HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Physicians
for a National Health Program, Cable De-regulation
by
Ralph Nader
August
19, 2003
August
is supposed to be a slow month in Washington, DC but two public reports
released by two news conferences on August 12th seem to indicate it is the
press that is slow.
Eight
thousand doctors called for national health insurance and outlined their
detailed single payer plan in an article published by the Journal of the
American Medical Association. The signers included two former U.S. Surgeons
General, the former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, hundreds of
medical school professors and deans and many practicing physicians throughout
the country.
Dr.
Marcia Angell of the Harvard Medical School said "In the current economic
climate, we can no longer afford to waste the vast resources we do on the
administrative costs, executive salaries and profiteering of the private
insurance system." A factual predicate for her statement was given by Dr.
Steffie Woolhandler, also of Harvard, who stated that "we are already
spending enough to provide every American with superb medical care - $5,775 per
person this year. That's 42% higher than in Switzerland, which has the world's
second most expensive health care system, and 83% higher than in Canada."
In
essence an expanded and improved version of traditional medicare, the proposal,
they assert, would save at least $200 billion annually on paperwork and
administration. This sum alone would cover all the uninsured and upgrade
coverage for those who are under-insured.
These
thousands of physicians are "taking a stand on the side of patients and
repudiating the powerful insurance and drug lobbies that block wholesome
reform," said Dr. Quentin Young, former head of the Departmentof Medicine
at Chicago's Cook County Hospital.
The
physicians' plan would provide universal, comprehensive coverage without
increasing overall health spending and give patients their free choice of
doctor and hospital (which today's HMOs prohibit). Most hospitals and clinics
would remain privately owned and operated.
What
is unique about this proposal by the Physicians for a National Health Program
is not only its life-saving potential, its increase in efficiency and its
restraint on greed and poor quality care. It is also its detailed explanation on
how it is to be paid for, how savings will result and how a much more benign
reallocation of where the money now goes to where it should go if patients'
needs are first. See www.pnhp.org for more
details or call 312-782-6006.
The
other event was about the failure of cable de-regulation and its skyrocketing
cable bills (just another example of the miserable failures of so many
deregulation schemes and their broken promises).
Remember
the promises of the cable industry. In the Fifties and Sixties, a small cable
industry promised no advertisements and vibrant local programming in return for
a modest monthly fee. Then, it was composed of many small firms which were
indeed locally rooted -- community cable, it was called. Now three giant cable
conglomerates control 56% of the entire national marketplace. De-regulation was
a set-up for a spate of mergers slouching toward wider monopolization.
Guess
what happened after the last full stage de-regulation in 1996 -- voted by many
liberal Democrats such as Cong. Ed Markey (D-MA) along with the Gingrich crowd?
Consumers were price-gouged more than 50%. This was after Congress and Clinton
promised that de-regulation would bring competition and lower prices, according
to Ed Mierzwinski of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group -- the prime
sponsor of the new report. (see www.uspirg.org
for more details).
But
according to Jay Halfon, who wrote the Report, the reach of the cable company
giants is boundless. They continue "to deny competitors access to critical
programming, wireline competition is virtually non-existent, and the industry
now dominates the broadband Internet market, giving it enormous and unregulated
influence over America's digital future," he writes. Andrew Jay
Schwartzman, long-time president of the Media Access Project was direct:
"The Internet as we know it is in jeopardy. If the cable television model
is extended to the Internet, the open and interactive system which
characterizes the dial up Internet will be lost."
What
does the Report propose? Return regulation to the states and local governments
and away from the pathetic Federal Communications Commission. Require as a
condition of franchise renewal that cable operators include billing inserts
that invite consumers to join a local Cable Action Group that would operate a
local Audience Channel, well funded and equipped by the cable company -- a
modest quid-pro-quo for the franchise.
Introduce
a la carte programming to expand consumer choices rather than being force-fed
the programming bundles the cable operators demand. Empower state public
utility commissions to regulate all cable rates and charges for video services
until real competition emerges.
Jeff
Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, summed up the
crisis: Cable's threat to democracy and diversity on the Internet, our virtual
town square, cannot be over-stated."
Two
fresh reports by prominent organizations and civic leaders about important
matters on a slow news day and the major media looked the other way. It happens
all the time in Washington, DC.
Ralph Nader is America’s
leading consumer advocate. He is the founder of numerous public interest groups
including Public Citizen, and has twice
run for President as a Green Party candidate. His
latest book is Crashing the Party: How to Tell the Truth and Still Run for
President (St. Martin’s Press, 2002)
* The Corporatist
Democratic Leadership Council
* Citizen-centric
E-Government
* Has the American
Enterprise Institute Lost Contact with Reality?
* Tax
Cuts While Problems of Homeless Grow
* Giving Our
Airwaves to the Media Moguls
* Let
Technology Work for People