

    I’d like to remind a few things here:
    1 – In 1978 the US signed a nuclear agreement with Iran the was paid by the Shah, which was America’s Nuclear poster boy
    The Shah: America’s Nuclear Poster Boy
    http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2006/pourzal250506.html

    2 – Algiers Accords of January 19, 1981, were brokered by the Algerian government between the United States and Iran to resolve the Iran hostage crisis.

    * The US would not intervene politically or militarily in Iranian internal affairs
    * The US would remove a freeze on Iranian assets and trade sanctions on Iran
    * Both countries would end litigation between their respective governments and citizens referring them to international arbitration, namely the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal.
    * The US would ensure that US court decisions regarding the transfer of any property of the former Shah would be independent from “sovereign immunity principles” and would be enforced
    * Iranian debts to US institutions would be paid

    The US chief negotiator was Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher.

    3 – This is not about Iran’s nuclear program, this is about what Israel wants
    – A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (commonly known as the “Clean Break” report) is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle for Benjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel
    “”Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: —striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan. —paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces”.

  7. EstherHaman said on May 10th, 2010 at 7:52am #

    A must read is the article ” Is Iran Really a Threat?” By Ray McGovern on April 26, 2010, the Arthur shows clearly the lies behind the propaganda that was created by the Zionists and us is generating this Iran phobia. The good old scare tactics is used to manipulated the US population again and again. Our Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said publicly that Iran “doesn’t directly threaten the United States.” Her momentary lapse came while answering a question at the U.S.-Islamic World Forum in Doha, Qatar, on Feb. 14.

    In a rambling comment, Clinton had lamented that, despite President Barack Obama’s reaching out to the Iranian leaders, he had elicited no sign they were willing to engage: “Part of the goal — not the only goal, but part of the goal — that we were pursuing was to try to influence the Iranian decision regarding whether or not to pursue a nuclear weapon. And, as I said in my speech, you know, the evidence is accumulating that that [pursuing a nuclear weapon] is exactly what they are trying to do, which is deeply concerning, because it doesn’t directly threaten the United States, but it directly threatens a lot of our friends, allies, and partners here in this region and beyond.” (Emphasis added)

    The moderator turned to Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim Al-Thani and invited him to give his perspective on “the danger that the Secretary just alluded to…if Iran gets the bomb.”. Al-Thani stressed that, “For a small country, stability and peace are very important,” and intimated — diplomatically but clearly — that he was at least as afraid of what Israel and the U.S. might do, as what Iran might do.

    All right. Secretary Clinton concedes that Iran does not directly threaten the United States; so who are these “friends” to whom she refers? First and foremost, Israel, of course.

    How often have we heard the Israelis say they would consider nuclear weapons in Iran’s hands an “existential” threat? But let’s try a reality check. Former French President Jacques Chirac is perhaps the best-known statesman to hold up to ridicule the notion that Israel, with between 200 and 300 nuclear weapons in its arsenal, would consider Iran’s possession of a nuclear bomb an existential threat.

    Are we going to be fooled again by the Zionists to go to another war and let our kids, friends and young men and women get killed or have blood on their hands to appease the Zionists some more? Enough is enough.

  8. behnoosh said on May 14th, 2010 at 10:01pm #

    “Ahmedinjad called for a Middle East where Muslims, Jews, and Christians would live in a real democracy and in liberty. ”
    It is so sad that you repeat this nonsense when his criminal regime is executing people right and left. It is so sad that we cannot be against Colonization of other lands (Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan), imperial wars and at the same time

    “By all instances, Iran is a democratic society,” Oh, that is why, they have paraded prisoners in front of TV to repent. That is why they are raping 20 year olds in prison. That is why women get lashes for not obeying the sharia laws. That is why they arrested 80 young men and women for attending party and then condemning them to 80 public lashes and that’s why they executed 5 people recently, without a fair trial, letting their lawyer know and not even the parents. That’s why the imprison workers for wanting to form independent labor Union. Kill writers for wanting to establish an independent writers’ Guild. Arresting journalists for actually reporting the facts! I guess in your world, this is called a democratic society. In mine it is called a Totalitarian regime. And yes, it will change, because Iranian people deserve better. A change through an organic struggle which started on March 7th 1979 with Iranian women saying no to compulsory veil and they have not stopped ever since!

  9. behnoosh said on May 14th, 2010 at 10:03pm #

    “Ahmedinjad called for a Middle East where Muslims, Jews, and Christians would live in a real democracy and in liberty. ”
    It is so sad that you repeat this nonsense when his criminal regime is executing people right and left. It is so sad that we cannot be against Colonization of other lands (Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan), imperial wars and at the same time deploring despotic regime such as Iran

    “By all instances, Iran is a democratic society,” Oh, that is why, they have paraded prisoners in front of TV to repent. That is why they are raping 20 year olds in prison. That is why women get lashes for not obeying the sharia laws. That is why they arrested 80 young men and women for attending party and then condemning them to 80 public lashes and that’s why they executed 5 people recently, without a fair trial, letting their lawyer know and not even the parents. That’s why the imprison workers for wanting to form independent labor Union. Kill writers for wanting to establish an independent writers’ Guild. Arresting journalists for actually reporting the facts! I guess in your world, this is called a democratic society. In mine it is called a Totalitarian regime. And yes, it will change, because Iranian people deserve better. A change through an organic struggle which started on March 7th 1979 with Iranian women saying no to compulsory veil and they have not stopped ever since!