HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Iran
Nuclear Agreement a Slap in Bush’s Face
by
William O. Beeman
October
23,2003
Iranian
officials have given the international community almost everything it wants in
terms of compliance with nuclear nonproliferation. The agreement was a
calculated rap in the chops for the Bush administration, but Washington is not
likely to take the hint.
For
months now the Bush administration has been trying to bully and threaten Iran
over its development of nuclear power. A light-water reactor being built in the
city of Bushehr that could never practically be used to generate nuclear fuel
was breathlessly declared an international threat. Miniscule amounts of
enriched uranium were revealed to the press as harbingers of an imminent
nuclear bomb.
The
United States pressured Russia unsuccessfully to stop helping Iran with its
legitimate development of nuclear power. Though it will never be conclusively
proven, it is almost certain that the US put pressure on Japan, Canada and
Australia to introduce an impossible resolution before the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) that would require Iran to prove a negative to demonstrate
that they were not developing nuclear weapons. This is the diplomatic
equivalent of asking someone to prove that they don’t beat their spouse.
The
United States should learn that pressure doesn’t work with the proud Iranians.
Once the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany Jack Straw, Joschka
Fischer and Dominique de Villepin respectively sat down with Iranian
officials and offered carrots and reason instead of sticks and invective, Iran
responded in kind. In return for Iran’s agreement to sign an additional
protocol to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which would pave the way for
tougher UN inspections of its nuclear facilities, the three European foreign
ministers will pledge to help Iran with an “assured fuel supply” with technical
assistance in modernizing its civil nuclear program.
The
Iranian agreement should be welcomed by Washington, but don’t count on
laudatory comments from the Bush administration. The name of the game in
Washington is Iranian demonization. Ever since Iran was named as a component of
the “axis of evil” in US President George W. Bush’s 2002 State of the Union
Address, the White House neo-con warriors have been looking for any excuse to
undermine Iran’s clerical establishment. However, with no diplomatic
representation and no economic relations with the Islamic Republic, there is
little that Washington can exert in the way of leverage.
True
diplomacy, as shown by the United States’ European allies is apparently not
dead. Moreover, securing Iran’s agreement to the additional nonproliferation
protocols was good for everyone. It is good for Iran, where there are
legitimate economic and environmental reasons for developing nuclear energy;
and good for the region and for the rest of the world in terms of assurances
that nuclear development will not soon turn to production of violent weaponry
in the region.
The
agreement is too new to have engendered the inevitable sour grapes from the
losers. Washington has issued a cautious welcome to the agreement. However,
assertions that Iran is not serious about fulfilling its part of the bargain,
that secret atomic development is still underway and that whatever Iran does,
they are not to be trusted, are to be expected both from Washington and from
Israel. The world has heard this rhetoric before, and every time, it has proved
directly counter-productive in getting Iran to comply.
A
few hard-liners in Iran will also chime in with defiant assertions, such as
that of Supreme National Security Council chief Hassan Rohani, who declared
immediately after the announcement of the agreement that “all of Iran’s
peaceful nuclear activities, including enriching uranium, are the Iranian
nation’s obvious right … and nobody can take away this obvious right.”
Of
course all parties Iranian and European must now deliver on their promises.
Maintaining an atmosphere of calm and goodwill is the best way to assure that
this will happen. It is fervently to be hoped that the United States does not
prove to be the spoiler in this delicate period.
Bullying
from the White House has clearly been the order of the day for the past two
years. The tough stance has made some hard-core right-wing Republicans happy,
but it has yielded nothing but misery for Americans and for people throughout
the Middle East. Iran’s implied message to Washington is that if treated in
this insulting and humiliating manner, they will not agree to anything, however
reasonable. It is refreshing to see the European foreign ministers behaving
like reasonable adults, and demonstrating conclusively that treating a nation
like Iran with respect frequently produces a reasonable response.
William O. Beeman teaches anthropology and is
director of Middle East Studies at Brown University. He has lived and conducted
research in the region for over 30 years. He is author of Language, Status
and Power in Iran, and two forthcoming books: Double Demons: Cultural
Impediments to U.S.-Iranian Understanding, and Iraq: State in Search of
a Nation. Email: William_beeman@brown.edu.
* The Saudi
Bombing: A Calculated Act With a Political Message
* The
Unknown Hawk: Neoconservative Guru Sets Sights on Iran
* Religious
Zeal Makes 'Short War' in Iraq Doubtful
* Regime
Change, Literally: Jordan's King May Rule Post-War Iraq