HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
by
Philip A. Farruggio
September
23, 2003
In
any republic, the government should reflect the voice of the people. In these
times, our government has become the 'arbitrary' voice to the people. Lost in
the shuffle are the countless lives sacrificed for dreams of empire and individual
gain. We view on CNN, each and every day, our youth in uniform marching in
harms way for an action that growing numbers of Americans now question.
Millions throughout the globe dissented against this terrible preemptive
action, ironically since America has always been thought of as the modern
'cradle of liberty and personal freedom'.
Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi have gone without electricity and viable
drinking water for months -- yet just a few hours of blackout here at home can
cause such an uproar (and rightly so).
Go
to your library or video store and get "Judgment at Nuremberg"
(1961). The film focuses on the 1948 US Military Tribunal trial of four German
judges. It’s more than just a tale of the prosecution of four guilty parties-
it’s an indictment of what lack of dissent offers any ruthless regime. The
moral of the story is how not only a culture, but a whole world, turned a blind
eye to injustice and persecution. The film infers that many profited from the
'high crimes and misdemeanors' of a government, while others in positions of
judicial power thought it to be but a 'passing phase', to be followed by an era
of 'peace and order' (New World Order?).
Is
this beginning to sound all too familiar? History, sadly put, does have this
nasty habit of repeating itself. In the closing scenes of the film, Spencer
Tracy portraying the presiding judge on the tribunal is ready to pass sentence.
Before doing so, he states the majority opinion. Viewers should close their
eyes and inhale his thoughts: "there are those in our own country today
who speak of 'protection of country, of survival'.... then it seems that the
only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to wrest survival through
what is expedient . . . then what does our country really stand for?" Our
George II took that same path on his road to war with Iraq -- the expedient
road. Yet, he could not have done so without consent of Congress -- and give it
they did! Four of the nine candidates for the Democratic (mind you) nomination
gave their consent, their right and power as Congress to wage war, to this
President. It was the 'path of least resistance', charted by an administration
and navigated by a willing media. Dissent thus became 'anti-American' or
'pro-terrorist', and we who demonstrated were 'crackpots and malcontents' --
not fit to carry or wave the flag. Simply put, this government, the voice of
the people, decided to 'shoot and ask questions later'.
Back
to the movie (art imitates life and all that). In the film, the Maximillian
Schell character, defense attorney for the accused judges, makes a stirring
closing statement. In it, he reminds the court (and all who would listen) how,
as late as 1938, Hitler was publicly praised by Winston Churchill as a leader
the British would be 'lucky to have'. He then goes on to state that many U.S.
companies made fortunes financing German industry in the 1930's, well AFTER the
Nuremberg Racial Laws were enacted -- well AFTER the concentration camps were
in full operation. Finally, he reminds the court how the Soviet Union entered
into a non-aggression pact with Germany in 1939, oblivious to all the horrors
that the Nazi regime was undertaking. Stalin was obviously too busy burying his
own corpses.
Fast
forward to the mid-1980's, Baghdad. Saddam Hussein, the soon to be labeled
"Butcher of Baghdad", was already a decade into his reign of terror
on Iraqi dissidents and the Kurds. He used biological and chemical weapons (aka
WMDs) on those aforementioned folks and yes, also on the Iranians, newly hated
enemies of the US of A. Of course a few years prior to that, the Iranians,
under our pal the Shah, were our 'friends'. So much so, that the U.S. and the
Israelis helped train Iran's dreaded SAVAK (Secret Police), who were doing to
their dissidents what Saddam's boys were doing to his. Whew!! No nation should
willingly and with purpose ignore atrocities committed by another nation --
then, whenever it chooses, go full thrust against those same outrages.
Wake
up American people, and be the voice that our constitution deemed you to be. It’s
later than we realize!
Philip A Farruggio is a true
progressive thinker. This Brooklyn NY
born, bred and educated (Brooklyn College '74) son of a longshoreman, has had
over 35 columns posted on progressive sites and newspapers since the 2000
election, including NewsInsider.org.
Philip can be reached at brooklynphilly@aol.com.