HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Washington
Pursues Dangerous Policy in Venezuela
by
Mark Weisbrot
September
25, 2003
In
recent weeks U.S. officials have made a series of remarkably unfriendly
statements against the government of Venezuela, and its President Hugo Chavez.
This breach of diplomatic norms can only serve to worsen relations between the
two countries. It also provokes resentment in Latin America -- in the same way
that the Bush administration's decision to disregard the United Nations and
invade Iraq lowered our standing throughout the world.
"I
think that some of the things that he [Chavez] has done at home politically and
his policies on the economic side, has ruined what is a relatively wealthy
country," said Roger Noriega, the State department's top diplomat for the
Americas. This statement is ironic, since Venezuela's current recession is
mainly a result of the 64-day oil strike organized in December and January by
opposition leaders seeking to overthrow the government. The State Department
did not criticize this strike nor ask its friends in the opposition to desist
from it, even though the Bush administration was preparing for war in the
Middle East and had a strong interest in maintaining the flow of oil from
Venezuela, the world's fifth largest oil exporter.
U.S.
officials have also made a number of statements indicating support for a
referendum to recall President Chavez. This is in sharp contrast to the Bush
administration's position on the California referendum. When Republicans were
gathering signatures to recall Governor Gray Davis, the Bush team remained
studiously neutral.
In
addition, U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela Charles Shapiro violated diplomatic
protocol by meeting with the country's newly appointed electoral commission
last week , even before the commission had met with the government. He offered
"assistance" with the commission's work, including their first task
of deciding whether to accept the opposition's recall petition. The petition
was subsequently rejected unanimously by the commission, with even the
opposition members abstaining.
Administration
officials have also made statements, without offering any evidence, indicating
that the Chavez government is supporting the guerillas in neighboring Colombia.
And in July our government cut off U.S. Export-Import Bank credits to
Venezuela.
Chavez
has responded angrily to these statements and actions, telling our government
"not to meddle" in Venezuela's internal affairs. Noriega, in turn,
accused Chavez of "unrelenting hostility" to the United States.
But
how would the Bush Administration react if the president of France, for
example, were to call for the impeachment of President Bush? Clearly it is
Washington's hostility to Venezuela that is causing the problem.
In
fact, the Bush Administration openly supported the military coup against
President Chavez in April 2002, reversing its stance after it became clear that
the United States was diplomatically isolated.
Our
government's clear pro-opposition bias, as well as its lack of respect for
democracy and national sovereignty in Venezuela, prevents it from playing any
positive role in resolving political conflicts there. Nor is such intervention
necessary.
Venezuela
is a democracy, with complete freedom of the press, speech, assembly and
association. In spite of Washington's support for the military coup last year,
the Chavez government has done its best to maintain friendly relations with the
United States. It is our third largest trading partner in Latin America, and
has always -- except during the opposition's oil strike -- been a reliable
energy supplier.
The
Bush Administration's policies are destabilizing Venezuela, politically and
economically. This is wrong and dangerous, and has the potential to push the
country towards civil war. There needs to be more pressure on the Bush team
here in the United States to change course, before it creates another foreign
policy disaster.
Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director
of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a nonpartisan think-tank in the
nation's capital (www.cepr.net).. Readers may write him at CEPR,
1621 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20009-1052 and e-mail him at
Weisbrot@cepr.net
Other Recent Articles by Mark Weisbrot
* Bush in
Africa: Compassionate Protectionism?
* Tax Cut
Continues "Class Warfare"