My
favorite photograph of Mark Wilkerson shows him smiling, looking
relaxed. He is standing in a grove of trees whose trunks radiate
outward from his image as though they are drawing life from him. One
side of his face glows with reflected sunshine. He wears a black "Iraq
Veterans Against the War" T-shirt with a small star over his heart.
I first met Mark on the grounds of the
Texas Capitol during a peace demonstration on Gandhi's birthday,
October 2, 2004. Mark was stationed at Ft. Hood, and he and his wife
had driven down to attend their first anti-war demonstration in
Austin. I didn't know then the extent of Mark's experience in Iraq,
but he looked stressed, his eyes circled with dark shadows. He exuded
nervous energy. He looked at the materials on our Nonmilitary Options
for Youth table and described how he had been recruited through the
JROTC program in high school with assurances that he would receive
training to become a peacekeeper. At the demonstration, Mark met local
members of Veterans for Peace, who understood more profoundly than I
the internal and external battles he was facing.
Mark had served one tour of duty in Iraq, during which he had begun
to question both the morality and the practicality of the invasion and
occupation. Assigned to the military police, he participated in house
raids and arrests of Iraqi citizens. He witnessed the effects of the
occupation on Iraqi civilians and the change in attitude toward US
soldiers. He began suffering serious post-traumatic stress and
underwent a crisis of conscience about his participation in the
army. He filed for a discharge as a conscientious objector in March
2004. When his claim was denied 8 months later, he appealed the
decision, but soon learned that his unit was about to be deployed to
Iraq for a second tour. Stuck between honoring his conscience and
obeying orders to deploy, he went AWOL in January 2005.
Mark was AWOL for about 18 months. During that time, he said the
nightmares didn't stop. He also felt at sea, as though he could not
move forward with his life. He worked long hours, trying to save for a
future that might include prison. Just before he turned himself in at
Ft. Hood in August 2006, he held a press conference at Camp Casey in
Crawford, TX. Flanked by other GI resisters and supportive members of
Military Families Speak Out and Gold Star Families for Peace, Mark
confidently and eloquently expressed his reasons for having left the
military and his reasons for returning to the base to accept the
consequences.
When I saw Mark Wilkerson last on February 22, 2007, he was embracing
his family shortly before being handcuffed and walked to a van outside
the Major General Lawrence H. Williams Judicial Center at Fort Hood,
Texas following his sentencing by a military judge to seven months of
confinement, demotion in rank and a bad conduct discharge for
desertion and missing movement.
During the court-martial proceedings, several family members and
officers in Mark's chain of command were called as character
witnesses. Mark's wife described how, several months into his tour,
his letters began to include doubts about his mission. During his
first 2-week leave, she saw that Mark had changed. He was restless,
bothered and "set off by little things. There was an edge to him that
hadn't been there before." When he returned to Iraq, Mark felt
increasing hopelessness about his mission, yet he performed his duties
admirably, as his commanding officers testified.
After his tour, Mark had emotional battles, nightmares, and one night,
a breakdown. "My body and my mind had never felt that way before," he
said. He explained that when he was home, family and friends " were
treating me like some sort of hero," but he felt nothing like a hero
inside. He hesitated to ask for help in the military "because an
unsaid rule is that we're not supposed to rock the boat." Even after
he filed his conscientious objector claim, he was advised to refrain
from seeking PTSD counseling while the case was pending.
In Mark's court-martial, the fact that his conscientious objector
claim had been denied prior to a looming second deployment could not
be used as a defense to the charges of desertion and missing movement
to which he pleaded guilty. However, it is important to note that the
conscientious objector approval process in the military is considered
by many to be a broken system. By law, the military must allow
soldiers to apply for discharge as conscientious objectors when they
have experienced, after enlisting, a "crystallization" of their moral,
ethical or religious beliefs about participating in war. However, J.E.
McNeil, director of the Center on Conscience & War, says that,
according to military figures, only about 50 percent of CO claims are
being approved, and anecdotal evidence suggests the percentage may be
even lower. "They throw as many roadblocks in your way as they
possibly can," she says. "The process takes incredibly long, and it
really doesn't have to. They don't really follow their own
regulations. They treat it as an annoyance."
Unlike the case of First Lt. Ehren Watada, the illegality of the Iraq
war was not used as a point of defense in Mark's court-martial.
However, at one point, the military judge asked if there wasn't an
inconsistency inherent in Mark's guilty plea. Was his intent to
"shirk a duty," or to resist an unjust war? If he was saying he was
wrong to desert, was he also saying he was wrong to act on his
conscience? Both defense and prosecuting attorneys stated that they
saw no inconsistency, and the judge laid aside the concern.
The brief interchange touched on what may be the crux of the dilemma
faced by soldiers in all wars. What is a soldier's duty? The
prosecuting attorneys in Mark's case stressed that he "shirked his
important service" when he was "absent by design." He was told that he
"abandoned the Army family that would embrace him." Soldiers commonly
say that when they are on the battlefield, they are not fighting to
protect liberty or democracy; they are fighting for the soldiers on
their right and left. If they are compelled by conscience to embrace a
larger human family that extends to their adversary, it's no wonder
that their expanded sense of duty presents a problem for the military
and themselves.
One of the prosecuting attorneys distinguished between being a good
soldier and a good public citizen. "This dichotomy must be
maintained," he said. But, human beings simply cannot divide
themselves into two separate beings with two separate moral codes and
two separate sets of behaviors. Attempts to do so are injurious, and
soldiers who suffer from PTSD know this.
Part of Mark Wilkerson's defense centered on his achievements in high
school as a teenager with a keen interest in peacemaking. Following a
serious family violence crisis when he was 12 years old that was
described in detail during his court-martial, Mark adopted a strong
leadership role in his family, his school and community. He used the
tragedy to become more determined to prevent violence. He wanted above
all to help people, to be a healer and a reconciler.
Mark wanted to help his country, but his country betrayed him. His
country capitalized on his honorable intentions, gave him false
promises, fed him misinformation, used him to carry out inhumane
missions, caused him psychological injury and then punished him by
making him an object lesson
for his fellow GI's.
In fact, Mark is an example of the best kind, for all of us. In the
same courtroom where soldiers were sentenced for harming Abu Ghraib
prisoners, Mark was sentenced for refusing to harm. In his final
testimony, Mark's plainspoken optimism rose above the contradictions
of his surroundings. "I'm ready to live the life I know I can live,"
he said. "I still want to help people, to be useful. I always lived by
a certain moral code. I know whatever I do, I'll do it well. I look
forward to being able to do it."
Mark Wilkerson’s blog is
www.markwilkerson.wordpress.com.
Susan Van
Haitsma is active with Nonmilitary Options for Youth in
Austin, Texas and can be reached at:
jeffjweb@sbcglobal.net.
Other Articles by Susan
Van Haitsma
* A
Valentine to Newlyweds Separated by Their Country
*
Using Words,
Not Weapons: Students Weigh in on the Draft
* The Ground
Truth: Iraq War Veterans Speak Out
* Military War
Resisters Protect First Amendment Freedoms
* The Truth
Force of Sorrow
* Every
Generation Has its Heroes, and Every War Wants Them
* Just Think
of Me as Your New Guidance Counselor . . . Or Just Think
* Veterans
for Peace Roll with the Peace Train
* We Will
Not Pay for Killing
* Camp
Casey, Texas: The Village is the Answer
* Beyond
Guilt and Innocence
*
Pushing Back the Violence: Peacemaker Teams Get in the Way
* Operation
Red Flag: Recruiting at the IMAX
*
Confessions of a Conscientious Objector
* Rethinking
the D-Word: Does the Military Really Instill Discipline?
* The
Recruiter in Each of Us
* Weapons
Trade: Mixing Guns, Schools and the Messages We Give Our Kids