HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
by
US Senator Robert Byrd
October
20, 2003
In
1837, Danish author, Hans Christian Andersen, wrote a wonderful fairy tale
which he titled The Emperor's New Clothes.
It may be the very first example of the power of political
correctness. It is the story of the
Ruler of a distant land who was so enamored of his appearance and his clothing
that he had a different suit for every hour of the day.
One
day two rogues arrived in town, claiming to be gifted weavers. They convinced the Emperor that they could
weave the most wonderful cloth, which had a magical property. The clothes were only visible to those who
were completely pure in heart and spirit.
The
Emperor was impressed and ordered the weavers to begin work immediately. The rogues, who had a deep understanding of
human nature, began to feign work on empty looms.
Minister
after minister went to view the new clothes and all came back exhorting the
beauty of the cloth on the looms even though none of them could see a thing.
Finally
a grand procession was planned for the Emperor to display his new finery. The Emperor went to view his clothes and was
shocked to see absolutely nothing, but he pretended to admire the fabulous
cloth, inspect the clothes with awe, and, after disrobing, go through the
motions of carefully putting on a suit of the new garments.
Under
a royal canopy the Emperor appeared to the admiring throng of his people - -
all of whom cheered and clapped because they all knew the rogue weavers' tale
and did not want to be seen as less than pure of heart.
But,
the bubble burst when an innocent child loudly exclaimed, for the whole kingdom
to hear, that the Emperor had nothing on at all. He had no clothes.
That
tale seems to me very like the way this nation was led to war.
We
were told that we were threatened by weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but
they have not been seen.
We
were told that the throngs of Iraqi's would welcome our troops with flowers,
but no throngs or flowers appeared.
We
were led to believe that Saddam Hussein was connected to the attack on the Twin
Towers and the Pentagon, but no evidence has ever been produced.
We
were told in 16 words that Saddam Hussein tried to buy "yellow cake"
from Africa for production of nuclear weapons, but the story has turned into
empty air.
We
were frightened with visions of mushroom clouds, but they turned out to be only
vapors of the mind.
We
were told that major combat was over but 101 [as of October 17] Americans have
died in combat since that proclamation from the deck of an aircraft carrier by
our very own Emperor in his new clothes.
Our
emperor says that we are not occupiers, yet we show no inclination to
relinquish the country of Iraq to its people.
Those
who have dared to expose the nakedness of the Administration's policies in Iraq
have been subjected to scorn. Those who have noticed the elephant in the room
-- that is, the fact that this war was based on falsehoods – have had our
patriotism questioned. Those who have
spoken aloud the thought shared by hundreds of thousands of military families
across this country, that our troops should return quickly and safely from the
dangers half a world away, have been accused of cowardice. We have then seen the untruths, the
dissembling, the fabrication, the misleading inferences surrounding this rush
to war in Iraq wrapped quickly in the flag.
The
right to ask questions, debate, and dissent is under attack. The drums of war are beaten ever louder in
an attempt to drown out those who speak of our predicament in stark terms.
Even
in the Senate, our history and tradition of being the world's greatest
deliberative body is being snubbed.
This huge spending bill has been rushed through this chamber in just one
month. There were just three open
hearings by the Senate Appropriations Committee on $87 billion, without a
single outside witness called to challenge the Administration's line.
Ambassador
Bremer went so far as to refuse to return to the Appropriations Committee to
answer additional questions because, and I quote: "I don't have time. I'm completely booked, and I have to get
back to Baghdad to my duties."
Despite
this callous stiff-arm of the Senate and its duties to ask questions in order
to represent the American people, few dared to voice their opposition to
rushing this bill through these halls of Congress. Perhaps they were intimidated by the false claims that our troops
are in immediate need of more funds.
But
the time has come for the sheep-like political correctness which has cowed
members of this Senate to come to an end.
The
Emperor has no clothes. This entire
adventure in Iraq has been based on propaganda and manipulation. Eighty-seven billion dollars is too much to
pay for the continuation of a war based on falsehoods.
Taking
the nation to war based on misleading rhetoric and hyped intelligence is a
travesty and a tragedy. It is the most
cynical of all cynical acts. It is
dangerous to manipulate the truth. It
is dangerous because once having lied, it is difficult to ever be believed
again. Having misled the American
people and stampeded them to war, this Administration must now attempt to
sustain a policy predicated on falsehoods.
The President asks for billions from those same citizens who know that
they were misled about the need to go to war.
We misinformed and insulted our friends and allies and now this
Administration is having more than a little trouble getting help from the
international community. It is perilous
to mislead.
The
single-minded obsession of this Administration to now make sense of the chaos
in Iraq, and the continuing propaganda which emanates from the White House
painting Iraq as the geographical center of terrorism is distracting our
attention from Afghanistan and the 60 other countries in the world where
terrorists hide. It is sapping
resources which could be used to make us safer from terrorists on our own shores. The body armor for our own citizens still
has many, many chinks. Have we
forgotten that the most horrific terror attacks in history occurred right here
at home!! Yet, this Administration
turns back money for homeland security, while the President pours billions into
security for Iraq. I am powerless to
understand or explain such a policy.
I
have tried mightily to improve this bill.
I twice tried to separate the reconstruction money in this bill, so that
those dollars could be considered separately from the military spending. I offered an amendment to force the
Administration to craft a plan to get other nations to assist the troops and
formulate a plan to get the U.N. in, and the U.S. out, of Iraq. Twice I tried to rid the bill of expansive,
flexible authorities that turn this $87 billion into a blank check. The American people should understand that
we provide more foreign aid for Iraq in this bill, $20.3 billion, than we
provide for the rest of the entire world!
I attempted to remove from this bill billions in wasteful programs and
divert those funds to better use. But,
at every turn, my efforts were thwarted by the vapid argument that we must all
support the requests of the Commander in Chief.
I
cannot stand by and continue to watch our grandchildren become increasingly
burdened by the billions that fly out
of the Treasury for a war and a policy based largely on propaganda and
prevarication. We are borrowing $87
billion to finance this adventure in Iraq.
The President is asking this Senate to pay for this war with increased
debt, a debt that will have to be paid by our children and by those same troops
that are currently fighting this war. I
cannot support outlandish tax cuts that plunge our country into potentially
disastrous debt while our troops are fighting and dying in a war that the White
House chose to begin.
I
cannot support the continuation of a policy that unwisely ties down 150,000
American troops for the foreseeable future, with no end in sight.
I
cannot support a President who refuses to authorize the reasonable change in
course that would bring traditional allies to our side in Iraq.
I
cannot support the politics of zeal and "might makes right" that
created the new American arrogance and unilateralism which passes for foreign
policy in this Administration.
I
cannot support this foolish manifestation of the dangerous and destabilizing
doctrine of preemption that changes the image of America into that of a
reckless bully.
The
emperor has no clothes. And our former
allies around the world were the first to loudly observe it.
I
shall vote against this bill because I cannot support a policy based on
prevarication. I cannot support doling
out 87 billion of our hard-earned tax dollars when I have so many doubts about
the wisdom of its use.
I
began my remarks with a fairy tale. I
shall close my remarks with a horror story, in the form of a quote from the
book Nuremberg Diaries, written by G.M. Gilbert, in which the author interviews
Hermann Goering.
"We
got around to the subject of war again and I said that, contrary to his
attitude, I did not think that the common people are very thankful for leaders
who bring them war and destruction.
".
. . But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy
and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a
democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist
dictatorship.
"There
is one difference," I pointed out. "In a democracy the people have
some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United
States only Congress can declare wars."
"Oh,
that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be
brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell
them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism
and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."
Robert Byrd
is the Democratic Senator of West Virginia: http://byrd.senate.gov/