HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Counter-terrorism
and Corporate Crisis Management Specialist Heads Iraq's Reconstruction
by
Bill Berkowitz
May
15, 2003
When
L. Paul Bremer III sets down in Iraq as the U.S.'s new overseer of
reconstruction, he'll be bringing a lot of baggage along with him. Chosen by
President Bush for his expertise in counter-terrorism, crisis management and
diplomacy, Bremer has a resume that includes extended service in the Reagan
Administration, an eleven-year stint at Kissinger & Associates, and the
co-chairmanship of the Heritage Foundation's Homeland Security Task Force.
That
President Bush has turned to a civilian and a skilled negotiator -- the
president called Bremer a "can-do-type person'' -- is indicative of the
administration's fear that events in post-war Iraq are in danger of spinning
out of control. Bremer, the current Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Marsh Crisis Consulting, a subsidiary of the Marsh & McLennan Companies
(MMC), will take the reins of the multi-billion dollar reconstruction project
from retired Lt. Gen. Jay Garner, the administration's first civil
administrator, and assume command over the Office of Reconstruction and
Humanitarian Affairs.
Early
commentary on this leadership change focused on whether Bremer's appointment
was a victory for a beleaguered State Department. While Secretary of State
Colin Powell may be in need of victories, the Washington Post pointed out that
Bremer is "a hard-nosed hawk who is... supported by Rumsfeld and Deputy
Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz.” Furthermore, “White House aides said the
appointment affirms Bush's satisfaction with Pentagon control over Iraq until a
new government is in place." Bremer's appointment indicates that there
continues to be substantial support for the Iraqi National Congress, headed by
Dr Ahmad Chalabi.
Robert
Gelbard, a retired career diplomat who led post-conflict efforts in Haiti,
Bosnia and East Timor, told Newsday that "In terms of finding someone to
manage this process, which has not started out well, I do not believe that [the
White House] could have done better" than to select Bremer. According to
Gelbard, administration sources believed that Garner "was not
sophisticated enough to supervise the transition."
Who
is L. Paul Bremer and why is the White House counting on him?
Bremer
is a consummate insider with roots in several presidential administrations:
During his twenty-three year diplomatic service career, he was stationed in
Afghanistan, Malawi, Norway, and also served as Ambassador to the Netherlands.
In 1989 he joined the powerful New York-based Kissinger Associates, and in late
2001, along with former Attorney General Edwin Meese he co-chaired the Heritage
Foundation's Homeland Security Task Force, which created a blueprint for the
White House's Dept. of Homeland Security. For two decades Bremer has been a
regular at Congressional hearings and is recognized as an expert on terrorism
and homeland security.
According
to the Web site of Financial Executive International, Bremer currently sits on
the board of directors of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Akzo Nobel NV, the
Harvard Business School Club of New York and The Netherland-America Foundation.
He is also a Trustee of the Economic Club of New York, and is a member of The
International Institute for Strategic Studies and The Council on Foreign
Relations.
Bremer's
bread and butter issue is terrorism. According to the World Socialist Web Site,
in 1981, President Ronald Reagan's Secretary of State Alexander Haig appointed
him as his special assistant in charge of the department's "crisis
management" center. From there he became Reagan's ambassador-at-large for
counter-terrorism -- a tenure that coincided with Reagan
Administration-sponsored "low intensity" wars in Central America and
Africa. Although Bremer co-chaired the Operations Sub-Group at the National
Security Council along with Oliver North, according to Malcolm Byrne of the
National Security Archive, Bremer was on the "periphery" of the
Iran/Contra Scandal.
Bremer
has consistently espoused a get-tough stance towards terrorists. In an August
5, 1996, Wall Street Journal opinion piece titled "Terrorists' Friends
Must Pay a Price" Bremer called on the Clinton administration to "get
serious about the fight against terrorism." Bremer advised Clinton to
deliver ultimatums to Libya, Syria, Iran and Sudan telling them to close down
terrorist bases or they will "receive the full weight of American
might." Ironically, Iraq was not mentioned in the piece.
In
September 1999, Speaker of the House of Representatives Dennis Hastert named
Bremer Chairman of the National Commission on Terrorism. This commission
reviewed America's counter-terrorism policies and, in June 2000, it reported
its recommendations to the President of the United States and to the Speaker.
Two
days after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Bremer
wrote: "Our retribution must move beyond the limp-wristed attacks of the
past decade, actions that seemed designed to "signal" our seriousness
to the terrorists without inflicting real damage. Naturally, their feebleness
demonstrated the opposite. This time the terrorists and their supporters must be
crushed. But," he added, "we must avoid a mindless search for an
international 'consensus' for our actions. Tomorrow, we will know who our true
friends are."
In
October 2001, the Washington, D.C.-based Heritage Foundation named Bremer and
former Attorney General Edwin Meese III as co-chairs of its Homeland Security
Task Force. The Task Force's January 2002 report titled "Defending the
American Homeland" claimed the U.S. was "dangerously vulnerable"
to terrorist attacks. It made a number of recommendations including: increasing
security at U.S. borders, encouraging greater sharing of information among
various federal law enforcement agencies and with local law enforcers, changing
federal law to allow greater monitoring of foreigners in the United States, securing
federal computer networks and information systems better, moving ahead with the
plan to bury nuclear waste beneath Yucca Mountain in Nevada, improving
communications with the public in the event of attack or increasing threats and
"unleash[ing] market forces to mobilize the private sector to promote
infrastructure security." A number of these recommendations have already
been put in place.
The
Homeland Security Task Force fused the war against terrorism to the mission of
the Heritage Foundation -- privatization, de-regulation and smaller government
-- maintaining that "many government initiatives, such as the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), antitrust legislation, liability concerns, and current
tax policies, inhibit the development of a true partnership for security
between the private sector and the government."
In
June 2002, President Bush appointed Bremer to the President's Homeland Security
Advisory Council. Composed of American businessmen, academics and political
leaders, the Council ostensibly provides the President with independent advice
on the defense of the American homeland.
Bremer
is also listed as a senior advisor to William J. Bennett's Americans for
Victory Over Terrorism (AVOT). A few months back he was a featured speaker at
the AVOT-sponsored "teach-in" at UCLA. At that event, former CIA
chief R. James Woolsey described the war against terrorism as a "fourth
world war."
A
month after 9/11, Jeffrey W. Greenberg, Marsh & McLennan Companies'
chairman and chief executive, recognized that the terrorist attacks, which
killed 295 of its employees, was also a new business opportunity. "Within
days of the twin towers' destruction," the Wall Street Journal reported,
Greenberg and top company officials "began planning to form a new
subsidiary to sell insurance to corporate customers at sharply higher rates
than were common before Sept. 11." The company also "accelerated
plans to launch a new consulting unit to capitalize on heightened corporate
fears of terrorism." On October 11, Marsh Crisis Consulting was launched
with Bremer at its head. Bremer told the Journal that the unit would
concentrate on catastrophic risks, those that in some cases could put a company
out of business.
In
addition to retaining retired Lt. Gen. Jay Garner, Bremer's team in Iraq is
being peopled with former Iraqi exiles and assorted Reagan and Bush I retreads.
Doug Henwood, editor of the Left Business Observer, told Inter Press Service's
Emad Mekay in late April that the selection process is "very much like the
Bush administration itself -- a bunch of private sector alumni called upon to
perform the task in government they were performing in the private
sector."
Mekay
noted that recent appointees included "agricultural industrialist"
Dan Amstutz, who will "lead the US government's agriculture reconstruction
efforts in Iraq" and Peter McPherson, a long-time Washington insider and
deputy US treasurer in the Ronald Reagan administration, who will be
"financial coordinator" for the Office of Reconstruction and
Humanitarian Assistance (ORHA). His deputy in Iraq will be George Wolfe, a
senior US Treasury Department lawyer.
Bremer's
greatest challenge will be to create the trappings of a democracy while
ensuring that a fundamentalist Islamic government does not win control over the
country. If the Shiite majority prevails in democratic elections, post-war Iraq
could take on a decidedly anti-American cast. Anatol Lieven of the Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace told WBAI Radio's Doug Henwood in late April
that such a government would not want the U.S. to control its oil or establish
military bases on its soil -- and would not be likely to recognize Israel.
What
special expertise about Iraq or the Middle East is Bremer bringing to Iraq?
None, says a former senior State Department official who has worked with
Bremer. He is a "voracious opportunist with voracious ambitions," the
official told Newsday. "What he knows about Iraq could not quite fill a
thimble. What he knows about any part of the world would not fill a thimble.
But what he knows about Washington infighting could fill three or four bushel
baskets."
Bill Berkowitz is a longtime
observer of the conservative movement. His WorkingForChange.com
column Conservative Watch documents the strategies, players, institutions,
victories and defeats of the American Right.