HOME DV NEWS SERVICE ARCHIVE LETTERS SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
He Made the Moral Case for War, but Backs
A Dictator Who Boils Prisoners to Death
by George Monbiot
Dissident Voice
November 1, 2003
The
British and US governments gave three reasons for going to war with Iraq. The
first was to extend the war on terrorism. The second was to destroy its weapons
of mass destruction before they could be deployed. The third was to remove a
brutal regime, which had tortured and murdered its people.
If
the purpose of the war was to defeat terrorism, it has failed. Before the
invasion, there was no demonstrable link between Al Qaeda and Iraq. Today, Al
Qaeda appears to have moved into that country, to exploit a new range of
accessible western targets. If the purpose of the war was to destroy Saddam
Hussein's weapons of mass destruction before he deployed them, then, as no such
weapons appear to have existed, it was a war without moral or strategic
justification.
So
just one excuse remains, and it is a powerful one. Saddam Hussein was a brutal
tyrant. While there was no legal argument for forcibly deposing him on the
grounds of his abuse of human rights, there was a moral argument. It is one
which our prime minister made repeatedly and forcefully. "The moral case
against war has a moral answer: it is the moral case for removing Saddam",
Tony Blair told the Labour Party's spring conference in February. "Ridding
the world of Saddam would be an act of humanity. It is leaving him there that
is in truth inhumane." [1]
Had
millions of British people not accepted this argument, Tony Blair might not
have been prime minister today. There were many, especially in the Labour
Party, who disagreed with his decision, but who did not doubt the sincerity of
his belief in the primacy of human rights.
There
is just one test of this sincerity, and it is the consistency with which his
concern for human rights guides his foreign policy. If he cares so much about
the welfare of foreigners that he is prepared to go to war on their behalf, we
should expect to see this concern reflected in all his relations with the
governments of other countries. We should expect him, for example, to do all he
could to help the people of Uzbekistan.
There
are over 6,000 political and religious prisoners in Uzbekistan. [2]
Every year, some of them are tortured to death. Sometimes the policemen or
intelligence agents simply break their fingers, their ribs and then their
skulls with hammers, or stab them with screwdrivers, or rip off bits of skin
and flesh with pliers, or drive needles under their fingernails, or leave them
standing for a fortnight, up to their knees in freezing water. [3]
Sometimes they are a little more inventive. The body of one prisoner was
delivered to his relatives last year, with a curious red tidemark around the
middle of his torso. He had been boiled to death. [4]
His
crime, like that of many of the country's prisoners, was practicing his
religion. Islam Karimov, the president of Uzbekistan, learnt his politics from
the Soviet Union. He was appointed under the old system, and its collapse in
1991 did not interrupt his rule. An Islamic terrorist network has been
operating there, but Karimov makes no distinction between peaceful Muslims and
terrorists: anyone who worships privately, who does not praise the president
during his prayers or who joins an organization which has not been approved by
the state can be imprisoned. [5] Political dissidents,
human rights activists and homosexuals receive the same treatment. Some of
them, like dissidents in the old Soviet Union, are sent to psychiatric
hospitals. [6]
But
Uzbekistan, as Saddam Hussein's Iraq once was, is seen by the US government as
a key western asset. Since 1999, US special forces have been training Karimov's
soldiers. [7] In October 2001, he gave the United States
permission to use Uzbekistan as an airbase for its war against the Taliban. [8] The Taliban have now been overthrown, but the US has no
intention of moving out. Uzbekistan is in the middle of central Asia's massive
gas and oil fields. It is a nation for whose favors both Russia and China have
been competing. Like Saddam Hussein's Iraq, it is a secular state fending off
the forces of Islam.
So,
far from seeking to isolate his regime, the US government has tripled its aid
to Islam Karimov. Last year, he received $500 million, of which $79 million
went to the police and intelligence services, who are responsible for most of
the torture. [9] While the US claims that its engagement
with Karimov will encourage him to respect human rights, like Saddam Hussein he
recognizes that the protection of the world's most powerful government permits
him to do whatever he wants. Indeed, the US State Department now plays a major
role in excusing his crimes. In May, for example, it announced that Uzbekistan
had made "substantial and continuing progress" in improving its human
rights record. [10] The progress? "Average
sentencing" for members of peaceful religious organizations is now just
"7-12 years", while two years ago they were "usually sentenced
to 12-19 years." [11]
There
is little question that the power and longevity of Karimov's government has
been enhanced by his special relationship with the United States. There is also
little question that supporting him is a dangerous game. All the principal
enemies of the US today were fostered by the US or its allies in the past: the
Taliban in Afghanistan, the Wahhabi zealots in Saudi Arabia, Saddam Hussein and
his people in Iraq. Dictators do not have friends, only sources of power. They
will shift their allegiances as their requirement for power demands. The US
supported Islamic extremists in Afghanistan in order to undermine the Soviet
Union, and created a monster. Now it is supporting a Soviet-era leader to
undermine Islamic extremists, and building up another one.
So
what of Tony Blair, the man who claims that human rights are so important that
they justify going to war? Well, at the beginning of this year, he granted
Uzbekistan an open license to import whatever weapons from the United Kingdom Mr.
Karimov fancies. [12] But his support goes far beyond
that. The British ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murray, has repeatedly criticized
Karimov's crushing of democracy movements and his use of torture to silence his
opponents. [13] Like Roger Casement, the foreign office
envoy who exposed the atrocities in the Congo a century ago, Murray has been
sending home dossiers which could scarcely fail to move anyone who cares about
human rights.
Blair
has been moved all right: moved to do everything he could to silence our
ambassador. Mr. Murray has been threatened with the sack, investigated for a
series of plainly trumped-up charges and persecuted so relentlessly by his
superiors that he had to spend some time, like many of Karimov's critics, in a
psychiatric ward, though in this case for sound clinical reasons. [14] This pressure, according to a senior government source,
was partly "exercised on the orders of No 10". [15]
In
April, Blair told us that he had decided that "to leave Iraq in its brutalized
state under Saddam was wrong."16 How much credibility does this statement
now command, when the same man believes that to help Uzbekistan remain in its brutalized
state is right?
George
Monbiot is Honorary Professor at the Department of Politics in
Keele and Visiting Professor at the Department of Environmental Science at the
University of East London. He writes a weekly column for the Guardian newspaper
of London. His recently released book, The Age of Consent (Flamingo
Press), puts forth proposals for global democratic governance. His articles and
contact info can be found at his website: www.monbiot.com.
* Back
to Front Coup: The Military is Being Invited into the Heart of Politics in the
US
* The
Enemies of Science: Nothing Damages Science More than Forcing Researchers to
Develop GM
* The
Philosophy of Cant: Part Three of Three-Part Series on Trade
* Whose Side
Are You On?: Part Two of a Three-Part Series on Trade
* The Worst of
Times: Part One of a Three-Part Series on Trade
* Beware the
Bluewash: The UN Should not Become the Dustbin for America's Failed Adventures
* Poisoned
Chalice: Wherever it is Prescribed, a Dose of IMF Medicine Only Compounds
Economic Crisis
* SleepWalking
to Extinction
* Driven
Out of Eden
* Shadow of
Extinction: Only Six Degrees Separate Our World from the Cataclysmic End of an
Ancient Era
* I Was
Wrong About Trade: “Localization” is Both Destructive and Unjust
* Seize the Day:
Using Globalization As Vehicle For the First Global Democratic Revolution
* Trashing
Africa: Blair Has Ensured that Europe and the US Will Continue to Promote
Famine
* War
Crimes Case in Belgium Illustrates Folly of Blair’s Belief That US is
Interested in Justice
1. Tony Blair, 15 February 2003. Speech
to Labour's local government women's and youth conferences, Glasgow.
2. The Guardian (26 May 2003) reports
estimates of 6,500, citing independent human rights groups and the Sunday Times
(26 October 2003) estimates of 7-10,000, citing Ambassador Craig Murray.
3. See for example, Human Rights Watch,
World Report 2003; Amnesty International, Annual Report 2003; Human Rights
Watch, 4 April 2003. Deaths in Custody in Uzbekistan. Briefing Paper
4. Human Rights Watch, 4 April 2003,
ibid.
5. Human Rights Watch, 25 March 2003. In
the Name of Counter-Terrorism: Human Rights Abuses Worldwide. Briefing Paper
for the 59th Session of the United Nations Commission http://hrw.org/un/chr59/counter-terrorism-bck4.htm#P364_91494;
Human Rights Watch, 10 August 2001. Memorandum to the U.S. Government Regarding
Religious Persecution in Uzbekistan.
6. Amnesty International, 2003, ibid;
Human Rights Watch, World Report 2003, ibid.
7. CJ Chivers, 25 October 2001. Long
Before War, Green Berets Built Military Ties to Uzbekistan. New York Times.
8. United States Department of Defense, 5
October 2001. Secretary Rumsfeld Press Conference with President of Uzbekistan.
http://www.dod.mil/transcripts/2001/t10082001_t1005uz.html
9. Nick Paton Walsh, 26 May 2003. US
looks away as new ally tortures Islamists. The Guardian
10. Human Rights Watch, 3 June 2003.
Uzbekistan: Progress on Paper Only. Analysis of the U.S. State Department's
Certification of Uzbekistan.
11. ibid.
12. Richard Norton-Taylor, 27 February
2003. Export of arms criticized. The Guardian.
13. See for e.g. Craig Murray 17 October
2002 - Speech to Freedom House, Tashkent. The British Embassy. http://www.britain.uz/inform/presrel.htm
14. David Leigh, Nick Paton Walsh and
Ewen MacAskill, 18 October 2003. Ambassador accused after criticizing US. The
Guardian; Jonathan Ungoed-Thomas and Mark Franchetti, 26 October 2003. The
British ambassador says his hosts are boiling people to death. The Sunday
Times; Martin Bright, 19 October 2003. Short backs envoy who criticized US. The
Observer.
15. David Leigh, Nick Paton Walsh and
Ewen MacAskill, ibid.
16. Tony Blair, 14 April 2003, 3.30 pm.
Statement on Iraq to the House of Commons. http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/cm030414/debtext/30414-05.htm