HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
George
W. Christ?
by
William Rivers Pitt
May
6, 2003
In
the 835 days Americans have passed since the inauguration of George W. Bush, we
have come to know him as a man who wears many masks to suit a variety of
political purposes. Even before he won the lawsuit that put him in his lofty
position, we saw a man who cloaked his vision in terms that smacked of
humility. "Ours will be a humble nation," Bush said during the Presidential
debates. There are a number of words which can be applied to the actions of
this administration, but "humble" is not one of them. At the time,
however, it suited his purposes to make Americans believe he saw himself as
unassuming, perhaps even small.
This
was the same man, however, who mocked Texas death row inmate Karla Faye Tucker
so viciously before she rode the lightning to whatever awaits us on the Other
Side. He was asked, in an interview for Talk Magazine during the campaign, what
Tucker might say to him if she were given the chance to plead for her life.
"Please," said Bush with pinched face and lips drawn down in a
quivering bow as he imitated the woman about to die, "don't kill me."
Then he laughed.
You
would think we'd have known better 835 days ago. We didn't, mostly because the
news media decided such stories were without merit. Now we are a humble nation
that brazenly disregards the entire planet as we seek military solutions to
diplomatic problems. Now we are a humble nation that breaks treaties by the
boatload and 'punishes' nations that foolishly believe they can make decisions
for themselves. One is forced to wonder if Bush sat in front of a television as
the 'Shock and Awe' firebombing/cluster-bombing of Baghdad began, face pinched
and mouth drawn down, saying "Please, don't kill me" in the voice of
an Iraqi civilian. One is forced to wonder if he laughed afterwards.
We
have come to see a new mask in the aftermath of the attacks on September 11. In
the 18 months that have passed since that dark day, we have been introduced to
Bush the Soldier. Draped in flags and the veneer of patriotism, Bush has spent
a great deal of time and energy identifying himself with the very military he
described as unfit for service during the 2000 campaign. The metastasizing of
Bush into some sort of military hero reached a crescendo during this past week
when he landed on the deck of the carrier Abraham Lincoln in the co-pilot's
seat of a Navy S-3B Viking combat aircraft. According to the lore that has been
rapturously reported on every hour by cable television news services, Bush took
the stick "momentarily" to pilot the craft. He hopped out, garbed in
the flight suit of a Navy pilot, and flashed a thumbs-up sign across the deck.
This, we were told by the media, harkens back wonderfully to Bush's service
piloting F-102 fighters for the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam
War.
The
problem, as with any mask, is that whatever is underneath bears little
comparison to the mask itself. According to the reports, it was appropriate for
Bush to don the gear of an actual military pilot, because it mirrors the
reality of his experience back in the Texas Guard. In reality, Bush may as well
have put on the standard attire of a Mongolian yak herder from the Asian
continental steppe. That would have been fitting, too, because neither the Navy
suit nor the yak gear have anything at all to do with Bush the Actual Person.
Neither has anything to do with history, or with fact.
An
article by David Corn entitled "Bush's Top Gun Photo-Op," which
appeared in The Nation magazine's online publication this past week, described
the disturbingly under-reported facts behind Bush's dalliance with the Texas
Air National Guard:
Enlisting in the Guard was one way to beat
the draft and avoid being sent to Vietnam. Is this why Bush signed up? During
the campaign, Bush said no. Yet in 1994, he had remarked, "I was not
prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun in order to get a deferment.
Not was I willing to go to Canada. So I chose to better myself by learning how
to fly airplanes." That sure sounds like someone who was looking to avoid
the draft and pick up a skill. Obtaining a slot in the Guard at that time was
not usually easy--for the obvious reason: lots of young men were responding to
the call of self-preservation. (Think Dan Quayle.) Bush, whose father was then
a congressman from the Houston area, has said no strings were pulled on his
behalf. Yet in 1999, the former speaker of the Texas House of Representatives
told The New York Times that a Houston oilman who was a friend of Bush's father
had asked him to grease the skids for W. and he obliged.
What Bush did in the Guard. In Bush's
campaign autobiography, A Charge To Keep, he wrote that he completed pilot training
in 1970 and "continued flying with my unit for the next several
years." But in 2000, The Boston Globe obtained copies of Bush's military
records and discovered that he had stopped flying during his final 18 months of
service in 1972 and 1973. More curious, the records showed Bush had not
reported for Guard duty during a long stretch of that period. Had the future
commander-in-chief been AWOL?
In May 1972, with two years to go on his
six-year commitment to the Guard, Bush moved to Alabama to work on a Senate
campaign. He asked if he could do his Guard duty there. This
son-of-a-congressman and fighter pilot won permission to do "equivalent
training" at a unit that had no aircraft and no pilots. The national Air
Reserve office then disallowed this transfer. For months, Bush did nothing for
the Guard. In September 1972, he won permission to train with a unit in
Montgomery. But the commander of the unit and his administrative officer told
the Boston Globe that they had no recollection of Bush ever reporting for duty.
And when Bush returned to Texas after the November election, he did not return
to his unit for months, according to his military records. His annual
performance report, dated May 2, 1973, noted he had "not been observed at
this unit" for the past year. In May, June and July of that year, he did
pull 36 days of duty.. And then, as he was on his way to Harvard Business
School, he received permission to end his Guard service early.
The records suggest Bush skipped out on
the Guard for about a year. (And during that time he had failed to submit to an
annual physical and lost his flight status.) A campaign spokesperson said Bush
recalled doing duty in Alabama and "coming back to Houston and doing
duty." But Bush never provided any real proof he had. Asked by a reporter
if he remembered what work he had done in Alabama, he said, "No, I really
don't." A fair assumption was that he had gamed the system and avoided a
year of service, before wiggling out of the Guard nearly a year before his time
was up. It looked as if he had served four, not six years.
When he enlisted in the Texas Air Guard,
Bush had signed a pledge stating he would complete his pilot training and then
"return to my unit and fulfill my obligation to the utmost of my
ability." Instead, he received flight training--at the government's
expense -- and then cut out on his unit. He had not been faithful to the Guard.
He had not kept this particular charge.
The
problem with masks is that, after wearing one for a very long time, a person
might reach a level of self-delusion that tells them their reality is the mask
itself, and not what lies underneath. Bush has been skittering around the fact
that he went AWOL during his term of military service for over three years now.
The spectacle on the Abraham Lincoln suggests he has finally managed to
convince himself that he did, in fact, serve the military of his country with
honor and in accordance with the oath he took. Either that, or he is so utterly
without shame as to be beyond the scope of normal human understanding.
Neither
choice is particularly palatable, and never mind the inherent danger in a
civilian commander so energetically equating himself with the military.
Americans don't have a war leader anymore. They have a leader who is war
personified. The fact that this personification comes at the expense of fact
and truth is merely an accent in the symphony.
Another
mask was donned by Bush on the deck of that aircraft carrier, one whose
implications are far more dire and disturbing. Bush was there to tell the world
that combat operations in Iraq had ceased. He did not go so far as to declare
victory, as such a declaration would have required, under the Geneva
Convention, the release of POWs and the withdrawal of American forces. The
banner hanging across the control tower -- "Mission Accomplished" --
said all that needed to be said.
In
his remarks, Bush closed with a paraphrasing of the Book of Isaiah: "In the
words of the prophet Isaiah, 'To the captives, 'come out,' and to those in
darkness, 'be free,''"
This
was a quotation from Chapter 61 of Isaiah, the very book Jesus Christ used when
proclaiming that Isaiah's prophesies of the Messiah had come true. Using this
passage from Isaiah, Jesus presented himself as the Son of God in Nazareth.
Thus it is told in Luke, Chapter 4, Verses 16-22:
"And
he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up; and he went to the
synagogue, as his custom was, on the sabbath day. And he stood up to read; and
there was given to him the book of the prophet Isaiah. He opened the book and
found the place where it was written, "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to
proclaim release to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set
at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the acceptable year of the
Lord." And he closed the book, and gave it back to the attendant, and sat
down; and the eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on him. And he began to
say to them, "Today this scripture has been fulfilled in your
hearing.""
Under
normal circumstances, we could write this off as a President reaching for
hopeful Biblical language to frame a particular argument. This has been done
before, by many American leaders in many situations. In this case, taken on the
political surface, we could see a President using the Bible to define the
latest reason for war in Iraq -- the 'liberation' of the people -- in the
conspicuous absence of the oft-repeated reason that started the war -- the
presence of mass destruction weapons. A further analysis of George W. Bush
himself, however, leads to some serious questions.
The
passage of Isaiah referenced by Jesus at Nazareth, and by Bush on the Abraham
Lincoln, is part of a larger collection of verses known as the "Servant
Songs." The specific verse used by Bush, out of Isaiah 61, is most
important; it is widely accepted by both Christian and Jewish scholars as
announcing the Messiah. For Christians, the Messiah is Jesus, and so this
passage refers specifically to Him and His coming. The fact that Jesus Himself
used this passage to announce His presence further confirms this. Bush's
reading of this passage suggests the possibility that he believes this coming,
for the second time, has arrived.
It
has been oft-reported that Bush witnessed the attacks of 9/11 and came to
believe that God Himself, and not Scalia and the rest, put him into the
Presidency for the sole purpose of pursuing this war against terrorism. It has
likewise been oft-reported that Bush is an evangelical Christian of the
vigorous Billy Graham stripe. We have witnessed the failure of every
rationalization for making war on Iraq -- the WMDs, the terrorist connections
-- and are left now with the rhetorical argument that we did the whole thing to
'save' the Iraqi people. Ergo, Bush positioned himself on the deck of that
aircraft carrier as a savior.
We
are talking about a man who wears masks for the sake of political opportunism,
and to survive moments when he has to address himself in the bathroom mirror.
Does this newest mask have George W. Bush taking on the mantle of Jesus Christ,
Savior and Redeemer?
Here
is a man so steeped in self-denial that he can shunt aside his own shameful
history in order to pretend he is on the same moral level as the soldiers he
abandoned when his time of service came due. Here is a man intent upon making
war on as much of the Muslim world as he can put his hands around, while
wrapping around himself the image and prophesies of Jesus Christ. What is next?
Will we see George W. Bush standing before the American people saying
"Today this scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing"?
George
W. Bush, master of denial. George W. Bush, wearer of masks. George W. Bush,
soldier for Christ.
George
W. Bush, Christ Himself?
Oh
dear God, let there be light.
William Rivers
Pitt
is
a teacher from Boston, MA. He is author of the bestselling book War On Iraq:
What Team Bush Doesn’t Want You To Know (Context Books, 2002) with Scott
Ritter, and The Greatest Sedition is Silence (Pluto Press, 2003), now
available at http://www.silenceissedition.com.