HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Michael
Moore Apologists Are Not What We Need
by
Richard Oxman
October
20, 2003
Bless
Amy Goodman; she rocks relative to
the mainstream outlets, one must admit. But what happens to her when she leaves
the likes of Tariq
Ali and dwells in the house of the more celebrated guests? To wit, Michael
Moore seems to bring out the ga-ga in Amy, the giggly girl, to use the vernacular.
With Ali there's nothing much questionable that arises; he speaks the straight
word, and he has the bearing and background to obviate the need to question
confrontationally. But Moore's in a whole different world, and more's the pity
that Amy loses it under such circumstances.
First
of all, with the very announcement that Goodman will interview Moore,
progressives from Maine to Schwarzenegger are chomping at the bit to see what
she'll make of Moore's recent indiscretion vis-à-vis Wesley. But she
disappoints. Spending almost the entire time on the questions he wants to
confront Bush with -- the foundation of his new book's structure, as I
understand it -- and allowing him to rip off his "Aint Bush Awful &
Don't He Deserve An Inquiry" comments -- all part of the progressive
public record (and for much of which Gore Vidal and others should be given
credit) -- our loveable Democracy Dame leaves only a few
minutes to address the truly damnable.
Why
did he encourage Wesley
to run? The hackneyed lines go unchallenged. Does he know Clark has
demonstrated that he lacks humanity by any standards? We're informed that Mike
liked a few things he said about something innocuous. And we're told that
Baseball Cap had the Kosovo abominations highlighted in his highly successful
Bowling flick. That's said as if it's supposed to address the subject, not
raise even more questions. But, bottom-line, how could he have anything to do
with him? Somehow we drift to a commentary on Oprah wherein it's underscored
that she wouldn't be a bad choice as a leader since she'd surely have us all up
and exercising with a smile on our faces. That's Oprah, the hostess with the
mostess (and greatest Bush/Friedman/Schwarzenegger quotient on TV), Oprah of
the mindless. Moore of the same. Sun, moon, stars, rain…and how does Amy begin
to explain how leftists are apt to forget to remember with up so floating, many
bells down?
But
does Mike know that W.C. initiated "one of the biggest barbarities that
can be committed against humanity"? He of the Nascar set replies in his
best NRA drawl (laughing heartily as he imitates a critic), "But, Mike,
he's the Butcher of Kosovo!" Don't know where Amy went, but the next thing
I know Mike's saying "Well, maybe we need a 'Butcher of Kosovo' to butcher
Bush!" Amy's still there, but nowhere to be found. I'm stupefied that he's
going to get away with voicing that damaging dribble. But he does. And Raphael
Lemkin is rolling over in his grave.
I've
seen that kind of thing before on Democracy Now! when Tim Robbins was a guest.
Again, bless Tim Robbins, but let's not make believe that he hasn't committed a
sin of sins when he asserts that although he's dead set against the Iraqi
genocide, he was for the invasion of Afghanistan. He didn't make that statement
on Amy's show, but he did say it prior to his appearance a couple of places,
including Phil Donahue's program. And that's something, again, that we need to
confront amongst those of us who are left.
Why?
Because as much good as Moore has done, as much dedication Amy has given us,
and as much as Tim has accomplished, people overseas will continue to be
starved, tortured and bombed to death with what's left of our tax money…as long
as we don't call a war criminal a war criminal, force the barbarians to face
trial, and cease doing the celebrity fandango with supporters of war crimes.
It's time to take a little of the easy-listening partisan talk out of the Oprah
Room (Did I just hear the NPR theme music commence?), and begin to ask the very
hard questions all of the time. As hard as it was to write this.
Richard
Oxman is co-organizer of OneDance: The People's Summit and the
"Hunger for Peace Strike" for 2004, both of which will make a Bush
re-election unlikely. He can be reached at mail@onedancesummit.org
* Excerpt from Democracy Now! interview
with Michael Moore Like, You Know, Maybe We Need a Butcher October 15, 2003 AMY GOODMAN: Michael Moore, you have
called for Oprah to run for president and also Wesley Clark. Talk about each.
MICHAEL MOORE: Failing Oprah, Wesley
Clark. Well, Oprah, you know, America loves Oprah. See, this is our problem.
We don’t have—they run Arnold Schwarzenegger, they run Ronald Reagan. You know,
they run these people that the American people, you know, like for some
reason. They connect to them. They’re stars or whatever. We have people on
our side, too. Oprah’s got good politics, she’s got a good heart, and she’ll
have us all up Jazzercising at six in the morning. This cannot be a bad
thing, and reading a book while we’re Jazzercising. So America would be
better off if Oprah were president. Now, Wesley Clark, you know, I think,
you know, look, we’ve—Bush has got to go. Bush has got to go. Now, I don’t
see that meaning anybody but bush. I just don’t think that’s a good position
to take. Sometimes we’re worse off when we have a Democrat in there who is,
you know, saying he’s a Democrat, but, you know, acting like a Republican. I
think, you know, and most of the Democrats, let’s face it, they’re funded by
the same people that fund the Republicans. This is two sides of the same
coin, and oftentimes the Democrats, they talk a nicer line. They’re for the
people, they’re for the unions. They’re for all this. And that’s why they’re
able to get away, in some cases, like with Clinton, with much worse stuff. You know, the best example I have, I
know personally is just in my own hometown of Flint, Michigan. Flint was
devastated during the Reagan and Bush years, but we lost many more jobs
during the Clinton-Gore years. And was really—the nail was put in the coffin
during a time we had a Democratic president in office, and he completely
ignored places like Flint, Michigan. But I think we’re at a real crisis
situation here with Bush. And so we’ve got to figure out, what can we do to
beat this guy? And I think the American people, first
of all, they hate politicians. The recall in California, if there was a
recall election in the other 49 states, they’d probably like to recall
everybody right now. People are angry. The economy is not
good. They were lied to about Iraq. I mean, there’s an angry electorate out
there, and they’re in the mood to get rid of these people, especially the
professional politicians. They would rather vote for somebody who has no
experience than to vote for somebody who has the experience with this sort of
thing. Clark, I heard him speak here a couple of months ago, and he said
these things, and I thought, this should be out there. People should know
about this, the one I mentioned earlier, about the calls that he got after
9-11, trying to connect, you know, to 9-11. And he also said that generals at
the Pentagon were calling him before the Iraq war saying, get out there and
try and convince people, you know, we don’t want this war. The Pentagon
really didn’t want this war. They were dragged into this by Wolfowitz,
Rumsfeld, that whole crowd there that’s running the Bush administration. The
professional military people knew this was a mistake. It violated their
Powell doctrine, which is don’t start any war that you don’t know the way
out. There’s no plan here. They knew there was no plan. Now they’re in it.
Now they’re in it and they’re stuck in it, and they don’t know how they’re
going to get out of it. And so, you know, I heard Clark say
these things, and I heard him, you know, he was pro-choice, you know, on
stronger environmental laws, and he went down the whole list of things. I
just saw him on C-SPAN here a week ago where he was asked about medical
marijuana, which he said he supports the states who say that that’s OK, that
it’s OK for the people to use it for that. Somebody asked him, do you support
the constitutional amendment that says married chastity between a man and a
woman, he said no. I mean, he’s willing to take these positions. I don’t know
if the guy would be any good. I don’t know if he’s the right person. I’m not
endorsing him. There’s a lot of good things about Dean. There’s a lot of good
things—you know, Kucinich is probably the closest to me, you know,
politically in terms of the ten— or now, nine—announced candidates. AMY GOODMAN: I guess what surprised so
many people when you sent out your letter, and now in your book, on Wesley
Clark, I don’t think people were surprised that he ran for president, but
that he’s called the anti-war worrier, that this is the man who said the rest
of the world has got to get with us, this is the man who presided over the
bombing of Yugoslavia. MICHAEL MOORE: Well, yeah, I put it in
“Bowling for Columbine,” I’m so upset still about what happened in Kosovo,
it’s in my movie. I found a way to work it into a gun movie and draw the
connections between the largest—the day the largest bombing took place in
Kosovo was on the day of the Columbine massacre. So, I’m very concerned about
that. And I’d like to hear his answers about that. I’d like to hear, you
know, exactly what happened. And I read the story in the “New York Times”
last week that offered a whole different explanation of what I’d been reading
on the internet. So I don’t know. I mean, I think that’s
why—I just thought he should be in the debates, and we should hear what he
has to say. And I think any time we’ve got a four-star general that seems to
be on our side, you know, we should accept that. And people say, well, Mike,
you know, he said he voted for Reagan. I say, well, yeah, so did most of
America. If one of them wants to come over to our side, shouldn’t we have
open arms and say, well, you know what, OK, maybe this guy screwed up in the
past, maybe, you know, he’s not done the right thing or whatever. But jeez,
you know, he said he’s going to do this, and this and that, and he stands for
these things. You know, let’s hear the guy out, let’s have him in the
debates. I think it’s a good thing. Well, Mike, he’s the butcher of Kosovo.
Maybe that’s what we need right now is a butcher. We need the butcher of
Bush. I mean, I don’t know. Again, I’m not—it’s not an endorsement, but it’s
like, what do we do, Amy, people like us? Because you got somebody like Dean.
OK, Dean is great on all this stuff, but I met with Dean, he told me that he
supports the death penalty— in three different cases he would allow the death
penalty. He won’t cut the Pentagon budget. You know, you go down the whole
list of things, and I just think, jeez, you know, what do we do about it? How
much do we have to compromise and keep compromising to find the right person? |