HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Out
Now!
by
By Dennis Rahkonen
July
21, 2003
During
the Vietnam era, there was a considerable difference between the two major
wings of the American peace movement regarding precisely which war- ending
approach ought to be popularly adopted.
The
People’s Coalition for Peace and Justice felt it was most practical to organize
around calling for negotiations and a specific date for ceasing hostilities.
The
National Peace Action Coalition, however, was very emphatic in its consistent
demand of “Out Now!”
I
worked with both tendencies, striving to build badly needed unity in an
American Left infamous for its fratricidal factionalism.
While
I was a local coordinator for the PCPJ, supportive of its assessment of how
Nixon’s Indochina folly could best be terminated, I simultaneously plastered
every available lamp post or bare spot of wall in our town with the NPAC’s blue
and white “Out Now!” stickers.
A
similar discrepancy exists among opponents of George Bush’s war against Iraq.
The
dominant position -- except among categorical anti-imperialists of the true Left
-- has been that the U.S. “presence” in Iraq shouldn’t too hastily or “recklessly”
be brought to a close, for fear that Saddam Hussein would return or that “chaos”
would ensue. Coupled with this opinion
are calls for internationalizing the defacto occupation, allowing for our
troops to be replaced by foreign “peacekeepers”
Among
the announced Democratic presidential aspirants, for instance, this is the
majority view.
But
doesn’t that actually amount to Bush’s policy goals being implemented by
proxy? Regardless which countries’ forces
assume the final occupational role, the “peace” they’d try to impose would be
an attempted quashing of valid Iraqi resistance to what would still be a neo-colonial
thwarting of Iraq’s sovereign right to independent self-determination.
Washington
would hardly tolerate an outcome that meant U.S. multi-national corporations (read
Big Oil) wouldn’t get the fabulously profitable fruits that Bush’s aggression
was designed from the very start to...steal.
Let’s
not kid ourselves in any sense.
This
wasn’t a war about weapons of mass destruction that were never found, nor was
it a noble and needed ouster of a vile despot. The U.S. and Britain both have
WMD of their own, and were not averse to providing Iraq such capabilities when
it was in their former, Cold War interest to do so.
Furthermore,
Saddam Hussein -- like Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan -- was essentially a
creation of our self-serving meddling in Iraqi internal affairs. As a United Press International
investigative piece disclosed this spring, he was plucked from obscurity by the
CIA to practice barbaric repression against Iraqis deemed too dangerously
leftist in Washington’s opinion, at a time when all politics everywhere were
too readily infused with U.S. vs. Soviets overtones.
No,
it wasn’t worry over weapons that we ourselves not only have but have used with
horrific consequence over time (beginning at Hiroshima). And the U.S. corporate state would be
thrilled to have Saddam as our henchman, no matter how brutal his
techniques.
Dubya’s
attack on Iraq was an utterly uncalled-for invasion to grab somebody else’s
wealth, to achieve regional hegemony in shabbily disguised colonial form, and
to assert America’s new, ugly presumption of being the sole ideological and
economic decider of humanity’s affairs.
In
other words, there’s entirely nothing good or worthy about what Bush did.
Likewise,
there’s no actual righteousness or broad value in anything we’re doing in Iraq
as our troops remain there. Our
military doesn’t try to get the power back on in this Iraqi town or that to
give the locals light to read the Koran by, but to undercut a basis for
rebellion and to provide electricity for commerce and industry that Yankee
monopolists hope to lucratively dominate.
That’s
imperialism, folks. No decent person
should have any truck with what is unequivocally humankind’s worst bane,
especially in the subsequently-suffering Third World.
We
need to get the hell out of Iraq, now, because there’s no morally defensible
reason for us being there, period.
America, under Bush, has absolutely no legitimacy, no basis for
considered respect.
For
most Americans, however, talk of imperialism is abstruse and arcane.
Years
of conservative mind bending have assured that we’re not predisposed to widely
delve into radical political analysis.
What
it’ll all hinge on will be those recent high school graduates violently dying
in Iraq on a daily basis in a guerrilla war that’ just the latest in a string
of unpleasant surprises the American people have been dismayed by -- following
blatant lies used to sell a dirty debacle that should never have happened in
the first place.
As
one who was personally radicalized by grim, inescapable truths about Vietnam
more than thirty-five years ago, I can assure you our general citizenry is
ready to make the quantum leap into defacto anti-imperialism.
They’ll
do it from the overpowering emotional standpoint of no longer tolerating our
youth being sacrificed in the distant, dusty heat for the sordid likes of Bush,
Cheney and Wolfowitz.
It’s
a no-brainer, really.
Build
it (the movement), and they will come.
Dare to say it, and America will agree:
“Out
Now!”
Dennis Rahkonen,
from Superior, WI, has been writing progressive commentary and verse for
various outlets since the ‘60s. He can
be reached at dennisr@cp.duluth.mn.us