|
Here's
a little new wrinkle in the story of the corporate-liberal New York
Times' servility to imperial power. Last Monday's Times
contained an outwardly progressive item: a two-page photo essay on
civilian casualties (what the paper calls “The Face of Sacrifice”) in Iraq
(“The Face and Voice of Civilian Sacrifice in Iraq: Photographs by Adam
Nadel,” NYT, 26 December 2005, pp. A16-A17).
“In Iraq,” the
Times says, “nobody knows, and few in authority seemed concerned to
count, just how many civilians have been killed and injured. Soon it will
be three years since the American-led invasion. The estimates of those
killed run into the tens of thousands, the numbers wounded two or three
times the number who lost their lives. Even President Bush, estimating
recently that 30,000 civilians may have been killed, acknowledged that was
no more than an abstraction from unofficial calculation, not a Pentagon
count.”
Of course, people on the left have been talking about -- and trying to put
a human face on -- Iraqi civilian casualties since even before the
murderous and illegal occupation was launched.
Maybe the Times’ willingness to see and show some of that that
Iraqi civilian face is better late than never....
But there's a curious and revealing problem with the Times' photo
essay.
It relates seven
incidents in which Iraqis have been violently killed or injured since
March 19, 2003 (day one of “Operation Iraqi Freedom”). And who did the
killing in the small number of such incidents it chose to report?
In three of the seven, the killers are technically unidentified. Regarding
these three cases, readers learn only that the damage was done by “a bomb”
that somehow exploded, though the suggestion is strong that
anti-occupation forces (“terrorists”) were the agents.
In another three of the seven incidents, the Times clearly
identifies the occupation resisters (“terrorists”) as the perpetrators of
violence against Iraqi civilians.
And in the last incident, located at the bottom right of the second page
(A17), the Times shows a surviving husband who claims to have lost
a wife and a daughter when his family's car was shot up by the American
“liberators”. According to the Times, Ahmed Moayda “said his family
was fired upon by an American convoy as they were traveling by car from
Baghdad to Jordan.
The Times makes no such source qualification in regard to any of
the other incidents related in Monday's photo essay. In the three attacks
attributed to anti-occupation forces, the perpetrators’ identities are
simply stated as an uncontested matter of fact, without any “he said/she
said” prelude.
Interesting.
Just for the record,
Iraq Body Count (IBC)'s recently published “Dossier
of Civilian Casualties in Iraq, 2003-2005”
reports that one in every 1,000 Iraqis was violently killed between March
20, 2003 (the day after the beginning of the U.S. invasion) and March 19,
2005. By projecting from readily available data on Iraqi marriage and
childbirth rates, IBC infers that “tens of thousands of Iraqi women
and children have lost a husband or father to violence since March 2003, a
loss which will have long lasting psychological and economic consequences
for the bereaved families.”
Iraqi families are also dealing with crippling injuries resulting from
wartime violence. By IBC's tabulation, 42,500 Iraqis have been
wounded during the occupation.
By IBC's meticulous account, based on multiple verifiable media
reports, anti-occupation forces have killed less than 10 percent of the
total number of the nearly 25,000 dead for whom the killers can be
identified. “Criminal elements,” who have thrived in the lawless
environment created by the destruction of Iraqi civil authority, killed
8,935 or 36 percent.
The biggest killers have been the US-led armed forces, which violently
ended the lives of 9,270 Iraqis or 37.3 percent.
In separate databases that include real-time accounts from reporters in
Iraq, IBC presents a number of accounts of Iraqis killed by
American “liberators”. IBC's “Falluja Archive” contains (to give
one among many examples) an April 2004 Associated Press (AP) story
relating how more than 600 Iraqis, “mostly women, children, and the
elderly,” were butchered during Uncle Sam's massive “retaliatory” (after
the resistance killed US-funded Blackwater USA Security mercenaries)
campaign in Falluja. “Iraqis in Falluja,” the AP noted, “complained that
civilians were coming under fire by U.S. snipers.”
One such civilian was mentioned in an especially chilling account quoted
in the Falluja Archive. “One of the bodies brought to the clinic,” wrote
journalist Dahr Jamail in The Nation, “was that of a 55-year old
man shot in the back by a [U.S.] sniper outside his home, while his wife
and children huddled wailing inside. The family could not retrieve his
body for fear of being shot themselves. His stiff corpse was carried into
the clinic, flies swarming above it. One of his arms was half raised by
rigor mortis.”
That would have been a good picture for the Times to have taken and
included at the top, not the bottom of its photo essay.
If accurate portrayal of the violence's agents had been a value in the
construction of its story, at least two of the Times' photos should
have portrayed victims of direct U.S. violence. At least two should have
portrayed victims of criminal violence related to America's destruction of
Iraqi civil authority. No more than one should have portrayed victims of
those resisting the occupation.
There's certainly more people in Iraqi authority than in American
authority that are “concerned to count just how many civilians have been
killed and injured.” And it was General Tommy Franks of US Central Command
who said the following when asked how many Iraqis had died in the initial
phases of the U.S. invasion: “We Don't Do Body Counts.” How odd and
revealing for the Times to say that “even Bush” can give only an
abstract estimate of Iraq's casualty number and “not a Pentagon count.”
Paul Street
is a Visiting Professor of American History at Northern Illinois
University. His latest book is
Empire and Inequality: America and the World Since 9/11 (Boulder,
CO: Paradigm Publishers, October 2004). He
can be reached at: pstreet@niu.edu.
Other Recent Articles by Paul Street
*
Pentagon
Puppets and Other Orwellian Horrors at USA Today
* Messianic
Militarism Versus Democracy in Imperial America
* “Dishonest
and Reprehensible”?
* The
"Cowardice" Card: Militarism's Last and Self-Fulfilling Refuge
* Bill
Clinton Was No Champion of the Poor
* Dominant
Media and Damage Control in the Wake of a Not-So Natural Disaster
* The
All-Too American Tragedy of New Orleans: Empire, Inequality, Race and Oil
* Still
Separate, Unequal: Race, Place, Policy & Racism Avoidance in and Around
Chicago
* Bush,
China, Two Deficits, and the Ongoing Decline of US Hegemony
* Watergate
Was a Minor Crime
* The Nuclear
Option” and the One Party State
* Terri
Schiavo, 84,000 Black Men, and Dominant Media's Selective Morality
* “Because We
Are America!”
* Martin
Luther King. Jr. and “The Triple Evils That Are Interrelated”
* Love
Motivates Us to Kill the Enemy
* Rumseld
to Troops in Iraq: “Fight Naked...Life’s a Bitch and Then YOU Die”
* No
Apology for Dissent: Truth and Cowardice
*
Love, Hates, Kills, Dies
* Killing
on Tape and the Broader War Criminality
* Dear
Europe
* The
United States: “As Menacing to Itself and the World As Ever”
* The Fabric
of Deception and Liberal Complicity
* Campaign
Reflections: Resentment Abhors a Vaccum
* The 9/11
Commission Report: Bush's Negligence Didn't Happen
* Notes on
Race, Gender, and Mass Infantilization
* “A
Descending Spiral Ending in Destruction for All-Too Many”
* Racist
Democratic Empire and Atrocity Denial
* Kerry's
Predictable Failure to Make Bush Pay for Rising US Poverty
* Thought
Control, Costas, the Olympics and Imperial Occupations Past and Present
* JF Kerry:
“I am Not a [Redistribution] Democrat”
* Stupid
White Men and Why Segregation Matters
* The
"Vile Maxim" Versus the Common Good: Different Approaches to November
* We Need
a New Media Relationship
* “Failed
States” at Home and Abroad
* Be “Part
of Something”: Sign Up With The American Empire Project
*
Congratulations, Mr. Bush: You Have Not Presided Over the Final Collapse
of Capitalism
* "Slaves
Had Jobs Too"
* Brown
v. Board Fifty Years Out: Still Separate and Unequal
* Let Them
Eat "Cakewalk"
*
England, America, Empire, and Inequality
* Niall
Ferguson Speaks on the Need for Imperial Ruthlessness
* Richard
A. Clarke, Rwanda, and “Narcissistic Compassion”
*
Honest Mistakes? The New York Times on "The Failure to Find Iraqi Weapons"
*
Urban Race Relations: "Everything Changed" After 9/11?
*
Forbidden Connections: Class, Cowardice, and War
*
The "Repair" of "Broken Societies" Begins at Home
*
Deep Poverty, Deep Deception: Facts That Matter Beneath The Imperial
Helicopters
HOME
|
|