HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Too
Err is Human, To Truly Correct is Divine
by
Norman Solomon
August
8, 2003
For
America’s newspapers, the New York Times is a pacesetter. And this summer, with
the Times expanding its daily “Corrections” slot on page two, some other papers
seem open to more rigor in setting the record straight. This is commendable. But
the limitations of the genre leave much to be desired.
Traditionally,
published corrections focus on such factual matters as the proper spelling of
names or the accuracy of various numbers, dates and geographic locations.
Sometimes we learn that photo captions mixed up the identities of individuals.
Or we find out that events happened a bit differently than they were reported.
Fine.
When it comes to getting facts right, better late than never. However, more
substantive steps could be taken. So, here are some hypothetical newspaper
corrections of the sort that I’d like to see:
* Yesterday’s front-page article about the
mayor’s support for taxpayer subsidies of the proposed new ballpark failed to
mention that he received more than $150,000 in campaign contributions from real
estate investors who stand to benefit from the plan. The Daily Bugle regrets
the error of omission.
* For the 958th consecutive week, the Daily
Bugle published a Business section each day without ever including a Labor
section in the paper. This tacit identification with the interests of capital
over the interests of working people is inconsistent with the values of independent
journalism. The editors regret this chronic error.
* The Daily Bugle published a wire-service
story yesterday that flatly reported: “The events of 9/11 changed everything in
America.” But Sept. 11 did not really change everything. For instance,
widespread hunger among low-income people has persisted in this country. To
take another example, 9/11 did not change the society’s basic financial structures,
which continue to widen already-huge economic gaps between rich and poor. It is
inaccurate and irresponsible journalism to report that “9/11 changed
everything.” The Daily Bugle regrets that it has gotten caught up in this media
myth.
* A news report in the Daily Bugle on Thursday
stated that Secretary of State Colin Powell is “a moderate.” This assessment
should have been attributed rather than being presented as an objective fact. The
lengthy article did not mention Powell’s record of strong efforts for the
contra war in Nicaragua, the invasion of Panama, two massive assaults on Iraq
and other wars waged by the Pentagon: a record some would contend hardly merits
characterization as “moderate.”
* On Wednesday, a news story in the Bugle used
the term “casualties in Iraq” to refer only to the deaths of American troops. This
usage had the effect of rendering invisible the Iraqis who continue to die
because of military actions by the occupiers.
* News articles and editorials about
regulatory issues related to the media industry have not included the relevant
information that the Silverado Newspaper Group, the chain that owns the Daily
Bugle, stands to gain or lose millions of dollars in profits depending on the
outcome of deregulation proposals. The editor regrets the lack of appropriate disclosure
and disclaimers.
* In recent weeks, the Daily Bugle has printed
more than a dozen large advertisements for cigarettes. During the same period,
the Bugle has published no articles about negative health consequences of smoking.
The editors regret this error of judgment.
* Yesterday’s long article about Democratic
presidential candidate Howard Dean described the former Vermont governor as a “candidate
from the left.” Yet the story failed to mention that many of Dean’s positions
are far from the left: such as his statements in support of raising the Social
Security retirement age, his stance against cutting the U.S. military budget,
his assertion that American troops should not be withdrawn from Iraq, his
opposition to medical marijuana, and his backing for the NAFTA “free trade”
agreement.
* In numerous stories this year, the Bugle has
referred to U.S. “defense spending.” Yet it is an arguable point as to whether
most of the Pentagon budget is for “defense.” A more evenhanded journalistic term
would be “military spending.”
* Several articles about international affairs
in Friday’s edition quoted top officials and other sources in the U.S.
government without balancing their claims with quotations from foreign-policy critics.
This stenographic reliance on official sources is not in keeping with
independent journalism. The Daily Bugle expresses its regret and resolves to do
better in the future.
Norman Solomon is Executive
Director of the Institute for Public Accuracy (www.accuracy.org) and a syndicated
columnist. His latest book is Target Iraq: What the News Media Didn’t Tell
You (Context Books, 2003) with Reese Erlich. For an excerpt and other
information, go to: www.contextbooks.com/new.html#target. Email: mediabeat@igc.org
* US Media
Are Too Soft on the White House
* Green
Party Taking the Plunge for 2004
* Media’s
War Boosters Unlikely to Voice Regret
* Summertime
. . . and the Politics of Money is Easy
* Tilting
Democrats in The Presidential Race