House Slave Syndrome

A recent article declares, “Tired of war, thousands of Iraqis want to go to U.S.” What it fails to mention is who triggered all the bloodshed. Who made conditions in Iraq so intolerable that these people must flee?

You know who. Over and over again, the U.S. has instigated mayhem or carnage overseas, generating thousands if not millions of refugees, many of whom longing to escape, paradoxically, it seems, to the source of their suffering. You beat and humiliate me, so can I move in?

But there is no paradox here, really. Let’s call this phenomenon the House Slave Syndrome. With its vast military, petrodollar racket and control of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, the U.S. dominates every single life on earth. It is a truly a full spectrum master. There is not a Panamanian, Nigerian, Georgian or Japanese, etc, whose life goes unmolested by American military or, more importantly, financial decisions. Each U.S. sneeze distorts the entire world. When its attention to your land includes a coup or a preemptive strike, then the plot just gets bloodier (and often oilier). No use hiding. Unless you’re Bin Laden, Uncle Sam can always reach you!

The fact that many Iraqis want to come here means that our way of life is superior to theirs, many Americans will conclude, and what we’re doing over there is entirely justified, if a bit costly on our end, but we’re such good people, we give so much. Ignored is the fact that we’ve sold their oil and gas and kept 98% of the gross receipt. Our occupation is also not called We Will Bomb You, Strip You Naked and Smear Shit On Your Face, but Operation Iraqi Freedom. We’re teaching them about civilization, even if they did start it five thousand years ago. A refresher course can’t hurt. Between waterboarding lessons, we’ll teach them about Angelina Jolie, and, for the more serious and advanced students, Megan Fox and Whoopie Goldberg. We’ll throw in easy to understand parables about Jesus. Turn the other cheek, you Satanist Terrorists!

There is nothing new here. We’ve been messing with Iraq for half a century. In 1963, we orchestrated a coup there. We supported Saddam Hussein even before he became president. Before we turned against him, Saddam was our boy, just like Ngo Dinh Diem, Ferdinand Marco, Mohammad Pahlavi, Manuel Noriega and so many others. It’s good that Uncle Sam is not a baseball executive, because his picks are always terrible, but just ask yourself, What sort of character, for cash or career advancement, collaborates with the C.I.A.?

Washington ditches foreign dictators when they no longer serve its needs, but even the most loyal servants of our ruling class are just disposable tools, if not collateral damages. It has come out that General John D. Lavelle, who died in disgrace 30 years ago, was unjustly blamed for a military decision authorized by Richard Nixon. As his career was destroyed, both White House and Pentagon said nothing. Consider also what happened to Old Blood and Guts. Sixty-three years after the death of General Patton, evidences emerged that he was killed by the O.S.S., precursors to the C.I.A., in a staged car crash.

So even the highest ranked house slaves are not safe. Still, it’s better to be inside than out. In fact, it’s best to be as close to the man as possible. Here’s a basic rule of survival: When shots ring out, run to the gang with the biggest guns, the one with the most tanks, planes and ships, and you’ll less likely to become kabob. If they’re smart bombing your neighborhood, you can save your own ass by moving into theirs, for even their least desirable real estate, even Detroit, for example, is safer than Baghdad, if not by much. In short, the closer you are to the baddest mofo, the less likely you are to be zapped by one of his drones or military contractors. If you sit next to the pilot, he’ll have a harder time bombing your ass. Sniffing the man’s deodorant, you will also have better access to his table scraps, preowned clothing and maybe even a bit of hand me down culture.

As long as we engage in wars on foreign soils, refugees will try to come here, but we simply can’t stop because war is our primary industry, what we export to the rest of the world. War is our way of life. We are a war servicing nation. War nourishes our military industrial complex, cheers up stock holders of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General Electrics, etc. Without wars, our stock market would disappear. College-aged children of the investment class may hold up cute signs protesting this or that conflict, but daddies and mommies need systematic and routine mass murders to maintain healthy stock portfolios.

Linh Dinh is the author of two books of stories, five of poems, and a novel, Love Like Hate. He's tracking our deteriorating social scape through his frequently updated photo blog, Postcards from the End of America. Read other articles by Linh.

44 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Maien said on August 6th, 2010 at 9:21am #

    So, may I assume that whomever controls the US govt (money) are also the Masters of us all, as certainly I have understood that politicians are mostly useful stooges, paid for, in full.

  2. lichen said on August 6th, 2010 at 2:57pm #

    It is really sad and gross that anyone would want to come to the U.S, this wildly unequal, racist poverty plantation that just loves to exploit cheap labor; this ugly, polluted land designed to cater to the wealthy few. Stay in Iraq and do everything you can to destroy the palace-embassy and make the us pay for destroying your country!

  3. Don Hawkins said on August 6th, 2010 at 3:16pm #

    The report emphasizes that human society has developed for thousands of years under one climatic state, and now a new set of climatic conditions are taking shape. These conditions are consistently warmer, and some areas are likely to see more extreme events like severe drought, torrential rain and violent storms. NOAA

    The Russian people are this very second finding out about this new set of climatic conditions. Here in the States just hot so far well yes some extreme events like severe drought, torrential rain and violent storms and just on the off chance it’s real by 2020? Yes a new set of climatic conditions are taking shape and the Persuaders want us to follow them I think not.

  4. Deadbeat said on August 7th, 2010 at 2:18am #

    IMO another [wrong}.

    The author states …

    Ignored is the fact that we’ve sold their oil and gas and kept 98% of the gross receipt.

    This isn’t footnoted anywhere in the article. The Iraqi sold their contracts to Dutch Shell and other foreign firms. When, where, and how did the U.S. obtain the gross receipts? Who in the U.S. received these receipts? The U.S. government? U.S. Firms?

    We are a war servicing nation. War nourishes our military industrial complex, cheers up stock holders of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General Electrics, etc.

    Can the author please show with some reference where the “military industrial complex” actually lobbied for war on Iraq otherwise those remarks are just empty axiomatic conjectures.

    However there is clear evidence that Zionists lobbied for the War on Iraq and the Bush Administration was satiated with Zionist war planners. It would be more accurate to say that war nourishes the Zionist Power Configuration and advance Israel’s interest in the region.

    Evidence of Zionist participation and influence in the War on Iraq goes completely unnoticed by the author.

  5. Jonas Rand said on August 7th, 2010 at 2:25am #

    They did not lobby for the Iraq War but they were involved in fighting on America’s side in the war. Those companies manufactured supplies for the American military for Iraq. It was Paul Wolfowitz as well as oil corporations that supported the United States.

  6. Josie Michel-Bruening said on August 7th, 2010 at 3:34am #

    Regrettably, I cannot object to the author’s remarks:
    “We are a war servicing nation. War nourishes our military industrial complex, cheers up stock holders of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and General Electrics, etc.”
    I would only like to add and Europeans are joining “the Best”, the only thing other nations within the western system can do, is to compete in: ” Who is the best house slave?” – Zionists are include, of course.
    If some of our grandchildren will have had the chance to survive, they will certainly ask, what did our ancestors for avoiding the catastrophy.

  7. Don Hawkins said on August 7th, 2010 at 4:09am #

    Sent this to the greatest minds in human history you know to boldly go where we have gone before.

    Morning,

    As a result, Serenko continues, “the heat is changing Russia,” all the more so because Russians have been told that next year and the one after that may be even worse. What needs to begin happening, he suggests, is to “assess fully the extent of these changes” in order to predict what will happen next. Georgian daily

    “Assess fully the extent of these changes,” have we done that here in the States? Sort of and what conclusions did we come up with? Well you all might want to read this again.

    We need a simple honest flat rising carbon fee across the board. It should be revenue neutral – all funds distributed to the public – “100 percent or fight”. It is the only realistic path to global action. China and India will not accept caps, but they need a carbon fee to spur clean energy and avoid fossil fuel addiction.

    But our governments have no intention of solving the fossil fuel and climate problem, as is easy to prove: the United States, Canadian and Norwegian governments are going right ahead developing the tar sands, which, if it is not halted, will make it impossible to stabilize climate. Hansen

    http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2010/Sophie_20100722.pdf

    Yesterday on Fox New’s same game climate change is a hoax remember the e-mails and there talk arguments you have to admit are a little nut’s. Yesterday CNN the kid Don ask Chad ok this weather in Russia is it because of global cooling, global warming, the Sun? Well Chad said El Nino a little. It would be different if we saw at least a little reason but we don’t it’s not even good illusion anymore just crazy talk. I wonder how does it work where does the decision come from you know it’s ok crazy talk go for it. Remember the cold war and what we were told about Russia well, “all the more so because Russians have been told that next year and the one after that may be even worse”. Ah ha in Russia they are being told “assess fully the extent of these changes” in order to predict what will happen next so as to prepare as best they can. After the NOAA report you all did one day on climate change now it’s back to it’s hot well we know it’s hot. Could we say the media in the States are the persuaders and just how is it that you all know how to persuade sort of the same page all at once. Is there like some big giant computer that sends you messages. Very sure you all know what’s coming down the track and to say it’s hot or don’t drive turn around is about 1% of what needs to be told. Here in Alma I talk with many people and a few years ago climate change was still unclear to may and now I have noticed that thinking has changed they know. Watch Fox and the people how they are getting, becoming sorry you don’t play those kind of games with your head and other peoples heads and expect to be sane. Well in a mad world only the mad are sane come on if that is not what we are seeing I’d like to know what it is. Do we see even a little reason, imagination, working together, knowledge come on think. So the big plan is…………………………………….? It’s the economy stupid well as long as that is the thinking we are all going down the drain in not such slow motion and probably not it’s the economy stupid but it’s the economy stupid for a few very few. Remember the bus is out front to take you to the airport where the C-130’s are waiting and then off to the secure location and the password is rosebud I think not. Shocking come on what we see and hear from so called leaders is what is shocking to say the least. Like Hansen and a few more said years ago think of this as kind of a war an enormous effort, Herculean and just what do we see in old twenty ten all aboard never mind about the abyss up ahead ticket’s please sorry that’s economy class next car please.

    Don

  8. linhdinh99 said on August 7th, 2010 at 7:14am #

    This is just one story concerning U.S. stealing of Iraqi oil. From the BBC, 7/27/10:

    The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction says the US Department of Defence is unable to account properly for 96% of the money.

    Out of just over $9bn (£5.8bn), $8.7bn is unaccounted for, the inspector says.

    […]

    Much of the money came from the sale of Iraqi oil and gas, and some frozen Saddam Hussein-era assets were also sold off.

    This is not the first time that allegations of missing billions have surfaced in relation to the US-led invasion of Iraq and its aftermath.

    In 2005, the inspector general criticised the Coalition Provisional Authority, the US-led occupation administration, for its management of an $8.8bn fund that belonged to the Iraqi government.

    A criminal investigation conducted led to the conviction of eight US officials on bribery, fraud and money-laundering charges.

  9. linhdinh99 said on August 7th, 2010 at 1:22pm #

    And here’s the Patton story.

  10. teafoe2 said on August 7th, 2010 at 1:52pm #

    I don’t pretend to be an expert on climate or weather issues, but those who aspire to be might be interested to note that here on the west coast of the US we’re experiencing the coolest summer in decades. I myself have been resident in Northern CA for the last fifty years, and this has been the coolest summer I can remember.

    Not that that proves anything, but it does suggest that this summer’s conditions in other places might be more the result of an El Nino type shift in weather patterns than of an overall heating of the planet.

    Like I say, I’m not an expert, just somebody looking for convincing answers. ??

  11. lichen said on August 7th, 2010 at 4:10pm #

    Thus far, 2010 is the hottest year ever recorded–these things are looked at cumulatively, worldwide; not based on anecdotes whether you thought you had a cold summer in your little part of the world, or not. If you want answers, you can look them up instead of writing 40 pages on chomsky/world jewry every day.

  12. lichen said on August 7th, 2010 at 4:43pm #

    Furthermore, overall global warming causes climate instability and change in different locales–due to the globe warming, some individual regions can have drought, floods, get much warmer, or even colder–indeed, the melting of the glaceirs may cause a new ice age in Europe. That won’t disprove global warming, but however it will back up the analysis of the complex climate processes at work.

  13. teafoe2 said on August 7th, 2010 at 5:32pm #

    According to the Sacramento Bee, which now with the fading of the SF Chron is the nearest to a Newspaper of Record in N. Calif, this is the coolest summer in this area since 1967.

    If Mr Wiseguy really knows all about this issue, I would urge him to post a link or two to whoever or whatever he considers the final authority on it, instead of spouting juvenile insults which do not clarify anything but his sympathy with ziono-power.

  14. Deadbeat said on August 7th, 2010 at 7:54pm #

    linhdinh99 writes …

    This is just one story concerning U.S. stealing of Iraqi oil. From the BBC, 7/27/10:

    Out of just over $9bn (£5.8bn), $8.7bn is unaccounted for, the inspector says.

    Much of the money came from the sale of Iraqi oil and gas, and some frozen Saddam Hussein-era assets were also sold off.

    In 2005, the inspector general criticised the Coalition Provisional Authority, the US-led occupation administration, for its management of an $8.8bn fund that belonged to the Iraqi government.

    Ok let’s put this story into perspective shall we …

    The article is talking about 9 billion dollars money that is earmarked as a Development Fund for Iraq.

    According to the article, this is $9 billion dollars with “Much of the money came from the sale of Iraqi oil and gas, and some frozen Saddam Hussein-era assets were also sold off.”. The article doesn’t specify how much is coming from the sale of Iraqi oil and how much came from the Hussein’s confiscated assets. But let’s assume all of the money is coming from Iraqi oil.

    Now let’s put that into perspective shall we.

    You’re going to try to convince reader here that the U.S. spent according to Joesph Stiglitz estimates $3 Trillion dollars to obtain a mere $9 billion dollars in Iraqi oil. That’s a total return of 0.9%.

    Let’s add the other %8.8 billion from the 2005 article that ups the total return to a whopping 1.8%

    What the author is doing is assessing the Iraq war only in dollars terms of the suppose theft or confiscation of Iraqi oil revenues. However we know that Dutch Shell and other major FOREIGN firm where the main beneficiaries in extracting Iraqi oil

    The author ignore viewing the Iraq ware form the STRATEGIC VALUE that Israel obtain from the U.S. efforts. Can the author provide a dollar figure for that? Does he want to? We can come up with rough estimate…

    Let’s see how about $3+ TRILLION DOLLARS using Joesph Stiglitz estimates. Since Israel didn’t spend a dime of its own money and continues to receive AID FROM THE U.S. TAXPAYERS that a huge sum of money spent for Israel’s benefit. For some reason those calculations doesn’t figure into the author’s analysis.

    We can point the author to PNAC, AIPAC, JINSA and the alphabet soup of Zionist organizations that lobbied for the War on Iraq and got what they wanted from the U.S. Somehow that obvious bit of information is totally missing from the article.

    So from a benefit analysis standpoint oil was not the major driver and beneficiary for the War on Iraq. ZIONISM was and still is.

  15. Jonas Rand said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:00pm #

    Did Stiglitz estimate that it cost 3 trillion dollars for Iraq in 2005, or anywhere close in time to when that fund was issued/lent?

  16. hayate said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:00pm #

    The usa runs things? OK. But who runs the usa?

    zionists

    One could argue whether the zionists who run the usa are from new york, tel aviv or london based, but the fact remains they are an international association loyal only to their own and israel’s continued dominance. They are not the whole problem, by any means, but they are certainly the most pressing of the problems facing this planet right now. What zionism and zionists represents make the nazis look like amateur 2nd rates in comparison. And these 21st century nazi goatsods have nukes.

    Does a sensible person allow a nation of son of sams to have nuclear weapons?

  17. Deadbeat said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:02pm #

    Jonas Rand writes …

    It was Paul Wolfowitz as well as oil corporations that supported the United States.

    There is no evidence that I’ve seen the oil companies supported the war. There is evidence that the oil companies didn’t want the war. War doesn’t permit them to do business and in the end the contracts when to Dutch Shell and French firms. U.S. oil companies were not the beneficiaries of the Iraq War.

    The idea that the oil companies, the military, Boeing, Lockheed, etc pushed for the Iraq war are empty axiomatic conjectures that are consistently repeated by the Chomskyite Left without any real evidence to support it. Those axiomatic conjectures are structured to conceal the push for war on Iraq by the Zionists.

  18. Deadbeat said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:08pm #

    Did Stiglitz estimate that it cost 3 trillion dollars for Iraq in 2005, or anywhere close in time to when that fund was issued/lent?

    Does it matter when he did the estimates? What matters is that his estimates reflect the TOTAL cost of the War. Which is still ongoing thus are an understatement.

    My point is that the strategic value to Israel of the war in Iraq is MUCH greater, WAY WAY GREATER, than anything the “oil companies” will “coup”. In fact U.S. oil companies essentially LOST business due of the war as their foreign rival got the Iraqi contracts.

  19. Jonas Rand said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:08pm #

    OK 10mil people murdered by Nazi German fascists, a million Palestinians killed, no one is worse in killing it just needs to stop no matter what. Whether Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Jew or Christian is murdering in whatever faith’s name is irrelevant. Racism and discrimination, as well as murder by governments based on superficial factors like ethnicity, should end. It is injustice. Also, “does a sensible person allow a nation of Son of Sams to have nuclear weapons”? The key word is “allow” here. Who is allowing, not just one, but three nations who have not signed the NPT have nuclear weapons? The huge superpower ally and one of the biggest supporter of all three governments, of course! That would be the USA, and the countries are Israel, India and Pakistan. Israel is like a powerful person’s bad dog on an infinitely long leash, a leash whose length the owner could easily limit the infinity of. The dog’s owner refuses to accept that the dog does anything it wants, and even tries to get it to be stronger. Eventually the dog is realized as a safety risk, but the owner is powerful and thus can gain exemption to any kind of restriction.

  20. Jonas Rand said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:18pm #

    Deadbeat: It does indeed matter. You state:

    “the U.S. spent according to Joesph Stiglitz estimates $3 Trillion dollars”

    “$9 billion dollars in Iraqi oil. That’s a total return of 0.9%.”

    The percent would be inaccurately calculated if you used data from later on about the cost of the war. As the money spent on the war after 2005, a large percentage of the 3 trillion, was spent after the fund was lent to the US occupation government in Iraq, it does not count towards the amount that, by 2005, would have been spent on obtaining that 9 billion dollars. Moreover, what about other deals with oil companies on the part of the US Occupation authorities that were made before 2005? Didn’t the money that was spent on them count towards the total return from ’05? After that date, many deals were made, such as with ConocoPhillips, so the money was spent towards their aspirations for other oil projects later on, too.

  21. linhdinh99 said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:35pm #

    Hi Jonas,

    The 3 trillion dollars that came out of our treasury benefited the war profiteers, so, yes, we lost that money, but the many companies that did business with the Pentagon all gained. As for the 9 billion, that also benefited only who stole it, not American tax payers. I mentioned that theft to remind readers that we’re taking from Iraq, not contributing to it. You and I know that already, of course, but there are still many Americans who believe the official propaganda.

    As for your cost analysis, I’m afraid it does not apply here, because the 9 billion should be added to that 3 trillion. That’s the total loot available to the war profiteers.

    I did not mention Israel in this article, but I have written about it in the past. Here’s one article.

  22. Jonas Rand said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:42pm #

    Yes. That was the point I was trying to make anyway. The 3 billion was spent, at least according to Stiglitz, by the US/Coalition on the war, though it was taken from the taxpayers, so you’re right about that.

  23. hayate said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:47pm #

    Yes the ami attacked Iraq for the oil, not because ziofascists run the usa. Of course, that fully explains this development:

    Russia’s Gazprom Neft signs contract to develop Iraqi oil field

    14:35 28/01/2010

    (excerpts)

    “Russian state-run oil company Gazprom Neft signed on Thursday a contract to develop the Badra oil field in Iraq, the company announced.

    A consortium of companies led by Gazprom Neft was declared the winner of a tender for the deposit’s development in December 2009. The consortium also includes Korea’s Kogas, Malaysia’s Petronas and Turkey’s TPAO.

    Gazprom Neft, the oil arm of energy giant Gazprom, will hold 30% in the project, Kogas 22.5%, Petronas 15% and TPAO 7.5%, while the Iraqi government represented by Oil Exploration Company will have a 25% stake…..”

    http://en.rian.ru/business/20100128/157704059.html

    JFC, how the hell could anyone doubt america attacked Iraq to give american and europatsy capitalists control of Iraqi oil? Gazprom, as ami as apple pie, right goatsods?

    If the main reason the ami fascists invaded Iraq to gain control of it’s oil, they would not be allowing their chosen quislings there to hand out development contracts to a Russian state owned oil firm (Russians are the real enemy to these fascists and ziofascists).

    The oil of Iraq was icing on the cake, the real reason is control of the region. Exclusive control of the region. Both the ziofascist and fascist oligarchies wanted this and this is why these modern day nazis worked together on it. Ole saddam said no to the Jewish mafia, his downfall was just a matter of time after that.

  24. teafoe2 said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:47pm #

    Jonas my friend, it’s easy to see you’re one of the good guys, but your estimate of the numbers killed by the Nazis is way way too low. They killed somewhere between twenty and thirty million in the USSR alone, depending on which source you trust the most.

    Re the thesis that the oil industry is the force behind the March 2003 US attack on Iraq, I’ve just come from reviewing what came up on Google when I typed in Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz’ names.

    Clearly PNAC was not the brainchild of the Petroleum Institute, but of a group of what came to be called “Neocons”, one bunch of them originally students of Leo Strauss or his disciple Allan Bloom. The other “original neocons” were mostly former Trotskyists who made a 180 degree transition from Leninism to extreme rightwing militarism. The missing link for many of them was coldwar Democrat Henry “Scoop” Jackson. Andrew Mellon heir Richard Scaife and KKK funder HL Hunt’s scion Roy were behind the scenes providing $$. John Lehman’s role seems to be more one of providing introductions & connections. Lazard Freres and Salomon Bros also make an appearance in some accounts.

    Cheney did have close ties to the Wyoming “energy sector” which was/is mostly into mining coal and extracting natural gas. So far I haven’t seen anyone suggesting that these Westerners were the force that pushed the US into the “war on terror”, but plenty of stuff just as farfetched passes through this website every day:)

  25. Michael Collins said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:57pm #

    Outstanding! Deception and manipulating propping up perpetual war is the only way the one trick ponies who run things know how to make money. It would be easier for a Hummer to pass through the front door of most homes than for a new idea to enter the the mind of any member of The Money Party. De-evolution is the new road map.

  26. teafoe2 said on August 7th, 2010 at 9:43pm #

    linhdinh99 said on August 7th, 2010 at 8:35pm

    Linhdinh I hit your link and read your article. Most of it I found very very good, vividly written and politically right on.

    However your remarks about how Zionism came about as a response to Russian & Eastern European antisemitism, while adding some seldom cited details about criminal Tsarist abuses, in my opinion is inadequate and a little misleading about the historical origins of what became the world Zionist power network and the “State of Israel”.
    I’d suggest that you may want to check out what Lenni Brenner has written about Herzl, Nordau, Ussushkin & the Lovers of Zion in the period leading up to the Basel Conference? His books are all available to read free online.

    The point is that Organized Zionism started as an effort by a handful of ambitious political entrepreneurs, who saw in the aftermath of the Dreyfuss Affair an opportunity not to be missed. At the time, several other movements enjoyed widespread popularity among Jews of the Pale, notably the “Bund” and the Plekhanov/Ulanov brand of Russian Marxism. Zionism was more appealing to Jewish members of the more affluent classes, hence Herzl sought and found support from the House of Rothschild and other top Jewish capitalists who liked the idea that they could join their goyish fellow capitalists as fellow Colonialists controlling a patch of what we now call “the third world”.

  27. lichen said on August 7th, 2010 at 10:33pm #

    I agree the Iraq war was caused by US right wing ideologues and petrochemical corporations.

    teafoe, you can take your pick:
    http://www.google.com/search?q=2010+hottest+year+on+record&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

  28. Don Hawkins said on August 8th, 2010 at 3:25am #

    http://www.columbia.edu/~mhs119/Temperature/

    Teafoe take a look again and look at figure 11 you will see it those temperatures to the North on planet Earth are different is a good word. There shouldn’t even be ice up there at present levels of green house gasses but we put it into the atmosphere so fast a little lag time and California is cold this summer and so climate change is not real well where I live in South Georgia the heat started in late May and hasn’t let up a bit. Let’s talk about Russia or Pakistan and a little something called energy balance. The reason I said go to figure 11 is in just a few years the Sun will again be at peak and don’t think short term 11 year cycles and say 2021 not even a half a blink of an eye boring this will not be.

  29. Don Hawkins said on August 8th, 2010 at 3:31am #

    Stabilizing climate requires restoring our planet’s energy balance. The physics is straightforward. The effect of increasing carbon dioxide on Earth’s energy imbalance is confirmed by precise measurements of ocean heat gain. The principal implication is defined by the geophysics, by the size of fossil fuel reservoirs. Simply put, there is a limit on how much carbon dioxide we can pour into the atmosphere. We cannot burn all fossil fuels. Specifically, we must (1) phase out coal use rapidly, (2) leave tar sands in the ground, and (3) not go after the last drops of oil. James Hansen

    Please note Hansen wrote phase out coal use rapidly, like yesterday.

  30. PatrickSMcNally said on August 8th, 2010 at 4:48am #

    > The other “original neocons” were mostly former Trotskyists who made a 180 degree transition from Leninism

    That actually is a pretty severe exaggeration which has been promoted by conservatives like Justin Raimondo to try to rehabilitate conservatism. The distinctive thing about Raimondo is not just that he seeks to blame neo-conservatives for having planned the Iraq war (in which case he would be absolutely right), but that he aims to disassociate past conservatism from war-mongering (even when this requires editing the facts).

    When General Douglas MacArthur started insisting that Korea should be expanded into a regional nuclear war by pouring atomic bombs along the Yalu River, Truman kicked him. SubsequentlyRight-wing supporters of MacArthur used to charge that Truman had exposed himself as a Communist agent by not supporting MacArthur’s readiness to risk WWIII. The people who pushed that line would certainly be called “paleocons” in today’s language, but Raimondo simply deletes them from the picture.

    The man who is usually named as “the Godfather of neo=conservatism,” Irving Kristol, never joined the Socialist Workers Party, but spent less than 2 years as a member of the Young People’s Socialist League-Fourth
    International which was the youth affiliate group associated to the SWP. Every account of Kristol’s activities in those years shows that he was more involved with reading books at college rather than bothering much about Leninism. A fair run-down on the facts about neo-conservatism is detailed here:

    http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0304/0304neocontrot.txt

    Although the latter site is conservative itself and carries some claims which I’d have to take issue with, its rejoinder to Raimondo is pretty accurate and thorough.

  31. Don Hawkins said on August 8th, 2010 at 4:50am #

    Here are some words that just might be needed to restore a little thing called energy balance. Herculean, enormous, kind of like a war effort. Now it does appear so called leaders Worldwide if the truth be known are not up for the challenge as in order to become a so called World leader first they had to embrace the system to keep going and going and learn to use things like myth and illusion bullshit is a good word and after doing this well air conditioned tents, Vera Wang and orange chicken comes to mind oh almost forgot vacations. Yes to boldly go where we have gone before War or destruction on a grand scale this they know keeping people in slavery is another good one for the mind is also something they know. They say a picture is worth a thousand words well go to Linh Dinh photo blog another little side effect. Yes going and going and the people human’s we see in those photo’s Bozh used to write much about this knowing something is wrong. In many way’s much better as human’s than these so called leaders because that voice in there head told them something is wrong very wrong and if that’s all there is I don’t want to play. Becoming a share holder in the system just seemed wrong and they are correct. These so called leaders in all there shapes and sizes are wimp’s and courage I think not and yes they will do whatever they can to keep the present system going and going even if it means the destruction of most life on this planet. We can’t keep fighting wars of the first kind and exspect to restore energy balance will not happen. Nuclear war and climate change one and two or two and one not much difference end result the same. So here in the States the big plan is a fund for off shore drilling wimp’s and just maybe a better word is nut’s along with having there head up there ass. Oh breaking new’s;

    Floods and landslides across Asia plunged millions into misery Sunday as rubble-strewn waters killed at least 127 in northwestern China and 4 million Pakistanis faced food shortages amid their country’s worst-ever flooding.
    In Indian-controlled Kashmir, rescuers raced to find 500 people still missing in flash floods that have already killed 132, while North Korea’s state media said high waters had destroyed thousands of homes and damaged crops.
    Terrified residents fled to high ground or upper stories of apartment buildings in China’s Gansu province after a debris-blocked river overflowed during the night, smashing buildings and overturning cars. An estimated 2,000 more people were missing in the latest deluge in a summer that has seen China’s worst seasonal flooding in a decade.
    Worst hit was the county seat of Zhouqu in the province’s Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, where houses buckled and streets were smeared with a yard (meter) of mud and water.
    The landslides struck after heavy rains lashed China late Saturday, causing the Bailong River to burst its banks, the official Xinhua News Agency quoted the head of Zhouqu county, Diemujiangteng, as saying. AP

    ENERGY BALANCE

  32. PatrickSMcNally said on August 8th, 2010 at 5:14am #

    > This is just one story concerning U.S. stealing of Iraqi oil. From the BBC, 7/27/10:

    That phrase may have created some confusion from the way you used. You’ll notice that the article doesn’t actually say anything about oil having been stolen:

    —–
    The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction says the US Department of Defence is unable to account properly for 96% of the money.

    Out of just over $9bn (£5.8bn), $8.7bn is unaccounted for, the inspector says.

    […]

    Much of the money came from the sale of Iraqi oil and gas, and some frozen Saddam Hussein-era assets were also sold off.
    —–

    The oil itself appears to have been sold in a normal way, at leat according to how this article phrases it. Money gained from those oil sales now appears to be unaccounted for. That could be just the result of bureaucratic incompetence, or it be conscious embezzling of some kind. But the article doesn’t really tell us. If one wants to make up speculative hypotheses, the money could have been rerouted into Ariel Sharon’s health care funds. Anything is possible. But it’s not exactly accurate to say that the BBC article describes the “stealing of Iraqi oil.”

  33. Don Hawkins said on August 8th, 2010 at 9:20am #

    My comment above probably better to not talk about it taboo, forbidden knowledge sort of could be one reason we are all going down the drain in not such slow motion and Linh Dinh’s photo blog did you look pictures of men and women. How does that song go little Annie who froze somewhere in a small room making artificial flowers for ladies of high fashion and fame. My daughter would she do that I don’t think so or my son again forget about it. The hardest part for me with my kid’s is to try and get them to understand yes the world is a little nut’s in a mad world only the mad are sane my girl you are ok being a nurse is a good thing and you are ok. My son you are a farmer and a good person those people you see on TV so called leaders are in most cases and I mean most cases are full of shit remember that part. I remember one time my son was over to my house and Glenn Beck was on and after a few minutes got up and said you see that guy he’s nut’s want’s to privatize the planet Earth the only reason for government is to kiss the private sector’s ass you know big corporations the very people who keep us all in slavery and will send all of us into hell and his boss who owns Fox new’s you know what I call him the penguin, quack, quack, quack, my son has seen all the batman movies. He’s a good kid all he said was I know dad he does know too.

    More breaking new’s;

    WARSAW, Poland — Flooding caused by heavy rains has killed at least eight people in Poland, Germany and the Czech Republic, officials said Saturday.

    Lenka Moravcova, a spokeswoman for a rescue service in the northern Czech Republic, said three men drowned in a region on the border with Poland and Germany Saturday. A fourth victim was found drowned late Saturday. Details were not given.

    At least a thousand people had to be evacuated, some from areas below two dams threatened by rising waters. People in the towns of Chrastava and Frydlant were rescued by police and military helicopters from the roofs of their homes. AP 20 hours ago

    How’s India or the Mid East doing probably just more 100 year storms on the planet Zenon.

  34. Don Hawkins said on August 8th, 2010 at 1:46pm #

    Published August 6, 2010
    An ice chunk four times the size of Manhattan has broken off of Greenland’s Petermann glacier—possibly the biggest glacier collapse in recorded history, scientists announced Friday

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/08/100806-ice-chunk-island-greenland-glacier-petermann-biggest-science/

    Then I read this from the new American.

    So even though the Petermann Glacier calving can hardly be classified as a threat to the environment or a portent of impending disaster, depend upon major media to warn otherwise. Just remember, Greenland didn’t get its name by being covered with ice as it is today. And as SPPI noted, “the Greenland ice sheet was entirely absent 850,000 years ago: therefore, even if Greenland’s ice were to melt, its disappearance would be entirely within the natural variability of the climate.” New American

    Oh there’s a new American on the way alright even if Greenland’s ice were to melt, its disappearance would be entirely within the natural variability of the climate and Live Science wrote this in April of 2009 and after this summer’s weather not climate might have to rethink the thinking and we human’s have been on the Earth about 180,000 to 200,000 years and for the last 200 years busy little beavers indeed. These people at the New American are kidding right it must be satire.

    2009
    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency declares carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases to be pollutants under the Clean Air Act.
    An ice bridge connected to the Wilkins Ice Sheet of Antarctica breaks apart.
    Many of the world’s major rivers are found to be losing water. (Aiguo Dai, NCAR, Journal of Climate)
    2012
    The first phase of the Kyoto Protocol, an international environmental treaty created to limit the production of greenhouse gases, expires. Nations will have to draw up and enact a succesor treaty to further limit emissions, should they choose to do so.
    2020
    Flash floods will very likely increase across all parts of Europe. (IPCC)
    Less rainfall could reduce agriculture yields by up to 50 percent in some parts of the world. (IPCC)
    World population will reach 7.6 billion people. (U.S. Census Bureau)
    2030
    Diarrhea-related diseases will likely increase by up to 5 percent in low-income parts of the world. (IPCC)
    Up to 18 percent of the world’s coral reefs will likely be lost as a result of climate change and other environmental stresses. In Asian coastal waters, the coral loss could reach 30 percent. (IPCC)
    World population will reach 8.3 billion people. (U.S. Census Bureau)
    Warming temperatures will cause temperate glaciers on equatorial mountains in Africa to disappear. (Richard Taylor, University College London, Geophysical Research Letters:)
    In developing countries, the urban population will more than double to about 4 billion people, packing more people onto a given city’s land area. The urban populations of developed countries may also increase by as much as 20 percent. (World Bank: The Dynamics of Global Urban Expansion)
    The Arctic Sea could be ice-free in the summer. (James Overland, NOAA, Muyin Wang, University of Washington, Geophysical Research Letters)

  35. Don Hawkins said on August 8th, 2010 at 5:37pm #

    Worldwide the forests burn and so it goes.

    Jerusalem (CNN) — As Russia contends with hundreds of wildfires fueled by heat and drought, Israel is dealing with its own fire problem.
    According to the Jewish National Fund, about 100 acres of burned forests were added over the past weekend, bringing the total number of acres burned this year across Israel to 5,500. Thousands of acres of natural forest and woodlands have already burned this year.
    Yoram Levy of the Israel Fire and Rescue Services told CNN the cause for the fires is a combination of deliberate fires and negligence. The majority of the damages were at the Golan Heights and at the forests surrounding the area.

    Our amazing intelligence seems to have outstripped our instinct for survival. We plunder the earth hoping that accumulating material surplus will make up for the profound, unfathomable thing that we have lost. Arundhati Roy

  36. Don Hawkins said on August 8th, 2010 at 5:54pm #

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-08/china-risks-sacrificing-growth-as-energy-curbs-slow-factory-production.html

    Ah ha maybe China will be the first to stand up. Regardless it will take a lot of us. Come on is it not time to end the bullshit.

    “Bull”, meaning nonsense, dates from the 17th century, while the term “bullshit” has been used as early as 1915 in American slang, and came into popular usage only during World War II. The word “bull” itself may have derived from the Old French boul meaning “fraud, deceit” (Oxford English Dictionary. The term “horseshit” is a near synonym. Wiki

  37. teafoe2 said on August 8th, 2010 at 7:15pm #

    Lichen, you are an interesting blend of real insights and what Don Hawkins explains above, quote: “The term “horseshit” is a near synonym.” Sometimes you sound like somebody capable of participating in a reasonable discussion, but as long as you keep parroting the bs about how the Iraq war was caused by “Petrochemical corporations” you can’t be take seriously.

    Don Hawkins, thanks for all the feedback, I’ll come back to it in a minute, but just let me thank you for mentioning Bozh. I’d been wondering where he went. ??

    P McN, I agree with you about Raimundo, he is not a trustworthy source, has a bunch of “America First” axes he’s grinding. There are other sources which substantiate that many who eventually gained “fame” as Neocons earlier had been deeply involved in various Trotskyist splinters. I wasn’t speaking specifically of Kristol. It’s clear he had some involvement with the SWP youth org but to me it only matters as part of a larger pattern.

    Don — I have to get off this infernal instrument of the devil for a while so can’t respond to your posts as completely as they probably deserve. One point, I don’t think the Nat’l Geographic is necessarily a reliable source.

    The problem I have is that a lot of the climate change information I come across is obviously hype for somebody’s agenda. Like this cap & trade crap?

    And people I know, like this herbalist/midwife who sends me long dissertations on how to grow potatos & yams in pots, also send me stuff purporting to debunk a lot of the climate change information I see on TV etc.

    There’s no doubt the planet has been subjected to more abuse in the last 200 than all the rest of its career, all the plastic bottles in the ocean etc etc. But I haven’t been able to sort out the claims & counterclaims about Global Warming. Every now and then they show footage of hunks of iceshelf breaking off, but my rule of thumb is If It’s On TV It’s BS. Works pretty well so far.

    BTW I just got a headsup from Pulse Media, Col. Ann Wright wrote an Open Letter to Pres Obummer warning him against letting Izzy bomb Iran, cosigned by Ray McGovern & other ex-Intel Com types. I urge everybody to read it. long but exceeded my expectations. I’d fwd it to my list but Pulse doesn’t have a Printer Friendly link, just a bunch of Twitter etc crap.

    Well I hope Bozh is OK, at our age you never know. ??

  38. PatrickSMcNally said on August 9th, 2010 at 12:09am #

    > There are other sources which substantiate that many who eventually gained “fame” as Neocons earlier had been deeply involved in various Trotskyist splinters.

    They may recycle the same rumors, but not much else. Yhe article I had referenced above

    http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0304/0304neocontrot.txt

    covers most of what is known. Kristol is one of the only few people among neoconservatives who has even a tentative link to Trotskyism. There are a few others with some minor past connections that never went very deep, and that’s it.

  39. Deadbeat said on August 9th, 2010 at 2:14am #

    Tf2 writes …

    There’s no doubt the planet has been subjected to more abuse in the last 200 than all the rest of its career, all the plastic bottles in the ocean etc etc. But I haven’t been able to sort out the claims & counterclaims about Global Warming. Every now and then they show footage of hunks of iceshelf breaking off, but my rule of thumb is If It’s On TV It’s BS. Works pretty well so far.

    The part of TF2’s remarks that I emphasized is the problem that I have with “Global Warming”. It’s a debate that EXCLUDES the masses. If you are not an expert in the field there is no WAY to discern who telling the truth, who misleading, or whether the information is plan inconclusive.

    However the way I’ve seen this discussion being played out is rather suspect:

    [1] “Environmentalists” have used this argument to UNEQUALLY lay BLAME on humanity rather than on Capitalist production.

    [2] “Environmentalists” have used this argument to employ fear as an organizing tool.

    [3] The masses are in desperate need of resolving their IMMEDIATE problems not a problem that may or may not manifest decades from now.

    [4] Developing countries see this issue as a threat to their growth by Western countries and a tool of Western Imperialism.

    [5] The term “climate change” itself is too ambiguous. At first we were told it’s “global warming” now its “climate change”. And “climate change” happens every year — it’s called “seasons”.

    The amount of energy being devoted to “climate change” should be devoted to pollution and focused on confronting Capitalist production. But the “climate change” rhetoric doesn’t appear to be making that its number one priority.

    This doesn’t mean lichen climate change advocacy is incorrect. What it means is that if you seriously want to solve the climate change problem you’ll have to confront both Capitalism and Zionism because those two forces fully dominates the U.S. and is wrecking havoc with much of humanity today.

  40. Don Hawkins said on August 9th, 2010 at 3:55am #

    [3] The masses are in desperate need of resolving their IMMEDIATE problems not a problem that may or may not manifest decades from now.

    DB am not going to play a problem that may or may not manifest decades from now is an incredibly Fox new’s or CNBC thing to say. This is Earth DB not Zenon. We must now think in terms of years not decades. It does appear by 2013 a little shift from first to second gear so to speak. So far the masses are still in dreamland well I take that back probably 50 50 on the ones that know and those that don’t. If you think for one second that we the masses are all headed to the shinning city you are out of your mind. Let’s read this again.

    Our amazing intelligence seems to have outstripped our instinct for survival. We plunder the earth hoping that accumulating material surplus will make up for the profound, unfathomable thing that we have lost. Arundhati Roy
    If advanced spacefaring aliens exploit resources like humans we’d better hope they don’t find us anytime soon. Hawking

    Accumulating material surplus will make up for the profound, unfathomable thing that we have lost. What have we lost or just maybe never found? We are not the center of the Universe we are part of the Universe and we have for the last 10k years that should cover it with our amazing intelligence dug more holes on this planet than Carter has little liver pills and in order to dig those holes not only destroyed a large part of the eco system but ourselves war and other life on this planet. Well guess what we are all now finding out just how unintelligent we are granted a few at the top of the food chain would like us to think that’s not the truth but becoming much harder to do. We like civilizations before us just kept going and going not going to work well this time as we human’s seem to be getting bigger and bigger the Earth is staying the same size. If we decide to try using that amazing intelligence it is not going to be easy as we will need to slowdown and we human’s don’t seem to like that part. Remember years not decades and as our forests burn should give us all a clue there’s more. So just on the off chance what we now see with our own eye’s is real what’s the big plan for the masses there isn’t one at least not yet.

  41. Deadbeat said on August 9th, 2010 at 4:08am #

    Don Hawkin writes …

    DB am not going to play a problem that may or may not manifest decades from now is an incredibly Fox new’s or CNBC thing to say

    That’s a slippery slope Don. Fox and CNBC say those things and do so cynically. However Don you need to be realistic about what people under the yolk of Capitalism put as their priorities. If you are in imminent need of housing, food, health care, transportation, a job, money, etc those issues are going to get top priority from people — not “climate change”.

    My argument is not whether lichen or you are correct on this matter. If you and lichen are right — fantastic!

    My point is how are you going to get the ATTENTION of the masses because you are going to need them if you want to change how we produce, consume, who get access to resources and who does not, who pollutes and who does not.

    If tomorrow the government created a huge job program around nuclear energy or some other polluting form of energy, let’s be realistic Don you know damn well the public would take those (shitty) jobs if it means putting “food” (even if it is poisonous) on the table.

    So let’s be realistic and not kid ourselves. That’s really the basis of my critique.

  42. Don Hawkins said on August 9th, 2010 at 4:52am #

    I am being realistic let’s just take a look at how the game is still being played just on the off chance what we see with our own eye’s is real. I’ll bet at the top of the food chain high on the hill the top floor the big cheese say’s to his or her yes people don’t worry you are on the list. He or she say’s this maybe after a little air time got to keep those electrons moving in an air conditioned tent while having drinks and try the orange chicken. Maybe it’s said in one of there many 500,000 square foot houses to there gay chef or driver or secretary but in reality there is no list there is no plan some at the top might like to think there is but mere illusion. Look back in history is this uncommon well no it sure isn’t and yes we kept going say after Rome this time we really went and did it no second chance in that mere blink of an eye. So say we did try will a fund for off shore drilling safety do the trick while Rome is burning well no. How about think of it as kind of a war tax carbon and tax it hard research total focus a controlled slowdown take a little weight off so to speak farming you don’t ship food from 4,000 miles away all very radical ideas anyway have you tried the orange chicken you are on the list where did I put that must be here somewhere and the big question of all time and I mean all time how do we get this started to try for real. I know a reality show that start’s off with people of Earth we are in deep………………………………….who would like to stand up first how’s that orange chicken?

  43. Don Hawkins said on August 9th, 2010 at 6:01am #

    By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV (AP) – 27 minutes ago
    MOSCOW — Deaths in Moscow have doubled to an average of 700 people a day as the Russian capital is engulfed by poisonous smog from wildfires and a sweltering heat wave, a top health official said Monday.
    Moscow health chief Andrei Seltsovky blamed weeks of unprecedented heat and suffocating smog for the rise in mortality compared to the same time last year, Russian news agencies reported. He said city morgues were nearly overflowing, filled with 1,300 bodies, close to their capacity.
    Acrid smog blanketed Moscow for a six straight day Monday, with concentrations of carbon monoxide and other poisonous substances two to three times higher than what is considered safe. Those airborne pollutants reached a record over the weekend — exceeding the safe limit by nearly seven times.
    About 550 separate blazes were burning nationwide Monday, mainly across western Russia, including about 40 around Moscow, according to the Emergencies Ministry. Forest and peat bog fires have been triggered by the most intense heat wave in 130 years of record keeping.
    Alexander Frolov, head of Russia’s weather service, said judging by historic documents, this heat wave could be the worst in up to 1,000 years.
    “Our ancestors haven’t observed or registered a heat like that within 1,000 years,” Frolov said at a news conference. “This phenomenon is absolutely unique.”
    He said the heat in Moscow reflects the global climate’s increased volatility.

    ENERGY BALANCE

  44. teafoe2 said on August 11th, 2010 at 12:38pm #

    Patrick McN, I opened the link you provided, many thanks, very informative. Your knowledge of history is very impressive.

    I think Kristol was a little more involved with Trokstyism than might be gathered from your comment, since it seems he authored an autobiography which was entitled something like “The Life of a Trotskyist” or something similar. The mention of Trotsky was by then tongue in cheek.

    But I agree, most of the “trotsky to neocon” story is hyped by paleocons like Raimundo as carborundum for axes they’re grinding.

    It IS interesting to note the trajectories of erstwhile “Left”-orienatated figures like Horowitz & Hitchens. And how a onetime flaming Maoist like Bob Scheer could recede back into a successful career working for the LA Times & McClatchy. Such unexpected developments seem less surprising to me after what I’ve been learning about the now-defunct Yiddish culture…