The 10 Worst Corporations of 2008

What a year for corporate criminality and malfeasance! As the Multinational Monitor compiled its annual list of the 10 Worst Corporations, it would have been easy to restrict the 2008 awardees to Wall Street firms.

But the rest of the corporate sector was not on good behavior during 2008 either, and didn’t deserve to escape justified scrutiny.

So, in keeping with the tradition of highlighting diverse forms of corporate wrongdoing, the list includes only one financial company out of the 10 worst. Here, presented in alphabetical order, are the 10 Worst Corporations of 2008.

AIG: Money for Nothing

There’s surely no one party responsible for the ongoing global financial crisis. But if you had to pick a single responsible corporation, there’s a very strong case to make for American International Group (AIG), which has already sucked up more than $150 billion in taxpayer support. Through “credit default swaps,” AIG basically collected insurance premiums while making the ridiculous assumption that it would never pay out on a failure — let alone a collapse of the entire market it was insuring. When reality set in, the roof caved in.

Cargill: Food Profiteers

When food prices spiked in late 2007 and through the beginning of 2008, countries and poor consumers found themselves at the mercy of the global market and the giant trading companies that dominate it. As hunger rose and food riots broke out around the world, Cargill saw profits soar, tallying more than $1 billion in the second quarter of 2008 alone.

In a competitive market, a grain-trading middleman would not make super-profits. In fact, rising prices would crimp the middleman’s profit margin. But the global grain trade is not competitive, and the legal rules of the global economy — devised at the behest of Cargill and friends — ensure that poor countries will be dependent on, and at the mercy of, the global grain traders.

Chevron: “We Can’t Let Little Countries Screw Around With Big Companies”

In 2001, Chevron swallowed up Texaco. It was happy to absorb Texaco’s revenue streams. It has been less willing to take responsibility for Texaco’s ecological and human-rights abuses.

In 1993, 30,000 indigenous Ecuadorians filed a class-action suit in U.S. courts, alleging that over a 20-year period Texaco had poisoned the land where they live and the waterways on which they rely, allowing billions of gallons of waste to spill and leaving hundreds of waste pits unlined and uncovered. Chevron had the case thrown out of U.S. courts on the grounds that it should be litigated in Ecuador, closer to where the alleged harms occurred. But now the case is going badly for Chevron in Ecuador — Chevron may be liable for more than $7 billion. So, the company is lobbying the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to impose trade sanctions on Ecuador if the Ecuadorian government does not make the case go away.

“We can’t let little countries screw around with big companies like this — companies that have made big investments around the world,” a Chevron lobbyist said to Newsweek in August. (Chevron subsequently stated that the comments were not approved.)

CNPC: Fueling Violence in Darfur

Sudan has been able to laugh off existing and threatened sanctions for the slaughter it has perpetrated in Darfur because of the huge support it receives from China, channeled above all through the Sudanese relationship with the China National Petroleum Corp. (CNPC).

“The relationship between CNPC and Sudan is symbiotic,” notes the Washington, D.C.-based Human Rights First in a March 2008 report, “Investing in Tragedy.” “Not only is CNPC the largest foreign investor in the Sudanese oil sector, but Sudan is CNPC’s largest market for overseas investment.”

Oil money may have fueled violence in Darfur. “The profitability of Sudan’s oil sector has developed in close chronological step with the violence in Darfur,” notes Human Rights First.

Constellation Energy Group: Nuclear Operators

Although it seems too dangerous, too expensive and too centralized to make sense as an energy source, nuclear power won’t go away, thanks to equipment makers and utilities that find ways to make the public pay and pay.

Constellation Energy Group, the operator of the Calvert Cliffs nuclear plant in Maryland — a company recently involved in a startling, partially derailed scheme to price-gouge Maryland consumers — plans to build a new reactor at Calvert Cliffs, potentially the first new reactor built in the United States since the near-meltdown at Three Mile Island in 1979.

It has lined up to take advantage of U.S. government-guaranteed loans for new nuclear construction, available under the terms of the 2005 Energy Act. The company acknowledges it could not proceed with construction without the government guarantee.

Dole: The Sour Taste of Pineapple

A 1988 land reform effort in the Philippines has proven to be a fraud. Plantation owners helped to draft the law and invented ways to circumvent its alleged purpose. Dole pineapple workers are among those paying the price.

Under the land reform, Dole’s land was divided among its workers and others who had claims on the land prior to the pineapple giant. Workers were then required to form labor cooperatives. However, wealthy landlords maneuvered to gain control of these cooperatives, and then focused more on maximizing profits than providing fair wages and healthy working conditions, according to an October report by Washington, D.C.-based International Labor Rights Forum (ILRF).

Dole has since slashed its regular workforce and replaced them with contract workers from these labor cooperatives. Contract workers are paid under a quota system, and earn about $1.85 a day, according to ILRF.

GE: Creative Accounting

In June, former New York Times reporter David Cay Johnston reported on internal General Electric (GE) documents that appeared to show the company had engaged in a long-running effort to evade taxes in Brazil. In a lengthy report in Tax Notes International, Johnston reported on a GE subsidiary’s scheme to invoice suspiciously high sales volume for lighting equipment in lightly populated Amazon River regions of the country. These sales would avoid the higher value added taxes (VAT) of urban states, where sales would be expected to be greater.

Johnston wrote that the state-level VAT at issue, based on the internal documents he reviewed, appeared to be less than $100 million. But, he speculated, the overall scheme could have involved much more.

Johnston did not identify the source that gave him the internal GE documents, but GE has alleged it was a former company attorney, Adriana Koeck. GE fired Koeck in January 2007 for what it says were “performance reasons.”

Imperial Sugar: 14 Dead

On Feb. 7, 2008, an explosion rocked the Imperial Sugar refinery in Port Wentworth, Ga., near Savannah. Days later, when the fire was finally extinguished and search-and-rescue operations completed, the horrible human toll was finally known: 14 dead, dozens badly burned and injured.

As with almost every industrial disaster, it turns out the tragedy was preventable. The cause was accumulated sugar dust, which, like other forms of dust, is highly combustible.

A month after the Port Wentworth explosion, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) inspectors investigated another Imperial Sugar plant, in Gramercy, La. They found one-fourth-inch to 2-inch accumulations of dust on electrical wiring and machinery. They found as much as 48inch accumulations on workroom floors.

Imperial Sugar knew of the conditions in its plants. It had in fact taken some measures to address its operations prior to the explosion. The company brought in a new vice president to clean up operations in November 2007, and he took some important measures to improve conditions. But it wasn’t enough. The vice president told a congressional committee that top-level management had told him to tone down his demands for immediate action.

Philip Morris International: Unshackled

The old Philip Morris no longer exists. In March, the company formally divided itself into two separate entities: Philip Morris USA, which remains a part of the parent company Altria, and Philip Morris International. Philip Morris USA sells Marlboro and other cigarettes in the United States. Philip Morris International tramples the rest of the world.

Philip Morris International has already signaled its initial plans to subvert the most important policies to reduce smoking and the death toll from tobacco-related disease (now at 5 million lives a year). The company has announced plans to inflict on the world an array of new products, packages and marketing efforts. These are designed to undermine smoke-free workplace rules, defeat tobacco taxes, segment markets with specially flavored products, offer flavored cigarettes to appeal to youth and overcome marketing restrictions.

Roche: “Saving Lives Is Not Our Business”

The Swiss company Roche makes a range of HIV-related drugs. One of them is enfuvirtide, sold under the brandname Fuzeon. Fuzeon brought in $266 million to Roche in 2007, though sales are declining.

Roche charges $25,000 a year for Fuzeon. It does not offer a discount price for developing countries.

Like most industrialized countries, South Korea maintains a form of price controls. The national health insurance program sets prices for medicines, and the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs listed Fuzeon at $18,000 a year. South Korea’s per capita income is roughly half that of the United States. Instead of providing Fuzeon at South Korea’s listed level — and still turning a profit — Roche refuses to make the drug available in South Korea.

South Korean activists report that the head of Roche Korea told them, “We are not in business to save lives, but to make money. Saving lives is not our business.”

Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Multinational Monitor, and director of Essential Action. Copyright © 2007 Robert Weissman Read other articles by Robert, or visit Robert's website.

11 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. rosemarie jackowski said on February 3rd, 2009 at 1:16pm #

    I would like to add Monsanto and Raytheon to the list – also the government of the US which is nothing more than a corporation pretending to be a republic.

  2. albert said on February 3rd, 2009 at 4:06pm #


  3. euclid said on February 3rd, 2009 at 6:59pm #

    I blame Albert for everything.

  4. Joseph Conrad said on February 3rd, 2009 at 10:10pm #

    These 10 ( plus MONSANTO, DOW & RAYTHEON) will continue to INFECT the US & World’s Food Chain as long as American Citizens LET THEM. Who are these ‘Citizens’? They’re just TOO OBLIVIOUS, STUPID, HAPPILY UNAWARE, UNINFORMED & COWARDLY to do more than down their 6-PACK OF COORS, hit Church on Sunday and make it to their job 5 days a week. The WEALTHY OLD WHITEBOY 1%-ERS who RUN America hope & PRAY dullard Americans NEVER WAKE UP & SMELL THE COFFEE- right in their damn cup!!

  5. rosemarie jackowski said on February 4th, 2009 at 10:21am #

    Joseph…I agree. It is us, WE, who are the stupid ones. While so many were saying that the Bush administration was stupid, they were laughing all the way to the bank.
    AND now what about Lynn from Raytheon being appointed by Obama???????
    It is not THEM. It is US. WE need to wake up. That will not happen as long as the masses are ‘hopenotized’.

  6. rosemarie jackowski said on February 4th, 2009 at 10:22am #

    P.S. I blame the voters for everything.

  7. zhann said on February 6th, 2009 at 4:15pm #

    As you all well know, it’s the corporations that run the country. The president is merely a figurehead. He is given the ability to push campaign promises, and various agendas, but the corporations are the ones that put him there, and the corporations are the ones that dictate terms. Different presidents are ruled by different corporations, but regardless, the President is simply a puppet.

    If we really want change, we must elect officials that aren’t backed by such powers. The ideal candidate for president is one who doesn’t want to be president, but is persuaded to by the desire to help his country. How does a person like that compete with a billion dollar campaign backed by corporations? He can’t. Its time for a new system to elect our officials. Senators, Congressman, Mayors, Governors and of course the President need to be people that have no ties to businesses, have no interest in business, and only care about the welfare of the people.

    This is a dream that will never come to pass in a capitalist environment.

  8. kalidas said on February 7th, 2009 at 7:19pm #

    Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.
    H. L. Mencken

  9. Jeremy said on June 29th, 2009 at 8:44am #

    To vote on the worst corporations of 2009 (it’s oddly fun):

  10. Karl Stoll said on August 29th, 2009 at 2:12am #

    I have to agree with those who voted for Monsanto. Perhaps it did not make the list because it has been so evil for so long it didn’t stand out in 2008. Monsanto is patenting all the seeds in the world with the long term goal of controlling food supply. They genetically modify food in unnatural ways. Genes from animals were never intended to be infused into tomatos. Farmers are sued by Monsanto after their genetically modified plants cross with normal strains. Farmers as a group need to sue Monsanto for creating weeds which contaminate natural strains.

  11. Hank said on November 13th, 2009 at 5:41pm #

    I believe that Constellation should be taken off and replaced with Monsanto. The legacy of GMO will stay on this planet indefinitely so they should be added. As for nuclear energy, it is actually rather safe and less harmful than coal or other fossil fuel power plants. I would prefer to see more wind and solar, but until then nuclear would be a nice thing because it is carbon neutral and although the waste does stay around a long time, there is very little of it compared to billions of pounds of CO2. Instances like Chernobyl happened because the Soviets were incompetent and I’m sure we can do better now.