HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
In
San Francisco, Protesters March,
Mull
Direction Of Next Peace Actions
by
Seth Sandronsky
April
14, 2003
In
San Francisco on April 12, thousands of people marched to protest the U.S.
invasion and occupation of Iraq. In
solidarity with anti-war actions worldwide, we stood in rainy, windy weather at
the city’s Civic Center, where recent peace rallies had ended.
Danny
Muller of Voices in the Wilderness, just returned from Iraq, described the
unfolding humanitarian catastrophe there.
Barbara Lubin of the Middle East Children’s Alliance criticized the U.S.
government’s funding of Israeli death squads that assault the Palestinian
people.
Past
and future actions against the energy corporations that harm ordinary Americans
was voiced by Henry Clark, director of the West County Toxics Coalition, based
in the largely black Bay Area community of Richmond.
“Don’t
forget the homeless,” shouted a tall man with a walking cast as he hawked the
Street Sheet, a paper produced and distributed by those seeking better housing
in a city where it is basically out of reach for low-income people.
Amid
the stark accounts of wars against regular people at home and abroad, there was
levity. For example, a group of women
wearing low-cut dresses carried signs that read “Bombshells, Not Bombs.”
The
two-mile march for peace and social justice through some gentrifying
neighborhoods ended at Delores Park in the Mission District. Along the way, many residents flashed the
peace sign and anti-war posters to marchers.
No
doubt attendance would have been larger with drier weather. Accordingly, many speakers noted the climate
factor, and praised those who did turn out.
At
Delores Park, Richard Becker of International ANSWER, a lead organizer of the
march, spoke about the strong mobilization of the U.S. peace movement during
the past year. This must continue and
expand, because the Bush White House plans to wage “endless war” to the
majority’s disadvantage, Becker said.
I
listened to a veteran activist relate her recent experience with Hispanic youth
concerning anti-war activism. Their
political consciousness was simultaneously challenging and confounding, she
said.
On
a bus trip from Davis to S.F. and back, riders announced upcoming local events
such as war tax resistance demonstrations.
Conversations about the risks of this ensued.
In
addition, a group of Davis artists distributed a handout announcing the
launching of a new activist paper there to counter 24/7 corporate coverage of
war, and more. Francisco J. Dominguez
informed us about his anti-war photography now on display at Sacramento City
College.
Similar
local actions and conversations, no doubt, were and will be taking place across
America about “what next” for the peace movement. Here, clarity of language is essential.
Peace
activists must, I think, be clear about which “America” is being discussed with
respect to war: the ruled or the rulers.
Presumably, most Americans don’t want to discuss class society.
However,
that may be changing as billions more of our taxpayer dollars flow away from
non-military spending to the Pentagon’s occupation of Iraq for the benefit of
U.S. energy corporations. Let a
thousand discussions of war economics and the ideology that tries to justify it
bloom in communities big and small across America.
Seth Sandronsky is a member of
Sacramento/Yolo Peace Action, and an editor with Because People Matter,
Sacramento's progressive newspaper. Email: ssandron@hotmail.com