Wal-Mart Stoops to a New Low

How the Country's Largest Corporation is Trying to Steal from a Disabled Woman

Just when you thought Wal-Mart couldn’t sink any lower . . .

Former Wal-Mart employee Debbie Shank became a target of the company’s lawyers in the wake of a car accident that left her severely disabled. Shank used to stock shelves at Wal-Mart, but she was severely injured in 2000 when her minivan was struck by a tractor-trailer. The accident left Shank permanently brain damaged and in a wheelchair.

Today, the 52-year-old lives in a nursing home and requires 24-hour-a-day care. In addition to her physical disabilities, Shank’s short-term memory has been damaged to the point that she can no longer remember that her son Jeremy was killed in Iraq. She breaks down in tears each time she is told again.

One small blessing for the family — or so they thought — was that Shank had signed up for Wal-Mart’s health care and benefits plan. The company’s insurance did kick in, with Wal-Mart paying a total of about $470,000 for Shank’s medical expenses.

Two years after the accident, Shank and her husband were awarded a settlement in a lawsuit against the trucking company involved in the crash. After legal fees, the couple received $417,000 — money that was put into a trust for Debbie Shank’s long-term medical and nursing home care.

But after three years went by, Wal-Mart started demanding that the couple reimburse it for the money spent on Debbie’s medical expenses. Wal-Mart sued the couple, demanding that it turn over proceeds from the legal settlement.

Like many employer health plans, the fine print gives Wal-Mart the right to recoup any money paid on medical care if the injured person later collects money in a lawsuit.

The legal rationale is that this prevents people from collecting twice for the same medical bill. But in the case of Debbie Shank, the settlement money was clearly going to be used to cover the cost of Shank’s future care, which will almost certainly run into the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars.

Even so, Wal-Mart sued the family for the entire $470,000. A court ruled in the company’s favor, though it did reduce the amount, saying Wal-Mart could only recoup money left in the family’s trust — currently about $277,000.

Still, that leaves the Shanks with nothing for Debbie’s long-term care. In March, the US Supreme Court refused to hear the case, leaving the Shanks without any other legal options.

“We assumed after three years [that Wal-Mart] had made a decision to let Debbie Shank use this money for what it was intended to,” the family’s attorney, Maurice Graham, recently told CNN.

Debbie’s husband Jim, who is currently recovering from prostate cancer, works two jobs and struggles to pay the family’s bills. He told CNN that he may lose his car and is afraid he won’t be able to send their youngest son to college because of the cost of both his and Debbie’s medical care.

Last year, struggling under the weight of the medical bills, Jim legally divorced Debbie — in order for her to qualify for more money under the Medicaid health program.

Jim Shank admits that Wal-Mart is “within their rights, but I just wonder if they need it that bad . . . Who needs the money more? A disabled lady in a wheelchair with no future, whatsoever, or does Wal-Mart need $90 billion plus $200,000?”

Of course, Wal-Mart doesn’t need the money at all. The company was ranked first on the Fortune 500 list of top U.S. corporations last year, with revenues of more than $351 billion and profits of over $11 billion. Wal-Mart took in $100 billion in just the last three months of 2007 — meaning it covered the $470,000 it claims the Shanks owe it in just 37 seconds during that period.

But Wal-Mart spokesperson John Simley told CNN in a statement that the company’s hands are tied. “Wal-Mart’s plan is bound by very specific rules,” Simley said. “We wish it could be more flexible in Mrs. Shank’s case since her circumstances are clearly extraordinary, but this is done out of fairness to all associates who contribute to, and benefit from, the plan.”

But Wal-Mart has never been known for being “flexible” when it comes to its employees. In fact, the company seems almost proud of the sub-standard wages and benefits it offers.

Last year, it sent Vice President Tom Emerick — the man responsible for designing its employee benefits packages — to lecture business leaders in Dallas. According to the Dallas Morning News, Emerick praised “high-deductible plans,” explaining that employees are more likely to curtail health care spending — and save the company money — if they have high out-of-pocket costs to pay.

In 2005, in an internal memo leaked to the press, M. Susan Chambers, Wal-Mart’s executive vice president for benefits, expressed dismay over the growing cost of employee health care. To solve the problem, Chambers suggested hiring fewer full-time workers, discouraging the elderly or people with health problems from taking jobs at Wal-Mart and reducing corporate contributions to employees’ 401(k) retirement plans.

According to the company’s own figures, as of January 2006, just 46 percent of Wal-Mart’s 1.3 million U.S. workers had company health insurance. And according to the Wal-Mart Watch Web site, that coverage is full of hidden charges, and plans frequently provide less in benefits than other comparable companies.

For now, the Shanks are out of legal options–though Jim Shank says the family will try to figure out a way to get by and “do the best we can for Debbie.”

As MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann, who recently nominated Wal-Mart as part of his “Worst Person in the World” series, put it: “Contrary to general opinion, Wal-Mart is not owned by the devil . . . but you know why people think of Wal-Mart and evil in the same sentence? Because of the crap you guys do like this . . . Wal-Mart: may your stores melt in the hot sun. Today’s worst person in the world.”

What You Can Do

* You can sign an Internet petition at the Wal-Mart Watch Web site urging the company to let the Shanks keep their money.

* Wal-Mart March and another union-sponsored site, Wake Up Wal-Mart, contain a wealth of information on the giant retailers scandalous behavior toward workers, as well news of various activist campaigns.

For a book that details the company’s rise to economic dominance, try Anthony Bianco’s The Bully of Bentonville. Charles Fishman’s The Wal-Mart Effect looks at the impact of the company and its policies on the U.S. economy. Liza Featherstone’s Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Worker’s Rights at Wal-Mart documents the class-action lawsuit filed by women workers over sex discrimination in promotions, pay and job assignments.

3 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Timber said on April 2nd, 2008 at 10:15am #

    How many of you dissidents, libertarians and other freedom-lovers are supporting WalMart? It’s been my experience that many people claiming to support individual liberties and human rights make an exemption for themselves and their own “little blessings” if they can save a few cents by joining their Republican counterparts at the sweatshop trough. We seem not so much to want to end other people’s exploitation as to make sure that we and our offspring are on the porch, not in the field.

    WalMart, Hummers, George Bush and our occupation of Iraq are all more accurate reflections of America’s character than the fairy tales taught in schools as “history.”

  2. onecansay said on April 2nd, 2008 at 2:48pm #

    Well put Timber!
    As well, for whom do you think the laws are made for. The CORPORATION! In just about every country that exists with these corporations, the corporations dictate how laws will be driven and hence executed. These same corporations own the corporate insurance company, the corporate trucking company, the corporate drug company, the corporate food system, the corpo……………. I think you get the drift. World corporate owns your ass as well as your shit. You have no where to go and no where to hide. World Corporate makes sure that your government knows who and where you are. SSN, SIN, blah blah. Wake up because the coffee pot is burning. Oh, too late, because you forgot to replace the batteries in the smoke detector and the place has burnt to the ground and you have lost all you have worked for, as well as your job.
    In God We Trust.
    Most have forgotten who the real boss is!

  3. hp said on April 3rd, 2008 at 10:47am #

    That Walmart picked Tuesday, April Fools Day to announce that it “will not seek to collect money the Shanks won in an injury lawsuit against a trucking company accident for the accident” and that “Mrs. Shank’s extraordinary situation had made the company re-examine its stance,” is odd, but considering Walmart initiated the case to begin with is even odder.