HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
by
Rebecca Wodder
August
25, 2003
While
President Bush is busy raising funds in the Northwest, conservationists are
busy taking him to task for promises he made the last time he was in town, but
has failed to keep. On the campaign trail, Bush said, "Washington faces
important challenges, and there's no greater challenge than to save salmon... .
For all of us, those fish are a wonder of nature and they must be
preserved." Too bad his administration's policies don't match Bush's
concern for the salmon population.
The
Bush administration cannot use the spike in salmon runs in recent years as
proof their policies are working -- as their campaign rhetoric seems to imply.
Favorable ocean conditions, not the Bush administration's salmon recovery
policies, explain the high salmon returns in the Columbia and Snake rivers over
the past several years. The majority of this year's returning salmon are not
wild fish -- they were raised in hatcheries.
Far
from contributing to healthy salmon populations, the administration's policies
actually threaten wild salmon and the local economies that depend on them. The
scientific evidence reveals clearly that the increase in salmon returns is due
primarily to a cyclical change in ocean conditions. This change is known as the
Pacific Decadal Oscillation -- a pattern that increases survival rates for most
species of salmon during their years at sea.
Unfortunately,
both state and federal scientists say that wild salmon and steelhead are still
very much at risk. Further, misguided administration policies will only accelerate
the decline of wild salmon in the Columbia and Snake rivers when the
notoriously cyclical ocean conditions take a turn for the worse. The region
continues to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on various measures without
any clear sense of whether they will be effective.
Breaching
the four dams on the lower Snake River would be the single most effective way
to bring back wild salmon. In light of the administration's failure to deliver
a valid recovery plan that keeps those dams in place, dam removal planning
should commence now so that action can be taken soon if the federal government
again fails to demonstrate that salmon can be protected with the lower Snake
River dams in place.
In
its 2002 study, the RAND corporation determined that the lower Snake River dams
could be removed without harming the Northwest's economy. Rather than
dismissing this salmon recovery action out of hand, the Bush administration
should take an honest look at the costs and benefits of lower Snake River dam
removal.
But
instead of working toward constructive solutions to improve river health while
protecting local economies, the Bush administration has generally ignored
science, instead formulating its policies to benefit a handful of special
interests. The fish kill in the Klamath Basin illustrates the tragic
consequences of the biases of this administration. Earlier this summer, the
Wall Street Journal reported that Bush adviser Karl Rove pushed the president's
political agenda at a 2002 meeting where Bureau of Reclamation managers were
deciding how to distribute Klamath River water. The decision to make full water
deliveries to farmers -- at the expense of river and wildlife health -- was
followed by the largest fish kill in U.S. history. The state of California, among
others, said the 33,000 salmon died at least in part because of low river
flows. One NOAA Fisheries biologist who worked on the Klamath salmon plan has
sought whistleblower protection. This summer, conditions in the Klamath are
ripe for another fish kill.
Salmon
in the Northwest are also threatened by the Bush administration's proposed roll
backs of Clean Water Act protections. The mining, logging and development
industries have an interest in relaxing these protections. If the
administration eliminates clean water protections for wetlands and small
streams, the effects will be devastating not only for salmon and other
wildlife, but also for water quality and public health throughout the
Northwest. Removing protections from small streams undermines protection
throughout the watershed. Whatever is dumped in these smaller streams will
eventually reach our larger streams and rivers.
Finally,
the administration's forest policy proposals threaten salmon and water quality.
The administration is seeking to gut salmon protection rules in the Northwest
Forest Plan. The so-called Healthy Forests Initiative will affect salmon
habitat by allowing extensive logging through national forests and Bureau of
Land Management lands in the name of forest fire prevention.
A
healthy Northwest economy depends on healthy salmon. President Bush should
commit his administration to doing everything in its power to restore abundant
harvestable wild salmon. Absent a credible alternative, this must include
removing the four lower Snake River dams. On this point, conservationists and
the commercial and sportfishing industries agree.
Rebecca Wodder is president of
American Rivers, a non-proft conservation organization (www.americanrivers.org). This article
first appeared in Tom Paine.com (www.tompaine.com)