HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Race
An Outdated Concept?
by
Seth Sandronsky
May
14, 2003
It’s
time to move past the concept of racial categories, according to columnist
George Will. “The obsessing of many Americans
about race,” he wrote on May 4, flies in the face of improving relations
between races.
There
is, of course, only one race—human beings.
But that’s not Will’s point.
He
chided some groups who have failed to see racial progress in the U.S.
These
malcontents whine louder the more this improves.
Those
unable to see this reality are in the business of politicizing race.
Will
is unhappy with them.
Such
scoundrels can be found in the Democratic Party, “professional civil rights
groups” and among liberals generally.
Liberals, for example, tend to see racial inequality in terms of black
and white relations.
On
that note, blacks are over-represented in U.S. jails and prisons. Here’s one example of this racial divide,
based on recent data from the Justice Department: At yearend 2001 there were
3,535 sentenced black male prisoners per 100,000 black males in the United
States, compared to 1,177 sentenced Hispanic male inmates per 100,000 Hispanic
males and 462 white male inmates per 100,000 white males.
In
1997, nine percent of black Americans (both females and males) were under some
form of criminal justice control nationwide, the Justice Department
reported. Two percent of whites were
similarly supervised.
“The
new incarceration numbers are essentially casualty statistics from a centuries
long, one-sided war that is escalating toward some unknown, ghastly conclusion,”
The Black Commentator editorialized on April 10 (http://www.blackcommentator.org/37/issue_37.html)
In
the meantime, Will cited federal census figures on race to call for their
abolition. “Because Hispanics have
supplanted blacks as America's largest minority, it is time to remove the race
question from the census form,” he wrote.
Presumably,
census enumeration of blacks was only a good thing when they were the nation’s
most populous minority group. It’s
worth noting that before the legal end of slavery, blacks only appeared on the
census if they had been freed.
And
for a century after the Civil War, except briefly during Reconstruction, the
majority of blacks remained second-class citizens. The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s ended the legal
framework for this substandard treatment, called Jim Crow.
Progress,
to be sure. America needs more of it.
To
that end, Will has a plan. Here it is.
“Battles
over quotas, preferences and other badges of victimhood and diminished
competence,” he wrote, would fade with the elimination of the government’s
racial categories. End don’t mend
affirmative action based on race, is his wish.
From
the right, Will is urging a reduction in government intervention on behalf of
the politically powerless. In this
case, blacks.
Here,
Will is on the same policy page in deed but not rhetoric with former President
Clinton. Both are cut from the same
cloth, with different approaches to weakening social spending.
As
a supposed liberal, Clinton entered the White House promising to provide all
the nation’s citizens with health care.
But once elected, the promise evaporated; in his second term he ended
welfare.
Clinton
talked left and moved right. Millions
of Americans fell for his act.
Will
talks right to move public opinion further in that direction. It is unclear how influential this pundit
is.
But
clearly pigs will fly before Will’s proposal on race enumeration creates racial
equality in America. For that to
happen, a new and sustained politics of social participation will have to
emerge.
Seth Sandronsky is a member of
Sacramento/Yolo Peace Action, and an editor with Because People Matter,
Sacramento's progressive newspaper. Email: ssandron@hotmail.com