Watching Israel Delegitimize the U.S.

The U.S.-Israeli relationship has long been America’s Achilles heel. Our first president warned against “entangled alliances” particularly when, as here, there’s a “passionate attachment.”

Our “special relationship” with this rogue state has placed the U.S. outside the same system of international law that we now seek to impose on others, including Iran.

Our handling of the current crisis on the Korean peninsula could restore our tattered reputation.

What’s the first issue that needs to be addressed?

Here’s where you the reader may well ask: “Do you mean the issue concerning the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center?” No, but nor is that question irrelevant to this latest crisis.

Here’s the second issue that must be addressed: to which nations has Israel transferred nuclear weapons or nuclear weapons technology? Is North Korea on the list?

That issue became relevant with the release of The Unspoken Alliance: Israel’s Secret Relationship with Apartheid South Africa. Archival research by author, Sasha Polakowsky-Suransky, uncovered “top secret” minutes of a military agreement signed in April 1975 between Shimon Peres, now president of Israel, and South Africa’s defense minister, P.W. Botha.

Though Israel denies the conclusions reached by reporters for The Guardian (U.K.), the agreement suggests an offer of nuclear weapons while its Apartheid regime was under international sanctions.

Israel was then building a surrogate arms industry in South Africa using what was, in practical effect, slave labor. That industry has since moved to Israel where it employs “guest workers.” Peres was responsible for building Israel’s nuclear program with help from France in the 1950s.

Some weeks before the offer, Israel and South Africa signed a covert agreement (code name Secment) governing their military alliance. In the subsequent meetings, “correct payload” was used to describe the nuclear warheads Israel would provide for a Jericho missile system. As The Guardian explained:

The use of a euphemism, the ‘correct payload’, reflects Israeli sensitivity over the nuclear issue and would not have been used had it been referring to conventional weapons… the only payload the South Africans would have needed to obtain from Israel was nuclear. The South Africans were capable of putting together other warheads.

South Africa did not go ahead with the deal it was offered though it did develop its own nuclear weapons, possibly with Israeli assistance. The Apartheid government revealed the program to Nelson Mandela when he became president.

In 1986, nuclear technician, Mordechai Vanunu, revealed Israel’s nuclear weapons program to the Sunday Times (London). Vanunu was kidnapped by Mossad agents in Rome and returned for trial in Israel. Sentenced to 18 years, he served 11 years in solitary confinement. On May 23rd, he was sentenced to another three months in prison for breaking the terms of his release by having unauthorized meetings with foreigners.

Evil Doers vs. Evil Doing

Even now Israel strives against all odds to maintain “ambiguity” about its nuclear weapons. But how can you offer nuclear weapons you don’t have?

Who provided nuclear technology to North Korea? That backward state, now nuclear-armed, was included in G.W. Bush’s post-911 “Axis of Evil” speech. Care to guess who wrote that speech?

Shortly thereafter the U.S. invaded Iraq to remove an Evil Doer. Only later did we learn that our “flawed” intelligence was “fixed” around a goal long sought by Israel as chronicled in A Clean Break, a strategy document written for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by a team of Israeli-Americans led by Richard Perle.

In 2001, Perle became chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Review Board.

The United Nations has long been scheduled to review the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to consider the creation of a Middle East free of nuclear weapons. As the date approached, the world community experienced a well-timed torpedo attack on a South Korean warship, reportedly by a North Korean submarine.

In the midst of these negotiations, mainstream media has been flooding the national consciousness with power-of-association stories about Iran, its nuclear program and even its links to North Korea. Tehran, of course, was the third member in the trio of Bush-era Evil Doers.

News outlets controlled by Israeli-American, Rupert Murdoch, are particularly active, including Fox News and The Wall Street Journal.

Is it true that Tel Aviv transferred to Pyongyang a German-made submarine? If so, does that qualify as evil doing?

Perhaps here is a good place to pose an out-of-sequence question: What about the collapse of Building 7?

Master Myth Makers

Does Israel routinely transfer war materiel to nations subject to international sanctions?

That would help explain their status as the world’s third largest arms exporter. The U.S. holds first place with Russia second. Israel and France vie for third and fourth, trailed by the U.K. and China in the Dirty Half Dozen.

If Israel has an extensive arsenal of nuclear weapons, why does the U.S not insist on inspections?

How does U.S. protection of Israel’s illegal conduct advance U.S. interests?

How is our conduct consistent with the behavior we are now pressing on Iran?

What is so valuable about the U.S.-Israeli relationship that we should sacrifice our credibility to cover-up violations of international law that make us appear guilty by association?

By law isn’t the U.S. obliged to support U.N. sanctions for Israel?

Why discredit the U.S. and undermine the stature of the United Nations? Wasn’t the U.N. the post-WWII organization founded in large part by the U.S. to discourage just such behavior?

Serial Provocations and Murderous Misdirection

Instead of sanctions, what do we see instead? Misdirection and intimidation.

The Internet is awash with Men in Black accounts featuring the usual array of conspiracies. Elvis may yet be blamed for a Korean peninsula incident that could ignite a nuclear war in the region.

How long before we see a story blaming Hezbollah terrorists led by the Pakistan Taliban aboard an Iranian submarine advised by Syrian nuclear scientists and Palestinian strategists?

Or aliens.

The stage has been set for another 911, possibly featuring a nuclear incident. A series of “plausible” Evil Doers have been prominently featured in assorted “terrorist incidents.”

Enough pre-staging has been done that Americans again feel insecure following the media coverage given the Ft. Hood shooting, the Christmas Day Bomber and now the Times Square Terrorist.

One small problem: none of these storylines hold up under close scrutiny. But then that’s not the point. Neither did the “intelligence” on which we relied to wage war in Iraq in response to the provocation of 911. It didn’t need to be true, just believable.

Time to Redo the Report

Anyone of substance associated with the report of the 911 Commission knows we still need a good faith investigation. Mainstream Europeans routinely call for it. Those demands are routinely couched in code due to the perils facing those in the EU who question our “special relationship.”

Instead, commentators ask about the “collapse” of Building 7. Good question. Also a fair question. The answer could lead somewhere useful. Therefore, don’t ask, don’t tell.

This entangled alliance has been an exercise in deceit since a Christian-Zionist president, a Democrat, was induced to extend recognition to an enclave of extremists.

Harry Truman dismissed the concerns of the Joint Chiefs who warned him about their “fanatical concepts” and their plans for “military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East.”

We were deceived by our own better nature to embrace a relationship that has long been at odds with our national interest. The durability of the relationship has long failed to pass muster as either rational or consistent with our values. The relationship has changed for the worse who we are as a nation.

Yet somehow the relationship endures. Along with the perceived legitimacy of this “state.”

Deception and Self-Deceit

Its persistence can be traced to the strength of a lobby that, to date, has escaped registration as a foreign agent. Those known for their skill at waging war “by way of deception” have routinely betrayed the nation that first befriended and most reliably defended them.

Even when a Christian-Zionist president, a Republican, led us to war on fixed intelligence, we were unable to identity the common source of our troubles. Some blamed G.W Bush. Others now blame Barack Obama. Both critiques miss the point. This treachery is now systemic and thoroughly embedded in both political parties.

Even now, an undisclosed media bias blocks Americans from the facts they require to make an informed choice about this relationship. And about the legitimacy of a transnational operation that murders with impunity (as in Dubai) and provokes with pleasure — anywhere they please.

Americans are now emerging from many quarters to resist the influence wielded on (and from within) our government by special interests. This special relationship often tops the list.

Many supporters of Israel have been deceived to believe that this relationship is in their best interest. The facts confirm otherwise. Like the nation itself, they too were “the mark” in this long-running fraud.

We have been seduced by those masterful at deceit to freely embrace the very forces that delegitimized us as a nation and collapsed our economy from within.

Which brings me back to the question: what about Building 7?

Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association, Democracy at Risk, and The Ownership Solution. Read other articles by Jeff, or visit Jeff's website.

5 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. bozh said on May 27th, 2010 at 12:04pm #

    For new readers i wld like to repeat this simplicity. If s’mone can render it more simple or illuminating, s/he’s welcome to it:
    Ever since clerico-noble class of people utterly destroyed our civil and civilized society, we’ve had all knds of ills.

    And there is much more of that to come. That we don’t know whether israel has WMD or not, proves beyond any doubt that only extremely evil society wld tolerate or approve of that. tnx

    Only an evil society wld a-bomb, enslave, enserf, lynch, kill ‘alien’ people.
    Is this so dificcult to see? tnx

  2. Mulga Mumblebrain said on May 28th, 2010 at 2:24am #

    Much as it is impossible to deny that Zionism has had a malign effect on the US, as it has had across the world, I must disagree that it delegitimises the US.The US delegitimised itself years before the establishment of Israel. The decades of support for brutal psychopaths from Somoza to Mobutu,numbering in the scores, the barbarous wars of aggression from the Philippines to Iraq, always involving mass murder,atrocities, pitiless destruction and raw, racist,murderousness and the brutal thuggishness and intimidation of US foreign policy revealed the true nature of ‘Americanism’ long ago. The alliance between the US and Israel, founded on shared delusions of racial and civilizational supremacism and in the unique money power of US Jews, who control the financial, media and political cess-pools of the US, is the greatest force for evil the world has ever seen,and ever will see, because one side-effect of the machinations of these terror states and their various stooges in the West and in the corrupt Quisling elites they impose wherever they can, is that the ecological collapse and resource depletion Armageddons remain resolutely unaddressed, long past the points of no return.

  3. bozh said on May 28th, 2010 at 6:44am #

    Rich people influence gov’ts more than poor people. And US system of rule allows or has been constructed deliberately so as to permit and even urge the rich people to govern more than poor people.

    The system does allow all rich people to donate money to politicians. To me, that amounts to abuse of money.
    But the system [a set of laws, really] also allows inequality under law; abolishes right to life, education, to be informed, etc.

    And this system became halowed over time; probably supported by 98% of US pop.
    Actually, ‘jews’, as a cultish set of people, may not support US system of rule as much as other [non]cultists.
    It may be that 99.99%+ of US multi-m’naires and b’naires support the system!
    So, once again it is matter of whether we use money as a tool or as weapon.

    Now, beating bush and around bushes or beating on ‘jews’ more than other 98% makes no sense.
    All of them are complying with US laws or interpretation of them. In any case, blaming bush, clinton, nixon, johnson, lieberman, pearle, wolfowitz, et al amounts to beating around bushes.
    It stresses importance of individuals and diminishes importance of a collection.
    And this subterfuge is also of the system: the more one blames or criticises individuals, the more system likes it.

    Of course, there is no a system w.o. people. In fact, it wld be better, to study behavior of people rather than study a set of laws.
    One can study laws all one wants and if one is adept in evaluating them, one wld be totally at sea as to what any law means.

    But it always means what the judiciary [part of the system] means. And the circle is forever closed. It is self-sealed!
    If people wld evaluate the fact that meanings are inside the skins of people and not in words [including verbal laws], wld solve for all time this age-old riddle and we wld start back on a trip to our civil and civilized societies we once had.

    A much civilized society wld be in an equilibrium bwtn collective and individual rights and duties. But as long as a society is abolishing right to life [soldiers are innocent; shld not be dying abroad nor shld people die beacuse they cannot obtain medical care], denies education-information, expect an even more vicious society to develop.

    oh my god, god8xy, how uncivilized we are! And people want to patch these old pants?! tnx

  4. mary said on May 29th, 2010 at 10:31am #

    Israel rejects Middle East nuclear talks plan
    Saturday, 29 May 2010 18:10 UK

    Israeli leaders do not comment on the country’s nuclear status.

    *Israel says it will not take part in a conference aimed at achieving a nuclear-arms free Middle East, proposed at a UN meeting in New York.

    Nearly 200 nations, signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), backed plans for the meeting in 2012.


    *Well they would say that, wouldn’t they?

  5. Mulga Mumblebrain said on May 31st, 2010 at 8:36am #

    Yes, mary, but the nearly 200 countries and the 99.7% of the human population they represent are just ‘two-legged animals’. The only voice that counts is that of the global ‘shadow hegemon’, which, through its unrivalled money power, controls the West and orders its killers to destroy country after country. They kill quite a few themselves, too. What makes it even more insane,more wicked,is that it is only a fraction of Jewry,the fundamentalist, religiously-inspired zealots, in politics, the military and intelligence, and their billionaire enforcers, who drive this cavalcade of crime, violence and pitiless sadism onwards, to global religious war and mass extermination. It is good that so many decent Jews reject Zionism and its Nazi ideology and behaviour, and tragic that they, like the rest of humanity, appear powerless to stop the evil psychopaths.