HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
by
Thom Hartmann
September
13, 2003
Imagine
a bomb that only kills Caucasians with red hair. Or short people. Or Arabs. Or
Chinese.
Now
imagine that this new bomb could be set off anywhere in the world, and that
within a matter of days, weeks, or months it would kill every person on the
planet who fits the bomb's profile, although the rest of us would be left
standing. And the bomb could go off silently, without anybody realizing it had
been released - or even where it was released - until its victims started dying
in mass numbers.
Who
would imagine such a thing?
Paul
Wolfowitz, for one. William Kristol for another.
And,
history shows, when the men who define U.S. military policy from the shadows
set their sights on something, it's worthy of our attention.
I
have brown hair and eyes, both determined by specific genes, and there are
probably other markers deep within my DNA that would show a geneticist that
most of my ancestors are Norwegian, Welsh, and English. While there's no one
gene for race, there are numerous genes for the various components of what we
call race - hair color and texture, skin and eye color, eye and nose shape,
predispositions or immunities to disease like Sickle Cell Anemia or Tay-Sachs,
and the like.
When
creating a genetic bomb to target specific groups, such genetic profiles are
actually far subtler and more accurate than the coarse pseudo-category we call
race. Among men named Cohen all over the world, for example, researchers have
found a specific genetic profile tying them all back to a common ancestor.
Another group with a common genetic profile are people with ADHD ("The
Edison Gene"), who uniquely share common inherited variations in their
dopamine-regulating genes regardless of their ostensible race, geography, or
ethnicity.
Thus,
anybody who's part of a group with a shared genetic profile may be at risk in
the future, suggest the authors of The
Project for a New American Century's (PNAC) report titled "Rebuilding
America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century."
The
report notes that, "Much has been written in recent years about the need
to transform the conventional armed forces of the United States to take
advantage of the 'revolution in military affairs....'" They point out that
our military requires a dramatic transformation, lest we lose our ability to
fight future, unconventional wars. Some may be fought in cyberspace, others
underwater or in outer space. And some even within our own bodies.
Consider
what would happen if there was a virus or bacteria that only infected a
particular type of person, killing, disabling, or sterilizing only those of a
particular genetic profile. Consider the political leverage a nation would have
if they could credibly threaten the extinction of all people worldwide with
almond-shaped eyes, or the sterilization of everybody with a gene that tracks
them back to a common ancestor or region.
Three
years ago, Wolfowitz, Kristol, and their colleagues suggested this is something
the Pentagon should be thinking about. Not just germ warfare, but gene warfare.
And
it's not limited just to warfare: Imagine how genetic terraforming could
replace diplomacy, could even render the United Nations irrelevant if entire
ethnic groups were wiped out or could be controlled by the threat of
extinction. Or how it could change the face of politics if an organism got
loose that killed off all the people of a particular minority who tend to vote
for a particular political party.
Genetically
targeted weapons could change world politics forever, according to PNAC.
"And,"
their report notes, "advanced forms of biological warfare that can
'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of
terror to a politically useful tool."
Given
that Kristol, Wolfowitz, and their conservative PNAC associates like Dick
Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Eliot Abrams, Jeb Bush, and John Bolton
have already brought us two of their early 1998 recommendations - the seizure
of Iraq and a huge increase in defense spending - it's tempting to wonder if this
is another of their other politically useful ideas being explored by the
Pentagon.
Or
maybe we'd rather not know. At least not those of us with politically
problematic relatives.
Thom Hartmann (thom@thomhartmann.com) is the
award-winning, best-selling author of over a dozen books, and the host of a
syndicated daily talk show that runs opposite Rush Limbaugh in cities from
coast to coast. Visit his website: www.thomhartmann.com.
His most recent book (September 2003)
is The Edison Gene. This article is copyright by Thom Hartmann, but
permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media so long
as this credit is attached and the title is unchanged.
* Blood,
Oil, and Tears - and the 2004 Bush Campaign Strategy
* Turn
Your Radio On: The Unions' Answer to Right-Wing Static
* How
An Earlier "Patriot Act" Law Brought Down A President
* The
Crime Of The Century: A Never-Ending "War Against Terrorism"
*
The
Real War - On American Democracy
* The Empire
Needs New Clothes
* Now
Your Vote Is The Property of a Private Corporation
*
Healthcare
Reveals Real "Conservative" Agenda – Drown Democracy In A Bathtub