HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
We
Ain't Seen Nothing Yet!
The
REAL Potential for 'Terrorism' is Still Brewing
by
Jerre Skog
June
10, 2003
Unlike
the US/UK allegations about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, this article is
not based on the odd Iraqi exile, paid to say what their American masters want
to hear, trumped up or fabricated 'intelligence' or falsified documents planted
by unknown parties. It is based on logical and reasonable assumptions, resting
on established and demonstrated patterns, historical facts and normal human
reactions to conditions forced on them. It is a scenario that might not come to
be. Or it might unfold in the next five, ten or twenty years unless we are
aware of it and use available resources to avoid it. These resources are not
guns, bombs, armies or the introduction of more fascist police states! What is
needed is the money that was not ours to begin with, equally applied justice,
fair trade-agreements and international solidarity and empathy! It is late but,
for the sake of our children, hopefully not too late to make a change!
The
main reason for terrorist activities is not religion, “they hate our freedoms”
(as Bush likes to say), nor is it limited to certain races or beliefs. The
reason is colonialism (and its modern version), oppression and injustices. And
in the future the targets may not only be the US and Britain, responsible for
most of the Middle East meddling, but virtually all European countries whose
companies are involved in neocolonial robbery.
Robbery
of foreign resources has been going on since the time when enough soldiers
could be transported into foreign lands to overcome a settlement and the first
ships were built that could carry a few men with spears across a bit of sea. It
went on, on a small scale and often haphazardly and disorganized, into the
middle of the second millennium. With the first settlements and colonies it
took on speed. By the end of the 19th century large parts of the world were
under French, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese, Belgian, German and mainly British
rule. Many of those areas that weren't formally ruled by Europeans still had to
suffer regular raiding and looting for whatever valuable resources, slaves,
gold or tea, that somebody thought it was worth to spend a few bullets on. Even
little Sweden had a colony for some time, St. Barthelemy in the Caribbean,
bought from the French in 1784 in exchange for trading rights in Gothenburg,
and returned to France in 1878 after a referendum. (Deciding the fate of poor
people over their heads for the sake of trade advantages for the wealthy is
obviously not an invention of the World Trade Organization!)
The
British empire was ruling the world in those days. It was largely run by the
British South Africa Company, the East India Company and other commercial
enterprises, and those corporations took the main loot, leaving enough to be
taxed away by the British Viceroy. Little Netherlands ruled over more than 100
million in Indonesia. The white man sent out missionaries to preach about the
Christian god of tolerance and compassion while he, backed by cannons and
Maxim-machineguns, took what he wanted and used the people as cheap workers and
lowly servants. He preached western justice and principles while putting
himself above that justice and applying violence as the ultimate principle.
Daily papers, communications, education and knowledge of the world was
nonexistent in the conquered countries and people soon submitted to the
occupation. Sometimes even the British burra sahib was preferable to an evil
rajah. Still, some took to weapons when they had enough. The Sepoy Mutiny in
1857 in India and the Zulu, Matabele and other wars in South Africa took a
terrible toll on both the British and the other side. But the robbery went on
and more fortunes were made for Europe. Cecil John Rhodes became the richest
man in the world, not from his own hard work, but from the slave work of
thousands of black men in the stolen gold and diamond mines. Diamonds might not
'be forever' as Rhodes' De Beers like to claim, but the deaths they caused and
still cause are surely forever.
This
brief picture of colonialism is very simplified but be sure that a few decades
into the 20th century European countries were ruling large parts of the world
and took an outrageous toll in blood and riches for it.
And,
yes, there were some positive things that came out of the colonial aggressions.
Some railways and telegraphs were built and people learned some words in the
ruler’s language (and how to grovel). In some cases and thanks to decent
individuals some schools and hospitals were built, with money from the loot
perhaps, but well, you can't have it all. Still, as an exercise in democracy,
colonialism was a miserable failure. After ruling India almost 200 years, the
caste system still hadn't been done away with. It was utilized by the British! The East
India Company had more important things to attend to. The few individuals
positive to foreign rule turned out in most cases to be those who made a good
living out of helping the colonialists to rule.
For
some years, few colonies remain in formal terms. Britain rules the Falkland
Islands, Gibraltar, Bermuda and some other small islands. The US runs Guam and
some other islands in the Pacific. In practice the US also rules Afghanistan,
Iraq, South Korea and Britain! France runs a few small places far away from the
Elysee Palace in Paris. The normal use for these colonies is mainly as air or
naval bases or as test sites for nuclear weapons. The Diego Garcia Archipelago
in the middle of the Indian Ocean is governed by the UK, leased to the US and
used as a major military base in order to control and dominate the whole of the
Middle East and Central Asia and useful for fueling the bombers on the way to
drop their loads on Afghanistan, Iraq or any other country that happens to be
the monthly enemy of the US. Since this base is considered to be of "critical
importance" for the defence of the Western World, according to the British,
they still refuse to give it back to the rightful owner, Mauritius. Though the
ruled populations in today's colonies don't have much say, or are simply
removed from the area, this is not where most of today's robberies go on!
New,
more refined and efficient, ways have been found to steal the riches belonging
to the black, yellow and brown peoples in Asia and Africa. Nowadays we do it,
maybe, according to the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and with
the help of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) who use money from western
taxpayers to force privatization (the easier to grab the assets), the profits to
be reaped by western corporations. It is as neat a scheme of internal and
external fraud as can be found anywhere! When WTO and IMF rules limit profits
too much or when they are not even applied (who cares out in the jungle!) there
are always private armies, mercenaries, warlords and dissenting factions whose
services can be retained for a small share of the loot. These new forms of
colonialism, through enforced, often unjust trade rules, with the help of
mercenaries like Executive Outcome, or with assistance of local dictators and
warlords as proxies, still rob people in poorer countries and keep them
oppressed. The old and the new colonialism is the natural cradle of what we
call terrorism and what the victims of the colonialism call a 'struggle for
freedom and justice'. The neocolonialist robbery is in many ways more
aggressive than the old version. Old values have in modern society often been
replaced by greed, and corporations have neither hearts nor concern about the
future; when a mine is empty, they close the operations and move on, leaving
whatever waste there is to others.
Let's
downplay Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda may be more or less organized but it's not an
almighty corporation responsible for 99% of terror attacks. Al Qaeda is rather
a convenient symbol to focus blame on for political ends than the dominating
perpetrator of terrorism. Now when we have seen what lengths the US/UK were
prepared to go to get their much wanted war on Iraq, we ought to view their
claims about terrorists' identity, whereabouts and motives with the greatest
suspicion! 'One organization fits all' is just too convenient! And it's wrong!
If
we are to believe Bush & Co, almost every act of political violence around
the world since the 80s can be linked to Al Qaeda. Somewhere here we better
watch out! Does it sound reasonable that a scattered organization that is constantly
being hunted and spied on can today perpetrate acts of terrorism from
Indonesia, Chechnya, Pakistan and Afghanistan to Morocco, Egypt, Kenya, Europe
and the US? Is it not more probable that individuals and smaller groups,
sometimes with religion as cover and excuse for meetings, having matured
politically and becoming more and more aware of the true nature of their
leaders and the ongoing stealing of their countries' riches, react in the only
way open to them in societies where 'freedom and democracy' are nothing but
words used in speeches? Are they terrorists or freedom-fighters? Do they do it
for personal gain as the colonialists or are they fighting for a fair cause
with dirty weapons?
The
reason why Muslim countries happen to have produced the
terrorists/freedom-fighters presently in the American bomb-sights is very
logical. Muslim countries have the dominating OIL-reserves! They have been
invaded, manipulated, regime-changed, slaughtered and robbed more than most.
These countries are often also at a stage of development where enough people
get enough education to understand what has been and is now being done to them.
And perhaps they don't accept it since they have heard from western mouths the
word 'Democracy'! It suits some western leaders to picture all terrorists as
fanatical Islamists. That way the real problem doesn't have to be addressed.
Well, Israeli aggression and land-stealing in Palestine naturally leads to some
pent up hate. So does the West's (now we are talking mainly about US and UK)
toppling more or less democratic leaders and installing dictators in Iraq and
Iran (Saddam Hussein and the Shah). And propping up and selling weapons to the
undemocratic Saudi rulers to keep the people oppressed is another cause for
Arabs to build up anger as was the mainly US/UK aggressions in Afghanistan and
Iraq.
Still,
fanatical Islamism may be not be the main motivating force but rather a common
belief that just happens to unite people who had enough of foreign meddling in
their land. It is also a good cover for organizing dissent and a way to recruit
new fighters. In countries where political organizations are forbidden, one of
the few places people are allowed to congregate is the mosque. When the
police-spies are absent, the imam may talk of revolt and invoke Allah.
This
is not much different from George Bush Sr. in 1991 telling the aircrews of the
332nd Air Expeditionary Group, which conducted bombing missions on Iraq,
"I'm delighted that I've been invited out here today to salute you, who,
in my view, are doing the Lord's work."
Let's,
just for the sake of argument, assume that Al Qaeda is largely a convenient
scapegoat for violent crimes directed against “western interests.” Let's assume
that most terrorism around the world is really a response to the West's past
and ongoing violent colonial rape of the world and that those who are involved
in it are politically aware individuals whose choice of weapons and targets
might be deplorable, but may be the only ones left to them in a militarized
world. Let's simply assume that there are many people who refuse to be stepped
upon and have the resources of their countries divided between their own
corrupt rulers and Wall Street investors!
If
we allow ourselves to see that people all over the world don't differ from us
in that they want freedom and justice, we may start to understand much of the
violence that goes on instead of being duped by our own leaders.
The
number of countries from which those we call terrorists so far have emanated is
very limited. Saudi Arabia, Libya, Algeria, Egypt, Palestine, Indonesia,
Pakistan, Chechnya and a few more. Countries with populations totaling perhaps
3-400 million*. What happens when other oppressed populations around the world
reach the stage of development and maturity where the young people realize that
their countries' riches for centuries took the fast lane to London to lay the
ground to fabulous wealth and to buy knighthoods and castles? What happens when
people without clean water and living in poverty come to understand that the
proceeds from the natural resources of their country went 10% to the dictator
installed by the US and 90% to his owners in American boardrooms earning $100
millions a year? What happens when the Angolan kid who lost a leg after
stepping on a landmine matures enough to see the connections between his
suffering, savage and greedy warlords, the copper mine in the area and a mining
corporation in Canada or US? There is a potential out there. A potential for
freedom fights (or terrorism if you get hit by it) that is terrible, but we
don't see it for it is neither Muslim nor Arab. But it is created by us! Us in
the West: our present and past corporations and our power-seeking, manipulating
leaders. We allowed them to come to power and take over the world while we
watched TV and enjoyed the small part of the loot that trickled down to us. Now
they blame a few fanatics and are willing to let the dirty game go on! A child,
crippled from an American mine in Angola because of the greed of an American
company, has been hit by the worst violence there is: Corporate terrorism,
accepted by a rich state! Do we expect them to take it forever?
*(Ireland,
Spain and some other places are not covered here, but the arguments apply there
too.)
There's
no shortage of local dictators and warlords. There is no lack of internal
fighting between tribes and clans in many places. Without western meddling,
people in Asia and Africa still manage to kill each other. But western
corporate interests encourage the bloodshed and often fund it, directly or via
mercenaries. Continents, especially Africa are saturated with guns, mines and
grenades after the meddling of the US and Russia. The indiscriminate selling
and giving of deadly weapons is as despicable as other western ways of
destroying the world.
Every
now and then it happens that a certain country manages to bury the differences
between tribes and groups and somehow elect a leader who wants the best for his
countrymen. A man who is honest and has integrity - like Patrice Lumumba
in the Congo, after Belgium awarded (what a hypocritical word!) it
independence. Too often does such a man meet his destiny in the form of a
bullet paid for by America. Too often is such a man replaced by a dictator
whose main objective is to rob his country while obeying American dictates --
as Mobutu did in the Congo
for the next thirty years. Other countries produced other men who united people
to fight the foreign rulers, Nkrumah, Gandhi, Mandela, Kenyatta, all were given
the honorary title JB (Jailed by the British).
There
is probably not one country in Africa where western interests have not resulted
in the stealing of loot, mines, raw materials, oil, rubber and other riches
including slaves. Africa is still a playground for greedy capitalists and the
examples are endless as is the suffering and the hate that is slowly brewing.
Here lives 600 millions ripe to join the fight for freedom and justice.
To
get a good picture of the terrible looting in Africa, read:
* Vital
Ore Funds Congo's War, by by Karl Vick
* Canadian
Predation in Africa, by Kim Petersen
* Congo in
the Crosshairs, by Paul Harris
* The
Africa Centre, Unfinished Business
* The Really Great Evil, by my
humble self
Then
imagine the same sort of robbery going on in many other parts of the world,
Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Thailand, Iraq and so on.
When
it comes to minerals and oil, take a close look at Mines &
Communities Country, and learn about business practices in the globalized
world, (note, btw, that those people don't hesitate to ruin the lives of people
and the environment in their own countries!). And, just as Mr. Bush doesn't
have to send emissaries to ask Israel to stop its aggression on Palestinians --
he could easily order it, threatening to withhold all the billions in aid and
military hardware, he doesn't have to send an envoy to seek the release of
democratic leader Aung San Suu Kyi, jailed by the Burmese (Myanmar) generals.
He could order it, threatening to end Unocal's and other US companies
profitable ventures there, no doubt financing most of the generals. If Tony
Blair was earnest about human rights he might join in, threatening a withdrawal
of Rio Tinto and, not to be outdone, Chretien of Canada could order mining
giant Ivanhoe to leave until democracy rules in Myanmar. When it comes to
mining, Canada, US, Britain and Australia are the biggest robbers, though some
of their companies may be registered in Singapore, Thailand or elsewhere.
India
and China are not robbed quite so openly these days (the worst is already
done), but still our companies take their toll. Just one example: Union Carbide
killed 5,000 Indians and thousands more had their lives destroyed after an
accident in Bhopal. The responsible American CEO is still at large, harbored by
the US. Anyone who wants to hear about reasons for hate can find out how Nike
and others produce their wares in sweatshops in slave-like conditions, how
Swedish Bofors corrupted Indians in order to sell a howitzer system, how Enron
(with the help of the US government) pressed the Indian government for
concessions. Yes, it still goes on, often under a smoke-screen of legality.
You
think that those people are not prepared to fight for their rights and dignity?
You believe the stupid ignorant tales spun by some 'Christian' leaders that the
Muslims are the dangerous ones as they believe they get a lot of virgins when
they die for Allah? Then learn how vicious the Hindu Tamil Tigers have fought
in Sri Lanka! Or read about the partition of India when the British left. If
the cruelty or savagery was any less from the Hindu side than the Muslim it was
just not noticeable. The remains of MauMau in Kenya might want to say a word or
two about what's going on even if they formally have an independent country now.
Any man who fights for his freedom and dignity, whipped forward by the right
words can be more savage than a tigress defending her young.
Now
don't get me wrong! There ARE corporations who play by halfway decent rules if
they must. The problem is that they are few in this world of international
piracy. And the lack of clear, just and strong rules and sanctions encourages
pirates as do the enormous profits. There are few TV-cameras in the African and
Indonesian jungles!
Maybe
the countries where the new terrorists/freedom-fighters are brewing can contain
them, maybe not, but for the sake of the values most of us confess to, let's
make sure we and they will never have to come to that test. Stop the looting of
foreign land!
Don't
be afraid of Al Qaeda! Those guys are just the indicators and forerunners of
the uprising of 3 billion people demanding their freedom and the right not to
have their countries' wealth stolen by western corporations with blessings from
hypocritical western leaders backed by complacent and ignorant voters.
Jerre Skog is a Swedish
writer, musician and independent observer living in Germany. His writings,
politics and satire, can be found on www.skog.de
and comments are welcome at jerre@skog.de