HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE LETTERS SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Sailor-Mongering
Civil Disobedience
The Justice Department’s War Against Greenpeace
by
Kurt Nimmo
Dissident
Voice
October 25, 2003
Imagine:
one of the members of your peace group is arrested for blocking a parking lot
driveway at a federal building. He or she may have or may not have blocked the
driveway intentionally; regardless, the police arrest the person. There's a
court appearance and a fine to pay. But ten months later your organization is
ordered to court again, this time with the intervention of Ashcroft's Justice
Department. Seems the feds believe your organization endangered the lives of
federal employees. A misdemeanor turns into a serious felony. If convicted,
your organization could lose its tax-exempt status and be forced to report its
activities to the government.
Sound
ludicrous? Not in America, you say?
Think
again.
In
April, 2002, Greenpeace activists boarded a commercial ship off the coast of
Florida. The ship was transporting mahogany illegally exported from Brazil's
Amazon rainforest. The activists unfurled a banner stating: "President
Bush, Stop Illegal Logging." The activists did not engage in violence or
destroy property. Minor charges against individual activists were settled last
year.
Enter
Ashcroft and the Justice Department.
In
July 2003, the Justice Department filed criminal charges in Miami federal court
against the entire Greenpeace organization under an obscure 1872 law originally
intended to end the practice of "sailor-mongering." In 1890, an
Oregon court described the purpose of the sailor-mongering law as preventing
"the evil" of "sailor-mongers [who] get on board vessels and by
the help of intoxicants, and the use of other means, often savoring of
violence, get the crews ashore and leave the vessel without help to manage or
care for her."
"This
prosecution is unprecedented in American history," complained John
Passacantando, executive director of Greenpeace in the United States.
"Never before has our government criminally prosecuted an entire
organization for the free speech activities of its supporters. If this
prosecution succeeds, then peaceful protest -- an essential American tradition
from the Boston Tea Party through the modern civil rights movement -- may
become yet another casualty of Attorney General Ashcroft's attack on civil
liberties."
If
convicted, Greenpeace could not only lose its tax-exempt status, but be forced
to regularly report its activities to the government. "Such a prospect
must secretly delight many people in the administration who see the group as an
ever-present irritant," writes Jonathan Turley of the Los Angeles Times.
"After all, it was Greenpeace that held the first demonstration at the
president's ranch after his inauguration, causing a stir when activists
unfurled a banner reading "Bush: the Toxic Texan. Don't Mess With the
Earth.'"
The
Bushites are steadfastly opposed to civil disobedience, an honorable form of
activism with a long history -- from David Thoreau refusing to pay war taxes to
Harriet Tubman's underground railroad and women earning the right to vote in
the United States. Imagine participants of the Freedom Rides in the South and
non-violent protesters against segregation in Birmingham, Alabama being charged
as "sailor-mongers."
If
Ashcroft and the Bush Justice Department had their way, there would never have
been antiwar demonstrations during the Vietnam War, or an anti-apartheid
movement. The Women's Pentagon Actions, the Pledge of Resistance, nonviolent
civil disobedience actions at Diablo Canyon, the Livermore Laboratories, and
SAC bases -- all would be criminalized and severely punished.
Imagine
Pax Christi USA, an international Catholic peace organization, losing its its
tax-exempt status and forced to report to the government. Imagine Detroit's
Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Gumbleton serving time in prison like the three
Dominican nuns who were charged with obstructing national defense for painting
crosses on a Minuteman III missile silo (Ashcroft wanted the elderly nuns to
spend 30 years in prison, essentially a death sentence). Last year, Gumbleton
urged the Pax Christi USA National Assembly to sign a civil disobedience pledge
in opposition to Bush's impending invasion of Iraq. The pledge was sponsored by
the American Friends Service Committee, Education for Peace in Iraq Center,
Episcopal Peace Fellowship, Fellowship of Reconciliation, Lutheran Peace
Fellowship, National Network to End the War against Iraq, and Voices in the
Wilderness.
In
fact, the Bushites have already attacked Voices in the Wilderness, the
organization that brought humanitarian aid and medical supplies to the people
of Iraq. Ashcroft and the Justice Department assessed a $20,000 fine against
Voices in the Wilderness for violating the Iraqi Sanctions Regulations enforced
under the international Emergency Economic Powers Act, which prohibits the
delivery of goods and services to Iraq except under special license of the U.S.
Office of Foreign Assets Control. "Voices will not pay the fine, and we
don't want anyone else to pay the fine for us," said a defiant Kathy
Kelly, confounder of the organization.
Is
it possible, due to growing opposition to Bush's USA PATRIOT Act, that the
Justice Department has decided instead to use arcane laws to go after its
enemies? Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act stipulates that a person or
organization can be considered terrorist if they engage in activity intended
"to intimidate or coerce a civilian population" and "influence
the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion." In the above
example, blocking the driveway of a federal building may very well be
considered "intimidation or coercion" by the Justice Department.
Ashcroft
and USA PATRIOT have come under increasing fire -- and that's why the Justice
Department organized a 16-city tour to "correct misinformation" about
the draconian aspects of the law. On the final day of this closed-door,
invite-only dog and pony show, more than 1,200 demonstrators in Boston and
2,500 in New York City made their displeasure known.
Ashcroft
and the Justice Department will likely continue to plumb the depths of
out-dated law and fashion iron-fisted responses to the environmental and peace
movements. Meanwhile, on the sidelines, organizations such as the American
Council of Trustees and Alumni -- founded by none other than Lynne Cheney and
the neocon Senator Joseph Lieberman -- and Americans for Victory Over Terrorism
will continue to target "groups and individuals who fundamentally
misunderstand the nature of the war we are facing," in other words
professors, legislators, authors, columnists, and activists who exercise their
rights under the First Amendment and oppose the homicidal madness of Bush and
the neocons.
*
Related Article: Only
in America? by Barbara Sumner Burstyn
Kurt Nimmo is a
photographer, multimedia artist and writer living in New Mexico. To see his photo
work and read more of his essays, visit his excellent “Another Day in the
Empire” weblog: http://www.drmenlo.com/nimmo/
* Criticizing
Zionism: Naked Anti-Semitism?
* Shock
Therapy and the Israel Scenario
* Cuba
and the "Necessary Viciousness" of the Bushites
* Bush's
Speech: Internationalizing the Whirlwind
* The
Imam Ali Mosque Bombing: Round Up the Usual Suspects
* Iraq's
WMD: The Lie that Will Never Die
* UN Bombing:
Terrorism or National Liberation?
* Saddam
Hussein: Taking Out the CIA's Trash
* The Bug
Exterminator Goes to Jerusalem
* Bread,
Circuses, Uday and Qusay