HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Other
Things You Might Do With $87 Billion
by
Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
September
11, 2003
You
can actually get a few things done with $87 billion, the amount that President
Bush has asked Congress to appropriate for expenditures related to the military
occupation and reconstruction of Iraq.
For
example:
*
The World Health Organization (WHO) and other UN bodies estimate the cost of
providing treatment and prevention services in developing countries for
tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and malaria at $12 billion a year.
*
The WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health estimated that donor investment
of $27 billion a year, including expenditures on TB, AIDS and malaria, as well
as to eliminate death and suffering from other infectious diseases and
nutritional deficiencies, could save 8 million lives a year. That's eight
million lives. A year.
*
The UN Development Program estimated in 1998 that the annual additional cost of
achieving basic education for all was $6 billion.
Prefer
to spend some or all of the money at home? Even in the United States, where the
dollar doesn't go as far, $87 billion can perform some pretty impressive feats.
For
example, according to Business Leaders for Sensible Priorities, it would only
cost $6 billion a year to provide health insurance to all uninsured children in
the United States. You can provide Head Start and Early Head Start to all
eligible children for $8 billion annually. You can reduce class size to 15
students per teacher in all first-, second- and third-grade classrooms for $11
billion a year.
For
$87 billion, you could eliminate the backlog of maintenance needs at national
parks nearly 15 times over. You could cover more than half the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA)-estimated 20-year investment needs to ensure safe
drinking water throughout the United States. You could more than double the
annual capital expenditures needed to improve public transportation in the
United States, according to estimates of the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials. You could provide almost half of the
overall funding EPA says is needed to provide clean watersheds in the United
States, including through wastewater treatment, sewer upgrades and nonpoint
source pollution control.
It
just so happens, as the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities points out,
that $87 billion is almost exactly what all departments in the federal
government combined spend annually on education, training, employment and
social services. So you could fund that for a year.
If
you looked at the $87 billion as found money, and wanted to do something
unorthodox, you could eliminate California's state budget deficit two times
over.
And,
you would still have enough left over to enable the Detroit Tigers (baseball's
worst team) next year to field a team full of Alex Rodriguez's. (Rodriguez, at
$25 million a year, is baseball's highest-paid player. A full roster -- 25
players -- of Rodriguez's would cost $625 million.)
We
accept that having imposed devastating economic sanctions on Iraq for a decade
and twice waged war on the country, the United States has a major obligation to
support reconstruction in Iraq. But three-quarters of the president's request
is for military expenses, not reconstruction, the request follows a previous
$79 billion appropriation, additional requests are certain to follow, and much
of the money being spent on reconstruction is being funneled as poorly
scrutinized corporate welfare to Bush and Vice President Cheney's buddies at
companies like Halliburton and Bechtel.
If
one steps back for a moment, it is evident that there is a long list of
expenditures that would do more to improve the world, and more to improve U.S.
security if reasonably defined, than what the president proposes to do in Iraq.
A
strange circumstance has evolved in the United States. Military expenditures
can be justified at almost any level. ("Whatever it takes to defend
freedom.") Politicians don't say, "Whatever it takes to make sure
every child in this country has a decent education." Or, "Whatever it
takes to deal with the worst health pandemic in the history of the world
(HIV/AIDS)." When it comes to the military, there is neither a sense of
proportion, nor of trade offs.
This
state of affairs is a tribute to the military contractors and political leaders
who have ridden to power by instilling fear in the populace. It can be traced
in no small part to campaign contributions and lobbyist influence, but the
problem runs much deeper than that. Fear has penetrated deep into the culture.
But
the administration's overreach in Iraq now offers an opportunity to create a
new sense of priorities. It is now even more apparent than it was before the
war that Iraq posed no security threat to the United
States.
And the sums of money requested by the administration – and more will be coming
-- are so extraordinary that they practically demand consideration of
alternative expenditures.
After
all, you really can do quite a bit with $87 billion.
Russell Mokhiber is editor of
the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter, http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com.
Robert
Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Multinational Monitor. They are
co-authors of Corporate Predators: The Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on
Democracy (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press; http://www.corporatepredators.org).
Other Recent Articles by Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman
* We
Had a Democracy Once, But You Crushed It
* The
Two Faces of George Bush in Africa
* Corporate
Crime Without Shame
* Gray
Panthers’ Corporate Connections
* Throwing
Precaution to the Wind
* Why
Ari Should’ve Resigned in Protest