weeks after the racialized poverty of New Orleans was laid bare in the
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, people in the United States asked, “Could
this be a turning point? Is this a moment when America might wake up to
the inequality and racism in our own country?”
The question itself
-- posed most often by people living comfortably in the white middle class
-- is an indication of just how deeply in denial the vast majority of
privileged Americans are about these fundamental injustices, their role in
perpetuating them, and how real change might come. We should be
collectively ashamed that the question is being asked in this form, for
two simple reasons.
First, it’s true that the television coverage of the people who were the
most vulnerable during the flight from Katrina and the aftermath --
largely poor and disproportionately black -- did shock many. As the
evacuation proceeded, it was impossible to avoid noticing that who got out
fairly easily and who got stuck -- who lived and who died -- was largely a
function of race and class.
But did we really need those images to know that the United States has an
inequality problem? In a country in which racialized disparities in wealth
and well-being are readily evident to anyone who cares to pay attention,
what does it say about us as a nation that we needed dramatic images on
television to force us to confront the issue?
Even a cursory scan of the data on such things as health (infant mortality
is twice as high in the black as the white community) or employment (black
unemployment is double that of whites, a gap that has actually widened in
the past three decades) reveals that serious inequality persists despite
the gains of the civil-rights movement of the 1950s and ‘60s. Even for the
measures on which there has been some improvement -- for example,
black-white poverty gap has narrowed somewhat in recent decades -- the
underlying reality is grim; at the current rate it will take 150 years to
reach parity on that poverty measure.
Anyone who wants to know these things -- any white middle class person
with a computer, for example -- can figure it out quickly. The data are
not state secrets.
More importantly, the cold data come to life dramatically when one listens
to the experiences of virtually everyone in non-white communities, not
just in New Orleans but anywhere in the United States. Perhaps no term
captures this more painfully that “driving while black,” a reference to
the routine harassment through traffic stops that so many black people,
especially black men who are so commonly seen as inherently criminal,
endure at the hands of law enforcement. In Latino communities, it’s called
“driving while brown.”
The data is clear. The testimony is clear. We shouldn’t need pictures. The
fact that so many seemed to be shocked by the pictures is a sign not just
of the society’s inequality, but of the routine complacency in the most
privileged sectors of our society.
But the question of whether the aftermath of Katrina will “change America”
is perhaps most objectionable for the way it allows those with the
responsibility to help change society -- that is, those who benefit from
the inequality -- to escape into emotions and speculation, rather than
analysis and action.
Yes, dramatic and painful images of black people packed into a sports
arena-turned-shelter have tweaked the consciences of many. But tweaked
consciences are notorious for lapsing back into complacency quickly when
no political pressure is applied. Lots of well-off white people may have
felt bad about what they saw in New Orleans, but such feelings are not
morally admirable unless they lead to action that can change things. That
means moving from an emotional reaction to a political analysis, and from
speculation about whether things might change to a commitment to making
Racism and racialized poverty in the United States are systemic and
structural problems. They are not simply the result of confusion on the
part of people in power; they are institutionalized. Progress comes when
those systems, structures, and institutions change. That requires
collective action, not individual fretting.
It’s true that the collective political project of overcoming racism is
intertwined with the very personal struggle to overcome our complacency.
It’s true that history can provide dramatic moments in which things can
change quickly. But it is naïve -- to a degree that suggests purposeful
ignorance -- to believe that a single emotionally charged experience such
as viewing the images of racialized suffering in New Orleans will have a
long-term effect on systems, structures, or institutions.
In the United States we have been through this before. In 1991, all of
America watched the videotape of the savage beating of Rodney King, a
black man, by Los Angeles police officers. We watched and emoted. We asked
the question: “Could this be a turning point? Is this a moment when
America wakes up to the inequality in our own country?”
Meanwhile, as we pondered that question in the 1990s, the United States
intensified the racist criminal-justice practices that disproportionately
target black and brown Americans. We built prisons to house the
disproportionately black and brown inmates who would be casually tossed
into jail to reassure the white affluent majority that things were safe.
As a result, if current incarceration rates continue, one of three black
males born today will be imprisoned at some point in their lifetimes.
So, it is self-indulgence to even ask the question whether an emotionally
intense event such as the aftermath of Katrina will change U.S. society.
The answer is painfully obvious: These events don’t create change.
Progressive change comes when people commit to take the risks necessary to
The hand-wringing that the white affluent segment of the United States
indulged in after the hurricane was a common way middle-class people deal
with their sense of guilt when they are confronted by what they have
largely chosen to ignore. But this problem is hardly unique to the United
States. It happens in virtually every country in which some segment of the
elite has convinced itself that the grotesque levels of inequality are
Robert Jensen is a journalism
professor at the University of Texas at Austin and a member of the board
of the Third
Coast Activist Resource Center. He is the author of The Heart of
Whiteness: Race, Racism, and White Privilege and Citizens of the
Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity (both from City Lights
Books). He can be reached at
Articles by Robert Jensen
From Hiroshima to Iraq and Back with Sharon Weiner
Demonizing News Media is Attempt to Divert Attention from Policy Failures
* A New
“Citizens Oath of Office” for Inauguration 2005
Election Day Fears
Dams in India -- Temples or Burial Grounds?
Supports Anti-Democratic Forces in Venezuela Recall
Hypocrisy on the Vietnam War
“Fahrenheit 9/11” is a Stupid White Movie
Just the Emperor Who is Naked, but the Whole Empire
Strike Remembers the Victims of World Bank Policies
Condi Rice Wouldn't Admit Mistakes
President Bush Involved with Donation
to Group with
Observe Right to Unionize by Making it Reality
New Purported Bush Tape Raises Fear of New Attacks
General Boykin’s Fundamentalist View of the Other
Just the (Documented) Facts, Ma'am
Through the Eyes of Foreigners: US Political Crisis
“No War” A Full-Throated Cry
Media Criticism of Iraq Coverage Reveals Problems with Journalists'
Conception of News
Embedded Reporters Viewpoint Misses Main Point Of War
Fighting Alienation in the USA
Where's The Pretext? Lack of WMD Kills Case for War
For Self-Determination in Iraq, The U.S. Must Leave
The Images They Choose, and Choose to Ignore
Embedded Media Give Up Independence
On NPR, Please Follow the Script