Tuesday night the Bill of Rights Party soundly beat the Article II Party. 

The party that favors freedom of speech and separation of church and state soundly beat the party that disfavors both. (1st) 
 
The anti-tyranny party soundly beat the party seeking to amass all power in the executive and soundly beat the party that seeks to nationalize state militias. (2nd) 
 
The anti-search and seizure party soundly beat the party that advocates spying on its own citizens and the party that would use illegally acquired information to blackmail its citizens and restrict their free movement. (4th) 
 
The party that favors fair trials for its citizens, that favors the right to counsel, that favors the right not to be forced into self incrimination and that favors the right to jury trials soundly beat the party which disfavors these rights. (5th, 6th, 7th) 
 
The party that disfavors cruel and unusual punishment soundly beat the party that favors torture. (8th)  

The party that favors the notion that power be reserved to the people and the several states soundly beat the party that advocates the unitary executive. (9th, 10th) 
 
The party that disfavors the oppression and slavery of its citizens and the party that believes in equal protection and justice for all soundly beat the party that apparently cares less. (13th, 14th -- the Bill of Rights II) 
 
The Bill of Rights party soundly defeated the Article II party and the Article II Party's belief in the unitary Executive. 
 
That's how this lawyer sees it.

David G. Mills has been a lawyer for 29 years.  He is licensed to practice in Texas and Tennessee.  He currently resides in Memphis. He can be reached at: mmillsas@midsouth.rr.com.

Other Articles by David Mills

* Article I, Section 8, and the Law of Nations vs. The Man Who Would Be King
* Intelligence Identities Protection Act and Why Karl Rove Legitimately Face Prosecution
* It's the Corporate State, Stupid
* Lying/Perjury vs. Fraud/Deceit
* War Without WMD: An Appeal to the British