<
FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from freestats.com
(DV) Gerard: Bush Abuses Recess Appointment Power


HOME 

SEARCH 

NEWS SERVICE 

LETTERS 

ABOUT DV CONTACT SUBMISSIONS

 

Bush Abuses Recess Appointment Power
by Gene C. Gerard 
www.dissidentvoice.org
January 17, 2006

Send this page to a friend! (click here)

 

Earlier this month President Bush took advantage of Congress’ winter recess to circumvent the Senate and appoint 17 individuals to various government positions. Article II of the Constitution allows presidents to make temporary appointments without Senate approval; those appointed can serve until the next Congressional elections. The Founding Fathers granted the presidency the power to make recess appointments because prior to the 20th century Congress was in session for less than six months a year, in many instances, and vacancies couldn’t wait until Congress reconvened. However, since the 1980s presidents have used recess appointments for political purposes.

 

Presidents Reagan and Bush made recess appointments in the face of a Democratically-controlled Senate. And following the Republican takeover of Congress in 1994, President Clinton frequently made use of his recess appointment power. In this sense, Mr. Bush’s use of recess appointments is nothing new. However, what is unique is that Mr. Bush is making recess appointments at a time when his own party controls the Senate. And he is making appointments at a pace much greater than that of recent presidents. President Clinton issued 140 recess appointments during his two terms in office. Mr. Bush’s father made 77 appointments during his administration. By comparison, Mr. Bush made 110 appointments during his first term alone.

 

Mr. Bush’s use of his recess appointment power is unusual in another respect. Many of those appointed are unsuited or unqualified for their positions. In other instances, Mr. Bush has appointed individuals not because of what they know, but rather whom they know. In the Bush administration, it’s frequently not the qualifications or experience of those appointed that matter, but their personal or political connections to Mr. Bush himself.

 

Among the 17 individuals appointed was Julie Myers, who was installed to head the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a division of the Homeland Security Department. The bureau has 15,000 employees and a budget of $4 billion. Yet Ms. Myers has never managed a large government agency and has no immigration experience. Until her recess appointment she was the special assistant for personnel to Mr. Bush. At the age of 36, Ms. Myers is one of the youngest and most inexperienced officials to ever head an agency. It seems more likely that her personal connections account for the appointment. She is the niece of General Richard Myers, who until recently was the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the wife of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff’s chief of staff.

 

Tracy Henke was appointed to serve as Executive Director of the Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness in the Homeland Security Department. Ms. Henke previously served in the Justice Department, where she was involved in an attempt to alter government documents. Last April, a report on racial profiling compiled by Lawrence Greenfield, the federal director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, was sent to Ms. Henke for review. The report found that although police stopped blacks, Hispanics, and whites at approximately the same rate, blacks and Hispanics were more likely to be searched and greater force was used against them. Ms. Henke returned the report to Mr. Greenfield with instructions to delete the reference to unfair police treatment of blacks and Hispanics. When Mr. Greenfield refused, he was reprimanded by Justice Department officials and ultimately forced to resign by the Bush administration.

 

Mr. Bush recess appointed another Justice Department official, Hans von Spakovsky, to serve on the Federal Election Commission (FEC). Yet Mr. von Spakovsky has been strongly criticized for playing a principal role in the Justice Department’s efforts to limit voting rights in Georgia. After Georgia passed a controversial law requiring all voters to produce valid photo identification at the polls, a Justice Department panel of five attorneys reviewed the law. By a vote of four to one, they found that the law potentially violated the Voting Rights Act. However, Mr. von Spakovsky rejected their finding. A subsequent study determined that Georgia’s law might disenfranchise as many as 300,000 poor and elderly voters who do not have a driver’s license, the most commonly available form of identification.

 

Also appointed to the FEC was Robert Lenhard. Mr. Lenhard was previously an attorney for the AFL-CIO and an outspoken critic of campaign finance reform legislation. In fact, Mr. Lenhard served as legal counsel in the case of McConnell v. FEC, which sought to overturn the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. As counsel, Mr. Lenhard argued that attempts to restrict advertisements disguised as addressing political issues but that actually attack or support a candidate are unlawful. However, the Supreme Court rejected his argument. Republican Senator John McCain referred to Mr. Lenhard as “someone who would use his [FEC] position not to enforce the law, but to weaken it.”

 

The Constitution clearly affords a president the ability to make appointments while Congress is not in session. But it also mandates that the Senate shall provide “advice and consent” on presidential nominations. By circumventing the Senate Mr. Bush is abusing his power. And he is putting the country at risk by appointing individuals to critical positions who are not qualified.

 

Gene C. Gerard teaches American history at a small college in suburban Dallas, and is a contributing author to the forthcoming book Americana at War. His previous articles have appeared in Dissident Voice, Political Affairs Magazine, The Free Press, Intervention Magazine, The Modern Tribune, and The Palestine Chronicle. He can be reached at: genecgerard@comcast.net.

Other Articles by Gene C. Gerard

* Another Brownie in the Making
* Pharmacists Can’t Say No to Contraception
* Any Soldier Will Do For the Pentagon
* Kansas Attorney General is Bush’s Kind of Guy
* VA Seeks to Punish Iraq War Veterans
* Soldiers Shouldn’t Serve as Police Officers
* Republicans Require Health Insurance for Immigrants Only
* Poverty Increases as Incomes Decline Under President Bush
* As in World War II, The President Should Limit Oil Profits
* Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts and the Voting Rights Act
* The Flag Should Not Infringe on the First Amendment
* President Bush Must Address Outsourcing
* Consumer Confidence Decline Surprises Only the Bush Administration
* Conservative Ideology Hinders U.S. AIDS Policy
* The Record of Judge John Roberts
* Gay Marriage Critics Are Misguided
* Democrats Can Succeed Without the Filibuster
* Turkey is Not a Role Model for the Middle East
* Violations of Civil Liberties are an American Tradition
* The Economy Turned the Corner and Is Headed in the Wrong Direction
* Bush Administration Promotes Global Conflicts by Rewarding Allies
* Bush Administration Attempts to Influence Global HIV/AIDS Policy
* Conservatives, Judicial Impeachment, and Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas
* Appeals Court Nominee Janice Rogers Brown Merits the Filibuster
* Zimbabwe’s Very American Election
* Appeals Court Nominee Thomas B. Griffith is a Poor Choice
* President Bush’s Use of Pardons Isn’t Very Compassionate
* E.P.A. Nominee Supports Testing of Chemicals on Human Subjects
* Military Policy on Gays is Costly and Dangerous
* Bush Administration AIDS Policies Continue to Fall Short
* Bush’s Judicial Nominations are Hardly Mainstream
* Bush’s Budget is at Odds With His Rhetoric
* Iraq’s Election Will Not Guarantee Democracy
* The Politics of SpongeBob

HOME