The Last Victory of Muammar Gaddafi

On March 6, 2010 it became clear that the Libyan regime has defeated the internal uprising and suspended the chaotization of the Arab world. A routine clandestine mission by a British diplomat protected by 8 SAS officers to the eastern base of Libyan opposition ended up with their detention and ‘interrogation’ by the rebel leaders. The Sunday Times report about it in reality signified the ‘white flag’ hoisted by the organizers of the 2010-2011 Middle East and North Africa protests.

From the very beginning the chain of events in Libya has taken an unexpected turn for global elites. Muammar Gaddafi refused to abandon Tripoli and together with his family and clan members was keeping permanent contact with the Libyans through national TV and regular public appearances. During his impressive speech on February 22, 2011 he managed to restore public support and encouraged Libyans to resist the revolution.

Since then the international mainstream media have been stuck in spreading unprecedented lies about events in Libya. We’ve heard about ‘foreign mercenaries killing civilians’, ‘air strikes on demonstrators’, ‘bombardments of the rebel positions’, ‘large-scale anti-Gaddafi protests in Tripoli’, ‘thousands of Libyan refugees’ and so many other announcements that, as it turned out, had nothing to do with the reality.

The Libyan insider sources e.g. of the St. Petersburg Center for Modern Middle East are depicting quite different picture. There were no real protests in Tripoli and its surroundings. Few street fighter groups of marginalized youth operating in Az-Zawiya (western suburb of Tripoli) and the centre (arson of the People’s Hall at night February 21 was seemingly their most notorious act) were promptly neutralized by the city police. The ‘air strikes’ of the Libyan Air Force were actually targeting ammunition depots nearby Benghazi when the threat that it would be captured by the eastern separatists was still high.

The issue of ‘foreign mercenaries protecting Gaddafi’ is apparently the most interesting one. It is crystal clear that any mercenary fights for money. So in the conflict where the interests of international oil mafia were involved the mercenaries are the least reliable force. They would betray Gaddafi first. So Gaddafi being a smart man is perfectly aware of it. He could not hire them himself. But let’s presume that their presence in Libya is a proven fact. Could they be ‘kindly’ proposed to Gaddafi by his neighbor African ‘sympathizers’? Yes, why not. What was their mission? They had to be ordered by their REAL masters to be as ruthless and fierce against local ‘protesters’ as possible to escalate the conflict. No wonder that after first clashes with their participation and announcements in the world media the mercenaries ‘disappeared’. We will certainly get to know some astonishing details about military operations by the Libyan army against ‘allied’ mercenaries in late February very soon. When watching CNN reports about large-scale ‘civil war’ in Libya we should understand that it means that the governmental forces are trying to localize and defeat these ‘allies’.

Now, why such a risky scenario? Because Gaddafi regime is the most stable in the Middle East. Take note that all ‘Arab dictators’ who came to power with the US backing in 1980s were easily defeated in January-February this year and promptly ‘fell in comae’. They did not have moral authority to fight for power as they once won it illegitimately. What is the key component of this illegitimacy? When aspiring for power they entered secret alliance with a foreign nation who provided them with comprehensive support. Since then they are not sovereign leaders. This is why they can’t defeat the revolution. They can’t tell the truth to their people and international community as start telling the truth means to tell ALL the truth. And ALL the truth includes the circumstances of their raise to power… But there is a solution for such ‘deadlock’ situation. If a political leader recognizes HIMSELF that he was or still is in disgraceful clandestine relations with a foreign power, he will never be condemned but FORGIVEN and supported by his people. After that the loyalty and professionalism of his bodyguards will guarantee his future political career going to its mayhem. The alternatives are Saddam’s gallows or Mubarak’s and Ben Ali’s deathbeds.

Ok, back to ‘Middle East popular revolutions’. We see that for its success the ‘enraged people masses’ are desperately needed. So somebody needs to enrage them. How was it done in Iran in June 2009? Unknown snipers were killing bystanders in Teheran during street protests (details are in the middle of our article ‘What will the Bilderbergers decide on Iran’).

How was it done in Egypt in January 2011? Again, unknown snipers were firing at the crowd from the roof of Interior Ministry building in Cairo. Please note that in both cases everything was done to persuade the audience that the perpetrators were governmental forces. But where is the proof? Is there any logic for security services in killing demonstrators and provoking them to commit violent acts? On the contrary, their mission is to disperse the crowd peacefully, to identify and arrest the ‘hot heads’ among protestors and to avoid victims! So who was firing from the roof of Interior Ministry on Egyptians? We still do not know. But those who did the same in Tunisia during the public unrest were captured and shown on RT. Please watch the following video:

Do you believe that these vague men with Swedish and British passports were really hunting boars on the streets of the Tunis city?

Now we can make a few conclusions.

First, there was nothing spontaneous in the wave of 2011 North Africa and Middle East revolutions. The popular unrests in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, etc were carefully prepared, organized, financed and supported through international media. Quite surprisingly, Al-Jazeera played a critically important role in fueling the conflicts within Arabic societies spreading disinformation and blocking truthful and sober voices.

Second, for those who masterminded these uprisings, it was generally a failure. No doubt that the idea was to organize chaos and civil wars in the Arabic world, provoke embarrassment among the national elites, give way for radical anti-progressive opposition to come to power in the key countries of the region. Then they expected that in due time the degrading social standards and governmental mismanagement catalyzed by rough propaganda in international media would create conditions to impose external control over these Islamic states. Libya with its rich natural reserves was the most desired prize. But with Muammar Gaddafi still in power enjoying regained public support and getting rid of ‘withered’ arm among his top officials, the global political chess players are suffering heavy zugzwang while the ghost of Pres. Bush Jr. is looming again off the Libyan coast. Apparently the elites do not have other option but uncover the cannons of the US super-carriers. They are cornered and pressured by crushing dollar pyramid.

Third and most important, these events have disclosed a hidden link between ‘Islamic radicals’ and global elites. Muammar Gaddafi fighting pro-Al-Qaeda Islamists and at the same time solemnly replacing Ben Laden as incarnation of ‘absolute Evil’ in mainstream media was a notable shift. Radical populists are to be a new generation of Arab leaders. They would not bring prosperity or merely social justice to their societies. Their mission is to tightly top the boiling pot of the Muslim world by pseudo-Islamic regulations and rhetoric. Once the pot is exploded, the energy of millions young uneducated fanatics spreading worldwide would pave the way for malicious Gran Pacifier. The seeds of this mysterious symbiosis were planted by British intelligence back in XIX century. For example if we track the story of Muslim Brotherhood’s founder Hassan Al-Banna, we will see that British ‘controller general’ in Egypt since 1878 Evelyn Baring, offspring of an old British bankers dynasty, was the person who nominated Sheikh Muhammad Abduh as Grand Mufti of Egypt. We should not underestimate the importance of his position. Gran Mufti of Egypt of that time was a top spiritual authority in Muslim world. Why Sheikh Abduh, a known salafist, was chosen by the British resident? Because the scenario of the false guidance of the Islamic world by global elites had already been written. They wanted Muslims as cannon fodder to impose their rule. They needed to corrupt Islamic faith, replace it with pseudo-Islamic surrogate. This is why Evelyn Baring wrote about salafists: ‘They are the natural allies of the European reformer’ [Goodgame, Peter. The Muslim Brotherhood: The Globalists’ Secret Weapon]. By that time Sheikh Adbuh became a murshid (teacher) for Muhammed al-Banna, the father of Hassan…

Thus we are entering very interesting, perhaps decisive times. Muammar Gaddafi has won his last battle despite eluding vigor and insolent pressure from everywhere. Will there be any new Gaddafis born by Muslim mothers to resist the new world order? We hope and pray for that.

Andrey Fomine is the founder of the open dialogue research journal Oriental Review where this article first appeared. Read other articles by Andrey.

21 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Andre said on March 9th, 2011 at 12:25pm #

    I always thought that both positive and negative ‘conjectures’ are subject for trial and proof. E.g. the statement that ‘Gaddafi is killing his people’ should be checked and proved with the same neutrality and soberness as the statement that ‘Gaddafi is being demonized by intl. media’. As to ‘conspiracy theories’ there is an anecdote:
    A cow speaks to another:
    – You know, I think humans breed us only for milking and after they slaughter us to eat our meat!
    – Come on, you are again with your conspiracy theories!

  2. John Andrews said on March 9th, 2011 at 11:30pm #

    For once I almost agree with Michael Kenny!

    This article appears to be based around the following statement, which is shown as one of the writer’s conclusions:

    “The popular unrests in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, etc were carefully prepared, organized, financed and supported through international media.”

    Whilst I wouldn’t be surprised if this were true, the writer supplies absolutely no evidence for it.

  3. commoner3 said on March 10th, 2011 at 12:44am #

    This is an excellent article that is very logical and makes a lot of sense to me.
    The article described exactly what I felt about the so called Egyptian “revolution”.

  4. commoner3 said on March 10th, 2011 at 12:59am #

    Re: John Andrews said on March 9th, 2011 at 11:30pm #

    John Andrew wrote:
    “Whilst I wouldn’t be surprised if this were true, the writer supplies absolutely no evidence for it.”
    How do you expect the writer can supply you with what you call proof?!
    Do you expect him to hack computers or bulglarise certain offices and displays the documents here for you to see??!! Is that make sense?!
    There is something called commonsense combined with knowledge of history, precedents and good analytical ability!

  5. 3bancan said on March 10th, 2011 at 1:35am #

    A somewhat different point of view:

    Point Of No Return: U.S. And NATO Prepare For War With Libya
    Rick Rozoff


  6. MichaelKenny said on March 10th, 2011 at 5:58am #

    Rozoff’s articles are always the same: “the omnipotent, invincible and eternal American Empire rules the world. Here’s the latest example”. Israel always wins, needless to say! What Rozoff’s latest article shows is the level of panic in Israel and among its supporters. Their hope probably is that if the US can be bamboozled into attacking Libya, that will start a “rollback” of the revoloutions in the Arab world. A word of warning for warmongers: Italy attacked three isolated provinces of the Turkish empire in September 1911. By October 1912, it had conquered them and named them “Libya”. There followed a guerilla war with the local population which lasted until … 1931!

  7. Maien said on March 10th, 2011 at 7:33am #

    Excellent article. I am glad that the author had the courage to write. Pity that writers on this site and the readers must be subjected to the limited, redundant cawing of “Israel always wins, needless to say!”. Individuals like this cause distractions and discourage honest adult discussion and learning. Perhaps since we all understand Mr. Kenney’s stance on everything and it is unlikely to change …just perhaps Mr. Kenney could consider a vow of silence …for one week? The rest, the silence would be appreciated, perhaps by more persons than just myself. Truly, a contrarian can be a useful voice but not when the voice has become simple ear-grating noise.

  8. shabnam said on March 10th, 2011 at 7:49am #

    {Neda Agha-Soltan became a symbol of Iranian rebellion. She was killed in Tehran on June 20, 2009 during street protests after the election in Iran.}

    Nada was not killed by the Iranian policeman, as the US –Israel-Britain, a true axis of evil, claim. She was more likely killed by MEK, a terrorist organization in the service of Mossad – CIA – MI6 on behalf of the intelligent services of the west. Numbers of Iranian scientists have been killed by MEK on behalf of these intelligent services in Iran. No wonder the EU, including Britain, has removed MEK name from the list of terrorist because MEK is in their service. Now the zionfascists in Congress want to do the same, to remove MEK from the State Department terrorists list.
    Neda was not a political activist and no sympathizer of ‘green’ but after she was killed, she was elevated to an ‘opposition’ figure and her ‘fiancé’ Makan used her targeted assassination to CASH IN and the Western intelligent services provided him with VISA to the west and soon after that he travelled to occupied land, Israel, for publicity and kissed Peres’s behind to say thank you for this opportunity. This publicity aired on TV.

    Neda at the time of main street disturbances was meeting his professor in a car. She was shot dead when she stepped out of the car to stretch her legs. She must be targeted for political purpose since she was a woman, young, attractive, university student and her name was NEDA, in Persian means VOICE. Now, the MI6-Mossad –CIA, the true axis of evil, have constructed the VOICE of the green ‘movement’ and the rest is history.

    An Iranian Doctor, who appeared at her side almost immediately after she was shot, lives in Britain. He fled to England right away. Iran wants him for questioning but he is protected by Britain. On the other hand, Britain has turn Neda into the voice of the phony green “movement” and has created many shrines for political purposes. Britain has established a scholarship in her name, and was involved in propaganda film made by Israeli’s film industry where aired at ‘public’ TV stations in US and other western countries for propaganda purposes to fool the public who is ILLITERATE and have achieved many success. When you have an ignorant population you can shape their opinion the way you want as many times as your plot requires. These propaganda films are feed to the ignorant population through PUBLIC LIBRARIES in the Western countries. Now, Neda became household name, but no one knows the names of MILLIONS OF VICTIMS KILLED BY US, ISRAEL, and EU INCLUDING BRITAIN. The ignorant population is complicit in the Western power’s war crimes against humanity.

    We have seen lies at the time of Iraq war, and Libya now where the phony ‘left’ let by the closet Zionists hide themselves under “anti imperialism’ have sided with the judeofascists who are pushing for a war against a ‘dictator’ want to establish a ‘no-fly zone’ AN ACT OF WAR.
    No one doubts that an insidious Iranian policeman shot an innocent creature with a cold blood.


  9. shabnam said on March 10th, 2011 at 8:15am #

    Should read:

    Neda at the time was away from the main street disturbances meeting his professor in a car.

    {No one doubts that an insidious Iranian policeman shot an innocent creature with a cold blood.}

    I copied the above line from one of the attached sources for this article and should have been removed, but I forgot to do that. This is not part of my comment. Sorry about that.

  10. 3bancan said on March 10th, 2011 at 9:11am #

    “France is the first country to formally recognise the legitimacy of Libya’s rebel National Transitional Council and will open an embassy in Benghazi, the government announced after meeting with NTC representatives in Paris Thursday”


  11. 3bancan said on March 10th, 2011 at 9:20am #

    NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen seems to know nothing about it…

  12. Jonas Rand said on March 10th, 2011 at 11:07am #

    @Shabnam – Mojahedin-e-Khalq is indeed a terrorist organization, but it is a Ba’athist cult-like group, it was pro-Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi faction of the Ba’ath Party had not been pro-US or Mossad since before the Gulf War. The US arms the Syrian dictatorship today, but MEK was supported by Saddam Hussein’s faction, not Bashar al-Assad’s. The USA may have paid Syria off to fight against their fellow Ba’ath party members in Saddam’s Iraq twice, but how do you explain that Syria is supportive of Iran, while MEK is not? They are both Ba’athists.

  13. Jonas Rand said on March 10th, 2011 at 11:10am #

    @Shabnam, your explanation of this was surely elaborate, but where is your evidence? Were you a witness to Neda’s death, and if not, was the person who concocted this tale a witness to Neda’s death?

  14. Deadbeat said on March 10th, 2011 at 11:15am #

    Jonas, do you have evidence to counter Shabnam’s arguments?

  15. 3bancan said on March 10th, 2011 at 11:20am #

    Jonas Rand said on March 10th, 2011 at 11:07am #

    “The US arms the Syrian dictatorship today”

    Yeah, the US has become SOOOOOO antisemitic!…

  16. MichaelKenny said on March 10th, 2011 at 12:09pm #

    France has indeed recognised the National Transitional Council, which seems to be destined to improve Sarko’s plummeting popularity at home. No other EU Member State has done so and most seem reluctant to go that far at this stage. The EU often operates that way. One Member State will do something and if it backfires, they can all deny everything.

  17. shabnam said on March 10th, 2011 at 5:49pm #

    Jonas Rand said on March 10th, 2011 at 11:07am #

    {but how do you explain that Syria is supportive of Iran, while MEK is not? They are both Ba’athists.}

    I don’t understand your logic. MEK is after power at ANY COST. Masoud Rajavi, MEK ‘leader’ has done anything to be taken seriously by Israel lobby. He cooperated with Saddam against Iran. Iranian people are not fools to forget MEK’s terrorist activities against Iranians. MEK is working closely with the neocons such as Richard Perle, Micheal pipes and others. Rajavi’s partner, Maryam, an opportunist, has already gone through ritual requirement of becoming the SERVANT of Mossad – MI6 – CIA, by visiting the Holocaust Memorial.

    It was reported:
    { November 27, 2008 – On Tuesday, the Iranian opposition politician, Maryam Rajavi, visited the Holocaust Memorial at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin. This exiled resistance figure who lives in Paris placed red roses at the memorial of the six million Jewish victims of the Holocaust.}

    Countries are after their INTERESTS. Churchill said: we don’t have permanent friend or enemies, only permanent interests.
    Syria is after her interest. Iran and Syria are the only targeted countries where have not been attacked so far by the war criminals. If Israel returns Syria’s territories, in exchange for more cooperation against Iran, then it would be very hard for Syria not to accept it. Syria’s interest is to have a good relation with Iran. Syria is assisted with oil from Iran.

    MEK, on the other hand, is trying to seize power in Iran at any cost. MEK is willing to kill hundreds of Iranian people to improve its position so can be taken seriously. This has been said by many including a famous Iranian female singer who worked with MEK for a short time. Syria and Iraq, both Ba’athists, did not have a good relation. Syria was against invasion of Iran by Saddam who was supported by the West, Russia and all Arab countries except Libya and Syria. The Palestinians led by Arafat supported Saddam against Iran. However, this betrayal did not turn the Iranian leadership against the Palestinian cause.
    If Syria was a friend of Israel and US, then MEK would have had a different relation with Syria, I think.

  18. shabnam said on March 11th, 2011 at 7:06am #

    Jonas Rand said on March 10th, 2011 at 11:10am #

    {Were you a witness to Neda’s death, and if not, was the person who concocted this tale a witness to Neda’s death?}

    No one knows who killed Neda at this point except those who executed this PLOT. It is clear to many that Iranian police WAS NOT the killer since it was reported in the media that she was killed from a short distance. So that stupid picture, a gun man on the roof in ISOLATION where could have been taken even before that day, cannot be taken as EVIDENCE to implicate the Iranian government by the green ‘opposition’ and their supporters, the western intelligent services.

    However, what happened after her death is suspicious so much that many believe that Neda might have been killed by the same terrorist group who targeted Iranian scientists and killed them.
    According to Wikipedia:
    {The footage of the death of Neda Agha-Soltan drew international attention after she was killed during the 2009 Iranian election protests. Her death was captured on video by bystanders and broadcast over the internet and the video became a rallying point for the opposition. It was described as “probably the most widely witnessed death in human history”. Her death became iconic in the struggle of Iranian protesters against the disputed election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.}

    Neda was murdered, and the killer(s) may never know. However, the west claims, the Iranian government killed Neda and their evidence in their biased ‘documentary’ films aired around the world, is a picture of a man holding a gun standing on the roof of a building. No one knows when that picture was taken. The person in that picture is isolated from the surrounding and no one from the picture can tell what is happening on the ground because the picture shows only the man with his gun, the building and the sky, not the street that Neda was killed.

    The voice of America (VOA) made a propaganda ‘documentary’ film about Neda’s life where Shohreh Aghdashloo was the narrator of this film. Aghdashloo is, a Bahia, an actor who works closely with the neocons and Israelis who have made number of propaganda films against Iran and Muslims. The latest is IRANIUM
    She has recently narrated a “documentary” called “Iranium” made by Clarion Fund, founded in 2006 by Raphael Shore, a conservative Israeli rabbi, and “documents” the development of Iran’s nuclear “threat,”.
    She has come under heavy criticism for her role in the movie from organizations in the Iranian Diaspora, such as the National Iranian American Council. Criticism of the movie and her role in it were also documented by BBC Persian.
    Aghdashloo plays the lead character in the movie The Stoning of Soraya M., a drama film released in 2009 in the United States and is based on a FAKE story and can be found in many PUBLIC LIBRARIES in the Western countries including the United States that is CHECKED OUT frequently by the ignorant population but people have very hard time to find a copy of Shahid Alam “Israeli Exceptionalism: The Destabilizing Logic of Zionism”
    In the library. The propaganda films and books widely is distributed and placed in PUBLIC LIBRARIES in the West.

    An imposter, Caspian Makan, who claimed he was Neda’s finance and later his claim was denied by Neda’s family, obtained a Visa to the West that he lives now, end up in Israel killing Peres’ hand:


    In a letter from leading Iranian News website Editors to the Western Journalist we read:
    {On June 20, 2009, a real young woman named Neda Agha Soltan was suspiciously shot to death near — not among — protestors in Tehran. Two hours later video clips featuring her final moments, as she lay next to a doctor named Arash Hejazi, spread worldwide through the Internet. Two days after the incident, the BBC interviewed Hejazi in Britain and other international media quoted him as an eyewitness blaming Iranian security forces for Neda’s death. Inconsistencies in Hejazi’s account were not questioned.
    Since the Iranian government was struggling to calm the public and the opposition sought to whip up excitement, in your opinion which side could expect to gain from murdering Neda? Why did Hejazi travel to Iran five days before her death and return to the UK the day after? How credible is the story when an assassination on a quiet street prompts passersby to move closer to film the victim up close instead of fleeing the scene?}

    After Neda was murdered, The Neda Agha-Soltan Graduate Scholarship was established at the QUEEN’S COLLEGE, OXFORD.

    Neda Agha Soltan is not the only plot against Iran. There were many FAKE reporting against Iran by the intelligent services of the west and their AGENTS in Iran. These agents were sending FAKE cases of murder and rape to obtain VISA and GREEN CARD from the intelligence agencies including BBC and VOA. One famous case which received wide publicity is a FAKE case of Taraneh Mousavi where reported she was raped and murdered. Later investigation and confession of the same biased reporter who exposed in the west shows that THERE WAS NOT SUCH A CASE to begin with and Taraneh Mousavi was created by the Iranian ‘journalists’ to help the West and themselves. These biased ‘journalists’ are working for BBC, excuse me MI6, now. Please read the following:

    {On Friday June 19, a large group of mourners gathered at the Ghoba mosque in Tehran to await a speech about the martyrs of the post-election protests by presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi. According to one Iranian blog, 28-year-old Taraneh Mousavi was one of a group of people that was arrested by plainclothesed security forces for attending the gathering.}


    This FAKE case was also exposed by Evan Siegel that you and people like you should read to understand that many FAKE cases are around.
    {On May 19, 2010, Omid Habibinia, a self-described media analyst who played a key role in publicizing the Taraneh Mousavi story, denounced it for the hoax that it is.}


  19. hayate said on March 13th, 2011 at 7:50pm #

    Western countries advocating intervention as pretext for oil grab – Russian envoy

    Published: 13 March, 2011, 11:04, Edited: 13 March, 2011, 19:25

    Russia’s Envoy to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin expresses concern over NATO’s plans for military intervention in Libya.


    “RT: Are there any conditions under which you would support foreign military intervention in Libya?

    DR: Facts, that’s all. Only facts on the table of the UN Security Council saying that weapons were used against peaceful civilians in Libya, or heavy military machinery was used against humanitarian targets, may force the Security Council to consider measures more substantial than political sanctions against the regime.

    The thing is, we don’t have any facts. We only have reports from BBC, CNN, and other media, featuring some machine gunner firing his machine gun in the air. At the same time, we don’t see any aircraft attacking; instead, we see people applauding the gunner for looking so cool. If there were a real aircraft attack in progress, they wouldn’t be applauding there.

    The footage we see on American and British channels looks fake. They create an illusion of military action. Where are the aircraft? Where are the bomb raids? Where are the destruction and casualties we hear so much about? If all that it true, evidence should be now on the table of the Security Council.

    RT: How are the rebels holding out against Gaddafi’s regular army? Are they already being aided by the West?

    DR: We assume that something is being done by the rebels and by the opposition and that the Special Forces that were used to evacuate citizens of Western countries from Libya have most likely remained there. There have been instances of the rebels themselves detaining members of Special Forces combat groups from the West (that being those sas handjobbers recently humiliated – h).

    We are not naïve and are well aware that some parts of special operations have long been done in Libya, on the side of the opposition.

    Otherwise, Gaddafi, to whom most of the army and police forces are loyal, could long have clamped down on the opposition. Since he has not done so as yet, it is a question of secret and illegal military backing by Special Forces. This is my personal opinion. I have no facts yet, but I have experience and I can analyze the situation.

    I can’t confirm this, but I think it’s true.”


    Full interview on video at the link.

  20. lichen said on March 13th, 2011 at 9:21pm #

    This article is more ridiculous bs. The Egyptian security forces tortured, killed, and extorted from the people for decades; of course they would open fire, they already did a great deal more. Those who have their heads in the sand of conspiracy will quite simply never see reality when it comes; when we see the young majority rise and up throw off the chains of old, right wing scum.

  21. Andre said on March 19th, 2011 at 3:51pm #

    I start wandering if that victory was the last? First French jet is reportedly down…