HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE LETTERS SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Patriotism,
Progress And A Beautiful Thing
by
David Edwards and Media Lens
Dissident
Voice
November 6, 2003
Perseus:
“What's the world like?”
Danae:
“Not like this.”
Perseus:
“What's this, then?”
Danae:
“A prison.”
Perseus:
“I thought it was the world.”
(The
Greek Myths, BBC2, April 23, 2003)
Prologue
A
medieval woodcut shows a traveller who has somehow worked his way to the very
edge of the known world with its familiar houses, churches, trees, sun and
moon. The traveller is shown poking his head and right arm through a boundary
of stars enclosing this everyday world and reaching out to a universe of
wonders beyond. The sphere of reality we know the ‘normal’ world is
depicted, not as a reassuring haven, but as a barrier to be transcended.
The Bubble Of Approved Reality
On
October 31, BBC and ITV news both presented reports detailing an award ceremony
“honouring Britain’s war heroes”. There were interviews with the mother of a
teenage soldier who had courageously saved the life of a comrade during a
‘friendly fire’ incident. The soldier gave his account of what happened over
dramatic video footage from the war.
The
only gesture towards dissent involved passing mention of the fact that an
officer awarded an OBE by the Queen had been cleared of war crimes by the
Ministry of Defence. Colonel Tim Collins of the Royal Irish Regiment had been
accused of mistreating Iraqi civilians and prisoners of war by a US soldier and
by Iraqis the case was dismissed.
The
news reports were presented in the same way as all coverage of royal events as
a time of national pride and solidarity when Britain unites to celebrate
something good about the country. Yes, there are issues of balance in all
reporting but sometimes it’s only proper that we should make it clear that
we’re “Backing Britain”. What was so interesting to us is that it was clear
that balance was not only deemed unimportant in these reports, it was
unthinkable - from the media’s point of view, patriotism simply is the
balanced view. Tolstoy noted the significance as long ago as 1900:
“Patriotism today is the
cruel tradition of an outlived period, which exists not merely by its inertia,
but because the governments and ruling classes, aware that not their power
only, but their very existence, depends upon it, persistently excite and maintain
it among the people, both by cunning and violence.” (Tolstoy, Writings On
Civil Disobedience and Non-Violence, New Society, 1987, p.100)
Thus
there were no mentions of the fact that many people in this country find
nothing honourable in a war of aggression against a defenceless Third World
minnow. Balance would necessarily have involved coverage of the kind of view
expressed so well by Mark Twain:
“I bring you the stately
matron named Christendom, returning bedraggled, besmirched and dishonoured from
pirate-raids in Kiao-Chou, Manchuria, South Africa and the Philippines, with
her soul full of meanness, her pocket full of boodle and her mouth full of
pious hypocrisies. Give her the soap and a towel, but hide the looking-glass.”
(Mark Twain, quoted, Norman Solomon, ‘The Twain That Most Americans Never
Meet’, ZNet Commentary, November 19, 1999)
The
point is this - can we honestly imagine the BBC or ITN ever allowing
this kind of sentiment to be expressed as part of that kind of news report?
Subjected
to the continuous effects of this flat ban on balance, it naturally becomes
difficult for viewers to poke their heads through the stifling sphere of
everyday ‘reality’ to see the war for what it was. Unchallenged celebrations of
honoured heroes, national courage and pride have the effect of obscuring what
was actually a major war crime, a massive act of state violence involving a
quarter of a million men against an essentially defenceless Third World
country.
As
viewers and readers we forever receive the subliminal impression that truths of
this kind are ‘outrageous’, ‘offensive’, ‘irresponsible’, and so we learn that
certain thoughts +are+ ‘outrageous’, and so we learn to reject them no matter
how important and reasonable they might be. This is thought control in action.
Concorde - Patriotism Meets ‘Progress’
On
October 24 both BBC and ITN devoted large amounts of airtime to the
‘retirement’ of the British Airways fleet of supersonic Concorde airliners.
Reporters described how they had shed tears as the planes landed at Heathrow
airport for the last time. This occasion, also, was the cause of much patriotic
fervour with pilots waving Union flags from their cockpits.
The
consensus view across the board in all news reports was that the loss of
Concorde was a staggeringly ironic step backwards in this age of “progress”
when everything is moving ever faster, not slower. The sentiment was summed up
by a letter published in the Daily Telegraph:
“The end of Concorde is a
giant step backwards for mankind. Not since the fall of the Roman Empire has
such a symbol of technological progress been cast aside.” (Letters, October 24,
2003)
As
reporters and members of the public wept, it would surely have been
mean-spirited for our media to have provided balance to this version of
progress. The idea that travelling ever faster, consuming resources ever more
voraciously, might have nothing to do with genuine “progress” on a finite
planet is, again, unthinkable to a corporate media steeped in a culture of
endlessly rising consumption and profits. Would it be “progress” for
individuals to make their hearts beat ever faster?
It
is remarkable that, even now, this version of “progress” is able to go
completely unchallenged as if the environment movement had never existed. Balance
would involve airing the views, for example, of environmentalist Theodore
Roszak:
"Work
that is built upon false needs or unbecoming appetites is wrong and wasteful.
Work that deceives or manipulates, that exploits or degrades is wrong and wasteful.
Work that wounds the environment or makes the world ugly is wrong and
wasteful." (Theodore Roszak - People/Planet)
In
April 1999, a joint session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) approved a report titled: ‘Summary for Policy Makers - Aviation and the
Global Atmosphere’. The report made clear that the then proposed development of
a fleet of second generation supersonic, high-speed civil transport aircraft to
replace Concorde, would have severe consequences on the climate. The IPCC
estimated that the global warming effect of such aircraft would be about a
factor of five larger than the subsonic aircraft they would replace. These
aircraft would also reduce stratospheric ozone and increase levels of
ultraviolet radiation reaching the earth’s surface.
So You Want To Be An Urban Warrior
The
November 1 cover of the Weekend magazine of Britain’s leading liberal
newspaper, the Guardian, shows a photo of Tony Blair considered by many at
home and abroad to be a war criminal - exposing the left breast of his wife,
Cherie, while frolicking in a swimming pool. Except of course it isn’t Blair as
the Guardian explains:
“No, this isn’t Tony and
Cherie mucking about in a pool Celebrity and fantasy in Alison Jackson’s new
lookalike photographs.”
As
we enter the magazine, we travel on a surreal journey past full-page,
full-colour adverts for Tiffany diamond rings and Vacheron Constantin watches
(“Royal Eagle Chronograph in pink gold”), before arriving at Julie Burchill’s
by now familiar mocking of the anti-war movement:
“You positively wriggle
with delight when King Hipocrite Sean Penn gives yet another interview talking
up his greatest role yet - that of anti-Bush, anti-Iraq-war peacenik. In
October last year, Penn spent $56,000 publishing an open letter to President
Bush in the Washington Post, putting the case against the war, before flying to
Iraq and meeting the foreign minister of the genocidal, parasitical, murdering
junta then ruling this unfortunate country.” (Burchill, ‘Mind the gap’,
November 1, 2003)
Penn
is declared a hypocrite for courageously opposing the US assault on Iraq -- so
risking endless invective of this kind and even physical attack -- because,
Burchill writes, “In the 1980s, this glorious heir to Gandhi spent a month in
jail after a glorious attack on a harmless extra.”
Moving
on, we pass a full-page advert for DFS sofas to read Alexander Chancellor’s
column. Chancellor writes that “puppy-training is a highly contentious issue.
There is a wide gulf between those who favour stern discipline and those who
think that extreme sensitivity is the key”. (‘Man bites dog’, November 1, 2003)
On
we go past more full-page adverts for Sony cameras, Chanel perfumes,
Mercedes-Benz cars, Hugo Boss eau de cologne, Omega watches... and we come to
the lookalike pictures of the Blairs by the pool. Past another full-page advert
for Samsung mobile phones, we see a cigar-toting lookalike Saddam Hussein
reading a British government dossier on weapons of mass destruction.
A
full-page advert for BT Mobile separates the counterfeit Saddam from a faked
photograph of the Duke of Edinburgh admiring a series of pictures of a woman
masturbating. The next page has a picture of a naked Elton John lookalike
receiving ‘colonic irrigation’ opposite a full-page advert for Intel PCs.
Full-page adverts for Siemens washing machines, Gore-Tex shoes, Tesco, De Vere
Hotels, Suzuki cars, Cornwall Breaks, Kenya Safaris, Olympus cameras, Averys
wine merchants, all follow.
And
then we reach a four-page spread: ‘Fashion spirit’. Here the country’s leading
liberal newspaper advises: “Metropolitan chic isn’t all combat trousers and
trainers. True urban warriors add a touch of class to their street wear.” And
“class” it is the “double-breasted coat” retails at £1,235, the “rollneck
sash dress” at £615, and the “A-line miniskirt” at £398. An address and phone
number in Paris where these items can be acquired by “true urban warriors” are
provided. Below, we learn that “silver trousers” are available at £1,080 from
Selfridge’s.
We
move on past full-page adverts for Epson computers, more ‘Fashion spirit’ ads,
Multibionta vitamins, The Images of Borneo, Kitchen Magic, Sofa Workshop, three
pages of Hotpoint adverts, Epson printers. Then we hit another section, ‘Home Space’,
and essentially an endless series of adverts...
Epilogue A Beautiful Thing
High
in the Swiss Alps, Hans Castorp is lost and alone in a lethal snowstorm.
Delirious from the cold, Castorp - the hero of Thomas Mann’s novel, The
Magic Mountain suddenly finds himself engulfed by a hallucination of
startling intensity and clarity. All around him he sees deep blue southern
seas, a bay enclosed by mountains, and white houses scattered among palm trees
and cypress groves. The sublime beauty of it all, Mann tells us, is “too much,
too blest for sinful mortals”. (Thomas Mann, The Magic Mountain, p.490,
Penguin, 1988)
The
people populating this world are equally beautiful:
“How
joyous and winning they are, how fresh and healthy, happy and clever they
look!”
Their
souls, too, appear completely unblemished to the enchanted Castorp:
“They
seem to be wise and gentle through and through.”
But
this is the dream world of illusion, of patriotism, of the adverts the world
as it is +supposed+ to be. Ken Adelman of the US Defence Policy Board said
recently of the invasion of Iraq:
“It
bothers me that people in Britain don't see it as people in America see it. We
did a beautiful thing." (Quoted, ‘How Blair Lost by Winning’, Geoffrey Wheatcroft,
The New York Times, October 8, 2003)
Suddenly
Castorp catches the eye of someone different, a sombre looking boy who looks
directly at Castorp and then, pointedly, past him. Following the boy’s gaze,
Castorp spies a large, forbidding temple. Responding to an inner compulsion,
Castorp walks over to the temple and enters.
And
here, far from the appearance of order, beauty and benevolence outside, is the
awful truth on which this dream world is somehow based. Thomas Mann explains:
“Two grey old women,
witchlike... were busy there, between flaming braziers, most horribly. They
were dismembering a child. In dreadful silence they tore it apart with their
bare hands - Hans Castorp saw the bright hair blood-smeared - and cracked the
tender bones between their jaws, their dreadful lips dripped blood. An icy
coldness held him. He would have covered his eyes and fled, but could not.”
With
these symbols Mann had brilliantly depicted the catastrophic gulf between the
benevolent appearance and violent reality of modern Western society our
society. And Castorp was tempted to cover his eyes and run from this truth, as
so many of us do. Erich Fromm wrote:
"To
be naive and easily deceived is impermissible, today more than ever, when the
prevailing untruths may lead to a catastrophe because they blind people to real
dangers and real possibilities." (Fromm, The Art Of Being, Continuum,
1992, p.19)
David
Edwards is the editor of
Media Lens,
and the author of Burning All
Illusions: A Guide to Personal and Political Freedom (South
End Press, 1996). Email: editor@medialens.org.
Visit the Media Lens website: http://www.MediaLens.org
Other Recent Articles by David Edwards
and Media Lens
* Out
on a Limb – Part Two
* Out
on a Limb -- Part One
* Lulling
Us Into Submission: Advertising, Core Truths, And The Great Electronic
Tranquilizer
* The
Importance of Being Nuanced: A Tragicomedy Of Media Manners
* What
Should I Do? Selfishness, Happiness And Benefiting Others
* The BBC,
Self-Glorification And Disaster
* Adventures
in Media Surreality – Part 2: Global Climate Catastrophe – Mustn’t Grumble
* Adventures
in Media Surreality – Part 1: Blair’s Serious and Current Lies
* Beating up the
Cheerleader: Government Attacks On The BBC Reflect Govt. Totalitarianism Not
BBC Radicalism
* Biting the
Had That Feeds – Part 1: Greg Palast, Robert Fisk, George Monbiot, Media Lens,
The New Statesman and Newsnight
* Biting the
Hand That Feeds – Part 2
* Stenographers
to Power: "Saddam Loyalists" Or "Anti-Occupation Forces"?
Ask The BBC