FREE hit counter and Internet traffic statistics from
(DV) Frank: Color Coded Justice -- John Roberts' Racial Hang-up







Color Coded Justice: John Roberts' Racial Hang-up
by Joshua Frank
August 3, 2005

Send this page to a friend! (click here)


First, Supreme Court nominee John Roberts Jr. lied about his membership with the far right-wing Federalist Society, and now file cabinets full of documents are being released which indicate Roberts' penchant for justice is color coded. He says he won't be an activist judge. But he's lying again. Right-wing activism is all Roberts knows.

On Thursday, July 28, Senator Edward Kennedy alleged that Roberts has a “rather cramped view of the Voting Rights Act.”

What an understatement.

In a series of documents which were recently disclosed by the Bush administration, Roberts noted it was his opinion that extending the 1965 Act, which was under consideration while Roberts worked for the Reagan Administration, would “not simply extend the existing and effective Voting Rights Act, but would dramatically change it ... It's not broken so there's no need to fix it.”

In another document during the same period, Roberts wrote that specific legislation designed to overturn a separate ruling by the Supreme Court “radically expand the civil rights laws to areas never before considered covered.” Consequently, Roberts urged the Court should vote against it.

This leads one to believe that perhaps Roberts is a bit on the racially charged side of the hate spectrum.

Maybe a lot.

As The New York Times recently reported, “In December 1981, the United States Commission on Civil Rights issued a report broadly defending affirmative action as a way to combat pervasive discrimination. Judge Roberts wrote a blistering critique, saying the ‘obvious reason’ affirmative action programs had failed was that they ‘required the recruiting of inadequately prepared candidates.’”

Let's clarify Roberts' remarks. It was his opinion that it was “obvious” that the minorities recruited under affirmative action policies were, by definition, “inadequately prepared candidates.” In other words, it wasn't possible for these black and Latino applicants to be anything but “inadequately prepared.”

Roberts' intolerant position was not based on any sort of legal facts or even a conservative reading of the Constitution. His position was based on a racial predisposition.

Go tell the Democrats that John Roberts Jr. is not fit to serve on the high court. Let them know he might be better suited for Grand Dragon. I hear there's an opening.

Joshua Frank is the author of the brand new book, Left Out!: How Liberals Helped Reelect George W. Bush, which has just been published by Common Courage Press. You can order a copy at a discounted rate at Joshua can be reached at Read an excellent review of Left Out! by Adam Engel.

View this feed in your browser

Related Articles

* Speaking Truth to Roberts by Paul Rogat Loeb
* John Roberts and the National Security State by Mike Whitney
* Turkey Supreme by Lila Rajiva
* The Record of Judge John Roberts by Gene C. Gerard
* Blame the Democrats & Move On: The Federalist Court by Jack Random

Other Recent Articles by Josh Frank

* Blame the Democrats: Passing CAFTA
* The Mrs. Thatcher of the Democrats, Hillary Clinton: Outflanking Bush from the Right
* Framing Abortion: Gonadal Politics and the Democrats
* The Plame Blame Game
* Muting the Muslims
* Commending Karl Rove
* Is Rove the Leaker? Stay Tuned...
* Rove To Be Indicted?
* Conrad Burns: A Senator and a Liar
* The War Path of Unity
* Bombing Iran: The Facts Don't Matter
* With Hand on Heart: Pelosi Admits Israel Comes First
* Newsweek's Koran Story Rubber Stamped by DoD
* Chavez's Economy: Is it Sustainable?
* Bush to Dine with Porn Star: Mary Carey Does DC
* John Kerry's Hate Speech
* Leaked UK Memo Indicts Blair's Iraq Folly
* A Bipartisan Assault on Teenage Girls
* A Scandal of Irony
* The Horowitz Gang: Nothing Short of Fascist
* Environmentalists Against Nature
* Supporting the Troops While Opposing Their Actions
* Calling Their Bluff: The Delay Scandal is Not a Partisan Issue
The Minuteman Project: Gunning for Change but Shooting Blanks
* US Intelligence “Dead Wrong”: Skeptics Were Right All Along
* The Selling-Out of the Antiwar Movement, Part Two
* The Selling-Out of the Antiwar Movement, Part One
* Hope in Red State America: Lessons from the Big Sky Country (Part 2)
* A Red State Paradox (Part One): Montana on the Cusp
* Protecting Campaign Coffers, Not Nature: The Trials of Max Baucus
* Diagnosing the Green Party: Narcissism Runs Rampant
* Farewell Hope: The Hogtying of the Deaniacs
* It Just Takes One McVeigh to Ruin Your Day
* The Distortions of Acumen Continued: More Liberal Trashing of Ward Churchill
* The Distortions of Acumen: Liberals Trash Ward Churchill
* Howard Dean’s Been Suckered: The Establishment Corrals the Deaniacs
* Democrats Support Bush’s Iran Policy
* Hope is Not on the Way: The Farce of the DNC Contest
* Privacy Piracy? What Howard Dean May Bring to the DNC
* Voter Fraud as Fundraiser: David Cobb and the Ohio Recount