HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Palestinian,
Intellectual, and Fighter, Edward Said
Rails
Against Arafat and Sharon to His Dying Breath
by
Robert Fisk
September
27, 2003
The
last time I saw Edward Said, I asked him to go on living. I knew about his
leukaemia. He had often pointed out that he was receiving "state-of-the-art"
treatment from a Jewish doctor and - despite all the trash that his enemies
threw at him - he always acknowledged the kindness and honour of his Jewish
friends, of whom Daniel Barenboim was among the finest.
Edward
was dining at a buffet among his family in Beirut, frail but angry at Arafat's
latest surrender in Palestine/Israel. And he answered my question like a
soldier. "I'm not going to die," he said. "Because so many
people want me dead."
On
Wednesday night he died in a New York hospital, aged 67.
I
first met him in the early years of the Lebanese civil war. I'd heard of this
man, this intellectual fighter and linguist and academic and musicologist and -
God spare me for my ignorance in the 1970s - didn't know much about him. I was
told to go to an apartment near Hamra street in Beirut.
There
was shooting in the streets - how easily we all came to accept the normality of
war - but when I climbed the steps to the apartment, I heard a Beethoven piano
sonata. No, it wasn't the "Moonlight"- nothing so popular for Edward
- but I waited outside the brown-painted door for 10 minutes until he had
finished.
"You've
read my books, Robert - but I bet you haven't read my work on music," he
once scolded me. And of course, I scuttled off to Librarie Internationale in
the Gefinor Building in Beirut to buy his definitive book to add to my
collection; his wonderful essays on the Palestinians, his excoriation of the
corruption and viciousness of Yasser Arafat, his outraged condemnation of the
criminality of Ariel Sharon.
He
was not a flawless man. He could be arrogant, he could be ruthless in his criticism.
He could be repetitive. He could be angry to the point of irradiation. But he
had much to be angry about. One afternoon, I went to see
him
at the Beirut home of his sister Jean - a fine lady whose own account of the
1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, Beirut Fragments, is worthy of her brother's
integrity - and he was half-lying on a sofa.
"I'm
just a bit tired because of the leukaemia treatment," he said. "I
keep on going. I'll not stop."
He
was a tough guy, the most eloquent defender of an occupied people and the most
irascible attacker of its corrupt leadership. Arafat banned his books in the
occupied territories - proving the immensity of Said and the intellectual
impoverishment of Arafat.
At
that first meeting in Beirut in the late Seventies, I had asked him about Arafat.
"I went to a meeting he held in Beirut the other day," he said.
"And Arafat stood there and was questioned about a future Palestinian
state, and all he could say was that 'You must ask every Palestinian child this
question.' Everyone clapped. But what did he mean? What on earth was he talking
about? It was rhetoric. But it meant nothing."
After
Arafat went along with the Oslo accords, Said was the first - rightly - to
attack him. Arafat had never seen a Jewish settlement in the occupied
territories, he said. There wasn't a single Palestinian lawyer present during
the Oslo negotiations. Said was immediately condemned – all of us who said that
Oslo would be a catastrophic failure were – as "anti-peace" and, by
vicious extension, "pro-terrorist".
Said
would weary of the need to repeat the Palestinian story, the importance of
denouncing the old lies - one of them, which especially enraged him, was the
myth that Arab radio stations had called upon the Palestinian Arabs of 1948 to
abandon their homes in the new Israeli state - but he would repeat, over and
over again, the importance of re-telling the tale of Palestinian tragedy.
He
was abused by anonymous callers, his office was visited by a fire-bomber, and
he was libeled many times by Jewish Americans who hated that he, a professor of
literature at Columbia University, could so eloquently and vigorously defend
his occupied people.
An
attempt was made, in his dying days, to deprive him of his academic job by some
cruel supporters of Israel who claimed - the same old, mendacious slur - that
he was an anti-Semite. Columbia, in a long but slightly ambivalent statement,
defended him. When the Jewish head of Harvard expressed his concern about the
rise of "anti-Semitism" in the United States - by those who dared to
criticise Israel - Said wrote scathingly that a Jewish academic who was head of
Harvard "complains about anti-Semitism!"
As
his health declined, he was invited to give a lecture in northern England. I
can still hear the lady who organised it complaining that he insisted on flying
business class. But why not? Was a critically ill man, fighting for his life
and his people, not allowed some comfort across the Atlantic? His friendship
with the brilliant Barenboim - and their joint support for an Arab-Israeli
orchestra that only last month played in Morocco - was proof of his human decency.
When Barenboim was refused permission to play in Ramallah, Said rearranged his
concert - much to the fury of the Sharon government, for which Said had only
contempt.
The
last time I saw him, he was exalted with happiness at the marriage of his son
to a beautiful young woman. The time I saw him before, he had been moved to
infuriation by the failure of Palestinians in Boston to arrange his slides to a
lecture on the "right of return" of Palestinians to Palestine in the
right order. Like all serious academics, he wanted accuracy. All the greater
was his fury when one of his enemies claimed that he was never a true refugee
from Palestine because he was in Cairo at the time of the Palestinian
dispossession.
He
had no truck with sloppy journalism - take a look at Covering Islam, on the
reporting of the Iranian revolution - and he had even less patience with American
television anchors. "When I went on air," he told me once, "the Israeli
consul in New York said I was a terrorist and wanted to kill him. And what did
the anchorwoman say to me? 'Mr Said, why do you want to kill the Israeli
consul?' How do you reply to such garbage?"
Edward
was a rare bird. He was both an icon and an iconoclast.
Robert Fisk is an award winning foreign
correspondent for The Independent
(UK), where this article first appeared. He is the author of Pity Thy
Nation: The Abduction of Lebanon (The Nation Books, 2002 edition). Posted
with author’s permission.
*
Iraqi
Broadcasters Risk Being Closed If They Put Saddam's Voice On Air
*
US
Secrecy on Iraqi Casualties
*
A Hail of
Bullets, A Trail of Dead, and a Mystery the US is in No Hurry to Resolve
* Don't Say We
Were Not Warned About This Mess
* The Ghosts
of Uday and Qusay
* US Moves
to Censor Freedom of Press
* "We
Keep Asking Ourselves Who’s Next"
* US
Troops Turn Botched Saddam Raid Into A Massacre
* The Ugly
Truth Of America's Camp Cropper, A Story To Shame Us All