Exposing Bush Administration Corruption

Information for this article comes from long-time business, finance and political writer and analyst Bob Chapman who publishes the bi-weekly International Forecaster. It’s power-packed with key information and a valued source for this writer. He obtained voluminous material directly from its source. People need to know it. Read on.

SueAnn Arrigo is the source. She was a high-level CIA insider. Her title was Special Operations Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI). She also established the Remote Viewing Defense protocols for the Pentagon in her capacity as Remote Viewing Advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS). It earned her a two-star general rank in the military. She called it a “ploy” so the Pentagon could get more of her time and have her attend monthly Joint Chiefs of Staff meetings. Only high-level types are invited, and she was there from October 2003 to July 2004.

Part of her job involved intelligence gathering on Iraq and Afghanistan — until August 2004 when she refused to spread propaganda about a non-existent Iranian nuclear weapons program and left. She followed in the footsteps of others at CIA who resigned for reasons of conscience and became critics — most notably Ray McGovern, Ralph McGehee, and Phil Agee.

On May 16, 2008, Arrigo sent extensive government corruption and cover-up information to Henry Waxman, Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform committee — in 12 separate cases. This article covers four of them or about one-third of what Congress got. The 12 are explosive and revealing but just the tip of the iceberg:

* of government corruption and war profiteering;

* sweetheart deals and kickbacks;

* high-level types on the take;

* trillions of missing dollars;

* on September 10, 2001, Rumsfeld admitting “According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions;”

* imagine the current amount;

* its corrosive effect on the nation; and people should

* demand accountability — who profits, who pays and what are the consequences of militarism gone mad.

SueAnn Arrigo offers a glimpse and at great personal risk. In August 2001, DCI George Tenet told her to assemble “a moving van full of Pentagon documents showing Defense Contractor kickbacks to Pentagon officials.” She did as instructed but not to expose corruption as she learned – to conceal it and in her judgment so CIA could divert defense business to Halliburton and “Carlyle-related contractors.” She stated: “The mood at the CIA and Pentagon was ‘war is coming’ because the Bush Family stands to make billions from it — so get ready.”

Arrigo was shocked at what she found and how brazenly the Pentagon wrote it up because it feels untouchable, especially since 2001. That notion proved misguided after CIA used the material to blackmail or bribe its officials “into ‘working on’ the Halliburton-Carlyle team.” Top CIA types were involved, and Tenet laid it out for Arrigo: You’ve “given me the keys to the kingdom. (These) documents will make me rich.”

She collected three types. Her report covers one but has plenty of incriminating evidence. Her precise recall of dates and names is incomplete, but events are factually right and damning on how Washington operates. It’s always been this way but never to the degree as under George Bush. Arrigo exposes the scheme — the systematic looting of the treasury to enrich contractors and high-level officials at Pentagon, CIA and others well-placed in government. Precise amounts are unknown, but at minimum are countless multi-billions, even trillions — at taxpayer expense and diverted from essential social and infrastructure needs.

Case 1: Ordering Unneeded New Fighter Aircraft

Arrigo discovered high-level Pentagon corruption. It involved bid-rigging and implicated “an Air Force general on the JCS and a Defense Contractor, Boeing.” She disclosed it to JCS Chairman Hugh Shelton and DCI George Tenet, and in both instances drew blanks. She also reported it to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the investigative arm of Congress. It was vetted and confirmed, but left unaddressed the larger issue of whether new generation planes are needed at an enormous cost to taxpayers. Arrigo believed not, and several Air Force generals agreed. Not other JCS members, however, who she learned are on the take.

There’s more. They “had the gall to try to force through another unneeded plane contract for Boeing.” At an early 2004 JCS meeting, Arrigo complained about the previous undelivered order because it didn’t meet Pentagon specifications. Yet one general in particular tried “to force the US military to buy another (unneeded) upgrade.” One other JCS member backed her to no avail, and the new order went through. Arrigo rightfully concluded that new plane orders were to enrich Boeing and high-level Pentagon types getting kickbacks for their cooperation.

She also learned how much — an average $22,000 “for each (JCS meeting) vote according to their bank” records. Not US ones. CIA-arranged Swiss accounts specifically for this purpose. Everyone at the meeting cashed in, except Arrigo and one dissenting general. More disturbing is that this is standard Pentagon practice — handouts to contractors; kickbacks to complicit brass; and taxpayers out multi-billions — year after year.

Jeff St. Clair wrote about it in his 2005 book Grand Theft Pentagon: Tales of Corruption and Profiteering in the War on Terror. It’s an explosive account of how contractors like Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Bechtel and the Bush family-connected Carlyle Group scam multi-billions at taxpayer expense and not a whiff of it in the mainstream. It’s the reason US annual “defense” spending tops $1.1 trillion (conservatively) with all military, homeland security, veterans, NASA, debt service and other allocations included.

Case 2: Halliburton Delivers Half Full Cartons to the Pentagon’s “Swing Shift”

Arrigo refers to the Pentagon’s Receiving Department “swing shift” personnel. They alone are on the take so other shifts are shut out and can’t report it. As a CIA insider, she checked and found damning evidence – about “the military (not) getting supplies to the troops on time.” She also learned that Halliburton has its “Representative to the CIA,” and one at the Pentagon as well. Both get federal salaries but neither was “hired by CIA or the military through their personnel departments. Neither had done military training or trained at (CIA’s) ‘Farm’ as a spy.” Arrigo was disturbed and with good reason when orders from the top said back off.

It got worse. Arrigo worked at CIA for over 30 years and reported directly to Tenet. But she wasn’t prepared for what she found — a new section at the Agency without her knowledge. It employed 40 people, all working for Halliburton “while being paid by the US taxpayer as if they were CIA.” It was secret. No files were on them. They were never interviewed, never vetted, and she concluded: “CIA had a back door in its security to let Halliburton put anyone they wanted in (its) hallways. It was an outrageous (breach) of US National Security,” and in a post-9/11 “war on terrorism” climate.

She was shocked and told Tenet. His reply: “Yes, I know.” Head of CIA building security also knew. Arrigo asked what he’d do about it. His answer: “Keep my mouth shut so I can stay alive and I suggest you do the same.” She asked if he, CIA or Halliburton would kill her if she talked. He didn’t think so. Would national security firm CACI do it because it’s affiliated with Halliburton and also has a CIA back door for its personnel at the Agency.

Arrigo dug deeper. She got inside Halliburton’s area and asked questions. Why was the company shipping half the contracted for amounts and shortchanging the troops and taxpayers. It was no different for war zones. Halliburton “set up the same corrupt system of swing shift receivers (for) at least 3 continents. They received the cartons and signed (off) that the goods were all received properly. Then the shortages later were chalked up to thefts or war damage, etc.”

Arrigo again informed Tenet. His answer: “This is nothing new,” then added: “Have a report about it on my desk before Christmas (2001).” It got worse. Arrigo told Tenet he’s responsible for “correct(ing) Halliburton’s short-shipping and its invasion of the CIA.” He said he couldn’t because the White House tied his hands. Call Congress, Arrigo said. DCI “should be a man of courage.” Tenet ignored her, so Arrigo faxed documents revealing Halliburton fraud to GAO — omitting national security secrets. One of them crowed about the scheme’s profitability, and having high-level officials involved made it foolproof.

It was clever and even more devious than Arrigo imagined. Halliburton uses each shortage complaint as a new order. “In that way (it) never (loses) by having to make good for (what’s) missing,” and (it gets) paid double for the same merchandise.

Arrigo knew too much, took risks to learn it, and what happened next is shocking. Halliburton’s “CIA Representative” confronted her, tore out her phone, ransacked her office, removed every shred of paper, and hauled her off bodily “to a prison cell” inside its basement offices. She was intimidated and threatened. Thought she might be killed. She survived, but the message was clear. She complained to Tenet. Showed him her bruises. He responded dismissively: “There, there, everything will be all right in the morning.”

GAO still has Arrigo’s files. It began investigating but stopped. She thinks that Congress can resume it and asked Waxman to do it. That’s where things now stand.

Case 3: The White House Conspiracy to Cook the Books — Halliburton, Carlyle and CIA

In 2002, Arrigo tried a new tact — ingratiating herself with “Halliburton’s Man” and using it to her advantage. She offered cooperation for access to his space and make him think she was on his side. It worked, went on for four and one-half months through late May, and it paid off — with plenty of insider knowledge “about Halliburton and how it works.” Enough to fill a book, she says, but her account sticks to highlights.

First off, it’s pure myth that Dick Cheney stopped running the company. “He called in orders to the man I worked for almost every day and sometimes two or more times a day. He remained (Halliburton’s) functional head in all but name. No one….had the power to override his orders.” Second, Cheney never divested himself of Halliburton profits. “He merely hid how (he got them) through a series of shell companies.”

One of Arrigo’s jobs was to liaison between Halliburton and CIA’s “creative accounting departments.” In other words, their co-conspiratorial treasury looting efforts, and Arrigo got insider access to it. Her advanced math and computer software training qualified her. In a few months, she became expert in how CIA and Halliburton hid their “financial illegalities.”

She explained – “Computers are good ways to fool most people because (they don’t) look inside of them.” They can be programmed “to print out one set of books for regulators, another for Defense Contractors, another for the Pentagon, another for the taxpayer,” and so forth. It’s simple. Decide what you want, and machines will create it in any desired form. The trick is doing it expertly, most criminals can’t, so they need professionals to do it for them. It means crimes are never secret, and many computer experts know about them. CIA has always been tainted, kept it secret since inception, so far has been untouchable, but remains vulnerable to exposure by people of conscience like Arrigo.

She explained: Halliburton has eight software programmers at CIA. Its home office has many more. She was on conference calls with 60 of them on ways to conceal illegalities and assure none of it leaks out. The company has less expertise than CIA so the Agency took charge to make the two systems compatible. It took several years and over 100 programmers. They came, left for other jobs, and took insider knowledge with them. It risks more leaks about Halliburton, other contractors, CIA, the Pentagon, high-ups in government, and the Basel-based Bank of International Settlements for its part in corruption.

Many investigations are ongoing, but huge pressure is exerted to quash them. Its feared leaks may unravel the whole scheme — a vast corruption web involving countless numbers of contractors, related companies, and many high level government and Pentagon insiders. Cover-up software hides it. Taxpayers fund it. Amounts keep getting greater, and they’re up to unimaginable levels.

Arrigo explained the system. Suppose Halliburton sold product A in 100 Lot Sizes, in Quantity X at Price Y to the Pentagon on a given date. Most civilian invoices disclose this. Pentagon ones don’t so contractors can cheat and Pentagon brass profit. Missing information conceals whether all merchandise was delivered as nothing indicates quantities shipped. Further, repackaging also hides proper amounts. Omitting the price alone conceals whether a shipment was shorted, but CIA is more clever than that. It experimented with “tested receivers at some of its front companies” to learn how best to deceive them. What works best is “shifting prices around like random noise” — one day this cost, another a different one, and so forth.

One company used a “gross overcharge method” that looked suspicious. It got receivers to discover the real price, and that defeated CIA’s scheme. When it works, it cooks the books, and no one’s the wiser. Ledger entries are inflated, undercut, omitted, added, or varied in amounts of similar transactions. Like a “professional crime institution,” CIA is expert at falsifying books so no one catches on. How? By random price variations to keep auditors off balance and unable to discover corruption patterns.

Another example:

CIA varies its front company prices monthly. Suppose Halliburton made a purchase “when it (used) a cost inflation idea of cheating. Halliburton (has) an incentive to inflate the cost of its purchases (to) justify (its) high (price) to the military.” So as standard practice it uses CIA’s highest price and claims that amount for its cost.

But comparing two sets of books reveals the scheme. So methodology became more sophisticated to conceal it. Halliburton takes CIA prices and doubles them on its books. It then claims the Agency recorded half the charge “accidentally,” says its front company promised a 50% discount, but never delivered. CIA looks bad, and it balked. No matter. Halliburton still does it, but CIA has “lots of fronts with lots of customers and worse problems (to hide) than merely jacking up prices. Some fronts (are) fictitious and (make) no products.” Others have real customers plus fake ones to launder money. CIA tries to “make (their) crimes ‘undetectable.’ “Halliburton hopes to “sneak by” until caught, then find a way to weasel out of it with minimal damage or cost.

Case 4: Halliburton’s Rigged Back Door Accounting Computer at the Pentagon

In early 2002, GAO got damning evidence: that Halliburton overbills and short-ships — deliberate fraudulent acts as standard company practice, confident it can get away with it, and most often it does.

GAO has the goods to expose it from Halliburton and Pentagon invoices. They reveal a problem. They don’t match, are grossly inflated, and payments exceed amounts billed — by about 35%. Arrigo met with GAO and compared notes. Halliburton has similar Pentagon and CIA-paid staff, and George Bush approved it in a secret Executive Order Arrigo has for proof. She gave it to GAO plus other documents showing national security is compromised and taxpayers cheated – hugely.

One document lists Halliburton’s CIA and Pentagon staff, what little official records discloses about them, their secret office locations, and information on their private security staff. Arrigo discovered that Halliburton’s top CIA man served time for felony fraud. Another at Pentagon was convicted as well — for stealing Army vehicles, then profiteering by transshipping them overseas.

Dick Cheney knew, blocked background checks to conceal it, but Arrigo found out and about the Pentagon fraud that followed. She has a handwritten Cheney memo instructing his man “to make sure that the Pentagon pays us all that it owes us and then some.” CIA’s forgery department verified the writing is Cheney’s.

Arrigo also has a letter from Halliburton’s Pentagon man to his CIA counterpart, and it’s damning. He brags how he’s “getting more than we bargained for (from) the Pentagon” and suggested they get together to compare notes. They did and Arrigo taped it. The evidence once more is damning — about how easy it is to scam the system; befriend accounting personnel; install company programmers; check bills supposedly behind in payments; install a special software code for higher amounts; and do all of the above at Pentagon and CIA.

Arrigo informed George Tenet so he’d stop “Halliburton from ripping off the American taxpayer via the CIA and Pentagon.” Tenet hardly blinked and responded casually: “Well, you certainly have done a thorough job as usual.” He then offered to inform the White House to “correct the problem.” Arrigo did herself, GAO as well, and later learned that the Bush administration (likely Dick Cheney) blocked an investigation.

This article covers four of Arrigo’s 12 cases. Their evidence is damning and shows systemic contractor, government, CIA and Pentagon fraud involving enormous amounts of money. One or more articles will follow if more material can be obtained. It’s not what Pentagon and CIA want outed so getting it is never simple and revealing it not without risks.

Stephen Lendman wrote How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War. Contact him at: lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Mondays from 11AM-1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests. All programs are archived for easy listening. Read other articles by Stephen.

5 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. J McBeal said on June 12th, 2008 at 9:44am #

    Wow. Is Arrigo writing a book?

  2. heike said on June 12th, 2008 at 10:01am #


    Yes, she was kidnaped in Virginia, raped and tortured. She has a personal relationship with George Tenet and Dick Cheney. She was involved in DOD ESP experiments as late as 2003 although the program was cancelled as worthless in 1995. She also treated UBL in the U.S. at the behest of the CIA. Her sister says that she has been a paranoid schizophrenic for decades. This is one “story” that badly needs quality control.

  3. Sue Arrigo, MD said on June 17th, 2008 at 2:41pm #

    It is standard operating procedure for those who are guilty to run smear campaigns against sources who expose their crimes. No one bothers writing a smear message against the crazy because that fact is obvious from the bizarre word associations in their sentence structures. That is distinct from the strange content inside intelligence circles. A smear campaign means that the guilty knew that the source was accurate and that they could not defend themselves based on the facts. Thus, the smear campaign should alert you to the guilt of those the source exposed.

    Those who do not honestly try to ascertain the facts and argue based on them, should be assumed to be for the corruption, until proven otherwise. Nothing was stopping readers from asking me pertinent questions, before they rush into a character assassination of me. My email address is at the top and bottom of the file at Special Report at http://www.libertycalling.com. The appropriate response is to write your Congressman demanding an effective investigation of my allegations. I sent the GAO the evidence. Thus, those engaged in a smear campaign appears to be in favor of ongoing corruption.

    Nowhere has the person(s) engaged in the smear campaign said that they are free of intelligence or corporate connections to those defrauding the taxpayer. The companies involved, like Halliburton, have their own intelligence people, rather like a corporate Mafia. Are we to assume that they will idly stand by and do nothing while the truth is being told about their corruption? No. I expected a smear campaign. So, I have provided references to others who assert severe corporate corruption, including;

    See the 6-minute video “Haliburton and KBR are screwing our troops!” at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ParFskGjsns&feature=related .

    See http://iraqforsale.org/facts.php for more Iraq corruption information.

    See Iron Triangle Exposed: The Carlyle Group

    See online IRAQ FOR SALE documentary at http://freedocumentaries.org/film.php?id=130,

    It is a known fact published by the GAO that enormous amounts of corporate fraud has been committed and not been prosecuted. One of the people responsible for oversight of the missing billions was so caviler as to say, “What is the big deal?” Since the corruption has not been adequately prosecuted it is clearly being protected from the top. Everyone can figure that out.

    The only thing different about my testimony is that I was inside the CIA and Pentagon at a very high level and had a need to know if foreign agents were behind this corruption. I sent my information to the US Congressional Govt. Oversight and Reform Committee to be investigated. So, why are some people so desperate to try to discredit me, instead of writing Congress and demanding that investigation? Such matters require serious investigation, not hiding the allegations under a label of “she must be crazy”.

    I clearly stated in Cases 1-17 that I had many intelligence students whom I had trained helping me in the collecting of this intelligence. Obviously, I was not able to name them due to their being covert operatives and the danger entailed.

    As a medical director, I had physicians working under me seeing patients. My medical work was about 10 hours a week. I was able to do it from any internet access point in the world, if I so chose, with some exceptions. My Medical work stopped in Oct. 2003. I put in exceptionally long hours for the CIA and Pentagon from Oct. 2003 to Aug. 2004, and indeed had done the same even before.

    Many opponents of the powers-that-be have been smeared as crazy. For example, Senator John McCain and ex-Vice President Al Gore were smeared by the press as “crazy” at various times. Do a google search on “McCain crazy” or “Al Gore crazy” and you will see how much effort is spent on falsely labeling people crazy to discredit them.

    In some cases, the CIA/CACI go to more effort when an ‘insider’ is a very serious threat to the US Administration’s plans. The NSA analyst Russ Tice who exposed the domestic spying scandal was thrown in a mental hospital to give him a record of being crazy (see http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/05/12/ale05176.html” \t “_blank” http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/05/12/ale05176.html ). Also, see the case of Susan Lindauer, a journalist who was thrown into a mental hospital and drugged against her will when she brought back information from Iraq that Saddam Hussein was willing to have the weapons’s inspectors back ( see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/war_of_the_wolves/message/8 ). When one hears of a case where a whistle blower is suddenly labeled crazy, it shows how much effort the guilty went to; that adds credibility to the whistle blower’s allegations.

    When I was outed from the CIA after refusing an illegal assignment from Cheney, I was thrown in a mental hospital to try to discredit me. I had been tortured by CACI for 4 days and injected with drugs against my will to try to make me look crazy. The CIA uses long-acting BZ and an amphetamine to prevent sleep to do that. I had no history of psychiatric hospitalizations or ever being put on anti-psychotics. I was quickly let out again when the medical physician determined that I was only suffering from sleep deprivation. The psychiatrists were apparently witting to the plan by the US Administration to lock me up for good, as they tried to hide from me the sleep study which helped get me released.

    You can see some of the aftermath of my torture in photos at http://www.geocities.com/sue.arrigo/ . I will add some photos which shows that torture to my eyes also occurred while my body was paralyzed. Only intelligence agencies or privatized torture companies, like CACI, used such sophisticated methods. Such injuries occurring during paralysis are obviously not self-inflicted. All of the trauma to my mind that I have suffered is the result of efforts to try to silence me. Therapists I have seen have diagnosed me as having Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and a mild case of Dissociative Identity Disorder. The latter problem is denial of what really happened due to horrendous torture, not making up delusional stories. It is the exact opposite of schizophrenia. Obviously, the therapists who knew me well and had the requisite training were the ones qualified to make the determination, not lay people who have never even met me.

    Because my sister, Linda Gail Arrigo, whom I have rarely seen since I was age 9, was alleging that I was schizophrenic, I emailed her recently to ask her why. She said that it was politically embarrassing to her that I said I had worked for the CIA. Yes, I can see that having a sister who had worked for the CIA could cause her some political problems in Taiwan where she is well known. ??She went on to say that she had concluded that both my older sister, Jean Maria Arrigo, and I were crazy. My sister Jean recently blew the whistle on the American Psychological Association’s condoning the use of psychologists assisting in torture interrogations. That surprised me that Linda said both of us were delusional. ??The reason she gave for coming to that conclusion was because we had both said that our father had been violent towards us as children. My mother also says that she was beaten by him and that was why she left him. And my sister Jean said that she had to repeatedly call Adult Protective Services because he was beating his next wife who was sick and on dialysis. So, 4 out of 5 of us are in agreement that Joseph Arrigo, bless his soul, had a history of violence. Linda was his favorite child and we agree that he did not beat her. I am very grateful that she was spared that. But, for her to claim that she knows what happened to us when she was not there–now that is absurd. She has a right to her denial, but I cannot share it. ??For her to publicly and insensitively denounce the victims of his violence as crazy, borders on cruelty, given what they have already been through.

    My mother called as I was working writing this rebuttal. She had this to add on the subject;

    I am the mother of Dr. Sue Arrigo, Linda Gail Arrigo in Taiwan, and Jean Maria Arrigo who blew the whistle on the American Psychological Association.
    Joe Arrigo beat me repeatedly and tried to kill me four times. Joe Arrigo molested and injured two of his daughters, but not Linda because she was his favorite.
    After WWII, Captain Joseph Arrigo and our family lived at the San Francisco Presidio where he was working for the US Army.
    I divorced Joe Arrigo about 1958 because of his violence. He said I would be on poverty row within 6 months. I steeled myself, got a Master’s Degree in Mathematics, plus 4 years of college. I taught calculus at San Diego Mesa College for 35 years, retiring at age 81. In 1990, I joined 7 teachers there to sue our Chancellor who was trying to steal $20 million from our community college district. We recovered $9.6 million.
    Dr. Sue Arrigo is not crazy! She was tortured by our American military and CIA because of what she was uncovering.
    In 2004, I went to the East Coast to rescue her. She has special talents that help her uncover the truth of the deceit by the Bush Administration. The American Public should deem itself fortunate to have a reliable person with the courage to uncover the frauds of our current US Administration.
    I am currently volunteering at Children’s Hospital and at La Jolla library. I was on Channel 6 TV for taking 5 car loads of books to a new Middle School 50 miles north of San Diego which had no books! Because of low budget 1,000 teachers were just fired in San Diego. Class size has doubled. War expenses have reduced educational services all over the United States.
    I wish you well,
    Nellie Arrigo Amondson

  4. heike said on June 18th, 2008 at 5:23am #

    Where did you say you treated UBL?

    Why would your sister in Taiwan, of all places, be embarrassed at your links with the CIA?

    How would you as a neurologist come across reams of inside information about government contracting fraud? Why would you have access to any of that? Where was your need to know?

    What’s this “FBI” uniform you were sent. Since when do they have uniforms, except dark suits?

    Why would the CIA send a physician to NY to investigate KGB hacking of a NYPD computer? Do you have expertise in that field?

    Why would a neurologist have instant access to Tenet or Cheney?

    They never heard of you at the Committee, incidentally. Which person did you say you contacted?

  5. heike said on June 20th, 2008 at 2:35pm #

    “Meanwhile I went into Czechoslavia to find resistance fighters freezing in the forests as partisans after the fall of the Plague Spring and lead them into Hungaria. There were not many remote viewers at the time who could find people and breaks in the East-West border. So here I was trying to lead East Blockers to safety while viewing the enslavement of US children by the CIA in every spare moment of my time. ”

    Do you understand why you are delusional? Do you even know the proper names of the countries you are writing about? So, as a 15 year-old, you were sent on a CIA mission to rescue resistance fighters who were partisans after the fall of the “Plague Spring.” Do you know that there never were any Czech partisans, either in 1968 or in World War II?

    Do you have a single document from the CIA that supports your claim to have been a high-level officer? Or was it sex slave? Or was it “coerced asset”? You were sexually molested by the CIA since the age of 3?

    You do know, of course, that your account of the Tice and Lindauer episodes are completely erroneous? Lindauer was in contact with Saddam Hussein’s intelligence agents and Judge Mukasey ruled she was incompetent to stand trial. The prosecution wanted to administer a drug that would help cure her psychosis but Mukasey ruled against them. She is in the bizarre position of wanting a trial when the government feels she is incompetent to be tried for anything. Tice was believed to be suffering from psychotic paranoia, but was never forced to take any drugs.

    The fact that you feel that people who challenge the many holes in your story are involved in a “smear campaign” against you speaks reams about your credibility.