HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
US
Corporations Win from War in Iraq
But
the Iraqi People Should be the Benefactors
by
Devin Nordberg
September
16, 2003
'It's
not about oil. It's not about oil."
But
we're taking their oil. And not just to finance reconstruction.
Paul
Bremer, the U.S. administrator of the Iraqi occupation, made that clear back in
July when he declared that Iraq needs to accept foreign investment and
privatization of its oil before a permanent government is put in charge of the
country. In other words, democracy is welcome only after the most important
economic decisions for the future of Iraqis have been decided for them.
You'd
think that such a blatant rejection of democracy and obvious grab at Iraq's oil
would attract more notice. Bremer made it clear that corporations have priority
over people in Iraq, and that the U.S. occupation plans to ensure that.
Our
occupation of Iraq has an eerie similarity to another intervention in the
Middle East that occurred 50 years ago — the CIA-British coup that ousted
Iran's democratically elected leader, Mohammed Mossadegh, and installed the
infamous Shah of Iran.
So
when Arab nations greet our rhetoric of creating democracy with suspicion or
outright derision, we've earned it. Iranians struggled successfully for
democracy and we promptly crushed their dream.
Then
as now, the United States and Great Britain used violence to prevent Iraq and
Iran from controlling their own oil.
This
set of priorities contrasts sharply to the U.S. occupation of Japan after World
War II, when Americans sat down with Japanese scholars and collaboratively
designed and implemented one of the most progressive, democratic constitutions
in the world. We can take pride for having helped Japan evolve into a peaceful,
stable, and prosperous country that is one of our closest allies. Today,
Iranian and Iraqi people resent our support of their previous corrupt regimes
and, understandably, don't trust our intentions now.
The
differences between American occupations of 1945 Japan and 2003 Iraq reflect
the rise of corporate power here and abroad, and within the Bush administration
in particular. Dick Cheney's former company, Halliburton, is already cashing in
on Iraqi "rebuilding" contracts that it obtained from the U.S. government.
The oil companies that donated so heavily to the Bush campaign will reap huge
profits if they are allowed to take over oil production in Iraq. The weapons
makers profit from Bush's policies as well, and even telecommunications
companies stand to benefit, since Bremer intends to give foreign corporations
license to operate mobile phone networks in Iraq.
It's
no surprise that Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld have been
advocating an invasion of Iraq since at least 1998 through the Project for a
New American Century. It could be argued that Saddam Hussein has been a marked
man since he nationalized Iraqi oil back in 1973, but that's another story.
Meanwhile,
the American occupation of Iraq increasingly resembles the cycle of violence
between Palestinians and Israelis: American soldiers are ambushed and killed,
and the U.S. military retaliates by rounding up and imprisoning Iraqi
"suspects," including civilians, women, and children as young as 11.
More Iraqi violence results, and the cycle continues. Iraqis have little hope
that American troops will withdraw anytime soon and have not been treated with
dignity or human rights by their occupiers.
How
did the American ideals of liberty and justice become hollow slogans for
presidents to use to justify military attacks abroad? Ever since Eisenhower
warned us of the dangers of the military-industrial complex, it has become
steadily more powerful. Corporations should not be allowed to influence foreign
policy.
Yet
the Bush administration's foreign policy, like domestic policy, often seems to
come directly from corporate board rooms. For example, Executive Order 13303
grants complete legal immunity to transnational oil companies operating in
Iraq. While U.S. soldiers attempt to establish law and order in Iraq, Bush has
put oil companies above the law.
The
time to end the occupation of Iraq is overdue. We should pull our troops out
before more of them die, hand the temporary administration of Iraq over to the
United Nations, let the U.N. weapons inspectors back in Iraq, fund the
rebuilding of Iraq through the U.N., and allow Iraqis to choose their own
government.
The
best way for us to fight terrorism is to advance justice; and justice will not
be possible as long as corporations are prioritized over people.
Devin Nordberg writes for
ReclaimDemocracy.org (www.reclaimdemocracy.org),
an organization devoted to restoring citizen authority over corporations and
advancing democracy. He can be reached at: nordberg@hawaii.edu