The Veterans Affairs
Department is currently
reviewing approximately
one-third of the cases of veterans
who are receiving disability benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD). After conducting an internal study, the VA believes that they
were too lenient in deciding which soldiers were eligible for PTSD
benefits. Last year, the VA spent $4.3 billion on PTSD disability
payments and the VA hopes to reduce these payments by revoking PTSD
benefits for many veterans. This will be the final insult to soldiers
who were asked to fight a war in Iraq on false premises.
Because of the war in Iraq
and Afghanistan, the number of veterans receiving compensation for PTSD
has increased by almost 80 percent in the last five years. By
comparison, the number of veterans receiving compensation for all other
types of disabilities has only increased by 12 percent. Under the
guidelines of the current review, soldiers who cannot prove that a
specific incident, known as a “stressor,” was sufficient to cause PTSD,
will have their benefits revoked. However, given the nature of warfare
in Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s not surprising that many returning
soldiers are suffering from mental illness.
In the July 2004 issue of the
New England Journal of Medicine,
carried a preliminary study of the effects of the war in Iraq and
Afghanistan on military personnel by Colonel Charles W. Hoge,
M.D., the chief of psychiatry at Walter Reed Army Institute, and his
colleagues. The study concluded that close to 20 percent of soldiers who
served in Iraq, and approximately 12 percent of those who served in
Afghanistan returned home suffering from PTSD. The study found that
there is a clear correlation between combat experience and the
prevalence of PTSD. The study determined that, “Rates of PTSD were
significantly higher after combat duty in Iraq.”
Approximately 86 percent of soldiers in Iraq were involved in combat, as
were 31 percent in Afghanistan. On average, soldiers engaged in two
firefights for each tour of duty. The study indicated that 95 percent of
soldiers had been shot at. And 56 percent of soldiers had killed an
enemy combatant. An estimated 28 percent were directly responsible for
the death of a civilian. Equally grim, 94 percent had seen or handled
corpses or bodily remains. Additionally, 68 percent witnessed fellow
soldiers being killed or seriously wounded.
Although the number of soldiers suffering from PTSD is high, Dr. Hoge’s
study found that a majority of veterans are not seeking treatment. Only
40 percent of returning soldiers acknowledged that they need mental
health care, and only 26 percent were actually receiving care. As such,
the number of veterans approved for PTSD compensation by the VA is
relatively small. Yet the VA believes that too many soldiers were
approved for PTSD disability compensation and is now seeking to deny
soldiers this benefit.
The lack of pre-war intelligence also likely contributed to a rise in
PTSD disability claims. Studies of the Vietnam War have indicated that
when soldiers can’t anticipate the nature and intensity of warfare that
they ultimately encounter they are psychologically unprepared, leading
to PTSD in many instances. During the early phase of the war in Iraq,
many soldiers were almost certainly unprepared for what they
encountered.
The Bush administration initially indicated that the war would be quick
and easy. Vice President Cheney, only a few days after the invasion of
Iraq, infamously stated that soldiers “…will, in fact, be greeted as
liberators.” Ahmed Chalabi, a close advisor to the Bush administration
prior to and immediately following the invasion said, “American troops
will be greeted with flowers and candy” by the Iraqi people, and the
administration repeated this many times. President Bush flew onto a U.S.
aircraft carrier in May 2003 and, while standing beneath a banner
proclaiming “Mission Accomplished,” announced that major combat
operations had ended.
It’s easy to understand why the VA has seen an increase in soldiers
seeking benefits due to post-traumatic stress disorder. What’s difficult
to comprehend is why the very agency responsible for meeting the needs
of our veterans is now turning its back on them. Perhaps it’s
attributable to money. The Bush administration may be seeking to reduce
compensation to soldiers for PTSD so that more money can be diverted to
the on-going war in Iraq.
Or, perhaps this is simply a public relations issue. The effort to
revoke PTSD benefits may be an attempt to assert that the war has not
been that devastating. What is certain is that the very people asked to
sacrifice their lives, if necessary, for the nation are now being
punished for doing so.
Gene C. Gerard
teaches American history at a small college in suburban Dallas, and is a
contributing author to the forthcoming book Americana at War. His
previous articles have appeared in Dissident Voice, Political
Affairs Magazine, The Free Press, Intervention Magazine,
The Modern Tribune, and The Palestine Chronicle. He can be
reached at
genecgerard@comcast.net.