HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE LETTERS SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Temporary
Work Grows in Bush’s America
by
Seth Sandronsky
Dissident
Voice
November 3, 2003
In
President George W. Bush’s America, you may be one of the 122,000 people who
became a temporary worker during the past seven months. If so, you may well lack (but want) the
stability of permanent work.
Permanent
workers usually have a steady paycheck and are more apt to have health care
benefits. Temporary workers are less
likely to have both.
Plus
the boss probably buys the labor-power of temporary workers more cheaply than
their permanent counterparts. Call it
the tyranny of the bottom line, the heart and soul of capitalism.
Nine
million Americans officially out of a job make it a buyer’s market for most
workers’ labor-power. Economic growth
in the U.S. in 2003 has yet to change this equation.
On
Oct. 31, the NY Times reported “The news that the economy had expanded in the
third quarter at a 7.2 percent annual rate - the best performance since 1984 -
gave Mr. Bush and his party a compelling piece of evidence to back their
assertions that they have put the nation back on the road to prosperity a year
before Election Day.” Prosperity for
whom is the $64,000 question.
The
day before in Columbus, Ohio, the president had promoted his policy of tax cuts
as the path to eventually creating “jobs aplenty for those looking for work.''
No mention of the growth in temporary jobs that some see as a positive trend.
“Global
Insight expects the recent buildup in temporary help payrolls will soon
translate into some slow but steady employment gains, with the more significant
job creation delayed until the spring of 2004,”” wrote Mark Ulmer, with the
firm. It “provides the most
comprehensive economic and financial coverage of countries, regions and
industries available from any source.”
Yet
recent data does not back Mr. Ulmer’s view on temporary employment.
Consider
this.
A
total of 75,000 temporary jobs were added between last February and June,
according to Labor Dept. figures. Yet
no jump in overall hiring followed, noted Dean Baker, an economist and
co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.
When
will a U.S. hiring boom arrive? Surely,
many temporary workers are waiting and wondering.
Speaking
of growth, what are the connections between the three federal tax cuts under
Bush and the nation’s job market? An
Oct. 3 report by the Economic Policy Institute titled “Bush administration’s
tax cuts falling short in job creation” tells quite a different tale.
“The
Bush administration called the tax cut package, which took effect in July 2003,
its “Jobs and Growth Plan.” The president’s economics staff, the Council of
Economic Advisers (see background documents), projected that the plan would
raise the level of growth enough to create 5.5 million jobs by the end of
2004—344,000 new jobs each month, starting in July 2003. Last month, September
2003, the jobs and growth plan fell 287,000 jobs short of the administration’s
projection. The cumulative shortfall since July 2003—the amount by which the
projected jobs exceeded actual job growth in August and September—is now
672,000” (http://jobwatch.org/).
In
America, it is clear that the working majority needs more permanent jobs. But U.S. policy makers appear unable to meet
their needs.
Meanwhile,
Bush’s strategists know that steady unemployment with or without economic
growth makes him vulnerable in the run-up to the 2004 presidential
election. Case in point is the 2.7
million manufacturing jobs that have disappeared since his 2000 (s)election.
So
what is the spin around this vulnerability?
Administration officials are partly trying to convince some of the
electorate that China is to blame.
Publicly,
Bush and Treasury Chief John Snow back American manufacturers.
Yet
both Republicans are mum on U.S. multinationals that do business in China.
Take
General Motors China. The corporation employs Chinese workers at low wages to
make auto parts for export to the U.S.
Meanwhile,
the struggle to find a permanent job continues in Bush’s America. Who will hire the un- and under-employed,
the government or private sector, is not the crucial thing to focus on at this
point in political time.
Input
from union and nonunion workers, active and retired, in anti-war coalitions,
churches, mosques and synagogues can help to find the focus.
For
starters, how many of these folks want to shift their taxes from occupying Iraq
to meeting domestic needs?
What
is my policy suggestion? Re-create a
federal Works Progress Administration-type jobs program for the American
people, as President Franklin D. Roosevelt did in 1935.
I
know. 2003 is not 1935, the depths of
the Great Depression.
Still,
the time is ripe to pressure politicians for a radical response to the current
political situation. Under Bush, for
example, a silent depression is spreading across the nation, one symptom of the
jobs crisis.
“Some
34.6 million Americans were living in poverty last year, 1.7 million more than
in 2001, according to the Census Bureau,” the Nov. 2 NY Times reported. Working people need relief well beyond temporary
employment.
Today.
* 9/11
And America’s Criminal Justice Crackdown
* No
Skateboards For The American Empire
* Arnold’s
California Dreaming
* Under
Bush, U.S. Economy Recovers, Unlike Workers
* Risky
Business: U.S. Borrowing And Foreign Lending
* In
California, The Ballot Box And The Market
* Globalize
That: Capital Flight to China
* In
US, A Job-loss Economy Emerges
* For
Black Teens, Jobs Crisis Worsens
* A
New Day for Affirmative Action?
* In
California, A Racial Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing
* In
U.S., Slow Growth, Excess Inventory and Mounting Debt