HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE LETTERS SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
The
Indigenous Struggle in the Chocó
Third in a Three-Part Report on the Chocó
Region of Colombia
by
Terry Gibbs and Garry Leech
Dissident
Voice
November 11, 2003
Our
indigenous guide maneuvered the dugout canoe cautiously through the shallow
waters of the Río Opogodó deep in the rainforest of Colombia's Chocó region. We
had traveled some 12 hours down the Río Atrato from the departmental capital
Quibdó when we approached a collection of canoes moored on a pebbled
embankment. After seeing few signs of human existence during the previous three
hours, the sight of a small Embera indigenous village consisting of some 20
open thatched huts on wooden stilts was a magical vision. Walking up a green
and muddy hill into the mist-enshrouded village was like traveling back a
thousand years in time. But the sense of peacefulness that greeted us as we
entered Egorokera proved to be mostly an illusion. The modern day reality for the
Embera is far from peaceful as communities from this indigenous tribe struggle
to cope with malnutrition, disease, governmental neglect, and constant
confrontations with Colombia’s armed groups.
There
has been little change in the way many Embera have lived their lives over the
centuries. This is clearly evidenced in Egorokera where there are few modern
amenities. A small outboard motor has replaced paddles for long trips in dugout
canoes, large plastic barrels catch the rain for drinking water and some of the
men wear t-shirts and long pants. Other than these few intrusions into the
Embera world, everything else remains traditional. Entire families still live
together in open-sided thatched huts in which fires are permanently maintained
for cooking purposes. The Embera’s food primarily consists of homegrown crops
and small game caught in the surrounding rainforest. The women adorn themselves
in decorative purple body paint and traditional parumas—colorful wraparound
skirts. There is no running water or electricity.
For
centuries the Embera have, for the most part, lived secluded from the rest of
Colombian society. But the violence that has ravaged the country over the past
half century has intruded upon their isolation. This indigenous tribe has been
caught in the middle of a conflict being waged by leftist guerrillas,
right-wing paramilitaries and the Colombian military. In the Chocó, the armed
groups are fighting for territorial control over a region that has been
considered for a major canal project and is a primary corridor for drugs and
arms trafficking. According to Harvey Suarez of the Consultancy for Human
Rights and Displacement (CODHES), there is a “fight over territory with the
[paramilitary] self-defense groups trying to gain territory from the insurgency
and claiming a great part of those zones, not only for geo-political interest,
but also for economic interest.”
The
conflict has prevented the Embera from addressing serious health problems in
their communities. Indigenous children regularly suffer from diarrhea, fever
and malaria, which is virtually epidemic in this part of the Chocó. A one and a
half year-old girl had died from malaria one month before we visited Egorokera.
Her sickness could have been treated if her parents could have taken her to the
doctor in Vigia del Fuerte or if they had been allowed to bring medicine to the
village. Tragically, neither was a viable option.
The
first problem the Embera face when deciding whether to make the six-hour
journey by canoe to Vigia del Fuerte is a lack of money to purchase fuel for
their outboard motor. Even if they choose to paddle their canoes all the way to
Vigia, they then face harassment at the hands of the state security forces.
According to a young Embera named Loselinio, “Many community members are afraid
to leave for fear of being hassled by the army and police.” Another Embera
elaborates, “Some go to Vigia, but there’s a lot of interrogation there, so
that scares us. They take away our documents, sometimes they tear them up, to
illustrate to us that they are not worth anything.” Reflecting on how this
affects sick Embera, he adds, “Some of us allow our kids or our women to die
here, because of fear.”
It
is also difficult for the Embera to obtain medicines in Vigia or neighboring
Bellavista because the army and police limit the quantity of supplies they can
take back to their villages. Loselinio claims, “The army prevents us from
taking food and medicine to our communities because we are suspected of giving
supplies to the guerrillas.” Because guerrillas from the Revolutionary Armed
Forces of Colombia (FARC) have long been active in the region surrounding
Egorokera, the army believes the indigenous are rebel sympathizers. Captain
Javier Pastran, commander of the Colombian army troops based in Vigia, says,
“The terrain is really difficult and the guerrillas—like the [paramilitary]
self-defense forces—in these areas move around easily in this terrain where
there are lots of indigenous communities that they infiltrate.”
Suarez
of CODHES corroborates Loselinio’s accusations of a military blockade in rural
Chocó: “There’s a lot of pressure on the communities from the public forces.
There’s fuel, medicines, and resource control by the public forces. There are
some places where the confinement, the siege of communities, has created a
humanitarian crisis… communities that are not able to leave, communities under
siege, subjected to economic blockades.” In a June 2003 report, the Colombian
office for the High Commission of the United Nations for Human Rights also
accused the military in the region of imposing “severe restrictions on
transport and the passage of supplies, medicines and other basic necessities.”
Because
the Colombian army restricts the flow of food supplies to Embera communities,
many indigenous children suffer from malnutrition. The Embera primarily grow
maize, rice and plantains for consumption, although they try to sell surplus
crops in Vigia or Bellavista. They use the money earned from these crops to
purchase salt, fuel, soap and other foodstuffs to supplement their diet. But
the army’s restrictions on transporting food has resulted in the Embera
surviving on a starch-heavy diet of yucca, rice and plantains, which has left
many children malnourished.
The
Embera also try to supplement their diet with meat through small game hunting
and fishing, but there are not many edible-sized fish in the shallow Río
Opogodó. Because of the presence of the armed groups, it is dangerous for the
Embera to stray too far from their village in order to hunt and fish. There are
paramilitary checkpoints on the rivers that connect the three indigenous
villages in the region we visited, making it dangerous to travel between
communities. Even though one Embera man in Egorokera claimed, “Guerrillas are less
of a problem because they are more nomadic,” rebels operating in the area have
harassed the village. An elderly indigenous man described one visit by a group
of rebels: “Guerrillas recently came and uprooted our maize crops, claiming
that the land on which they were growing was not Embera land.”
All
the armed actors—army, police, guerrillas and paramilitaries—regularly target
the Embera. Sometimes the villagers don’t even know which group is harassing
them. Shortly before our visit to Egorokera, armed men had visited the village.
One Embera said, “It’s been 15 days since they took two saws from us. We were
cutting some wood over there; we were cutting it because it was a commission
that we had received from the assembly in Quibdó. A group of paramilitaries or
guerrillas said they were under orders from their superiors to take our saws.
And so we were threatened and told that from now on we were not allowed to cut
anything.”
Working
out long term solutions to the various problems confronting the Embera will
inevitably be a complicated and multi-faceted process. There are questions of
the appropriate mechanisms to resolve the issues of health and security in
villages such as Egorokera. The 22 indigenous communities of this region have a
strong tradition of local governance with their own democratic methods of
decision-making and problem solving. Any viable solutions will need to be
rooted in the context of these existing indigenous cultural and political
organizations.
In
the long term, the lives of the Embera will not likely improve greatly until
Colombia’s decades long war ends. The problems we encountered in Egorokera are
not unlike problems faced by communities throughout the Chocó, where 80 percent
of the population lives in extreme poverty. Many, like the Embera in Egorokera,
find themselves in territory controlled by one of the armed groups and are seen
as sympathizers to that particular group. In addition, the national
government’s policy focus on security has ensured that many of the concerns
fueling the conflict related to poverty and underdevelopment go un-addressed.
However, in the short term much can be done.
Pressure
must be placed on the national government to confront the army and public
security forces in this region concerning the harassment of the indigenous
population. Commanders must be required to reign in their troops, reprimanding
those soldiers involved in directly intimidating local populations. Although
U.S. policymakers cannot control rebel activity in Colombia, they could have a
strong voice in ensuring that monitoring of the armed forces and the police is
taking place. This is key given that these actors are the chief perpetrators of
the daily harassment against the Embera. Such measures would help allow the
indigenous to engage in trade with local communities, to bring food, medicine
and other supplies to their villages, and to ensure that the infirmed can
access emergency healthcare when necessary.
After
spending two days with the embattled Embera, we boarded our canoe and slowly
made our way back down the Río Opogodó. The river grew wider as it neared the
region’s principal transportation artery, the broad and fast-flowing Río
Atrato. As we left the Embera’s world behind, we recalled the defiant words of
one indigenous resident of Egorokera, “We have been threatened for our
territory… but we are still here. We have resisted for 500 years.”
Terry
Gibbs is the director of the North American Congress on Latin
America (NACLA). Garry Leech is the editor of
Colombia Journal, where this article first appeared (http://www.colombiajournal.org), and
author of Killing
Peace: Colombia's Conflict and the Failure of U.S. Intervention
This
article is Third in a Three-Part Report on the Chocó Region of Colombia.
* Read Part One: Ghosts
of the Past
* Read Part Two: Displacing
Development in the Chocó
* US Policies
Consistently Undermine Human Rights
* Bush
Places Corporate Interests Over Human Rights
* Politicizing
Human Rights in Cuba and Colombia