HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
by
Gila Svirsky
September
22, 2003
The
other morning at 7 a.m., I joined Peace Now for an early morning demonstration
to ‘wake up’ Ariel Sharon to the fact that his policy of assassinations only
feeds the cycle of violence, and does not end terrorism.
“You’re
making a terrible mistake!” said our signs, “Your decisions will only create
further havoc!” And yet, it turned out
that few of us actually think that this policy is a mistake at all. Questioning the 5 or 6 people standing near
me, I discovered that all of us really believe that Sharon’s moves are the
product of deliberate policy – that they are carried out in the full knowledge
that further death and destruction in Israel would be an inevitable result.
Here
is a partial list of Sharon’s decisions that are usually referred to by critics
as policy blunders because of their unwelcome consequences:
*
Targeted assassinations and attempted assassinations, even during the recent
ceasefire, which provoke increased terrorist activity;
*
Failure to support the moderate Abu Mazen by meaningful confidence-building
measures, thereby leading to his downfall;
*
The decision to sideline and then ‘eliminate’ Arafat, whether by expelling or
killing him, knowing that, dead or alive, chaos and instability would ensue,
thereby delaying indefinitely any peace negotiation until the regime stabilizes
and an alternative leader emerges;
*
Rejection out of hand of the new ceasefire proposal; and
*
Excessive force against the Palestinians at large – limiting access to health,
education, and employment, ongoing house demolitions, curfews, harassment, etc.
– all of which only serve to fan the flames of bitterness and hostility among
the population.
The
consequences of these acts seem so dire, commentators cannot believe that
Sharon would deliberately pursue them.
But analysts have begun to add things up, and some have even begun to
alert the Israeli public to the deliberate nature of these moves. Writes Ze’ev Sternhell in Ha’aretz (12 Sept.
2003):
“There’s
no reason to complain to the prime minister and the defense establishment. The present policy is exactly what Ariel
Sharon, the chief of staff, the government, and the settlement leaders think is
correct and desirable. They know this
policy has a price and they are willing to pay it with eyes wide open.”
The
price? More death and destruction
inside Israel. Then why would the prime
minister of Israel agree to this price?
Sharon
rode into power on a double promise: security and peace. And yet Sharon has not made even one
significant act of progress to achieve either.
On the contrary, security and peace appear to be the victims of Sharon’s
overriding agenda: maintaining the occupation.
Although one can deliberate Sharon’s motivations for wanting to maintain
the occupation – a commitment to a Greater-Land-of-Israel ideology? a belief that Israel is in even greater
jeopardy without control over Palestinian lives? a hunger for power that feeds off fear of the other? Regardless of the reason, one thing is
crystal clear: All the abovementioned,
so-called ‘errors’ are blatant instances of making occupation the priority,
placing it above security and peace.
If
maintaining control over the territories is viewed as Sharon’s priority, then
all his actions fall into place. Here
are a few of Sharon’s impressive accomplishments after only two and a half
years in office:
*
He killed the Oslo Peace Process (a course begun by Netanyahu).
*
He exponentially increased the fear and loathing of Palestinians among Israelis
(which had declined during Oslo days).
*
He brought the Palestinian economy to ruin.
*
He resurrected Arafat’s power and influence among Palestinians by appearing to
ostracize him.
*
He continues to delay construction of a
‘Security Wall’, because it would de facto create a Palestinian state on the
other side of it. And,
*
He increased support for settlements by forming the most right-wing government
in the history of Israel.
These
‘accomplishments’ all lead to the same conclusion: a dead end to all avenues
leading to reconciliation. Sharon’s
efforts have destabilized Palestinian society economically and politically,
dehumanized Palestinians to an extent not seen even in pre-Oslo days, and
destroyed or disrupted all infrastructure that would enable a properly
functioning Palestinian society – roads, power and water supplies, health and
education systems, even the records and databases. Sharon has sown chaos and misery, and, above all, has kept the
Palestinian population in a constant state of turmoil. His scorched earth policy is not a mistake,
but a deliberate strategy to grind the population into submission, to prevent
the rise of a sovereign state, to allow Israel to continue its domination. And if these cruel measures give rise to
belligerent, anti-Israeli activity, all the better. Palestinian terrorism is what gives legitimacy to Israel – both
domestically and internationally – to maintain its brutal boot on the neck of
‘out-of-control Palestinians’.
A
recent Ha’aretz editorial (14 Sept. 2003) called the resolve to eliminate
Arafat “a stupid decision” and remarked, “Once again the government has failed
to fathom a reality that any reasonable person readily grasps.”
Is
Sharon really stupid, with no grasp of the consequences of his actions? Please.
It is not time for Sharon to wake up, but for the rest of us to open our
eyes. It is not Sharon who fails to
grasp reality, but those of us who buy into his words and fail to account for
his deeds. Sharon is deliberately
leading the Palestinians into a state of chaos because it leaves Israel in
control…and Sharon in power.
Twenty
years ago, the prestigious Kahana Commission of Inquiry, empanelled by the
government of Israel, found Ariel Sharon indirectly responsible for the
massacre of Palestinian refugees in Sabra and Shatila, forcing his resignation
as defense minister, and urged that Sharon never serve a senior security
function in Israel ever again.
The
Kahana Commission was right. Wake up,
everybody!
Gila Svirsky is an Israeli peace
activist living in Jerusalem. She is a founding member of the Coalition of Women for a Just
Peace, a grouping of eight Israeli and Palestinian women's peace organisations.
* "Realistic
Religious Zionism"
* A
Busy Couple of Days for the Bulldozers