HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Say
NO to Bush's $87 Billion Dollar Request
by
Rob Kall
September
18, 2003
It
is time for honest, tough leadership to show its face in Washington and in
congress. We can no longer afford this charade that the president can be
trusted, or that he is doing what is good for the US and the soldiers on the
front lines.
It's
that simple. Say NO. Do not give him the money. Do not allow him to hand over
more gifts to his Haliburton friends. Do not allow Paul Wolfowitz to privatize
the military, creating corporate military "divisions" as he told
congress he wants to do.
Everyone
agrees, now that Bush and Rumsfield and the neocon keystone cops have
fraudulently, stupidly and incompetently dragged us into this Iraqi quagmire
without any follow-up plans to the easy military victory, that we need to
finish the job responsibly.
But
what people are not saying and they should be screaming is that Bush has lost
the right to be trusted to do the right thing, that his advisors have proven
themselves to be failed incompetents who are totally untrustworthy, in terms of
coming up with solutions to the Iraqi problem. The Democratic leaders should be
stating, in no uncertain terms that they are one hundred percent in support of
the troops and in support of supporting Iraq, but also one hundred percent
diametrically opposed to letting George Bush and his team handle the money.
There
is no reason to trust Bush's competence to take the next steps and there are
many reasons to mistrust Bush-- that he will continue to lie, dissemble and
provide false, fraudulent, misleading information.
The
answer is to set up an independent, bi-partisan commission to take over the
decision making on Iraq. This will certainly raise a gallery of shrieks and
nasty remarks from Republicans like Tom DeLay. But we have seen the power of
the filibuster in the judicial appointment process.... and we're talking about
$87 billion dollars here, which we all know is just the next installment on the
biggest boondoggle in world history. We
know that Bush will be coming back to the trough in another six months.... and
the numbers have not gotten smaller, the next time he'll be asking for over
$100 billion dollars.
There
has to be a "line in the sand" to quote Bush senior, and it should be
drawn now. Say NO to Bush's request for $87 billion and YES to an independent
commission that can not only decide how monies for Iraq are spent, but can also
investigate and run how the post-war "peace" is being managed.
While
Bush has not yet been charged with impeachable offenses, he is clearly guilty
of mismanagement and massive misleading of the congress and the people. He has
failed totally in the use of diplomacy as a leadership tool. While he is not
yet impeached he should at least be restrained from doing more damage.
Of
course, this is one of those easy to suggest, not so easy to do proposals. When
Bush senior drew his line in the sand it was a declaration of war and this is
just as tough, just as strong a position. But back in '91 it was Saddam who'd
already declared the war by invading Kuwait, and now, in 2003, it is Bush and
his neocon handlers who declared war on the US, by their lies, and frauds--
using the normal faith and trust Americans have in the office of the presidency
to perpetrate a war of choice that was not necessary, that should never have
been initiated.
History
will look back on this war as one in a series that were initiated by leaders
who used lies and deceptions to fool the American public and congress. But
there is still the chance for history to record the outcome of this war as one
that was changed by tough, honest politicians and activists who stood up to the
corrupt leaders and forced the war to turn in a drastically different
direction.
It
is clear that Bush and his lieutenants are still either lying about Iraq or
deluding themselves, investing more in proving their past lies than in solving
the current problems. The only rational solution to the Iraq situation is to
wrest control of the decision making process out of the hands of the people
currently in charge. If it takes a filibuster that shuts down the congress, so
be it. Fortunately, a new ABC/ Washington Post poll reports that 61% of those
polled oppose the funding, and 71% of women do not support it. That should make
it easier for even the Republicans in congress to stand up to iPOTUS
(incompetent President of the United States.)
Rob Kall is publisher of
progressive news and opinion website www.opednews.com
and organizer of cutting edge meetings that bring together world leaders, such
as the Winter Brain Meeting and the StoryCon Summit Meeting on the Art, Science
and Application of Story. He can be reached at: rob@opednews.com. This article is copyright by Rob Kall, but permission is granted
for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media so long as this entire credit
paragraph is attached.
Other Articles by Rob Kall
* Who Says
Kucinich Doesn't Have A Chance