HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
The
Battle For...Pie
by
Dennis Rahkonen
May
10, 2003
Giving
massive tax cuts to the rich is both blatantly unfair and not an effective
economic stimulus.
The
selfishness that motivates moneyed interests to press for such reductions also
features a definite social irresponsibility that, almost always, results in
savings thereby gained being either simply sat on, or narrowly invested in ways
that have little job-producing impact.
Look
at history.
When's
the last time a policy-driven windfall for Big Business and the individually
well heeled translated into a boon for America's wage-earning majority? Certainly not during the Reagan years, when
huge breaks were granted to America's corporate and financial hierarchy.
It
was a time of extended unemployment for millions, with the jobs that were
finally found providing lower pay, fewer benefits, and worse conditions than
those originally lost.
Bush's
ballyhooed "solution" to 6% joblessness is just so much additional
injustice dumped on top of existing injustices, both economic and social.
And
it's that accumulated inequity -- the
favoritism constantly shown the elite while ordinary people's worsening needs
go unmet -- that lies at the heart of our country’s troubles.
You
don't solve a problem rooted in millionaires/billionaires having the
unrestrained power to do what they greedily desire...by rewarding that greed
and thereby solidifying its harmful influence on society.
Since
day one in office, Dubya has been waging one-sided class warfare against
workaday citizens. Whenever there's been a choice between serving the common
good or the extreme avarice of business and banking elements that contributed
heavily to Bush's election bid (with full expectation of eventual payback), the
administration has invariably, shamelessly exhibited a profits-before-people
bias.
There's
never been a U.S. president so dutifully a cat's paw of what he's decisively
helped make into an unabashed, reactionary Corporate State.
Logic
tells us that an authentic stimulus would entail targeted tax cuts going to
families most in need, combined with the existence of good, union- scale jobs
that would give Americans sufficient pay to buy back the goods society
produces.
Those
goods have been gathering dust in inventory because so many of us are too poor
to generate consumer confidence enough to get the economy up and energetically
running.
Faced
with a classic "overproduction crisis," American monopoly capitalism
looks only to its short-term aggrandizement, oblivious to the big picture and
the calamity that allowing the poor to get steadily poorer will ultimately
inflict on the system itself.
Plutocrats
squeezing the golden goose too hard today means it won't lay at all tomorrow.
America
requires more people with more folding green or securely "current"
credit cards showing up at its malls and other retail centers. Or in automobile dealerships.
Either
marginal tax breaks for Joe and Jenny Average over time, or a lump- sum outlay
mailed just once, wouldn't really do the trick. The remedy must be substantially more comprehensive.
Many
of us have so many outstanding bills that we'd use whatever we might receive
just to ease our painful debt burden.
Increased
minimum pay -- or a true "living" wage -- is the answer.
But
a fundamental contradiction arises: Our
economy's divisible value, while permitting some variation, is essentially a
finite entity.
Think
of it as a golden pie baked in a specific pan.
Our bosses have been cutting themselves fat pieces right along, and
they're hoggishly wanting even bigger ones. From a fairness standpoint, plus a
need to sustain ourselves, we workers can no longer make do with the small
slices we've long been forced to accept.
We
certainly couldn't tolerate the tiny, crumbling slivers that would be our
"reward" if Bush and Co. fully got its gluttonous way.
And
neither could the nation, since we're both its backbone and its destiny's
ultimate arbiter.
We
have to have bigger pieces ourselves, but will the Man, with his tightly held
spatula, relinquish it to us and permit a righteous cutting?
Not
without a serious struggle, meaning we'll have to engage in class warfare of
our own, on terms -- and from positions of strength -- that will assure our
control of the pie.
After
all, we're the ones whose labor made it possible in the first place.
It's
really our pie; the boss just owns the tin in which it was baked.
What'll
it take to show who's the real boss in the kitchen, and in America as a whole?
Unity,
unity, unity.
Working
people have to seamlessly unite, across all differences such as race, gender
and sexual orientation, to acquire the collective clout without which our pie
pieces will otherwise get almost too thin to see, let alone provide
nourishment.
We'll
also require clarity of guiding vision, enabling us to recognize that our true
enemies can be found in the boardrooms of Enron-corrupt corporations, and on
Wall Street, not in Baghdad or the next location on Bush's foreign, imperial
hit list.
Cohesiveness
and consciousness...all for one and one for all.
Back
before Republicans devolved into Greedicus Backwardus, Abraham Lincoln
correctly pointed out the proper relationship between workers and owners:
"Labor
is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor,
and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the
superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."
That
consideration certainly won't be granted by the current ruling structure, unless
it's forced to, through a "fed-up" rebellion of chronically
ripped-off U.S. workers.
It
takes a fight to win.
Do
we have what it takes to triumph, or will the oligarchy permanently leave us
with nothing at all on our forks?
(Thanks
to James and Bobby Purify, The Kingsmen, Jay and The Techniques, and the
Beatles for sub-title inspiration.)
Dennis Rahkonen, from Superior,
WI, has been writing commentary and verse for various progressive outlets since
the '60s. He can be reached at dennisr@cp.duluth.mn.us