Barack Obama: “America’s First Jewish President”

Obama asks Shimon Peres: “What can I do for Israel?”

Haaretz, November 17, 2008

The UN Special Rappateur on Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories (Richard Falk) has said Israel’s policies there amount to a crime against humanity…He said the UN must act to protect the Palestinian population suffering what he called ‘collective punishment’…He said the International Criminal Court should also investigate whether the Israeli civilian leaders and military commanders for the Gaza siege should be indicted and prosecuted for violations of international criminal law.

BBC News, December 10, 2008

We need to ratchet up tough but direct diplomacy with Iran, making very clear to them than their development of nuclear weapons would be unacceptable, that their funding of terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hizbullah, their threats against Israel are contrary to everything we believe in…We may have to tighten up those sanctions…and give them a clear choice…whether they want to do this the hard way or the easy way.

— President-Elect Obama on NBC Meet the Press, December 7, 2008

Introduction

According to a nationally prominent Zionist spokesperson, former Congressman, Federal Judge, White House Counsel to President Bill Clinton and early backer of Obama, Abner Mikvner, “Barack Obama is the first Jewish President”. Mikvner’s affirmation reflects both Obama’s one-sided and longstanding commitment to the State of Israel and loyalty to the Zionist Power Configuration (ZPC) in the United States, as well as the long-term and successful effort of a network of financially and politically powerful Jewish Zionists to ‘embed’ Obama to their ‘Israel First’ political apparatus. What is striking about the latter is the demeaning and arrogant claims made by some leading Jewish Zionist about their ‘central roles’ in the making of Obama’s professional and political careers – in effect denying the President-Elect any credit for his own academic or professional success. (Historically this has been mirrored in the continuous claims of some American Jews to have fought and won the battle of Civil Rights in the 60’s on behalf of African Americans – essentially denying black Americans any independent political role in their own struggle.) Even their personal flattery about his ‘wisdom’, ‘brilliance’ and ‘intellectual acuity’ is always linked with his unconditional support of the State of Israel. One can envision how quickly his Zionist colleagues would replace their plaudits with crude insults regarding his intelligence if he suggested Israel end its starvation blockade of Gaza… Needless to say the Zionists know their man, as they confidently proclaim, he is a cautious and prudent politician, who measures power before he speaks, especially as he has filled the White House, economic councils and security apparatus with Zionist zealots.

The Making and Re-Making of Obama

The Chicago Jewish News, a nationally prominent Israel-First propaganda organ, published a lengthy article on ‘Obama and the Jews’ by Pauline Dubkin (October 24, 2008), which quotes approvingly a ‘long-time Jewish observer of the political scene’, who declared that, “Jews made him (Obama). Wherever you look there is a Jewish presence.”

This is not merely the usual arrogant self-aggrandizing boasts of a Zionist power broker, with which we are constantly bombarded on so many political topics, this reflects an important part of what Obama has become, especially in advancing his latter day political ambitions. The Zionist self-promoters (ZSP), ever ready to take credit for any success (no matter how notorious and immoral) – Wall Street speculators, Ivy League professors, Pentagon militarists, cultural gurus and even the key patrons of art forms like jazz and constantly rewrite history (or biography in the case of Obama) to maximize their self-importance in all aspects of American life. The ZSP conveniently fail to mention in their articles that Obama’s white Gentile grandmother gave him the intellectual nurturing and encouragement and diligently petitioned for scholarships for him to attend elite private schools, which formed the basis for his intellectual skills to write, speak and reason as an educated man. The ZSP exclude from their ‘revisionist and Judaized’ biography of Obama, the central importance of Reverend Jeremiah Wright who transformed Obama from an elite Ivy university graduate into an effective social activist. Obama was able to participate and get involved in community organizing in Chicago’s African-American neighborhoods because of Wright’s endorsement and broad credibility. If it were not for Rev. Wright, Obama would never have had a social base or organizational experience to engage in Chicago politics. It is only after Obama had gained these skills and popular appeal that the Zionist politicos noticed him and went to work on his ego and ambitions, recruiting him to their pro-Israel agenda and financing his political career.

The Zionist re-write of his biography has gone curiously unchallenged by Obama. To suit his new mentors, the Israel-First ideologues and financial backers, he has willfully discarded and insulted his former mentors, as well as any current policy advisers and political colleagues who doesn’t adhere to the Zionist line of unconditional support for Israel. Two cases come immediately to mind. When leading Zionist ideologues objected to the presence of Zbigniew Brzezinski and Robert Malley, among Obama’s foreign policy advisors, the Zionists in Obama’s inner circle immediately marginalized them with his approval. When the notorious torture-promoting Zionofascist Harvard Law Professor, Alan Dershowitz raised a howl about former US President Jimmy Carter (a principled critic of Israel’s apartheid policies) speaking at the Democratic Party Convention (following a century-long political tradition of honoring former presidents) the Zionist operatives blatantly humiliated the elderly Carter by denying him even a five-minute speech – with Obama’s approval. ‘Professor’ Dershowitz publicly crowed about his success and power over the Democratic nominee Obama in censoring the former President.

The conversion and promotion of Obama as an Israel-Firster is an excellent case study of the methods the ZPC has used to build a near invincible power base in the US political system. The construction of the ZPC is not the result of a cabal with a preplanned centrally controlled operation. Obama’s conversion began through an ideologically diverse, individual, family and community-based effort. As Obama rose from local to national political office, Zionist promotion evolved from local into a nationally organized and concerted effort including campaign funding, business career appointments and paid propaganda and indoctrination junkets to Israel.

The ZPC offers positive inducements for the ‘recruitable’ and threats of retaliation and intimidation via media slanders and systematic public pillory through most Jewish communal organizations for the public political critics of Israel who remain recalcitrant and refuse to toe the Israel-First line.

Turning Obama into an Israel-Firster, according to the Chicago Jewish News article, began during his studies at Harvard Law School where he was ‘spotted’ by a Zionist professor, Martha Minow, as “smart, promising, and politically ambitious” and a likely recruit. The professor proudly recounts how she contacted family members, including her father, a major Democratic powerbroker, and fellow Zionists who ran a law firm in Chicago and recommended they hire the Obama. In brief, the first step in Zionist recruitment was using a prestigious academic post for initial contact, followed by a promise of career advancement through a professional network.

The next step was to introduce Obama to an association of ‘friends and neighbors in the Jewish Community including prominent Zionist financial supporters. Obama’s early promoters played a key role in convincing him that his political future depended on Zionist allies and that support depended on his total commitment to an Israel-First agenda. As Obama’s ties with his Zionist-liberal backers in the Democratic Party thickened, his links to black community organizing and his pastor and former mentor, the progressive African-American minister, Reverend Jeremiah Wright weakened. By the end of the 1990’s, Obama was firmly embedded in the liberal Zionist Democratic Party network and through it he teamed up with two key Zionist figures who were crucial to his presidential campaign: David Axelrod, Obama’s chief political strategist since 2002 and the chief architect and tactician of his presidential campaign in 2008 and Bettylu Salzman, daughter of Phillip Klutznick, a billionaire real estate developer, slumlord and zealous Israel-Firster. Salzman/Klutznick admits she never would have bankrolled and promoted Obama simply because of ‘his smarts’ or liberal politics if he hadn’t pledged his commitment to Israel’s interests. She states, “Obviously I’m not going to support someone who is opposed to Israel and what it stands for. He’s right on all the issues when it comes to Israel. He is in exactly the same place (Hillary) Clinton is, maybe stronger. He’s a clearer thinker.” (Chicago Jewish News, October 24, 2008) While Obama served in the Illinois Senate, he shared an office with an Orthodox Jew and fanatical Israel-Firster, Ira Silverstein, who boasts of his role in ‘educating’ Obama about Jewish Orthodoxy and more important “shared pro-Israel feelings” to the point that … “When Silverstein sponsored numerous resolutions condemning PLO bombings Obama eagerly signed on as a co-sponsor.” (ibid)

Fully embedded in the Zionist Power Configuration of Chicago, Obama was advised by the Axelrods, Klutznicks and other key strategists to make the obligatory ritual pilgrimage to Israel and pay obeisance to its leaders in the course of his Senate campaign. During his trip to Israel, two years later in 2006, Obama was accompanied and guided by the executive vice-president of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago. Under Zionist guidance, Obama ‘connected’ with the Israeli state, totally ignoring the plight of the Palestinians who were being savagely repressed by the Israel Army and assaulted on a daily basis by Zion-Fascist settlers. Obama returned a thoroughly committed Zionist African-American politician.

With the Israeli-ZPC certificate of approval, Obama’s financial base of support widened to include some of the wealthiest pro-Israel Jewish Americans in the Midwest including Lester Crown, whose son, James Crown headed Obama’s financial campaign in Illinois. According to Crown (pater), “From the time I met him, the times we talked about Israel and we talked about it several times, he has been an ardent backer of Israel’s defense position (sic), Israel’s security position.” (Ibid)

To those Zionfascists who demand that Israel annex all of Palestine and expel ‘the Arabs’ and were disturbed by Obama’s passing reference to a two-state solution, Crown assured them that Obama’s proposal was couched in such outrageously impossible demands for concessions from the Palestinians that it was a dead letter.

Not all Jews accept this view of a Zionist-embedded Obama: Some racists reject him as an untrustworthy and unqualified ‘Schvartze’ because of his ‘very close intimate relationship’ with Reverent Jeremiah Wright. The Zionist-influenced mass media took their cue from the far-right and orchestrated a hate campaign against Reverend Wright and his links to Obama. The ‘liberal Zionists’, who strategized and ran Obama’s presidential campaign, easily convinced Obama to publicly dissociate himself from his former minister and mentor of the 1980’s. Obama complied. However, the alliance of the Republican Right and Zionfascists demanded Obama make a public denunciation of the Minister. The liberal Zionists prepared the script, which Obama recited, issuing a vicious condemnation of Rev. Wright and specifically listed Wright’s defense of the sovereignty and self-determination of the Palestinians as one of his ‘crimes’.

Obama had crossed the River Jordan. His capitulation to the Zionofascists was the inevitable consequence of his intimate and longstanding ties to his liberal-Zionist backers. The public purging and scourging of a renowned African-American Christian theologian of the oppressed was only the beginning of the Zionist makeover of Obama as the first Jewish (or better Zionist) President of the United States. It was followed by further purges of any ‘centrist’ or ‘realist’ establishment adviser, who might at any time in the past have issued the mildest criticism of Israel’s policies or even praised or associated with any other critic of Israel or the Jewish Lobby in the US. It was ‘guilt by association’.

The Zionofascists soon pressed their campaign to force Obama’s liberal-Zionists to purge Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Cold Warrior National Security Adviser to former President Jimmy Carter, Samantha Power, author and lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and Robert Malley, a former Clinton adviser for their perceived crimes against Zionism. Brzezinski was accused of advocating what he called “an even-handed Middle East policy”, something clearly ‘anti-Semitic’ in the eyes of the unconditional supporters of Israel who dominate the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations (PMAJO). Worse still he praised the Walt-Mearsheimer book critical of the Israel Lobby, a capital offense in the eyes of most of the Jewish political spectrum. Power and Malley also transgressed the Israel-First line. Although Brzezinski later recanted his praise of Professors Walt and Mearsheimers’ study, he and the other members of the ‘objectionable three’ foreign policy specialists were marginalized and excluded from having any input on policy issues related to Middle East.

Control of Obama’s Middle East policy was taken over by Dennis Ross, a virulent Zionist advocate of Israel’s ultra-militaristic policies, including an armed preemptive attack on Iranian nuclear and military installations. Ross is an unconditional supporter of the Israeli starvation siege of the 1.5 million residents of the Gaza Strip and fully backed Israel’s savage air attacks against civilian targets in Lebanon. Obama’s appointment of Ross is the clearest guarantee to all Zionists, liberal, orthodox or fascist, that US policy in the Middle East will continue to be subordinated to the interests of the Israeli State and its military.

Obama’s purge of any and all moderate voices on Middle East policy, his placement of fanatical Israel-Firsters in most key positions in his campaign and new Administration reflects his long-term, deep immersion into the Zionist Power Configuration. The result is a “Jewish President” – in the sense that most key White House, economic and security appointments reflect pre-election Zionist power in the making, indoctrination and scripting of the Obama candidacy.

The Configuration of the ‘Jewish President’

One of Obama’s longest supporters, Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, provides a clue to Obama’s affinity for Zionist appointments. According to Rabbi Wolf, “Obama is embedded in the Jewish world.” While the Rabbi is presumptuous to assume that all Jews subscribe to his own Israel-First views, he is absolutely correct if he is referring to the Jewish-Zionist world.

Nothing better explains Obama’s selection of demonstrably failed economists and security officials than his long-term, large-scale links to the ZPC.

Obama started with the appointments of dual US-Israeli citizen, Illinois Congressman Rahm Emmanuel and Zionist David Axelrod to top White House posts, as well as Lawrence Summers (long-time Harvard ally of the Judeo-fascist, torture advocate Alan Dershowitz) as chief White House economic adviser. Summers is a life-time Israel-Firster, who used his presidency at Harvard University as a bully pulpit to attack a student-faculty group critical of Israeli policies in the Occupied Terrtories. As the former Treasury Secretary under the Clinton regime he was a key architect of the speculator-dominated financial system, which is currently in total collapse. In line with the ‘Jewish Presidency’, Obama named one of the foremost, unconditional Israel-Firsters to be his key Middle East policymaker – Dennis Ross, a leading Zionist ideologue and co-author of a presidential position paper advocating pre-emptive war with Iran. Ross is the pivotal Zionist figure in Obama’s entourage and his appointment is the guarantee for the 52 Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations (PMAJO) that the Obama regime will follow and support with American guns and American tax-payer money every Israeli war crime, assault or invasion on its Arab and Parsi-speaking regional neighbors. Ross, Axelrod, Summers, Emmanuel and their craven followers in Congress together with the AIPAC and the entire Zionist community-based network will ensure that Obama is inextricably ‘embedded’ in their agenda. They will not allow the publication or support of any intelligence investigation, judicial inquiry or United Nations report, which challenges Israel’s occupation of Palestine and promotion of pre-emptive war with Iran based on the fabrication of data about its so-called nuclear threat. Each and every recently appointed Zionists has condemned the United Nations and International Atomic Agency reports refuting Israel’s phony claims of an Iranian nuclear weapons program. They will make sure that newly appointed National Security Adviser, General James Jones will never bring up or make public his highly critical internal report based his on-site investigation of Israel’s crimes against the civilian Palestinian population in the Occupied Territories.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, President Obama and Defense Secretary Gates are so deeply ‘embedded’ in the Zionist network and so deeply infused with the Israel-First ideology that ZPC ‘pressure’ will not be necessary. The three are, in effect, Zionized Zombies, eager to fawn and truckle, even to grotesque excesses, at every wink and gesture, signaling military handouts, UN vetoes and repeated provocative acts of war against Iran. They have even exceeded President Bush in their eagerness to please their Zionist mentors by recognizing Jerusalem as the ‘undivided’ capital of the Jews – effectively denying the rights of the Palestinian residents.

Nothing speaks to the dominance of the ZPC over US political life – domestic and foreign – than the election of their meticulously groomed first ‘Jewish President’ – and the subsequent takeover of strategic economic and security posts in his administration.

Conclusion

The ascent of a minority of ambitious power-driven political operatives acting first and foremost for a militarist colonial power in a strategic region of the world economy represents the biggest threat to world peace and to US democratic values in recent history.

Think about it: Not only do the Zionists and their embedded clones rule the White House, they also have the political apparatus (left, liberal, center and right) to silence, insult, witch hunt and isolate any critic of their agenda, their organizations and of the State of Israel. When confronted by a critic the entire apparatus brays in unison about ‘anti-Semitism’ and follows up with severe civil sanctions. As Obama’s career under his Zionist handlers illustrates, they are capable of hurling repulsive denunciations against his former African-American mentor and spiritual councilor, Reverend Wright; capable of publicly humiliating and pushing aside a former President and Obama supporter, Jimmy Carter; capable of isolating and ‘sanitizing’ former top foreign policymakers from earlier Democratic Administration like Brzezinski, simply for pointing out Israeli crimes against humanity (although such observations are made daily in the European press and political circles).

The apparatus combines the carrot (embedding and promoting Obama) and the stick (stigmatizing Carter): It all depends on whether an individual, politician, academic, writer or journalist is ‘useful’ (i.e., an unconditional supporter) or ‘harmful’ (i.e., critical) to the State of Israel.

The Obama experience illustrates how a small, close knit, well-organized and well financed minority operating through prestigious professional posts and powerful economic enterprises can penetrate major political institutions, capture upwardly mobile politicians and ‘turn’ them into willing accomplices in promoting wars on behalf of a foreign colonial militarist power. If in the past we have experienced Zionist thuggery mugging our freedom of speech in civil society, think of what we can expect when these thugs have complete control of the White House. The ‘First Jewish President’ of the United States indeed! Where does that leave the American people, their rights, their interests and their country’s independent foreign policy?

Epilogue

In early December 2008, Israel’s right wing party, Likud, under the leadership of ‘Bibi’ Netanyahu, met and nominated its slate of candidates for the upcoming national elections (February 12, 2009). The majority of candidates nominated represent what most Israeli journalists call the ‘hard right’ or what might be accurately described as Zionfascism. The Likud Party majority favors the expulsion of all Palestinians (i.e. non-Jews) from Greater Israel, the military seizure of Gaza, the end of any pretense of peace negotiations and the immediate bombing of Iran.

Currently Likud and its fascists have the support of a plurality of Israeli Jews. If they win, it is a virtual certainty they will receive the automatic support of all the principle respectable pro-Israel Jewish organizations in the US, who follow the line that: “It is not ours to question whom the Israelis vote for office. It is our duty to back the State of Israel.”

The election of an Israeli-fascist regime will up the ante in Washington. Does Obama’s embedding in the Zionist apparatus include support for Jewish fascism , the total ethnic cleansing of Palestine and their unilateral decision to ‘nuke’ Iran? Three weeks into his presidency Obama will face his biggest Middle East challenge, which will define the nature of US policy in the region.

Obama has recently suggested that Washington would nuke Iran to protect Israel – which has never yet signed a treaty with the US – to which the Bush Administration replied contemptuously that it would be very hard to convince American parents in Kansas that their sons should risk nuclear incineration for the sake of a small country in the Middle East. Clearly Obama is a greater war monger on issues involving Israel then even Bush: It comes with being a “Jewish President”

29 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. RG the LG said on December 12th, 2008 at 10:33am #

    And, the surprise is?

    I am thoroughly amused that people really bought into the idea that there would be significant changes with the ‘Bama’s election. Sure, the man won’t be Bush, but even McCain wouldn’t have been as bad as Bush … almost doesn’t count!

    So we have a surrogate in the mid-east, Israel. Big deal … and the supporters of the Jewish state refer to the holocaust as the reason we should support their rapacious and inhumane treatment of the Palestinians. So what.

    It is a matter of the same old same old, though the ‘Bama is half-white. The real difference between him and the Bush-Clinton-Bush dynasty? The fact that his mother’s sperm donor was from Kenya … and that is about it.

    Cynically,
    RG the LG

  2. FADEL said on December 12th, 2008 at 10:47am #

    PROVIDE WEB LINK FOR YOUR QOUTES

  3. bozh said on December 12th, 2008 at 11:08am #

    US hadn’t since 1700s changed its basic course. but there r differences btwn US 1829 and US’08.
    it has better weapons now; in cia much larger terrorist org; constantly ‘imroving’ wmd; much larger army; much stronger economy and much firmer grip on powwer by plutos.
    US has on its side also world plutos.
    world plutos r no lngr waging wars among selves; they r now united like never before.
    and that is why a new prez/manager looks so dangerous. and in time to come, new managers will seemingly look even more perilous than today’s prez.
    uncle sam engages in an obvious deception in letting carter, nixon, johnson take a fall or letting bush, clinton, obama take all the blame. but samuel is being watched like never before; that is clear – for him.
    the watchers expect the worst; thus may also unite and face the threat. thnx

  4. Deadbeat said on December 12th, 2008 at 11:10am #

    RGtheLG writes…

    It is a matter of the same old same old, though the ‘Bama is half-white. The real difference between him and the Bush-Clinton-Bush dynasty? The fact that his mother’s sperm donor was from Kenya … and that is about it.

    I think this is more than the “same old same old”. This is about a problem that even the Left chooses to obscure — the influence that Zionism has on the U.S. political economy. Obama’s race is also important here that that was to consolidate a voting base among people-of-color to elect somehow who will clearly advance the Zionist agenda. This is why part of the critique of Obama has to be absolute confrontation of Zionism especially by the Left. The strategy must be to work with people of color and to help educate them as to the RACIST aspect of Zionism. This way confronting Zionism can be incorporated into the struggle against RACISM by people of color and conscientious whites.

    Labeling Obama as “same old same old” underestimates the nuances of the manipulative strategy by these elites. Once again this is why analysis especially the kind of analysis offered by Dr. Petras is extremely important in order to formulate the proper stance, tone and strategy.

  5. Michael Dawson said on December 12th, 2008 at 11:28am #

    Balderdash. Israel is the USA’s aircraft carrier in the Indispensable Oil Region (IOR). As such, its Benighted Flacks (BFs) are permitted to lobby and take the blame (PTLTTB) for American imperialism and energy insanity (AIEI). This nation is corporate capitalist, not ZPC. Every minute we spend talking about organizing to explain Zionism is a minute we waste from our real problems. If you want to stop Israel, stop talking about Jews and start talking about changing our foreign policy.

  6. bozh said on December 12th, 2008 at 11:35am #

    it is not that difficult to observe that once the black people attain elevated positions in washington, media, and entertainment, they become more right wing than bush.
    now that that a prez is ‘black’ or , perceived by blacks as a black, we can expect much disdain for blacks from a black president.
    but regardless what color O is, his color won’t change a bit just because he may be dying to become still lighter/skinned.
    and black people adore their successful black people even tho they do much to keep blacks from obtainig an enlightenment and more influence in the governance of US.
    i’m going on a limb by saying this. in fact the Toms, will vigourously deny their own repression of other blacks.
    but whites also repress own people.
    guess of what color is my skin? angry red! thnx

  7. bozh said on December 12th, 2008 at 11:43am #

    michael dawson,
    i, too, have come to same conclusion. and i have based my conclusion on salient facts.
    i do not call euro-khazarians “jews”; these people r nonshemitic. thnx
    .

  8. louisa said on December 12th, 2008 at 11:52am #

    It’s not for nothing that Obama’s first appointment was IDF veteran Rahm Emmanuel who, as we discover, comes from “good Irgun stock” according to a delighted William Daroff, director of the Washington office of United Jewish Communities (UJC).

    And it’s not for nothing that Rahm Emmanuel’s kindly pediatrician and ex-terrorist of a father said on the occasions of his son’s appointment:

    “Obviously he [Rahm Emmanuel] will influence the president to be pro-Israel… Why wouldn’t he be? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to clean the floors of the White House.”

    Because the clever Doctor knows that many Americans think Obama is an Arab and in any case are racist to the core, his subtext is that Obama is the one who will be cleaning the floors of the White House like a good schvartze (or Arab) while sonny Rahm will be running the show.

  9. Erroll said on December 12th, 2008 at 1:08pm #

    James Smith seems to be implying that any criticism of Israel is to be immediately construed as being anti-semitic. That inference by James Smith should be dismissed as being totally false.

  10. Max Shields said on December 12th, 2008 at 1:48pm #

    Deadbeat,

    Just so we don’t confuse things here. I agree that Zionism is an important part of the critique in terms of Obama (Obama is really a symbol of the power structure, let’s not forget, with a tad more mythology going for him).

    I see an anti-Zionist group who see everything through the prism of Zionism as if empire and its trappings had not long ago existed. I think that is dangerous because it purports that if you squeeze the pimple you’ve cured the acne (which is a relatively harmless way of describing something I think is anything but harmless).

    Zionism is a symptom and a manifestation of a problem of domination and empire. Obama has aligned himself with it. In some ways it is quite natural for the number one imperial empire to see itself in its client. Yes, there is more to the mythology of Zionism and its relationship to American politics than simply partners in crimes against humanity (of which both are in perpetual denial). The emotional underpinnings have been played to the hilt. It forms the glue that binds the purely “evil” manifestations of empire. Empires don’t live as if they are evil entities. They have a super-ego to rationalize even the most brutal acts.

    But, it is always dangerous to see all of this as Zionism. It is right to point out the evil doings of Israel, and to see them in the clearest way possible and to call them out, to do whatever we can to stop the madness perpetuated by one and enabled by the other imperial forces.

    But again, if we were to see the demise of Israel or Zionism we would not have solved our “problem”. Obama and the empire are not dependent upon Israel if it were to disappear. But I submit that American politics and US history is clearly reflected in Israeli/Zionist recent history – not the other way around.

  11. bozh said on December 12th, 2008 at 2:04pm #

    for ur erudition/elucidation, there r no such people as semites.
    ashkenzic people named selves “semites” and not shemites because ashkenazic people hate shem, the ancestor of arabs, moabites; perhaps also amonites, amorites, and canaanites.
    hebrews appear to be descendants of the mesopotamian chaldeans.
    and the khazaro-europenans r the biggest antishemites or antisemites,if one will.
    the few chaldeans who settled in canaan married great numbers of canaanite women. their priests were mighty worried; thus passing the law that only those people whose mother was an israelite, cld be an israelite.
    in 27oos bc, israel was defeated by assyrians; israelis vanished. only the judean (jewish) or southern kingdom, remained.
    it also vanished in 135 ad; its people killed or dispersed. only a few migrated to khazaria. khazars then took up judaism.
    but khazars, too, lost their homeland and had been dispersed.
    judeans as well as israelites (the 10 lost tribes) r no more.
    thnx

  12. bozh said on December 12th, 2008 at 2:22pm #

    where is the power? in money? i’d say yes. it buys liars and killers.
    so a qustion arises, how many of the 15mn ‘jews’ mnaires/blnaires?
    ok, let’s say, 1-3% of ‘jewish’ people r that rich?
    now let’s look how many italians, poles, germans, french, et r that rich.
    let’s put the figure of anywhere from 01-1% for each ethnic group living in US.
    but there r multimillionares in other lands. so, it seems that when one puts together all the world very rich people, the’d surely outnumber ‘jewish’ ones by, what, 100 to one?
    so, can we take seriously the claim that such a small minority controls US and by extension much of the world. thnx

  13. Michael Dawson said on December 12th, 2008 at 2:54pm #

    Well, bozh, there are no meaningful Chaldeans, either, biologically speaking. There is one human race with a host of intersecting and overlapping ranges in various bodily traits, none of which have anything to do with brain structure and function. There is as much diversity within any bio-grouping you want to name as there is between such groupings.

    Humans are divided by culture and power, both of which respond and change quite rapidly when conditions change.

    The sooner we stop believing in deep group differences, the better.

    One planet, one people…

  14. Deadbeat said on December 12th, 2008 at 3:20pm #

    Max writes…

    I see an anti-Zionist group who see everything through the prism of Zionism as if empire and its trappings had not long ago existed. I think that is dangerous because it purports that if you squeeze the pimple you’ve cured the acne (which is a relatively harmless way of describing something I think is anything but harmless).

    Max I actually agree with your caution. There was a tendency to ignore Zionism as a problem because often the Right were the ones pointing this issue out. With the Right’s xenophobia and arguments tinged with anti-Antisemitism made it all too easy to be dismiss by the Left.

    The argument however is not to see Zionism as a isolate part of “Empire” but to understand how Zionism had grown to influence “Empire”. “Empire”, as I see it, is the aggregate of all that is wrong. It is too abstract a term. People however see the “everyday” — the concrete issues. You already have a group of people who have been struggling against racism as part of their everyday lives and they fully understand it. This is why I’ve been advocating that the Left find solidarity with people of color and frame Zionism as the racist ideology that it is. This will IMO will help enlist people of color to confront this ideology as they confront White Supremacy.

    I think your cautionary concerns at best is why the Left has avoided really confronting Zionism. However Jews for the most part has never faced the level of persecution in the U.S. as people of color has. Therefore confronting Zionism in the U.S. will not have the kind of backlash against Jews that many on the Left fears. However IMO if Zionism is not confronted it could one day have a severe backlash against Jews because without educating people that Zionism is incompatible with Judaism ignorance will reign and that ignorance could have severe and irreparable consequences.

    Because Zionism was not confront when it was a “pimple” Max it has spread across its host and that is a major concern. That I think is the main point of Petras’ article. The Left unfortunately has been complicit in its silence and obfuscation of this problem.

  15. Max Shields said on December 12th, 2008 at 3:35pm #

    Deadbeat,

    You are predictable for sure.

    Again, I agree with much of what you’re saying, but it is hard to imagine that the American Imperial Empire, given its history, would not be with or without Zionism. Hopefully there is agreement there.

    That zionism has been a tic in the skin of American Imperial Empire seems to be true.

    Where you go off the tracks is by reiterating this notion that there is a left (is Petras in the left camp or no? Is he a special case of the American “left”?) that is “obfuscating” zionism. I agree that different people have different takes. I also can smell a phony “leftist” who wants to protect the vile behavior of the imperial zionists. But I will not presume to read the minds/motives of those who are clearly mindful and angered by zionism/Israel while discerning its context in the world at large.

    I’d ask that you not presume mine from some kind of Left “obfuscation” notion.

    Max

  16. bozh said on December 12th, 2008 at 5:11pm #

    michael, i agree. but at this stage, ethnocentrism is not wrong , it just is. ashkenazic volk is more ethnocentric than any other i know of. and as a group, they make more money that any other, or so i hear.
    and money buys killers and liars in US also. and we all r evil. but i haven’t got money to buy me killers and truthsayers. thnx

  17. Ron Horn said on December 12th, 2008 at 6:38pm #

    I think that we in the US should grant statehood to Israel. This would just recognize what is realty– Israel is an integral part of US politics. This would be a progressive measure in that we could collect taxes from them. As it is now, they have all the benefits of statehood without having to contribute a dime to the treasury.

  18. jaher said on December 12th, 2008 at 7:10pm #

    itsnt it great!! the first jewish president! finally someone who be willing to take it to the islamofascists , and the racist arab governments that murder, subjugate, and forbid jews and christians from practicing their faith. and as far as expelling the arabs of israel… why not!! is expected to uproot 200,000+ jews from their historical homeland to make way for a pal state in judea and sameria!! in order that this pal. state be free of jews!! but of course, this is not a problem for those who strickly hate jews. as clearly the author does.

  19. Brian Koontz said on December 12th, 2008 at 7:51pm #

    Israel would no longer have been nearly as necessary for American ruling class strategic interests in the Middle East had Iraq been more successfully dominated. While Iraq’s resistance strengthened Iran, it also strengthened Israel, as the US has become further enmeshed in the region without secure long-term footing outside of Israel.

    Israel is positioned so well in Western power politics because it holds a Middle Eastern monopoly on the combination of like minded imperial ambition and a powerful military.

    When one is the only game in town, one can name the price for services rendered. As far as the US ruling class is concerned, that price is well worth it.

  20. DavidG. said on December 12th, 2008 at 8:21pm #

    Israel is the tail that wags the American dog, methinks.

    It may end up being the tail that wags America over the precipice and into oblivion.

    Poetic justice, methinks!

  21. Gary Corseri said on December 13th, 2008 at 9:55am #

    This is a chilling conclusion:

    “The Obama experience illustrates how a small, close knit, well-organized and well financed minority operating through prestigious professional posts and powerful economic enterprises can penetrate major political institutions, capture upwardly mobile politicians and ‘turn’ them into willing accomplices …”

    And, perhaps more so, this one:

    “The ascent of a minority of ambitious power-driven political operatives acting first and foremost for a militarist colonial power in a strategic region of the world economy represents the biggest threat to world peace and to US democratic values in recent history.”

    While our mainstream media, academics and “public thinkers” pooh-pooh “conspiracy theories” as the pablum of fanatics &/or the irrational, we see before our eyes–if only we dare look–a conspiracy of global proportions to eviscerate American cultural and moral values and to dim our political consciousness.

    Zionfascism, masquerading as a defense of the Jewish people, has as much to do with combatting anti-Semitism as Naziism had to do with defending the rights of the German people. (Obviously, any political ideology purporting to combat anti-Semitism would have to defend the rights of the Semitic Palestinian people! Zionism’s sordid treatment of Palestinians and other Arab/Semitic populations illuminates the record of such “defense.”)

    Mr. Petras’ scholarship and careful connection of dots ought to bring the nature of the challenge to our democracy to the attention of all serious social critics and thinkers. Like Mearsheimer and Walt, like Jimmy Carter, Petras echoes Cicero to warn us that the greatest dangers to our Republic lie within our own inability to discern our own best interests and our inability to discern our true enemies.

  22. Max Shields said on December 13th, 2008 at 6:56pm #

    Deadbeat
    I really don’t think that Obama is a learning/teaching moment for African Americans regarding Zionism. I rather doubt there is a greater “block” of people who are as hyper-aware of Zionism in the US – certainly given the ignorance for so long of the American public in general.

    This use of Obama as a means of channeling black people into a left/progressive “direction” is just beyond rationality. Obama is a pull in the opposite direction. He is a “drag” on a progressive movement.

    But I see no way for Obama to provide a lesson for African Amerians about the evils of Zionism. As I said, I can think of no other Americans outside of Arab/Islamic/Palestinians who have as clear a sense of that RIGHT NOW.

    It is true that Obama is everything Bill Clinton was and more. He has always been just that. I said during the campaign, Deadbeat, and you disagreed regularly, that Obama was just a brown version of William Jefferson Clinton. His whole campaign, and now his staff and his approach as we see it unfolding is a page from Clinton administration. If Hillary had not run, you can bet everyone of her advisors would have been his – including Clinton, himself right from the very first primary, the first dollar donated.

    There is no mystery here. The only mystery is how this guy is going to deal with his hawks on war, and the corporate wolves. He’s shown himself, like Clinton, to be rather weak when confronted with the power structure. He must be in command if he is not totally swallowed up as was Clinton and George W. He’s young (mostly because we delay maturity in the US) and inexperienced. His inclination is to cowtow to power. I like that “violin player” metaphor – hold the violin with the left and play with the right – yea that’s Obama – Dem business as usual in a very unusual world.

  23. Deadbeat said on December 13th, 2008 at 10:22pm #

    Max says…

    I really don’t think that Obama is a learning/teaching moment for African Americans regarding Zionism

    Max I never said that Obama is a “learning/teaching” moment for African Americans regarding Zionism. Although Max, the converse of your premise is that Obama COULD be such a teaching moment for everyone and I see that as an opportunity.

    What I am saying however is that people of color are highly attuned to confronting white supremacy that they can be easily enlisted into confronting Zionism as yet another form of racism. With the demographic of the U.S. shifting toward people of color the Left should work with people of color on issues that are sensitive to them such as racism. By finding solidarity with people of color, IMO, Zionism can be confronted.

    This use of Obama as a means of channeling black people into a left/progressive “direction” is just beyond rationality. Obama is a pull in the opposite direction. He is a “drag” on a progressive movement.

    Max, African Americans are much further to the left than the general population. Blacks are further to the Left than Latinos and Whites. Therefore African American are much more likely to embrace progressive solutions. As you correct state Obama is a “drag” on a progressive movement but on the other hand if Obama is painted as the Zionist that he is, IMO, he will QUICKLY lose the support of African Americans and other people of color. The primary focus on Obama was is “centrism” and carrying water for “imperialism” rather than his kowtowing to Zionism. THAT is the main reason why Obama had to jettison Rev. Wright when Wright defended Louis Farrakhan’s stance against Zionism during the National Press Club. IMO this is the key to weakening Obama among Blacks.

    But I see no way for Obama to provide a lesson for African Amerians about the evils of Zionism. As I said, I can think of no other Americans outside of Arab/Islamic/Palestinians who have as clear a sense of that RIGHT NOW.

    The problem Max is that the root of Zionism’s power today is in the United States and NOT in the Middle East. As many on the Left argue, Israel is the U.S. “junior” partner. If that is true and if the U.S. “calls the shots” that means that Zionism has to be confronted on U.S. soil. Therefore Arabs, Islamic, and Palestinians and other anti-Zionism must build solidarity HERE in the United States to confront Zionism. The best way to do that is through communities of color who has the history and legacy of fighting racism in the United States.

    It is true that Obama is everything Bill Clinton was and more. He has always been just that. I said during the campaign, Deadbeat, and you disagreed regularly, that Obama was just a brown version of William Jefferson Clinton. His whole campaign, and now his staff and his approach as we see it unfolding is a page from Clinton administration. If Hillary had not run, you can bet everyone of her advisors would have been his – including Clinton, himself right from the very first primary, the first dollar donated.

    I cannot recall disagreeing with you about a comparison of Obama with WJC. I did in fact say that Obama triangulated the Left. However again Max to just say that Obama is a “brown” WJC misses a whole lot of nuance. It misses the Left’s inability to build solidarity with communities of color. It misses the race baiting and the southern strategy of both Clinton and McCain. My point is that you cannot merely use simplistic comparison and the same old critiques and tactic on Obama because of how race is being applied here. Sure Obama is staffing his Administration with the same old Clintonites but then again many of these Clintonites are Zionists. This, IMO, is Obama weak spot and where IMO the Left can do the most damage to tarnish his image.

    Another point I tried to convey is that African Americans are PRAGMATIC voters and why Black will not vote for 3rd Party candidates. What this means is that Blacks understand that the system is rigged but will vote for the lesser evil candidate since POLICY has a major effect on their day-to-day lives. This is what I means when I insist that the Left address concrete “everyday” issues rather than abstractions.

    There is no mystery here. The only mystery is how this guy is going to deal with his hawks on war, and the corporate wolves. He’s shown himself, like Clinton, to be rather weak when confronted with the power structure. He must be in command if he is not totally swallowed up as was Clinton and George W. He’s young (mostly because we delay maturity in the US) and inexperienced. His inclination is to cowtow to power. I like that “violin player” metaphor – hold the violin with the left and play with the right – yea that’s Obama – Dem business as usual in a very unusual world.

    I think Obama is in a strong position regarding corporate power than Clinton but IMO is weaker when it comes to Zionism. Obama is much more beholding to Zionism than Clinton. However corporations know that in this economic climate they may have to make some “slight concessions”. I think that Obama will throw enough of a bone to the Left to keep it off-stride. This make Obama a much harder target to attack without risking alienation by the very people the Left needs to attract. This is why the typical Left-wing rhetoric may actually be counterproductive and has to be nuanced in order to avoid alienation.

    Max I do agree with you is that it is a very unusual world which mean that a reevaluation of tactics are very much needed. But I think this article by Dr. Petras is hinting at where Obama is weakest among people of color and IMO this is where rubber meets the road of testing the Left. The Left has been extremely weak and tepid on confronting Zionism and I agree with Petras that Obama rise could not have occurred without his fealty to Zionism. Obama make this almost “IN YO’ FACE” to such an extent that it cannot be ignored or obscured without seriously trying.

  24. Max Shields said on December 14th, 2008 at 6:23am #

    DB this is what you said: “Obama’s race is also important here that that was to consolidate a voting base among people-of-color to elect somehow who will clearly advance the Zionist agenda. This is why part of the critique of Obama has to be absolute confrontation of Zionism especially by the Left. The strategy must be to work with people of color and to help educate them as to the RACIST aspect of Zionism. This way confronting Zionism can be incorporated into the struggle against RACISM by people of color and conscientious whites.”

    My last critique of what you said is based on this.

  25. bozh said on December 14th, 2008 at 9:43am #

    it is to hebrews that Zion had a meaning. later it had been christians who worshipped it; propagating the idea that it must be taken by sword.
    zion had nothing to do w. euros of judaic faith. some of these judaists, whose people were countriless, saw a golden chance in seemingly convincing christians that they r descendants of the judeans.
    and the ad hoc alliance was born in mid-19th cent.
    the word “semite”, deriving from word “shemite” , was coined; probably in 18th cent.
    indeed, judeans who remained in judea after rome defeated them, may have been shemitic or canaanitic.
    in any case, only these people were true pals and not khazaro-europeans.
    after the conquest of palestine in 7th? cent. the pop accepted islam and erroneously became known as arabs.
    some of the more salient facts show that canaanites/pals r only partially arabic.
    so, i am ignoring the judeo-christian propaganda ab zion or zionism; for me, the bloc is racist as well as imperialist/colononial.
    it may be noted that it is the judeo-christian ad hoc bloc who persist more that any other people that palestinians r arabs; having no connection w. the canaanites.
    and why wldn’t it?
    it may be a serious error to ignore ‘jewish’ dependence on both the christians and world plutos.thnx

  26. debra phillips said on December 14th, 2008 at 9:47am #

    one gigantic boat, we are all in it together. some rich, some poor, some supposed to be our smart ones, but it seems the dumb have figured out whats going on, but feel powerless to do anything about it! theres a behind the scene agenda, been there since time imortal. ok, you smart ones, what do we do about it? it’s only about good verses evil, who can change a mans heart!!!!!!!!! thats really the bottom line, its the human heart condition!!!

  27. Don Hawkins said on December 14th, 2008 at 12:43pm #

    Debra now that was good thank you. What you did was what Einstein spoke of when he said anybody can make something more complex and violent but it takes gut’s to go the other way. That was great.

  28. bozh said on December 14th, 2008 at 1:45pm #

    debra,
    u’r correct, some of the negative emotions have been w. us for eons.
    others, like exccessive greed, lust for control- two of the most devasting ones for working people, slaves, and serfs- may have arisen just millennia ago; perhaps ca 20-30K yrs ago.
    now, greed, need to control (setting some rules) may be beneficial for survival of humans.
    however, the degree of control/greed in US and other plutocratic lands has never beeen greater.
    and 98% of amers support just such a plutocratic grip on power; thus, no change will ever take place.
    amers r near complete dependents; life, free/worriless, calls for us to be interdependent.
    it had been destroyed almost totally by clero-patrician soyuz millennia ago.
    there is hope. it runs eternally. the way out, is for parents or activists to eduacate youngsters ab. their plight/serfdom imposed by clero-political class and ependency on unknown people, calling selves the enlightened/guiding lights, etc.,
    while in fact being ferocious despots. thnx

  29. Mulga Mumblebrain said on December 14th, 2008 at 5:08pm #

    The real crisis will come, in my opinion, when Obama’s Judeofascist controllers demand concrete action to thwart China’s rise. The secret to Ziofascist global domination, to what end I’m not sure, but the fashioning of Eretz Yisrael seems at least partly the explanation, is total control of the US polity. This is surely a situation unparalleled in history. A global hegemon totally controlled by a tiny minority, in fact, if polls of Jewish opinion in the US are to be believed, a minority of a minority,who have used their cats-paw to evade international condemnation and launch a War of Terror against the Islamic world, that has killed over two million so far. However, when China supplants the US as global hegemon, or an effective multi-polar balance of power is established, Zionist pre-eminence disappears. A Christian-Zionist dominance of the US is established, but a Confucian-Zionist dominance of China to that extent is plainly impossible. Hence the determination of the Ziofascists to mark China and Russia out for attention. The whole ‘Clash of Civilizations’ obscenity that presages an era of global turmoil and war in the pursuit of perpetual ‘Western’ (ie ‘Judeochristian) world dominance, is very definitely a neo-conservative, hence Likudnick, project. Although, by any rational calculation, Israel has a far greater chance of peace, progress and longevity if it ceases to attempt to rule the planet through its surrogate super-power, the racist and fascist elites running Israel and the US seem obsessed by domination. Perhaps this is an inescapable result of an ideology that sees all other human beings as lesser types compared with God’s ‘Chosen People’, and the bitter history of the Judeocide, and the subsequent, undisguised, growth of hatred of the goyim amongst some Jews, but Israel cannot bully and dominate its victims into submission forever. Hezbollah have proved that. Anyone truly interested in the future of Jewry, let alone outraged at the crimes committed in its name against the imprisoned Palestinians, must, I believe, be firmly opposed to Judeofascist ideology and Israeli state policy. Just how to remove such fanatical zealots, who see any opposition as some form of ‘new Nazism’ bent on a ‘new Holocaust’, from power, is difficult to see. Here in Australia Ziofascist ranting reaches new peaks of hysteria nearly every day. Palestinian voices have now been totally purged from the media, yet the local Judeofascists continue to rave that the media is ‘biased’ towards the Palestinians. Local Rightwing Jews have somehow bullied the Jewish Left into total silence, and the level of abuse of the Palestinians grows like topsy. It is absolutely unremarkable to see local Judeofascists, in either media empire, but particularly the Murdoch sewer, accuse the Palestinians, in 1948 and today, of intending to exterminate the Jews en masse in a new Holocaust, if they ever end their interminable oppression. Palestinian society, with the exception of the brutal Quisling despot Abbas and the detritus of Fatah, is traduced in terms that must have the shade of Julius Streicher gobsmacked with admiration. And, of course, any criticism of Israel in any particular, is instantly denounced as ‘anti-Semitism’, while racist denigration of Moslems and Arabs, Palestinians in particular, by Judeofascists is so omnipresent as to go almost unnoticed.