Sabbath Goys in the UK Press

In her desperate attempt to smear Lauren Booth, Independent writer Julie Burchill, a devout Zionist, proves how deceiving British multiculturalism is.

Indeed the Zionification of this Kingdom has left this country in a disastrous ethical limbo.

“Last year I took the first steps towards converting to Judaism; also last year, I abandoned my attempt”, says Burchill.

But I guess that Burchill didn’t really have to convert — She is obviously far more Jewish than anyone I can think of. Burchill can teach Rabbi Ovadia Yosef what self-love is all about. She can teach Paul Wolfowitz, David Aaronovitch and David Miliband what moral-interventionism stands for. She can give Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman a crash course in Hasbara. Burchill can lecture Zionist slander operators on how to spread venom.

But most significantly, she displays an astonishing command of Jewish humour. Burchill is indeed very funny.

Jewish humour is a pretty simple concept: it is based on self-mockery mixed together with the absurd. Thus we have Woody Allen presenting himself as an alpha male Schwarzenegger type, and through self deprecation, Larry David would appear to challenge our tolerance of the ultimate form of Jewish rudeness.

And then we have Julie Burchill presenting herself as a veteran Sex bomb – funny indeed.

Jewish humour though, is, in practice, a camouflage: through comedy, funny Jews manage to live in peace with their symptoms. But sometimes, even the best of Jewish comedians fail to provide the goods, as Woody Allen and Larry David may have learned.

It is pretty astonishing to witness the amount of poison that pours out of Burchill against Booth, a fellow journalist who recently converted into Islam: it is even more astonishing to find such a level of islamophobia and personal attack on the pages of a respected British paper. In the past, I certainly saw this kind of vile personal slander on Jews only blogs.

But I have never seen anything similar on paper, let alone in a British paper.

I guess that the Zionification of Britain is beginning to take a heavy toll on our cultural and public life.

Would Booth have to go through such a slanderous campaign if she had converted into Judaism? I don’t think so. Would anyone in the British press dare remind us, for instance, that it is actually Judaism that calls on its followers to “pour their wrath on the Goyim?” No one would remind us that the crimes that are committed on a daily basis by the Jewish state, are actually implied by certain interpretation of the Old Testament, namely the Zionist interpretation.

British multiculturalism is indeed a funny concept, it basically means tolerance towards everyone except Muslims.

I would prefer to spare you from reading Burchill’s personal attack on Booth (much of which reminds me of an old Jewish mother’s Passover dinner tantrum) but, I will review some of her argument, because it is apparent that the logic she employs is symptomatic of both Neocons and Zionists in Britain and in America.

“There is one religion which proscribes its followers under threat of death from rejecting it, and that is Islam” says Burchill. Yet if there was any truth in such a statement, our streets would be soaking with the blood of ex-Muslims. This is obviously not the case.

Whilst we are on the subject of proscription, restriction, revenge and forgiveness in religious precept and religious tradition, I am sure that Burchill learned in school about Jesus: whilst the man didn’t actually reject Judaism, he did suggest to his fellow Jews to love their neighbours.

That was enough to nail him to the cross. I guess that Burchill doesn’t know that the word Yeshu- Jesus in Hebrew-is the abbreviation for the Hebrew phrase “may his name and memory be blotted out”. Seemingly, Rabbinical Jews are yet to forgive Jesus.

But maybe we should leave Jesus’ crucifixion aside. Many contemporary Jews rightly argue that they have nothing to do with this crime. Yet, I do wonder whether Burchill has heard about Israeli PM Yitzchak Rabin, and the Talmudic Rabbinical ruling that led to his assassination. Igal Amir, the young student who took Rabin’s life, had come to believe that Rabin was a din rodef, meaning Talmudically, a ‘pursuer’ who endangered Jewish lives. Under din rodef, Amir would be justified in ‘removing’ Rabin from being a threat to Jews.

As far as Rabbinical Judaism is concerned, one doesn’t even have to reject Judaism in order to be murdered. It is enough that a Rabbi or a great Cohen tags a Jew as a ‘din rodef’ in order for another Jew to complete the job.

But let us return to Burchill’s ad hominem argument against Lauren Booth – next, she turns her attention to Booth’s work for Press T.V.

“It’s hard to know where to start when describing the sheer ickiness of Booth,” says condescending Burchill. “That she works as a paid stooge for the murderous Iranian regime’s television channel has to come pretty near the top.”

As tragic as it may be, it is actually Britain and the British (rather than Iran and Iranians) who are directly complicit in a colossal criminal war that has lead up to date to 1,421,933 fatalities in Iraq alone. It is pretty fascinating that ‘nearly converted’ Burchill would denounce the Iranian regime as murderous while it is evident that Britain was taken to the Iraq war by a government that was funded by the Zionist lobby, led by no other than fund raiser, Lord Cashpoint Levy.

In fact, more than ever, we need Press TV in the UK, for the Iranian TV channel is the only broadcast in Britain to deliver a full coverage of Israel’s colossal crimes. In case Burchill has managed to forget, at the eve of Operation Cast Lead, when the BBC was quick to follow IDF ‘instructions’ and evacuated its reporters from Gaza, it was Press TV that stayed behind and delivered live footage of the Israeli massacre. It was Press TV rather than BBC, SKY or ITN that broadcast in real time UNRA shelter shelled with white phosphorous.

We need Press TV, and we need many more Lauren Booths to perform real journalism instead of Zionised comedy. We need Press TV and Lauren Booth exactly because British press and people like Julie Burchill have so evidently failed.

Burchill is not just a devout Zionist and a Neocon, she is also a sincere feminist. She doesn’t like Islam, and she doesn’t hide it either. She doesn’t approve of regimes that “uphold the punishment of death by stoning for adulteresses”. For those who fail to remember, it was also so called ‘feminists’ who were the first to campaign against the Taliban in the mid 1990’s, just to prepare the ground for the American invasion. I am almost taken in by Burchill’s caring for Muslim women; yet, I wonder how come the ‘women’s right campaigner’ fails to show the same care for Palestinian women who are often enough bleeding to death in Israeli roadblocks.

When it seems as if Burchill runs out of Necoon slogans, she then takes the gloves off and pulls the chicken out of the boiling soup: Booth, according to Burchill, is so “jaded that she can only get a kick from self-denial.” But may I point out to Burchill here, that conversion is actually the exact opposite of ‘self-denial’. It is actually all about the ‘self’ being ‘spiritually awakened’ out of a state of denial, an experience that may be foreign to ‘nearly converted’ Burchill.

However, Burchill’s feeble accusation of ‘self denial’ does ring a bell here; it does sound familiar: It is after all, common amongst Jews and within the Zionist fold to label their dissident voices as being ‘self haters’.

As I mentioned earlier on, Burchill didn’t have to convert: the Jewish philosophy and manners are apparently deeply engraved within her soul. It spills out in each of her sentences — and it is far from being attractive.

But I guess that at a certain stage Burchill just couldn’t hold it together anymore. She wanted Lauren Booth to simply shut up. She suggested that Booth treats herself “to a full-face and — most essentially — mouth-covering burka”. All of a sudden, Burchill, the liberal impostor, the one who just a few lines before was rallying for freedom of Muslim, gays and women, has revealed her true face: in Burchill’s world, women and homosexual should be free — but Muslim converts better shut up.

Can anyone explain this discrepancy? It is no wonder why Neo-conservatism and moral interventionism are such a disaster. There is not a single shred of truth, coherence or consistency in it. It is in fact, simply a pretext for Zionist expansionism.

This is unfortunately the true meaning of the current western brutality. It obviously didn’t take me by complete surprise then, when I found out that Julie Burchill was also a supporter of the war in Iraq.

But, as one would expect, Burchill poisonous outburst is followed by some tender ‘light waves’ of self-love: Israel was named recently as “the eighth happiest country in the world — coming in above Britain and the US”, says the proud Zionist enthusiast.

And I am now more concerned than ever: If Israelis can be so pleased with themselves at a time when their army locks millions of Palestinians in concentration camps with no food or medical supplies, it really says a lot about the Jewish State, the Israelis — and it says a lot about Sabbath Goys like Julie Burchill.

I am afraid that we are dealing here with a morbid psychotic ideological collective. I wish I knew how to help them — or at least how to save the rest of us.

Gilad Atzmon, now living in London, was born in Israel and served in the Israeli military. He is the author of The Wandering Who and Being in Time and is one of the most accomplished jazz saxophonists in Europe. He can be reached via his website. Read other articles by Gilad, or visit Gilad's website.

10 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. shabnam said on November 2nd, 2010 at 7:55am #

    “Israel was named recently as “the eighth happiest country in the world — coming in above Britain and the US”, says the proud Zionist enthusiast.”

    The list must have been upside down.

    Thank you for exposing the imposters.

  2. MichaelKenny said on November 2nd, 2010 at 9:13am #

    I read the Burchill article in the Independent and found it amusingly contemptable. One could add that Lauren Booth is the half-sister of Cherie Booth, wife of Blessed Tony, who didn’t convert to Judaism either, although many Catholics would probably have preferred that he had. By the same token, she is also a descendant of John Wilkes Booth’s grandfather!

  3. Mulga Mumblebrain said on November 2nd, 2010 at 9:15am #

    I was much taken by Burchill’s braggart lasciviousness, boasting of her erstwhile career as a slapper. Still, one musn’t dwell on the sordid details. She’s got the essential Zionazi feature, generalised hatred, oozing from every pore, for all but her beloved Chosen People and her delectable self, in spades. I love her silly accusation that Press TV is ‘propaganda’. It is, in fact, stunningly even-handed in its debates, with representatives of both sides (often Zionazis or ‘Christian Zionists’ of such repellent extremism that inviting them to vent their hatred and lunacy is actually rather clever) present, a quaintly ‘unbiased’ habit long ago abandoned in the Western mainstream media sewer. As for the Iranian regime being ‘murderous’, that is certainly true, as of most regimes, but, in comparison with the genocidal fascist regimes that this indelicate creature worships, Israel and its puppet hyperpower, who have the blood of millions on their paws, the mullahs and Ahmadinejad et al seem paragons of relative humanity and decency. In my opinion Burchill’s quaint double standard is easily understood as the standard racist calculus that the Zionazis have made mandatory throughout the West-their lives do not count, even those of their children, who may be murdered in their hundreds of thousands if beautiful Jewish souls like Madeleine Albright think that the price is ‘worth it’, while ours, particularly those of the ineffable Chosen Ones, are infinitely valuable.

  4. hayate said on November 2nd, 2010 at 10:17am #

    Another well written commentary from Atzmon – as I wrote earlier, the guy is on a roll.

    So the burchill “sex BOMB” (as in “bomb” like “fat man” here: 😀 ) is at the independent now. The independent’s really going down the crapper now. 10 years ago she was at the guardian and pretty much despised there for her bigotry and self promotion (despised by readers, probably not by the management there). Back then she was considered a wind-up commentator. She was also a regular poster on their talkboard as Lindalotte, many of the guardian’s writers and staff are regulars there, and was generally disliked and ridiculed. Oddly, now, her views would fit in well there now, considering how bigoted that board has since become.

    She moved on to the times around the the time of the Iraq invasion, give or take a year, and I had not heard much about her since then. She is one of those very small minds who “made it” made it on connections rather than talent or intellectual skill.

  5. bozh said on November 2nd, 2010 at 11:39am #

    I do a lot of blitzlesen. But since i am now possessed with that damn evil PROTREPTIC value of any piece, i read Gil’s piece more carefully.

    My apologies to Gil, if i misread or misremembered anything he wrote.
    Btw, piece appears interesting– much more than raw cabbage i now eat– and, let’s not omit that the piece appears also veri meritocratic.
    Syntacticly, grammaticly, sensibly, spellingly, nonfragmentally, etc., ideal.
    But all pieces on all media appear of that kind.
    Alas, alack, weh ist mir, not protrepticly written.

    But neither had been quran, torah, US constitution, curricula, any US law, fiat, ukaz, army report, obama’s [tho brilliantly meritocratic: each word worth a kilo, and for afghan children more so] speech.

    And heaven, ergo, braking lose on now cool and getting cooler-choler Earth. But who cares; it isn’t ours anymore, anyawy! tnx

  6. Mulga Mumblebrain said on November 3rd, 2010 at 12:54am #

    hayate, I certainly concur with your observations regarding The Guardian comments. Hideous, but the result of culling by the ‘moderators’. Still it is good to know just how much stupidity, ignorance, arrogance and sheer vicious inhumanity is out there on the Right. As for the ghastly Burchill, I suspect that her rise without trace can be put down to an age old tactic of young, talentless, women, in our patriarchal societies. I’d say she was a ‘horizontale’ as the French say, but a ‘gross’ one, rather than ‘grande’.

  7. mary said on November 3rd, 2010 at 1:01am #

    The editor of the Independent is Simon Kelner who recently refused to take a paid ad from over 200 signatories protesting against the BBC coverage of the attack on the flotilla.

    The owner of the ‘newspaper’ is a rich ex KGB type called Alexander Lebedev. Enough said. The previous editor was no better. Alton supported the Iraq war.

    It is reassuring to see that its circulation is falling as is the case with many of the other mainly disgusting rags and their crapoganda.

  8. jayn0t said on November 3rd, 2010 at 5:41pm #

    Julie Birchill was the leading new wave journalist of British punk in the seventies, writing for the ‘New Musical Express’. Her politics were adopted purely for shock value. She said she was a fan of Joe Stalin. How can anyone take her seriously now?

  9. hayate said on November 4th, 2010 at 1:22am #

    Mulga Mumblebrain

    “I certainly concur with your observations regarding The Guardian comments. Hideous, but the result of culling by the ‘moderators’.”

    Most definitely, even worse on their [cough] comment is free section. Very bigoted in a zionist sort of way.


    “The owner of the ‘newspaper’ is a rich ex KGB type called Alexander Lebedev. Enough said. The previous editor was no better. Alton supported the Iraq war.”

    The independent hasn’t been much for a long while. I used to read it occasionally, but not recently. An example of the level of absurdity they’ve sunk to, a few years ago, they ran some piece about antisemitism on the guardian’s talkboard – exactly the opposite of reality – even mentioning that somebody is Jewish will get you banned from that site 😀 (literally, that has actually happened, repeatedly).

    Also, I’d put lebedev in the mossad camp rather than the kgb camp. From an article in the ziofascist times:

    “The newspaper boss likened the case to that of Yevgeni Chichvarkin, seen as a foe of the Kremlin, who, he said, was a victim of slanderous allegations by business enemies. “The man had to escape to England. At the moment I am far from thinking I am the new Chichvarkin. But some parallels come to mind.”

    Apparently the independent was gifted to him and he’s not on good terms with the current Russian guv. He appears to be one of the yeltsin oligarch holdovers (IE: ziofascist bought and paid for), awaiting his turn to bag it to Britain.


    “She [burchie] said she was a fan of Joe Stalin. How can anyone take her seriously now?”

    She is a British mouthpiece for israel. They cant openly be pro hitler, so stalin will have to do. ;D

    It’s what zionists think a leftist supports….

  10. Mulga Mumblebrain said on November 5th, 2010 at 4:57am #

    Burchill was at it again the other day, slagging off the unfortunate Stephen Fry who has again put his foot inelegantly in mouth. He must believe his own PR releases. I didn’t read that, life being too short, but I did pass a jaundiced eye over yet another attack on Islam by the ‘gross horizontale’ (which my dictionary says ought to be ‘grossier’ (ill-mannered) or ‘degoutant’ (disgusting).Both seem apposite). She referred to a BBC Radio 4 ‘mockumentary’ entitled ‘Hitler’s Muslim Legions’, about Moslems who fought with the Germans. It allowed her an opportunity for yet another Islam hating diatribe, like the proverbial dog with its favourite bone.
    Now, there are numerous levels of hypocrisy, ignorance and mendacity,or all three, involved here. One waits, breathlessly, for the degoutant one’s condemnation,in similar vein,of the tens of thousands of German Jews who fought for Nazi Germany, even rising to the ranks of general and admiral. One could hold one’s breath, also, waiting for her stern condemnation of openly fascist Zionist leaders like Begin, Shamir and Jabotinsky, all of whom admired Mussolini and his fascists, even apeing their uniforms, let alone policies.
    Or we could listen for the criticism of the various Zionists who sacrificed European Jewry to the gas chambers, preferring to concentrate on the Zionist project in Palestine. The most infamous example was in Hungary, where the Zionists ‘sacrificed’ 800,000 Jews in return for the escape of several hundred ‘worthies’ to Palestine. And Burchill might at least be honest and admit that there were collaborators with fascism in India and elsewhere as well, driven by hatred of Western colonialism and interference.
    Of course this typically sordid little piece of hatemongering is but one of several I’ve seen recently, directly equating Islam with Nazism. All written by Zionazis, most fascist Jews, all grist to the mill of incessant hatred and vilification aimed at Islam and Moslems. As ever we are being driven,like the cattle that the Zionazis,like the fragrant ‘Rabbi’ Ovadia Yoseph, see us as, to global religious war, which the Zionazis plainly see to be in their interest. This little pustule of hatred is just doing her bit for the Holy Cause.