FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from
(DV) Gerard: Consumer Confidence Decline Surprises Only the Bush Administration







Consumer Confidence Decline Surprises
Only the Bush Administration

by Gene C. Gerard
August 6, 2005

Send this page to a friend! (click here)


A new survey released last week shows that Americans are increasingly worried about the economy.  The Consumer Confidence Index declined by three percent in July. Economists monitor the index closely because consumer spending accounts for two-thirds of all economic activity in America. The Conference Board survey determined that more consumers expect the economy to worsen over the course of the next six months. The number of people expecting fewer jobs to be created in the next few months increased, while those expecting their personal incomes to increase declined.

Americans who believe that business conditions are “bad” increased according to the survey, as did those who responded that jobs are “hard to get.” Consumers who expect business conditions to improve declined in July, while those anticipating business conditions to worsen increased. The Bush administration responded to the decline in consumer confidence by fawning surprise. However, it’s hard to believe that anyone else was caught off guard.

On July 19, computer manufacturer Hewlett-Packard announced that it would layoff 14,500 workers in the next 18 months. Two days later, Kodak announced it would layoff 10,000 workers over the next two years, 7,000 of which will be in manufacturing jobs. The following day, Kimberly-Clark, the maker of Kleenex tissues, Huggies diapers, and Scott paper products announced it would cut 6,000 jobs and close or sell 20 manufacturing plants by 2008. For each of these companies, declining profits spurred the layoffs.

The labor market continues to be a source of anxiety for many Americans. Although President Bush maintains, “the economy has turned the corner,” few workers feel the same. Last month, the Bush administration reported that 146,000 new jobs were created, pushing the unemployment rate down to five percent, its lowest point in four years. While all job growth is good, this was the ninth month in the last year that the number of jobs created was less than predicted by economists. The new jobs reported in July were 49,000 less than predicted. William Cheney, chief financial economist at John Hancock Financial Services, characterized the labor market as, “…kind of anemic compared with what we were expecting.”

Long-term unemployment continues to be a significant problem. Based on the report released last month, 17 percent of those unemployed had been without a job for six months or more. According to a study by the Economic Policy Institute, this is unusually high following a recession. Historically, with an unemployment rate at five percent, only 10 percent have been unemployed for more than six months.

While the unemployment figure is an important indicator of the economy, another figure, which the Bush administration does not report on, is perhaps even more important. That’s the number of jobs cut. Fortunately, the private employment firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas does report monthly on the number of jobs eliminated. Their report released last month found that employers cut 110,996 jobs. This was a 35 percent increase over the prior month, and it brought layoffs up to their highest level since January of 2004.

Between January and June of this year, 538,274 jobs have been cut. This is a 14 percent increase over the same period last year. Last month’s report by Challenger revealed that the auto industry cut 45,378 jobs. This was the fourth month in a row that manufacturers cut jobs. In fact, job losses in manufacturing have occurred in all but two of the last twelve months. The retail industry eliminated 24,065 jobs. The Challenger report predicted, “The pace of job cutting in the second half of 2005 is expected to stay ahead of last year, as employers continue to close facilities and consolidate in order to achieve maximum efficiency.”  

Earlier this summer, the staffing firm Manpower surveyed 16,000 companies to determine their hiring expectations for the upcoming third quarter. Fifty-seven percent of the companies responded that they expect their hiring numbers to stay the same, a decline of two percent over this time last year. Six percent expect to decrease the size of their work force. Only thirty-one percent plan to hire more workers. The survey revealed that the employment picture for the Midwest is particularly grim, as a majority of companies in this region expect a downturn in hiring.

Since the recession in 2001, the return of full-time jobs has been slow, at best. It took 40 months for the labor market to return to its original level of full-time employment following the 2001 recession. Since July of last year, full-time employment has only grown by 2.4 percent. This recovery has been slower, and more meager, than in any recession during the last 25 years, according to the Economic Policy Institute

Following the economic downturn in 1981, it took 27 months for full-time employment to return to its pre-recessionary level. After the recession of 1990, it took 34 months for the labor market to return to its previous full-time employment level. And fewer additional full-time jobs have been created after this recession than the previous two. At this point following the recessions, full-time employment was 7.1 percent (1980s), 4.2 percent (1990s), and 2.4 percent (2000s) higher than at the start of the recessions.

It’s difficult to find and keep a good job today. Given the condition of the labor market, it makes sense that people have less confidence in the economy. What doesn’t make sense is why this bewilders the Bush administration. 

Gene C. Gerard teaches American history at a small college in suburban Dallas, and is a contributing author to the forthcoming book Americana at War. His previous articles have appeared in Dissident Voice, Political Affairs Magazine, The Free Press, Intervention Magazine, The Modern Tribune, and The Palestine Chronicle. He can be reached at

View this feed in your browser

Other Articles by Gene C. Gerard

* Conservative Ideology Hinders U.S. AIDS Policy
* The Record of Judge John Roberts
* Gay Marriage Critics Are Misguided
* Democrats Can Succeed Without the Filibuster
* Turkey is Not a Role Model for the Middle East
* Violations of Civil Liberties are an American Tradition
* The Economy Turned the Corner and Is Headed in the Wrong Direction
* Bush Administration Promotes Global Conflicts by Rewarding Allies
* Bush Administration Attempts to Influence Global HIV/AIDS Policy
* Conservatives, Judicial Impeachment, and Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas
* Appeals Court Nominee Janice Rogers Brown Merits the Filibuster
* Zimbabwe’s Very American Election
* Appeals Court Nominee Thomas B. Griffith is a Poor Choice
* President Bush’s Use of Pardons Isn’t Very Compassionate
* E.P.A. Nominee Supports Testing of Chemicals on Human Subjects
* Military Policy on Gays is Costly and Dangerous
* Bush Administration AIDS Policies Continue to Fall Short
* Bush’s Judicial Nominations are Hardly Mainstream
* Bush’s Budget is at Odds With His Rhetoric
* Iraq’s Election Will Not Guarantee Democracy
* The Politics of SpongeBob