HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
by
Josh Frank
April
25, 2003
Since
the first week after the initial bombs blasted Baghdad, the anti-war voices
have been virtually tongue-tied. Finding solid ground in the muddy swamps of
patriotism has not been easy. But as the dust from the smart bombs settle - the
movement will be pulling on new boots - calling for an end to the military
occupation Iraq’s invaders believe will spread democracy.
While
disorder in Iraq ensues, an interim government is being rapidly deployed. Meetings have taken place for several days
now, and team Bush has been foaming at the mouth. Vice President Cheney’s old
company Halliburton has already secured a $7 billion no-bid contract to clean
up the oil reserves in Iraq. While
Bechtel, a California based construction company, with close ties to Bush, was
also offered a no-bid deal - worth up to $680 million. Bechtel will be paid to rebuild almost
everything destroyed under the US led bombardment. Including schools, hospitals, roads, electricity and water supplies.
Recently
White House spokesman Ari Fleisher said of these makeshift government meetings
that they will, “pave the way preliminarily for what will eventually become the
Iraqi interim authority.” He went on to say that these, “meeting(s) will be
done with the help of United States officials.”
What
Fleisher forgot to mention was -- that the US variant of democracy in Iraq will
require a hefty dose of military pressure to ensure corporations like
Halliburton and Bechtel can go about their business dealings. But Fleisher could be wrong. Democracy in Iraq may be a futile effort.
Ex-US
ambassador to Iraq during the first Gulf War, Joseph Wilson IV, has been an
outspoken disputer of Bush’s assertion that democracy will prevail following
war. In an interview with Bill Moyers, Wilson proclaimed that, “it's hard for
me to imagine that a democratic system will emerge out of the ashes of Iraq in
the near term. And when and if it does, it's hard for me to believe that it
will be more pro-American and more pro-Israeli than what you've got now.”
Aspirations
of a US friendly Iraq regime may be more of a mirage than a foregone
conclusion. Bush knows anti-American sentiment in Iraq is reaching colossal
levels. He’s said he is willing to occupy the country as long as needed. Rest assured he means, “as long at it takes
to instill a government friendly to American interests.”
This
is where the anti-war movement will come in - nullifying their old attempts of
halting the Iraq invasion - and adhering to the new anti-occupation
manifesto.
This
shouldn't mean that all United States envoys should exit the Gulf
entirely. Under international law the
United States is obligated to maintain order in the region, and provide
everything from humanitarian aid to children’s reading books. This will prove to be a largest hurdle the
anti-occupation protesters may encounter - how to exit US forces while
continuing to bandage the wounds of war’s afflictions.
For
true democracy to prevail, America’s presence in Iraq must be limited to
humanitarian aid, not military might.
But with corporations reaping the avails of the smoldering battlefield,
it is unlikely Bush will pull out his military operatives. The movement must be clear in deeming the
Bush administration responsible, while also pressuring for the exit of the
occupation units.
Freedom
and democracy in Iraq may be false ambitions, but this does not bind us to
complacency. We must follow
international law, providing for the needs of those who have suffered - but we
cannot endorse a military occupation of any kind. The United Nations weapons
teams must re-enter Iraq to search for those elusive WMD's.
The
people of post-war Iraq are calling on activists throughout the world to compel
the Bush administration to end their combative stances. This means we must denounce any profits made
by war-profiteers and to admonish the tough rhetoric Bush has been spewing at
Syria and Iran.
It
will be a fine line between occupation and rebuilding. But it will be a line the anti-war movement
must toe if it is to once again regain a stronghold among war critics. Now that war is dwindling - freedom must
prevail. It must not be the democracy
Bush craves - one of resource control and power. Instead it must become the democracy Iraqis deserve - freedom
without occupation.
Josh Frank is a journalist
living in Portland Oregon, his work appears frequently in Impact Press and
online at Counterpunch. He can be
reached at frank_joshua@hotmail.com